Shincheonji Bible Study – Advanced Level (Revelation)

Lesson 105: “Revelation 4: The Throne and Structure of God in the Spiritual Realm”

A Refutation Using “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story”

---

Introduction: The Unveiling of the “New John”

You’ve been studying for over seven months now. In Lesson 103, you were told that Revelation was fulfilled in Korea through “actual reality—real people, real events, real places.” In Lesson 104, you were told that your doubts are demonic, that you shouldn’t let seven months “disappear,” and that you can relieve God’s 6,000-year sorrow by accepting Shincheonji’s interpretation.

Now, in Lesson 105, the mask comes off completely. The instructor announces:

“What’s remarkable is that while God had been revealing heaven’s nature to us all along, we couldn’t perceive or recognize it because the word was sealed. However, now is different. Because someone has seen it, recognized it, and is testifying about it, we now have understanding.”

And then, buried in the timeline section, comes the explicit claim:

“In 1977, Jesus appears to New John (as recorded in Revelation 1:9-20), appointing him and instructing him to send letters… As new John, his first official act was sending these letters to the messengers of the seven churches, which he carried out.”

This is the moment Shincheonji has been building toward for seven months. They’re now explicitly claiming that their founder, Lee Man-hee, is the “new John”—the one who witnessed Revelation’s fulfillment, the one appointed by Jesus, the one through whom all understanding comes.

The lesson presents a detailed timeline:

• 1965: Jesus appears to the 7 stars
• 1966: The 7 stars establish the Tabernacle Temple
• 1967: “New John” enters the Tabernacle Temple
• 1975: “Nicholas” enters and begins corrupting the temple
• 1977: Jesus appears to “New John” and appoints him
• 1979: “New John” sends letters to the 7 stars
• 1980: The 7 stars resign, destruction begins, Revelation 4 events unfold

Students are told that everything in Revelation 4—the throne, the 24 elders, the 4 living creatures, the sea of glass—has a physical equivalent in “Mount Zion” (Shincheonji). They’re told that “New John” witnessed these events and is now testifying about them.

The psychological pressure is immense. After seven months of conditioning, students are now being told:

• There is a “new John” appointed by Jesus
• This person witnessed Revelation’s fulfillment
• Understanding comes only through this person’s testimony
• You must accept this to be part of God’s kingdom

But what if we examined these claims through different lenses? What if we evaluated Shincheonji’s timeline against the documented historical reality? What if we read Revelation 4 as first-century Christians would have understood it—as a vision of God’s sovereign throne, offering hope to persecuted believers, not as a code for organizational structures in Korea?

This refutation will analyze Lesson 105 using the framework established in “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story.” We’ll examine SCJ’s teachings through first-century Christian lenses, historical-literary perspectives, and biblical theology—not through modern eschatological systems (Premillennialism, Amillennialism, or Postmillennialism), but through the understanding of early believers who first received John’s revelation.

For comprehensive documentation of what actually happened in Shincheonji’s organization—the real history behind their claimed “fulfillment”—please visit the SCJ Examination at closerlookinitiative.com, particularly “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1 and 2” and “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale.”

---

Part 1: The “New John” Claim—Examining the Central Deception

Shincheonji’s Explicit Claim

Lesson 105 makes explicit what previous lessons only hinted at. The instructor states:

“In the Vision Revelation, we see that Apostle John is the one who sees these events. However, an important question arises: Will Apostle John physically return to life to experience these events again? The answer is clearly no. Therefore, when the text uses ‘I’ in this context, we understand that this ‘I’ refers to New John. This New John is the one who will witness these events occurring again.”

And in the timeline:

“In 1977, Jesus appears to New John (as recorded in Revelation 1:9-20), appointing him and instructing him to send letters… As new John, his first official act was sending these letters to the messengers of the seven churches, which he carried out.”

What Shincheonji Is Claiming

Shincheonji is explicitly claiming that:

1. There is a “new John” who fulfills the role of the Apostle John in Revelation
2. This person is Lee Man-hee, their founder
3. Jesus appeared to Lee Man-hee in 1977, just as He appeared to John in Revelation 1
4. Lee Man-hee witnessed the events of Revelation being fulfilled
5. Lee Man-hee sent letters to the seven stars (leaders in the Tabernacle Temple)
6. Understanding Revelation requires accepting Lee Man-hee’s testimony
7. Everything in Revelation 4 has a physical equivalent in Shincheonji’s organization

Why This Claim Is Problematic

Problem #1: The Text Never Predicts a “New John”

Nowhere in Revelation—or anywhere in Scripture—is there a prediction of a “new John” who would witness Revelation’s fulfillment 2,000 years later.

What Revelation Actually Says:

“I, John, your brother and companion in the suffering and kingdom and patient endurance that are ours in Jesus, was on the island of Patmos because of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus. On the Lord’s Day I was in the Spirit, and I heard behind me a loud voice like a trumpet, which said: ‘Write on a scroll what you see and send it to the seven churches: to Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia and Laodicea.'” (Revelation 1:9-11)

John identifies himself by name. He was exiled to Patmos. He received a vision. He was told to write what he saw and send it to seven real churches in Asia Minor. There’s no mention of a future “new John” who would repeat this process.

Problem #2: Revelation Was Written to Be Understood by Its Original Recipients

If Revelation required a “new John” 2,000 years later to explain it, what were first-century Christians supposed to do with it?

“Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear it and take to heart what is written in it, because the time is near.” (Revelation 1:3)

The blessing is for those who read, hear, and take to heart what is written—not for those who wait 2,000 years for a “new John” to explain it. The phrase “because the time is near” indicates relevance to the original audience.

Problem #3: The “New John” Concept Contradicts Scripture’s Finality

Scripture presents itself as complete and sufficient:

“All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.” (2 Timothy 3:16-17)

“I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll. And if anyone takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, God will take away from that person any share in the tree of life and in the Holy City, which are described in this scroll.” (Revelation 22:18-19)

The warning at the end of Revelation emphasizes the completeness and finality of the revelation. There’s no room for a “new John” to add new revelation or claim special authority to interpret.

Problem #4: It Creates a New Mediator

“For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all people.” (1 Timothy 2:5-6)

Christ is the only mediator. We don’t need a “new John” to mediate between us and God or between us and Scripture. The Holy Spirit guides believers into truth:

“But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth.” (John 16:13)

Problem #5: It Elevates a Human Leader to Divine Status

By claiming Lee Man-hee is the “new John” appointed by Jesus to witness and testify about Revelation’s fulfillment, Shincheonji elevates him to a status that belongs only to Christ and the inspired biblical authors.

The Apostle John was:

• An eyewitness of Jesus’ earthly ministry
• One of the Twelve chosen by Jesus
• Inspired by the Holy Spirit to write Scripture
• Writing under divine authority

Lee Man-hee is:

• A human man born in 1931
• Not an eyewitness of Jesus’ earthly ministry
• Not chosen by Jesus during His earthly ministry
• Not writing inspired Scripture
• Making claims that contradict the biblical text

These are not equivalent.

The Historical Reality: What Actually Happened

According to documented evidence in “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1 and 2” and “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale”, the actual history is very different from Shincheonji’s narrative:

The Tabernacle Temple:

The Tabernacle Temple (Jangmak Seongjon) was founded by Yoo Jae-yeol in the 1960s-1970s. Yoo claimed to be the “Counselor” promised in John 14-16. This was already a heterodox group making messianic claims about its founder.

Lee Man-hee’s Involvement:

Lee Man-hee joined this group and became involved in its leadership. He was not an innocent observer—he was a participant in a group that was already making false prophetic claims.

The Conflict:

The organization experienced internal conflicts over leadership, finances, doctrinal interpretations, and personal ambitions. These were human conflicts driven by ego and disagreement—not a cosmic battle between good and evil.

The Split:

Eventually, the organization split. Different factions formed, each claiming to be the true fulfillment of Revelation. Lee Man-hee left (or was expelled—accounts differ) and took some followers with him to form Shincheonji.

The Reinterpretation:

After establishing Shincheonji, Lee Man-hee reinterpreted what had happened:

• He claimed Jesus appeared to him in 1977
• He claimed he was appointed as the “new John”
• He claimed he sent letters to the seven stars
• He claimed the Tabernacle Temple was the “tabernacle” in Revelation
• He claimed the conflict was the “betrayal” prophesied in Revelation
• He claimed Shincheonji was the “new tabernacle” or “Mount Zion”

This narrative conveniently made Lee Man-hee the hero and everyone who opposed him the villains.

The Problem:

This narrative is:

• Self-serving: Lee Man-hee is the hero of his own story
• Unverifiable: No independent witnesses to Jesus’ appearance
• Contradictory: Different accounts exist from those involved
• Changing: Shincheonji’s interpretations have changed over time
• Self-referential: The only “evidence” is Lee Man-hee’s testimony

Chapter 18 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” (Testing Authority Claims) provides biblical criteria for evaluating prophetic claims and demonstrates why the “new John” claim fails these tests.

---

Part 2: The Timeline—Fact vs. Fiction

Shincheonji’s Timeline

Lesson 105 presents this timeline:

• 1965: Jesus appears to the 7 stars
• 1966: The 7 stars establish the Tabernacle Temple
• 1967: “New John” enters the Tabernacle Temple as a regular member
• 1975: “Nicholas” enters, introduced by Mr. Yoo (one of the 7 stars)
• 1977: Jesus appears to “New John,” appointing him
• 1979: “New John” sends letters to the 7 stars
• 1980: The 7 stars resign, destruction begins, the beast enters, Revelation 4 events unfold

What Actually Happened: The Documented History

According to “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1 and 2” and “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale”, the actual history is more complex and less dramatic:

The Tabernacle Temple’s Origins:

The Tabernacle Temple was founded by Yoo Jae-yeol, who claimed to be a special prophetic figure. The organization was already heterodox from its inception, making messianic claims about its founder.

Lee Man-hee’s Involvement:

Lee Man-hee joined this group and became a leader. He was deeply involved in the organization’s activities and teachings. He was not an innocent bystander observing corruption—he was a participant.

The “Nicholas” Figure:

Shincheonji claims someone named “Nicholas” entered in 1975 and corrupted the temple with “established Christian denominational teachings.” However, the documented reality is that the organization experienced various internal conflicts over leadership, doctrine, and finances. Attributing all problems to one person entering in 1975 oversimplifies a complex situation.

The 1977 “Appearance”:

Shincheonji claims Jesus appeared to Lee Man-hee in 1977 and appointed him as the “new John.” However:

• There are no independent witnesses to this appearance
• This claim was made after the fact, when Lee Man-hee was establishing his own organization
• It conveniently legitimizes his authority and delegitimizes his opponents

The “Letters”:

Shincheonji claims Lee Man-hee sent letters to the seven stars in 1979. However:

• These were not divinely inspired letters like Revelation 2-3
• They were human communications in the context of organizational conflict
• Reinterpreting them as fulfilling Revelation 2-3 is retrofitting events to match prophecy

The 1980 Events:

Shincheonji claims 1980 was when the seven stars resigned, destruction began, and Revelation 4 events unfolded. However:

• The organization split due to human conflicts over leadership and doctrine
• Multiple factions formed, each claiming to be the true fulfillment
• Calling this “Revelation 4 fulfillment” is subjective interpretation, not objective reality

The Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction:

Shincheonji claims:

“The Tabernacle Temple was established in Gwacheon, South Korea, at the base of Mount Cheonggye, a famous mountain. The leaders identified themselves as the seven stars. While the location was beautiful, the temple building no longer exists today – it was completely destroyed, with not one stone left upon another.”

The phrase “not one stone left upon another” is meant to echo Jesus’ prophecy about the Jerusalem temple (Matthew 24:2), suggesting divine judgment. However, according to “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale”, the building was sold for financial reasons, not destroyed by divine judgment. This is a significant distortion of the actual events.

The Pattern: Retrofitting Events to Match Prophecy

Shincheonji’s timeline demonstrates a common pattern in groups that claim to fulfill prophecy:

Step 1: Identify Past Events

Select events from your organization’s history (conflicts, splits, leadership changes).

Step 2: Match to Prophecy

Find biblical prophecies that seem to match these events (using symbolic, flexible interpretation).

Step 3: Reinterpret

Reinterpret the events as fulfilling the prophecies, making yourself the hero.

Step 4: Claim Divine Authority

Use this “fulfillment” to claim divine authority and delegitimize opponents.

Step 5: Demand Recognition

Tell followers they must recognize this “fulfillment” to be saved.

This pattern has been repeated in numerous groups throughout history. It’s not unique to Shincheonji. And it’s not genuine prophecy-fulfillment—it’s retrofitting events to match prophecy after the fact, with subjective interpretation and no independent verification.

Chapter 20 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” (Creative Fulfillment) examines this pattern in detail, showing how Shincheonji retrofits events to match prophecy and how their interpretations change over time.

---

Part 3: Revelation 4—First-Century Understanding vs. Shincheonji’s Interpretation

Shincheonji’s Interpretation

Lesson 105 claims:

“The throne and structure of God in the spiritual world must be built in the physical world. In Revelation chapter 4, everything described has a physical equivalent in Mount Zion: The one seated on the throne, The 24 elders, The 7 lamps, The sea of glass, The 4 living creatures, The 12 gates. John saw these elements and was tasked to build them, just as others in the past were given the task of building what was seen in heaven on earth.”

Shincheonji is claiming that:

• Everything in Revelation 4 has a physical equivalent in their organization
• The “new John” (Lee Man-hee) witnessed these things
• These structures must be “built” in the physical world (Shincheonji)
• This is how God returns to His creation

Reading Revelation 4 as First-Century Christians

To understand what Revelation 4 actually means, we must read it as first-century Christians would have understood it—as a vision of God’s sovereign throne, offering hope and perspective to persecuted believers.

Revelation 4:1-11 (Full Text):

“After this I looked, and there before me was a door standing open in heaven. And the voice I had first heard speaking to me like a trumpet said, ‘Come up here, and I will show you what must take place after this.’ At once I was in the Spirit, and there before me was a throne in heaven with someone sitting on it. And the one who sat there had the appearance of jasper and ruby. A rainbow that shone like an emerald encircled the throne. Surrounding the throne were twenty-four other thrones, and seated on them were twenty-four elders. They were dressed in white and had crowns of gold on their heads. From the throne came flashes of lightning, rumblings and peals of thunder. In front of the throne, seven lamps were blazing. These are the seven spirits of God. Also in front of the throne there was what looked like a sea of glass, clear as crystal. In the center, around the throne, were four living creatures, and they were covered with eyes, in front and in back. The first living creature was like a lion, the second was like an ox, the third had a face like a man, the fourth was like a flying eagle. Each of the four living creatures had six wings and was covered with eyes all around, even under its wings. Day and night they never stop saying: ‘Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty, who was, and is, and is to come.’ Whenever the living creatures give glory, honor and thanks to him who sits on the throne and who lives for ever and ever, the ten elders fall down before him who sits on the throne and worship him who lives for ever and ever. They lay their crowns before the throne and say: ‘You are worthy, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they were created and have their being.'”

The Historical-Literary Context

Apocalyptic Literature:

Revelation 4 is apocalyptic literature, a genre common in Jewish and early Christian writings. Apocalyptic literature:

• Uses symbolic imagery to convey spiritual truths
• Addresses current crises through symbolic language
• Offers hope to persecuted communities
• Reveals God’s sovereignty over history
• Uses numbers symbolically (4, 7, 12, 24)

Old Testament Background:

Revelation 4 draws heavily on Old Testament throne visions:

Isaiah 6:1-4:

“In the year that King Uzziah died, I saw the Lord, high and exalted, seated on a throne; and the train of his robe filled the temple. Above him were seraphim, each with six wings: With two wings they covered their faces, with two they covered their feet, and with two they were flying. And they were calling to one another: ‘Holy, holy, holy is the LORD Almighty; the whole earth is full of his glory.’ At the sound of their voices the doorposts and thresholds shook and the temple was filled with smoke.”

Ezekiel 1:4-28: Ezekiel’s vision includes:

• Four living creatures with four faces (man, lion, ox, eagle)
• Wheels covered with eyes
• A throne with someone seated on it
• The appearance of fire and brilliant light
• A rainbow around the throne

Daniel 7:9-10:

“As I looked, thrones were set in place, and the Ancient of Days took his seat. His clothing was as white as snow; the hair of his head was white like wool. His throne was flaming with fire, and its wheels were all ablaze. A river of fire was flowing, coming out from before him. Thousands upon thousands attended him; ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him. The court was seated, and the books were opened.”

First-century Christians familiar with these Old Testament passages would immediately recognize Revelation 4 as a throne vision in the same tradition—revealing God’s sovereignty, holiness, and authority.

The Meaning for First-Century Christians

The Central Message:

Despite appearances, God is on the throne. He is sovereign. He is holy. He is worthy of worship. History is under His control.

Why This Mattered:

First-century Christians were facing:

• Roman persecution
• Economic sanctions for refusing emperor worship
• Martyrdom
• Pressure to compromise
• Discouragement and fear

In this context, Revelation 4 offered profound hope: The Roman emperor may sit on an earthly throne, but God sits on the ultimate throne. Caesar may claim divine honors, but God alone is holy, holy, holy. Rome may seem all-powerful, but God is the Almighty who created all things.

The Symbolism:

The Throne: God’s sovereignty and authority over all creation

The One Seated: God Himself, described with precious stones (jasper, ruby) and a rainbow (reminiscent of God’s covenant with Noah)

The 24 Elders: Likely represent the 12 tribes of Israel and the 12 apostles—the complete people of God from both Old and New Covenants. They worship God, showing that all God’s people acknowledge His sovereignty.

The 7 Lamps/Spirits: The fullness of the Holy Spirit (Isaiah 11:2)

The Sea of Glass: Purity, holiness, the separation between God and creation. In the Old Testament tabernacle/temple, there was a bronze sea for ceremonial washing. This sea of glass suggests perfect purity.

The 4 Living Creatures: Represent all creation worshiping God:

• Lion: wild animals
• Ox: domestic animals
• Man: humanity
• Eagle: birds

They’re covered with eyes (all-seeing, all-knowing) and have six wings (like Isaiah’s seraphim). They never stop worshiping God, declaring His holiness.

The Worship:

The entire scene is one of continuous worship. The living creatures and elders worship God for who He is (holy, almighty, eternal) and what He has done (created all things).

The Relevance:

For persecuted first-century Christians, this vision said:

• Don’t lose perspective: God is on the throne, not Caesar
• Don’t lose hope: God is sovereign over history
• Don’t compromise: God alone is worthy of worship
• Don’t fear: The One on the throne is almighty
• Keep worshiping: Join the heavenly chorus in declaring God’s worth

This was immediately relevant and powerfully encouraging—not a code for organizational structures in Korea 2,000 years later.

Why Shincheonji’s Interpretation Fails

Problem #1: Makes the Vision About Human Structures

Shincheonji claims the throne, elders, living creatures, etc., have physical equivalents in their organization. This makes the vision about human structures rather than God’s sovereignty.

But the point of Revelation 4 is not to describe organizational structures to be replicated. The point is to reveal God’s sovereign throne and call all creation to worship Him.

Problem #2: Ignores the Old Testament Background

Revelation 4 draws on Isaiah 6, Ezekiel 1, and Daniel 7. These were visions of God’s throne in heaven, not blueprints for earthly organizations. First-century Christians would have recognized this immediately.

Problem #3: Makes It Irrelevant to Original Recipients

If Revelation 4 is about structures to be built in Korea 2,000 years later, what were first-century Christians supposed to do with it? How could it encourage them during persecution?

Problem #4: Misses the Worship Focus

The entire chapter is about worship. The living creatures and elders worship God continuously. The climax is their declaration:

“You are worthy, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they were created and have their being.” (Revelation 4:11)

Shincheonji’s interpretation shifts focus from God’s worthiness to organizational structures. This fundamentally misses the point.

Problem #5: Creates False Equivalences

Shincheonji claims:

• The one on the throne = Someone in their organization
• The 24 elders = 24 people in their organization
• The 4 living creatures = 4 people/groups in their organization
• The 7 lamps = 7 people in their organization

But these symbols represent:

• God’s sovereignty (the throne)
• All God’s people (24 elders)
• All creation (4 living creatures)
• The fullness of the Holy Spirit (7 lamps)

These are not equivalent to organizational roles.

Chapter 26 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” (Reading Revelation Like a First-Century Christian) provides comprehensive analysis of how early believers understood Revelation’s visions and why Shincheonji’s interpretation contradicts this understanding.

---

Part 4: The “Order and Unity” Teaching—Manipulating Biblical Concepts

Shincheonji’s Teaching

Lesson 105 emphasizes “order and unity”:

“God is definitively orderly, not disorderly. As stated in 1 Corinthians 14:33, God is a God of order, not of chaos… Our culture has become individualistic, making unity difficult to achieve. Some people even find signs of unity frightening, often saying things like ‘don’t be a sheep’ and ‘think for yourself.’ They become suspicious when they see people unified, doing the same things together. While they spread fear about unified people, the Bible shows that unity is what God and Jesus have requested from us since the beginning.”

What’s Right and Wrong With This Teaching

What’s Right:

It’s true that God is a God of order:

“For God is not a God of disorder but of peace—as in all the congregations of the Lord’s people.” (1 Corinthians 14:33)

It’s also true that Jesus prayed for unity among believers:

“I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me.” (John 17:20-21)

What’s Wrong:

Shincheonji uses these biblical truths to justify their system of control and suppress critical thinking.

The Manipulation

1. Redefining Unity:

Biblical Unity:

• Unity in Christ (Ephesians 4:3-6)
• Unity in essential doctrines while allowing diversity in non-essentials
• Unity characterized by love (John 13:34-35)
• Unity that respects individual conscience (Romans 14)

Shincheonji’s “Unity”:

• Uniformity in interpretation (everyone must accept their teaching)
• Conformity in behavior (everyone attends four classes per week, recruits, etc.)
• Suppression of questions (questioning is “disunity”)
• Organizational loyalty (unity = commitment to Shincheonji)

2. Dismissing Legitimate Concerns:

Shincheonji dismisses people who say “don’t be a sheep” or “think for yourself” as spreading fear about unity. But Scripture actually encourages discernment:

“Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.” (1 John 4:1)

“Test everything; hold fast what is good.” (1 Thessalonians 5:21)

Healthy skepticism and critical thinking are not opposed to biblical unity—they protect against false teaching.

3. Creating False Dichotomy:

Shincheonji creates a false dichotomy:

• Either you embrace their “unity” (accepting their teaching without question)
• Or you’re promoting “disunity” (individualism, chaos, disorder)

But this is a false choice. Biblical unity doesn’t require accepting false teaching. In fact, Paul commended the Bereans for testing his teaching (Acts 17:11).

4. Weaponizing Unity:

By emphasizing unity, Shincheonji creates pressure to conform. Students who have doubts or questions feel they’re causing “disunity.” This suppresses critical thinking and creates groupthink.

Biblical Unity vs. Cultic Conformity

Biblical Unity:

“Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called to one hope when you were called; one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all.” (Ephesians 4:3-6)

Biblical unity is based on:

• One Spirit
• One hope
• One Lord (Jesus Christ)
• One faith (trust in Christ for salvation)
• One baptism
• One God and Father

It’s unity in Christ, not unity in an organization or interpretation.

Cultic Conformity:

High-control groups demand:

• Uniformity in interpretation (only one way to understand Scripture)
• Conformity in behavior (everyone does the same things)
• Suppression of questions (questioning is disloyalty)
• Organizational loyalty (unity = commitment to the group)

This is not biblical unity—it’s cultic conformity.

The Difference:

Chapter 8 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” examines how high-control groups use biblical concepts like “unity” to create conformity and suppress critical thinking.

---

Part 5: The Psychological Progression—From Doubt to Total Commitment

Where Students Are at Lesson 105

By Lesson 105, students have been studying for over seven months. The psychological progression has been carefully orchestrated:

Months 1-2 (Foundation – Parables):

• Build trust with evangelist
• Establish prophecy-fulfillment framework
• Create dependency on Shincheonji’s interpretation
• Begin isolation from outside influences

Months 3-4 (Intermediate – Old Testament):

• Deepen prophecy-fulfillment framework
• Establish Jesus as model for “fulfillment”
• Create pattern: prophecy → fulfillment → recognition → salvation
• Increase time commitment

Months 5-6 (Advanced – Revelation, Part 1):

• Introduce “new John” concept
• Reinterpret seven churches as seven people
• Establish OPAGH principle
• Define “perfect faith”
• Increase time commitment to four classes per week

Month 7 (Lessons 103-104):

• Reveal “fulfillment” in Korea
• Label doubts as demonic
• Weaponize sunk cost fallacy
• Create cosmic stakes (God’s 6,000-year sorrow)

Month 7+ (Lesson 105 and beyond):

• Explicitly identify Lee Man-hee as “new John”
• Present detailed timeline
• Claim Revelation 4 structures exist in Shincheonji
• Demand recognition and commitment

The Psychological State

Students at this stage are experiencing:

1. Cognitive Dissonance:

Their minds are trying to reconcile:

• Seven months of seemingly biblical teaching
• Explicit claims that Lee Man-hee is the “new John”
• Their own doubts and concerns
• Pressure to accept without questioning

2. Sunk Cost Pressure:

“I’ve invested seven months, hundreds of hours, reorganized my life. I can’t walk away now. That would mean it was all wasted.”

3. Fear:

Multiple layers of fear:

• Fear doubts are demonic
• Fear of being like Pharisees
• Fear of wasting seven months
• Fear of missing God’s work
• Fear of failing God
• Fear of disappointing evangelist

4. Isolation:

• Distanced from family and friends
• Primary relationships within Shincheonji
• Outside voices dismissed as “Babylon” or demon-influenced
• No access to alternative perspectives

5. Exhaustion:

Four classes per week, homework, memorization, recruitment—physically, mentally, emotionally, spiritually exhausted. Exhaustion impairs critical thinking.

6. Group Pressure:

• Everyone else in class seems to accept it
• Don’t want to be the odd one out
• Don’t want to cause “disunity”
• Want to be part of the “first” to unite

7. Anticipation:

The instructor says:

“By being among the first to unite, others will ask us: ‘How did you do it first? How did you overcome? Teach me what you did.’ They will ask about how we studied for these tests and attended class despite difficulties. People will commend us for being the first to gather at this critical time.”

This creates anticipation of future vindication and recognition.

The Manipulation Techniques in Lesson 105

Technique #1: Explicit Authority Claim

By explicitly identifying Lee Man-hee as the “new John” appointed by Jesus, Shincheonji:

• Claims divine authority for their teaching
• Makes questioning Lee Man-hee equivalent to questioning Jesus
• Creates dependency on Lee Man-hee’s testimony
• Elevates Lee Man-hee to apostolic status

Technique #2: Detailed Timeline

The specific timeline (1965, 1966, 1967, 1975, 1977, 1979, 1980) creates an impression of:

• Historical accuracy
• Detailed fulfillment
• Verifiable events

But the timeline is:

• Unverifiable by independent sources
• Disputed by those who were involved but left
• A subjective interpretation of organizational conflicts
• Constantly revised as interpretations change

Technique #3: Physical Equivalents

Claiming everything in Revelation 4 has a physical equivalent in Shincheonji:

• Makes the abstract concrete
• Creates a sense that you can “see” the fulfillment
• Implies that Shincheonji is heaven on earth
• Makes leaving seem like leaving God’s presence

Technique #4: Unity Pressure

Emphasizing unity and order:

• Creates pressure to conform
• Makes questioning seem like causing disunity
• Dismisses critical thinking as “individualism”
• Creates groupthink

Technique #5: Future Vindication

Promising that others will ask “How did you do it first?”:

• Creates anticipation of future recognition
• Makes current sacrifice seem worthwhile
• Implies you’re part of an elite group
• Motivates continued commitment

The Path Forward for Students

If you’re at this stage and experiencing doubts:

Your Doubts Are Valid:

The explicit claim that Lee Man-hee is the “new John” appointed by Jesus should raise serious concerns. This is not a minor interpretive difference—it’s a fundamental claim that contradicts Scripture.

You Can Question:

Despite the pressure to accept for “unity,” you can and should question these claims. Testing teachings is biblical (1 John 4:1; 1 Thessalonians 5:21; Acts 17:11).

Research the History:

Visit closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination and read:

• “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1 and 2” (what actually happened)
• “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale” (the real history)
• Testimonies from those who were involved in the Tabernacle Temple

Compare Shincheonji’s narrative with the documented historical reality.

The Sunk Cost Is Real But Not Determinative:

Yes, you’ve invested seven months. But continuing in deception doesn’t redeem that time—it only wastes more time. Many people have left Shincheonji after years of involvement. It’s never too late to recognize the truth and make a change.

You’re Not Alone:

Many people have left Shincheonji at various stages, including after accepting the “new John” claim. Your concerns are shared by others. Former members understand what you’re experiencing.

You Can Leave:

You are not trapped. Leaving Shincheonji does not mean losing salvation. Salvation is in Christ alone, not in recognizing Lee Man-hee or being part of Shincheonji.

Chapter 28 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” (Hope and Help) provides detailed guidance for those considering leaving Shincheonji.

---

Critical Red Flags for Students

If you’re currently studying with Shincheonji and have reached Lesson 105, here are critical warning signs to recognize:

Red Flag #1: The Explicit “New John” Claim

“In 1977, Jesus appears to New John (as recorded in Revelation 1:9-20), appointing him and instructing him to send letters… As new John, his first official act was sending these letters to the messengers of the seven churches, which he carried out.”

Why This Is Concerning:

This is an explicit claim that Lee Man-hee is a divinely appointed figure equivalent to the Apostle John. This claim:

• Has no biblical basis (Scripture never predicts a “new John”)
• Cannot be verified (no independent witnesses to Jesus’ appearance)
• Elevates a human leader to apostolic status
• Makes understanding Scripture dependent on one person’s testimony
• Creates a new mediator between believers and God

Biblical Response:

“For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus.” (1 Timothy 2:5)

“But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth.” (John 16:13)

We don’t need a “new John” to mediate between us and Scripture. The Holy Spirit guides believers into truth.

Questions to Ask:

• Where in Revelation does it predict a “new John”?
• How can I verify that Jesus appeared to Lee Man-hee in 1977?
• Why should I believe Lee Man-hee’s testimony over Scripture itself?
• If Revelation required a “new John” to explain it, what were first-century Christians supposed to do with it?

Red Flag #2: The Unverifiable Timeline

The lesson presents specific dates (1965, 1966, 1967, 1975, 1977, 1979, 1980) creating an impression of historical accuracy.

Why This Is Concerning:

This timeline:

• Cannot be independently verified
• Is disputed by those who were involved but left
• Interprets organizational conflicts as cosmic fulfillment
• Has changed over time as Shincheonji’s interpretations evolved
• Conveniently makes Lee Man-hee the hero

Biblical Response:

“Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.” (1 John 4:1)

Claims should be testable and verifiable, not dependent solely on the claimant’s testimony.

Questions to Ask:

• Can this timeline be verified by independent sources?
• What do former members who were involved say about these events?
• Has Shincheonji’s interpretation of these events changed over time?
• Why should I accept this interpretation over other accounts?

Red Flag #3: Physical Equivalents for Spiritual Realities

“In Revelation chapter 4, everything described has a physical equivalent in Mount Zion: The one seated on the throne, The 24 elders, The 7 lamps, The sea of glass, The 4 living creatures, The 12 gates.”

Why This Is Concerning:

This claim:

• Makes Revelation 4’s vision about organizational structures rather than God’s sovereignty
• Implies Shincheonji is heaven on earth
• Creates false equivalences between symbolic visions and human roles
• Makes leaving Shincheonji seem like leaving God’s presence

Biblical Response:

Revelation 4 is a vision of God’s throne in heaven, drawing on Old Testament throne visions (Isaiah 6, Ezekiel 1, Daniel 7). The point is God’s sovereignty and worthiness of worship, not organizational structures.

“God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.” (John 4:24)

God’s throne is not a physical structure in a human organization—it’s a spiritual reality.

Questions to Ask:

• Does Revelation 4 actually say these things have physical equivalents on earth?
• What would first-century Christians have understood from this vision?
• Why does Shincheonji’s interpretation make the vision about their organization rather than God’s sovereignty?
• If these are physical structures in Shincheonji, can I see them? Can they be verified?

Red Flag #4: The “Unity” Pressure

“While they spread fear about unified people, the Bible shows that unity is what God and Jesus have requested from us since the beginning… Some people even find signs of unity frightening, often saying things like ‘don’t be a sheep’ and ‘think for yourself.’ They become suspicious when they see people unified, doing the same things together.”

Why This Is Concerning:

This teaching:

• Dismisses legitimate concerns about groupthink as “fear”
• Redefines biblical unity as organizational conformity
• Pressures students to suppress critical thinking
• Makes questioning seem like causing disunity

Biblical Response:

Biblical unity doesn’t require accepting false teaching or suppressing critical thinking:

“Test everything; hold fast what is good.” (1 Thessalonians 5:21)

“Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.” (Acts 17:11)

The Bereans were commended for testing Paul’s teaching. Testing is not disunity—it’s biblical wisdom.

Questions to Ask:

• Is biblical unity the same as organizational conformity?
• Can I have unity in Christ while questioning Shincheonji’s interpretation?
• Why does Shincheonji dismiss critical thinking as “individualism”?
• Am I being pressured to conform rather than encouraged to think biblically?

Red Flag #5: Future Vindication Promise

“By being among the first to unite, others will ask us: ‘How did you do it first? How did you overcome? Teach me what you did.’ They will ask about how we studied for these tests and attended class despite difficulties. People will commend us for being the first to gather at this critical time.”

Why This Is Concerning:

This creates:

• Anticipation of future recognition and vindication
• A sense of being part of an elite group
• Motivation to continue despite doubts
• Justification for current sacrifice

But this is a common manipulation technique in high-control groups—promising future vindication to maintain current commitment.

Biblical Response:

Jesus warned against seeking recognition:

“Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.” (Matthew 6:1)

“So the last will be first, and the first will be last.” (Matthew 20:16)

Our motivation should be love for God and others, not anticipation of being recognized as “first.”

Questions to Ask:

• Is my motivation to be recognized as “first” or to serve God faithfully?
• What if this vindication never comes? What if I’ve sacrificed for nothing?
• Am I being manipulated through promises of future recognition?
• What does Scripture say about seeking recognition?

Red Flag #6: The “Sealed Word” Excuse

“What’s remarkable is that while God had been revealing heaven’s nature to us all along, we couldn’t perceive or recognize it because the word was sealed. However, now is different. Because someone has seen it, recognized it, and is testifying about it, we now have understanding.”

Why This Is Concerning:

This explains why no one recognized Shincheonji’s “fulfillment” until Lee Man-hee explained it. It shifts the problem from Shincheonji’s interpretation (which might be wrong) to everyone else’s understanding (which was “sealed”).

Biblical Response:

“I am not writing you a new command but one we have had from the beginning.” (1 John 2:7)

“Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear it and take to heart what is written in it, because the time is near.” (Revelation 1:3)

Revelation was written to be understood by its original recipients. The blessing is for those who read, hear, and take to heart what is written—not for those who wait 2,000 years for a “new John” to unseal it.

Questions to Ask:

• If the word was “sealed” until Lee Man-hee, what were Christians supposed to do for 2,000 years?
• Why does understanding require one person’s testimony rather than the Holy Spirit’s guidance?
• Is this “sealed word” concept biblical, or is it a way to explain why no one else accepts Shincheonji’s interpretation?

Red Flag #7: The Tabernacle Temple Narrative

“The Tabernacle Temple was established in Gwacheon, South Korea, at the base of Mount Cheonggye, a famous mountain. The leaders identified themselves as the seven stars. While the location was beautiful, the temple building no longer exists today – it was completely destroyed, with not one stone left upon another.”

Why This Is Concerning:

The phrase “not one stone left upon another” echoes Jesus’ prophecy about Jerusalem’s temple (Matthew 24:2), suggesting divine judgment. However, according to documented evidence in “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale”, the building was sold for financial reasons, not destroyed by divine judgment.

This is a significant distortion of actual events to make them seem like prophetic fulfillment.

Biblical Response:

“The LORD detests lying lips, but he delights in people who are trustworthy.” (Proverbs 12:22)

Truth matters. Distorting facts to make them seem like fulfillment is deceptive.

Questions to Ask:

• Was the building actually “destroyed” or was it sold?
• Can I verify what actually happened through independent sources?
• Why would Shincheonji distort the facts if their interpretation is true?
• What else might they be distorting?

Questions to Ask Before Full Commitment

Before fully committing to Shincheonji based on the “new John” claim, ask these critical questions:

About the “New John” Claim:

1. Where in Scripture is a “new John” predicted?
2. How can I verify that Jesus appeared to Lee Man-hee in 1977?
3. Why should I believe Lee Man-hee’s testimony over Scripture itself?
4. What makes Lee Man-hee’s claim different from other religious leaders who claim divine appointment?

About the Timeline: 5. Can this timeline be independently verified? 6. What do former members say about these events? 7. Has Shincheonji’s interpretation changed over time? 8. Why are there conflicting accounts from those who were involved?

About Revelation 4: 9. What would first-century Christians have understood from Revelation 4? 10. Does the text actually say these things have physical equivalents on earth? 11. Why does Shincheonji’s interpretation focus on organizational structures rather than God’s sovereignty? 12. Can I see these “physical equivalents”? Can they be verified?

About Authority and Verification: 13. Why does understanding Revelation require accepting one person’s testimony? 14. How is this different from other groups that claim special revelation? 15. What happens if I question or disagree with Shincheonji’s interpretation? 16. Am I being encouraged to test these claims or pressured to accept them?

About Salvation: 17. Does the Bible teach that salvation requires recognizing Lee Man-hee as the “new John”? 18. What do Ephesians 2:8-9 and Romans 10:9-10 say about salvation? 19. Is salvation by grace through faith in Christ, or by recognizing “fulfillment”? 20. Can I be saved without being part of Shincheonji?

What to Do If You Have Serious Concerns

1. Don’t Suppress Your Concerns:

The explicit “new John” claim should raise serious red flags. This is not a minor interpretive difference—it’s a fundamental claim that contradicts Scripture and cannot be verified.

2. Research Independently:

Visit closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination and read:

• “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1 and 2” (what actually happened)
• “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale” (the real history)
• “Prophecy and Fulfillment” series (how interpretations change)
• Testimonies from former members who were involved in the Tabernacle Temple

3. Compare Accounts:

Compare Shincheonji’s narrative with accounts from:

• Former members who were in the Tabernacle Temple
• Independent researchers who have documented the history
• Those who left Shincheonji after years of involvement

4. Seek Outside Perspective:

Talk with:

• A pastor or Christian counselor outside Shincheonji
• Family members or friends who are concerned
• Former Shincheonji members who can share their experiences

5. Read Revelation 4 in Context:

Read Revelation 4 using:

• Multiple Bible translations
• Reputable biblical commentaries
• Historical information about apocalyptic literature
• Resources about Old Testament throne visions (Isaiah 6, Ezekiel 1, Daniel 7)

Ask: Does this vision really seem to be about organizational structures in Korea, or about God’s sovereign throne?

6. Test Against Scripture:

Compare the “new John” claim with clear biblical passages about:

• The finality of Scripture (Revelation 22:18-19; 2 Timothy 3:16-17)
• The Holy Spirit as our guide (John 16:13)
• Christ as the only mediator (1 Timothy 2:5)
• Testing teachings (1 John 4:1; 1 Thessalonians 5:21)

7. Consider the Pattern:

Research other groups that have made similar claims:

• A founder claims divine appointment
• Organizational conflicts are reinterpreted as prophetic fulfillment
• Members are told they must recognize this fulfillment to be saved
• The group claims to be God’s only true work

This pattern has been repeated throughout history. Recognizing the pattern can help you see Shincheonji more clearly.

8. Remember: You Can Leave:

You are not trapped. Leaving Shincheonji does not mean:

• Losing salvation (salvation is in Christ alone)
• Rejecting God (you’re rejecting a human organization, not God)
• Wasting your time (recognizing deception is valuable, not wasteful)
• Failing (it takes courage to recognize truth and make a change)

Chapter 28 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” (Hope and Help) provides comprehensive guidance for those considering leaving Shincheonji, including practical steps, resources for healing, and encouragement for rebuilding faith and relationships.

---

Part 7: For Family and Friends—Understanding Lesson 105

What Your Loved One Is Experiencing

If someone you love has reached Lesson 105, they’re at a critical and dangerous point. This is when Shincheonji explicitly identifies Lee Man-hee as the “new John” appointed by Jesus.

The Psychological State

Your loved one is likely experiencing:

1. Shock and Cognitive Dissonance:

The explicit “new John” claim may shock them. Their mind is trying to reconcile:

• Seven months of seemingly biblical teaching
• An explicit claim that their instructor’s leader is divinely appointed
• Their own doubts and concerns
• Pressure to accept for “unity”

2. Investment Pressure:

“I’ve invested over seven months. If I leave now, it was all for nothing. I need to keep going to see where this leads.”

3. Fear of Missing God’s Work:

“What if this really is God’s work and I reject it? What if Lee Man-hee really was appointed by Jesus? I don’t want to miss what God is doing.”

4. Isolation:

They’ve distanced from you and others who expressed concern. Their primary relationships are now within Shincheonji. They have no outside perspective to help them evaluate this claim.

5. Exhaustion:

Four classes per week, homework, memorization, recruitment—they’re physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually exhausted. Exhaustion impairs judgment.

6. Group Pressure:

Everyone else in class seems to accept the “new John” claim. They don’t want to be the odd one out or cause “disunity.”

7. Anticipation:

They’re being told they’re among the “first” to recognize God’s work, and others will ask them how they did it. This creates anticipation of future vindication.

Why This Lesson Is Critical

Lesson 105 is when Shincheonji explicitly identifies Lee Man-hee as the “new John.” This is the core claim that everything else depends on:

• If Lee Man-hee is the “new John,” then his testimony is authoritative
• If Lee Man-hee witnessed Revelation’s fulfillment, then Shincheonji’s interpretation is correct
• If Lee Man-hee was appointed by Jesus, then questioning him is questioning Jesus

But if this claim is false, the entire system collapses.

How to Help

1. Address the “New John” Claim Directly:

This is the time to address the core claim directly:

• “I’m very concerned about the claim that Lee Man-hee is the ‘new John’ appointed by Jesus”
• “Where in Scripture is a ‘new John’ predicted?”
• “How can we verify that Jesus appeared to Lee Man-hee in 1977?”
• “This is a huge claim—shouldn’t we be able to test it?”

2. Point to Scripture’s Finality:

Share biblical passages about Scripture’s completeness:

“All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.” (2 Timothy 3:16-17)

“I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll.” (Revelation 22:18-19)

“Scripture presents itself as complete. We don’t need a ‘new John’ to add to it or explain it.”

3. Challenge the Unverifiable Claims:

Point out that the claims cannot be verified:

• “There are no independent witnesses to Jesus appearing to Lee Man-hee”
• “The timeline of events is disputed by those who were involved but left”
• “The only ‘evidence’ is Lee Man-hee’s own testimony”
• “How is this different from other religious leaders who claim divine appointment?”

4. Share Historical Documentation:

Point them to closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination:

• “I found documentation of what actually happened in the Tabernacle Temple”
• “The accounts from former members who were there tell a very different story”
• “The building wasn’t ‘destroyed’—it was sold for financial reasons”
• “Can we look at this documentation together?”

5. Ask About Revelation 4:

Engage with the content of Revelation 4:

• “Does Revelation 4 really seem to be about organizational structures in Korea?”
• “What would first-century Christians have understood from this vision?”
• “The chapter is all about worshiping God—why does Shincheonji make it about their organization?”
• “Can you show me in the text where it says these things have physical equivalents on earth?”

6. Address the “Unity” Pressure:

Challenge the manipulation:

• “I’m concerned that you’re being told questioning is ‘disunity'”
• “The Bereans tested even Paul’s teaching and were commended for it”
• “Biblical unity doesn’t mean accepting claims without testing them”
• “True unity is in Christ, not in organizational conformity”

7. Point Out the Pattern:

Help them see the pattern:

• “Many groups throughout history have claimed their founder was divinely appointed”
• “They reinterpret organizational conflicts as prophetic fulfillment”
• “They tell members they must recognize this to be saved”
• “This is a common pattern—it’s not unique to Shincheonji”

8. Express Specific Concerns:

Share your concerns in “I” statements:

• “I’m very concerned about the claim that Lee Man-hee is the ‘new John'”
• “I’m worried that you’re being asked to accept this without being able to verify it”
• “I’m troubled that questioning is being labeled as ‘disunity'”
• “I’m concerned that you’ve invested so much that it’s hard to evaluate objectively”

9. Offer Unconditional Love:

Make it clear:

• “I love you no matter what you decide”
• “I’m here for you whether you stay or leave”
• “I’m not trying to control you—I’m concerned because I love you”
• “If you ever want to talk, research together, or need help, I’m here”

10. Pray Consistently:

Pray for:

• Your loved one’s eyes to be opened to the truth
• Wisdom in your interactions
• Protection from deception
• Courage for them to question the “new John” claim
• Restoration of your relationship

11. Connect With Resources:

Connect them with:

• Former Shincheonji members who can share their experiences
• Documentation at closerlookinitiative.com
• Pastors or counselors experienced with high-control groups
• Other families who have loved ones in Shincheonji

12. Be Patient but Persistent:

This is a critical moment. Your loved one is being asked to accept a claim that:

• Cannot be verified
• Contradicts Scripture
• Elevates a human leader to divine status
• Makes salvation dependent on recognizing one person

Be patient, but don’t give up. Many people have left Shincheonji after accepting the “new John” claim. Your consistent love and truth-telling matter more than you know.

Chapter 29 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” provides extensive guidance for families and friends, including communication strategies, resources, and hope for restoration.

---

Part 8: The True Throne Vision—God’s Sovereignty and Worship

Returning to the Text

After examining Shincheonji’s interpretation, let’s return to what Revelation 4 actually teaches. Reading it as first-century Christians would have understood it, the message is clear and powerful.

The Vision of God’s Throne (Revelation 4:1-11)

The Invitation (v. 1):

“After this I looked, and there before me was a door standing open in heaven. And the voice I had first heard speaking to me like a trumpet said, ‘Come up here, and I will show you what must take place after this.'”

John is invited into heaven to see “what must take place.” This is not about organizational structures in Korea—it’s about God’s sovereign plan for history.

The Throne (vv. 2-3):

“At once I was in the Spirit, and there before me was a throne in heaven with someone sitting on it. And the one who sat there had the appearance of jasper and ruby. A rainbow that shone like an emerald encircled the throne.”

The central image is the throne—representing God’s sovereignty and authority. The one seated is described with precious stones and a rainbow, evoking God’s glory and His covenant faithfulness.

The 24 Elders (v. 4):

“Surrounding the throne were twenty-four other thrones, and seated on them were twenty-four elders. They were dressed in white and had crowns of gold on their heads.”

The 24 elders likely represent the complete people of God—12 tribes of Israel (Old Covenant) and 12 apostles (New Covenant). They’re dressed in white (purity, victory) and have crowns (they reign with God), but they worship the One on the throne.

The Seven Spirits (v. 5):

“From the throne came flashes of lightning, rumblings and peals of thunder. In front of the throne, seven lamps were blazing. These are the seven spirits of God.”

The seven spirits represent the fullness of the Holy Spirit (Isaiah 11:2). Lightning and thunder evoke God’s power and majesty (Exodus 19:16).

The Sea of Glass (v. 6a):

“Also in front of the throne there was what looked like a sea of glass, clear as crystal.”

The sea of glass suggests purity, holiness, and the separation between God and creation. In the Old Testament tabernacle/temple, there was a bronze sea for ceremonial washing. This sea of glass suggests perfect purity—no washing needed.

The Four Living Creatures (vv. 6b-8):

“In the center, around the throne, were four living creatures, and they were covered with eyes, in front and in back. The first living creature was like a lion, the second was like an ox, the third had a face like a man, the fourth was like a flying eagle. Each of the four living creatures had six wings and was covered with eyes all around, even under its wings. Day and night they never stop saying: ‘Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty, who was, and is, and is to come.'”

The four living creatures represent all creation worshiping God:

• Lion: wild animals
• Ox: domestic animals
• Man: humanity
• Eagle: birds

They’re covered with eyes (all-seeing, all-knowing) and have six wings (like Isaiah’s seraphim in Isaiah 6:2). They never stop declaring God’s holiness.

The Worship (vv. 9-11):

“Whenever the living creatures give glory, honor and thanks to him who sits on the throne and who lives for ever and ever, the twenty-four elders fall down before him who sits on the throne and worship him who lives for ever and ever. They lay their crowns before the throne and say: ‘You are worthy, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they were created and have their being.'”

The climax of the vision is worship. The living creatures and elders worship God for:

• Who He is: Holy, almighty, eternal, living forever
• What He has done: Created all things

The elders lay their crowns before the throne, acknowledging that any honor or authority they have comes from God and belongs to Him.

The Message for First-Century Christians

For persecuted first-century believers, this vision offered profound hope and perspective:

1. God Is on the Throne:

Despite appearances, God is sovereign. The Roman emperor may sit on an earthly throne, but God sits on the ultimate throne. History is under His control.

2. God Is Holy:

“Holy, holy, holy”—the threefold repetition emphasizes God’s absolute holiness. He is set apart, pure, righteous. In contrast to the corrupt Roman Empire, God is perfectly holy.

3. God Is Almighty:

He is “the Lord God Almighty.” Despite Rome’s military might, God is the true Almighty. No power can ultimately resist Him.

4. God Is Eternal:

“Who was, and is, and is to come.” God existed before Rome, exists now, and will exist after Rome falls. Empires rise and fall, but God is eternal.

5. God Is Creator:

“You created all things, and by your will they were created and have their being.” Everything exists by God’s will, including Rome. The emperor is not divine—he’s a creature who exists by God’s will.

6. God Is Worthy of Worship:

The entire scene is one of worship. Only God is worthy of the worship Rome demands for its emperor. Believers must worship God alone, even if it costs their lives.

7. All Creation Worships God:

The four living creatures represent all creation. Even if Rome forces people to worship the emperor, all creation ultimately worships the true God.

8. God’s People Reign With Him:

The 24 elders have thrones and crowns, but they lay them before God’s throne. Believers who remain faithful will reign with God, but they acknowledge that all authority comes from Him.

The Relevance Today

While Revelation 4 was written to encourage first-century Christians facing Roman persecution, its message remains relevant:

For All Believers:

1. God Is Sovereign:

Whatever challenges we face—persecution, suffering, injustice, chaos—God is on the throne. History is under His control.

2. God Is Worthy:

In a world that worships many things (money, power, pleasure, self), God alone is worthy of worship.

3. Worship Is Central:

The vision reminds us that worship is the central activity of heaven. Our lives should be characterized by worship—acknowledging God’s worth in all we do.

4. Perspective Matters:

When we’re overwhelmed by earthly circumstances, we need heavenly perspective. God’s throne is the ultimate reality.

5. Creation Declares God’s Glory:

All creation worships God. We join the chorus of praise that has been sounding since creation.

For Those Considering Shincheonji:

Revelation 4 is not about organizational structures in Korea. It’s about God’s sovereign throne and His worthiness of worship. Shincheonji’s interpretation:

• Shifts focus from God to their organization
• Makes the vision about human structures rather than divine sovereignty
• Misses the worship focus entirely
• Contradicts what first-century Christians would have understood

Don’t let Shincheonji’s interpretation rob you of the true message: God is on the throne. He is holy, almighty, eternal, and worthy of all worship. Whatever you face, He is sovereign. Worship Him alone.

The Worship Response

The proper response to Revelation 4 is not to look for physical equivalents in an organization. The proper response is worship:

“You are worthy, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they were created and have their being.” (Revelation 4:11)

Worship God for who He is:

• Holy, holy, holy
• Lord God Almighty
• Eternal (who was, and is, and is to come)
• Living forever

Worship God for what He has done:

• Created all things
• Sustains all things by His will
• Reigns sovereignly over history

Lay your crowns before Him:

Whatever honor, achievement, or authority you have, acknowledge it comes from God and belongs to Him.

Join the heavenly chorus:

Add your voice to the worship that never ceases in heaven.

Chapter 26 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” (Reading Revelation Like a First-Century Christian) provides comprehensive analysis of how early believers understood Revelation’s visions and how we can read Revelation faithfully today.

---

Conclusion: The Choice Before You

Two Interpretations

Lesson 105 presents you with a choice between two interpretations of Revelation 4:

Shincheonji’s Interpretation:

• Revelation 4 is about organizational structures in Korea
• The throne, elders, living creatures, etc., have physical equivalents in Shincheonji
• Lee Man-hee is the “new John” who witnessed these things
• Understanding requires accepting Lee Man-hee’s testimony
• You must recognize this to be part of God’s kingdom

The Biblical Interpretation:

• Revelation 4 is a vision of God’s sovereign throne
• It draws on Old Testament throne visions (Isaiah 6, Ezekiel 1, Daniel 7)
• It offers hope and perspective to persecuted believers
• The central message is God’s sovereignty and worthiness of worship
• The proper response is worship, not organizational allegiance

Which interpretation is faithful to the text? Which interpretation would first-century Christians have recognized? Which interpretation focuses on God rather than a human organization?

The “New John” Claim

The core of Shincheonji’s system is the claim that Lee Man-hee is the “new John” appointed by Jesus. This claim:

• Has no biblical basis
• Cannot be verified
• Contradicts Scripture’s finality
• Elevates a human leader to apostolic status
• Creates a new mediator
• Makes salvation dependent on recognizing one person

This is not a minor interpretive difference. This is a fundamental claim that, if false, reveals Shincheonji as a deceptive organization.

The Real Question

The real question is not “What do the symbols in Revelation 4 represent?” The real question is:

“Who is on the throne of my life?”

Is it:

• God, revealed in Jesus Christ, worshiped for His holiness and sovereignty?
• Or a human organization claiming divine authority?

“Where does my hope come from?”

Does it come from:

• God’s sovereign control over history?
• Or from being part of an organization that claims to fulfill prophecy?

“What is the gospel?”

Is it:

• Christ died for our sins, rose from the dead, and through faith in Him we are saved by grace?
• Or recognizing Lee Man-hee as the “new John” and being sealed in Shincheonji?

An Invitation to Truth

If you’re currently involved with Shincheonji and have reached Lesson 105, please hear this:

The “new John” claim should raise serious red flags.

This is not a minor issue. This is a fundamental claim that contradicts Scripture, cannot be verified, and elevates a human leader to a status that belongs only to inspired biblical authors.

You can question this claim.

Despite the pressure for “unity,” you can and should question the “new John” claim. Testing teachings is biblical (1 John 4:1; 1 Thessalonians 5:21; Acts 17:11).

Research the actual history.

Visit closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination and read the documented history of what actually happened in the Tabernacle Temple. Compare Shincheonji’s narrative with accounts from former members who were involved.

Read Revelation 4 for what it actually says.

Read the chapter in multiple translations. Read it with biblical commentaries. Ask: Does this really seem to be about organizational structures in Korea, or about God’s sovereign throne and His worthiness of worship?

The seven months are not wasted if you leave now.

Recognizing deception is valuable, not wasteful. Continuing in deception doesn’t redeem the time—it only wastes more time. Many people have left Shincheonji after years of involvement. It’s never too late.

You can leave.

You are not trapped. Leaving Shincheonji does not mean:

• Losing salvation (salvation is in Christ alone)
• Rejecting God (you’re rejecting a human organization, not God)
• Missing God’s work (God’s work is not limited to one organization)
• Failing (it takes courage to recognize truth and make a change)

The True Throne

The true throne is not in a human organization in Korea. The true throne is in heaven, where God reigns sovereign over all creation.

“At once I was in the Spirit, and there before me was a throne in heaven with someone sitting on it.” (Revelation 4:2)

This throne has been there since before creation. It will be there after all earthly organizations have passed away. The One seated on this throne is:

• Holy, holy, holy
• Lord God Almighty
• Eternal
• Creator of all things
• Worthy of all worship

This is the throne that matters. Not organizational structures. Not human leaders. Not claims of special revelation.

God’s throne.

The True Gospel

The true gospel is not about recognizing Lee Man-hee as the “new John.” The true gospel is:

“For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, and then to the Twelve. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time.” (1 Corinthians 15:3-6)

“For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast.” (Ephesians 2:8-9)

“If you declare with your mouth, ‘Jesus is Lord,’ and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” (Romans 10:9)

Salvation is by grace through faith in Christ alone. Not by:

• Recognizing Lee Man-hee as the “new John”
• Accepting Shincheonji’s interpretation
• Being sealed in an organization
• Understanding Revelation “correctly”

Christ alone. Grace alone. Faith alone.

The True Worship

The proper response to Revelation 4 is worship:

“You are worthy, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they were created and have their being.” (Revelation 4:11)

Worship God for who He is:

• Holy, holy, holy
• Almighty
• Eternal
• Creator

Worship God for what He has done:

• Created all things
• Sustains all things
• Reigns sovereignly
• Sent His Son to save us

Lay your crowns before Him. Acknowledge that everything you have comes from Him and belongs to Him.

Join the heavenly chorus that never ceases:

“Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty, who was, and is, and is to come.” (Revelation 4:8)

Final Words

You’re at a critical crossroads. The explicit “new John” claim in Lesson 105 is the foundation of Shincheonji’s entire system. If this claim is false—and the evidence strongly suggests it is—then everything built on it collapses.

Before you commit your life to Shincheonji based on this claim:

• Research independently
• Read the documented history
• Compare accounts from former members
• Test the claim against Scripture
• Seek outside perspective
• Read Revelation 4 for what it actually says
• Pray for wisdom and discernment

And remember the true gospel:

Christ died for your sins. He rose from the dead. Through faith in Him, you are saved by grace. This is the good news. This is the gospel. This is the truth that sets you free.

Not recognition of a “new John.” Not organizational membership. Not understanding Revelation “correctly.”

Christ alone. Grace alone. Faith alone.

“Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” (John 8:32)

“So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.” (John 8:36)

May you know this freedom—the freedom that comes from the truth of the gospel, not from the bondage of a system that elevates a human leader and makes salvation dependent on recognizing his claims.

May you know this truth—that Christ has already accomplished your salvation, and through faith in Him, you are saved by grace.

May you know this hope—that God is on the throne, sovereign over all, worthy of all worship, and He loves you with an everlasting love.

To Him be glory and power forever and ever. Amen.

---

This refutation was prepared using the framework established in “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” and draws on first-century Christian understanding, historical-literary analysis, and biblical theology to provide accurate evaluation of Shincheonji’s teachings. For comprehensive documentation of what actually happened in Shincheonji’s organization and how their claims contradict historical reality, please visit closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination.

Additional resources mentioned in this refutation:

• “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1 and 2” – Available at closerlookinitiative.com
• “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale” – Available at closerlookinitiative.com
• “Prophecy and Fulfillment” series – Available at closerlookinitiative.com
• “How First-Century Christians Read Revelation Like a Political Cartoon” – Provides historical-literary context for understanding Revelation’s original meaning

All biblical quotations are from the New International Version (NIV) unless otherwise noted.