“Doctrinal Changes” as Understood by Former Members and Critics
What is Happening in SCJ Doctrinal Shifts:
• Vague and General Language: Critics point out that SCJ often uses vague or general language in its doctrines, which allows for continuous reinterpretation and avoids accountability for perceived mistakes.
• Denial and Blame-Shifting: When confronted with inconsistencies, SCJ leaders may deny that any changes have occurred, state that the questioner lacks understanding, or shift blame onto external sources, such as “slanderous information” from the internet or others’ misinterpretations. They also label criticism as “persecution” to deflect from accountability.
• Information Control: New members are generally not made aware of past doctrinal changes, and existing members are discouraged from seeking outside information, which is often dismissed as “poison” or “slander”. Questions and doubts are often suppressed, sometimes by labeling them as originating “from the devil”.
Think of it like a continually shifting sandcastle: SCJ claims it’s a perfectly stable, divinely designed structure being progressively revealed, but critics and former members observe that its builders are constantly reshaping its foundational elements to fit the changing tides of reality, while insisting the blueprint has never changed.
See Series:
Shincheonji Church of Jesus, a prominent New Religious Movement originating in South Korea, positions itself as the literal fulfillment of biblical prophecy, with its founder, Chairman Lee Man-hee, as the “promised pastor” and sole interpreter of Revelation. This report critically examines Shincheonji’s core claims, focusing on documented doctrinal changes, particularly concerning Revelation 7, and significant discrepancies between its historical narratives and verifiable facts.
The analysis reveals that Shincheonji’s interpretive framework, which asserts that prophecies are understood only upon their physical fulfillment, allows for continuous reinterpretation and adaptation of its teachings. This approach, while maintaining the illusion of prophetic accuracy internally, leads to demonstrable inconsistencies when confronted with external realities and biblical standards. Specific examples include the shifting explanations for the “3.5 days” prophecy, the retroactive introduction of “partially sealed” members to account for unfulfilled quotas, and the misrepresentation of historical entities like the Tabernacle Temple and the Stewardship Education Center.
Furthermore, the report highlights the inherent vulnerability of Shincheonji’s doctrine of physical immortality for Chairman Lee Man-hee, a claim directly challenged by the natural progression of age and the documented deaths of other senior leaders. The systematic use of deception in evangelism and the fabrication of historical details to validate theological claims underscore a significant divergence from conventional ethical and biblical principles. These findings collectively suggest that Shincheonji’s narrative often adapts to external realities rather than predicting them, raising fundamental questions about the veracity and immutability of its core tenets. The report also delves into Lee Man-hee’s unacknowledged history with previous religious groups, revealing how their doctrines may have influenced Shincheonji’s core tenets, and examines the organization’s use of gaslighting to manage doctrinal shifts and suppress dissent.
This report provides a detailed examination of Shincheonji Church of Jesus, a new religious movement that has garnered significant attention and controversy. Understanding its foundational claims and interpretive lens is essential for analyzing the subsequent evidence of doctrinal shifts and historical discrepancies.
Unraveling the Threads: Shincheonji’s Evolving Narrative
Imagine trying to follow a story that keeps changing its key plot points, or a map where the landmarks suddenly shift places. For many, navigating the doctrines and history of Shincheonji (SCJ) can feel a bit like this. While SCJ presents its teachings as a consistent unveiling of divine truth, directly revealed by Jesus to Chairman Lee Man-Hee, and claims to be the only place with a perfect understanding of the Bible’s prophecies and their fulfillment, ex-members and critical analyses reveal a different picture: one of significant doctrinal adjustments and historical discrepancies.
1.1. Overview of Shincheonji and its Theological Framework
Shincheonji Church of Jesus, the Temple of the Tabernacle of the Testimony (SCJ), founded by Lee Man-hee, is characterized as a new religious movement with teachings derived from Christianity. However, it is widely regarded as a pseudoreligion or cult by mainstream Christian denominations and former members.
A foundational aspect of Shincheonji’s theology is its belief that the Bible is divided into history, moral instruction, prophecy, and fulfillment. Crucially, prophecies are expressed through parables, and their true meaning is believed to be understood only when they are physically fulfilled in the present day. This interpretive approach grants the leadership, particularly Chairman Lee, considerable flexibility in applying scripture to contemporary events. Shincheonji teaches a “two seeds” doctrine (God’s seed and Satan’s seed) and views the Bible as a succession of covenants. They assert that the “New Spiritual Israel” is established at the Second Coming, with Shincheonji itself being the fulfillment of these New Testament prophecies.
1.2. Chairman Lee Man-hee: The “Promised Pastor” and “New John”
Shincheonji’s doctrine unequivocally identifies its founder, Lee Man-hee, as the “promised pastor” prophesied in the New Testament, particularly in the Book of Revelation. He is believed to have “overcome” false pastors (referred to as “Nicolaites”) and established the “new heaven and new earth” (Shincheonji), thereby restoring God’s kingdom on earth as the New Spiritual Israel.
Lee Man-hee claims to be the “New John,” asserting that he has “seen and heard all of the events of Revelation” and has “eaten the little scroll” (Revelation 10), thereby obtaining a perfect and complete understanding of Revelation’s fulfillment. He claims to have received this understanding directly from God and the spirit, not from human teachers or prior training. This unique claim positions him as the sole, authoritative interpreter of these prophecies, making his testimony central to the movement’s theological legitimacy.
This interpretive framework, where the true meaning of prophecies is understood only when they are physically fulfilled and then revealed by Chairman Lee, bestows immense power and adaptability upon the leadership. If an event does not transpire as initially anticipated or taught, the doctrine can be reinterpreted or retroactively adjusted to fit the new reality, thereby preserving the appearance of prophetic accuracy. This renders many of Shincheonji’s “prophecies” effectively unfalsifiable in the eyes of believers, as the “truth” is always unveiled by the “promised pastor” after the fact, or at a “proper time”. This mechanism allows Shincheonji to deflect challenges and maintain its authoritative narrative irrespective of external contradictions. Such an approach fundamentally discourages independent critical thinking among members, conditioning them to accept that the “true meaning” of prophecy will only be revealed by Lee Man-hee. This fosters intellectual dependence and contributes to the psychological manipulation tactics observed by former members. The leader’s pronouncements effectively supersede empirical reality or prior teachings.
1.3. Lee Man-hee’s Past: A Foundation or a Borrowed Blueprint?
Shincheonji officially began on March 14, 1984, when Lee Man-Hee (LMH) founded the Shincheonji Church of Jesus, the Temple of the Tabernacle of the Testimony. However, his spiritual journey began long before. Critics and ex-members highlight LMH’s prior involvement in several Korean apocalyptic movements, suggesting that much of SCJ’s doctrine may be rooted in these earlier influences, rather than solely direct divine revelation, as SCJ claims.
Here’s a look at his documented past affiliations and his age during those periods:
- Olive Tree Movement (1957-1967): LMH was a member of this hyper-successful movement founded by Park Tae-seon for ten years, from 1957 to 1967. During this decade, LMH would have been approximately 26 to 36 years old (born in 1931 ). Critics note that the Olive Tree Movement also claimed its leader was “the Righteous Man of the East” and “the One Who Overcomes,” claimed immortality, and taught about the 144,000 and the great multitude. This connection to the Olive Tree is notably absent from Shincheonji’s official biography of Lee Man-hee.
- Tabernacle Temple (1967-1971/1980): After leaving the Olive Tree, LMH joined the Tabernacle Temple in Gwacheon in 1967 or early 1968. He was involved with this group for over a decade, from approximately 36 to 52 years old (if he left in 1980, though some sources say 1971 ). The Tabernacle Temple, founded by Yoo Jae-yeol (also referred to as Yoo Jae-ho), had “seven messengers” who were believed to represent the “seven churches” of Revelation 2 and 3. This group also taught that Jesus spoke in parables and secrets that would be revealed near the end times. A significant historical inaccuracy arises here: Yoo Jae-yeol prophesied the world would end in September 1969, and that only those gathered inside the Temple before this date would be saved and live in a new heaven and new earth, never dying or growing old. When it didn’t, three of the seven messengers defected. Despite this failed prophecy, LMH remained for two more years (until 1971 ). LMH later claimed to have written letters to these “seven messengers” in 1979-1980, even though some had already left a decade earlier.
- Baek Man-Bong (Solomon) Recreation Church (Post-1969 to 1980): After the Tabernacle Temple’s time-limited apocalypse failed in September 1969, Lee Man-hee entered the Baek Man-Bong (Solomon) Recreation Church. He acted as one of the “Twelve Disciples” and served Baek Man-Bong as a lord. This occurred when LMH was around 46 to 49 years old (if he joined around 1977 ). This group also taught about “creation and recreation,” “betrayal, destruction, and salvation,” and had “12 disciples”. Mr. Baek even referred to himself as “Christ” and claimed the world would end in 1980, another failed prophecy. This group also disbanded on March 14, 1980, after Baek Man-Bong’s prophecy to “stop the Sun” failed. Following this, Lee Man-hee established Shincheonji on March 14, 1984.
SCJ’s narrative largely focuses on LMH’s experiences after joining the Tabernacle Temple as the point when he began to experience the fulfillment of Revelation’s events. However, critics argue that the striking similarities between SCJ’s core doctrines (e.g., figurative interpretations, betrayal-destruction-salvation themes, the 144,000, “overcomer” terminology, and the 12 tribes) and those of these earlier groups suggest a continuity of ideas, rather than a completely new, unique revelation.
1.4. Shincheonji’s Narrative and Gaslighting
Shincheonji’s narrative presents Lee Man-hee as the “one who overcomes” who fought against the corruption of the Tabernacle Temple and established Shincheonji as the true fulfillment of prophecy. However, the organization often omits or reinterprets his prior affiliations and the shared doctrinal elements (such as time-limited prophecies and claims of physical immortality) with these earlier groups.
When confronted with historical discrepancies or doctrinal changes, Shincheonji employs tactics that former members describe as “gaslighting”. They may dismiss questions as “persecution” or “satanic opposition” to deflect scrutiny and frame dissent as a lack of spiritual understanding. The phrase “Food at the proper time” is used to delay answering difficult questions, conditioning recruits to suppress critical thought. This allows Shincheonji to continuously reshape its doctrine to fit Lee Man-hee’s actions and pronouncements, making any challenge to him tantamount to heresy. The organization’s reliance on a “rewritten history” and the claim that “details don’t matter” when inconsistencies are exposed are further examples of this manipulative approach to maintain its narrative and control over members.
The doctrine surrounding Revelation 7, particularly concerning the 144,000 sealed individuals and the “Great Multitude,” represents a core tenet of Shincheonji’s theology and a significant point of contention for former members due to observed discrepancies and changes.
2.1. Shincheonji’s Core Teaching on Revelation 7
Shincheonji’s doctrine asserts that the 144,000 saints, specifically 12,000 sealed individuals from each of the 12 tribes (as referenced in Revelation 7:2-8 and 14:1-5), are currently being gathered and will participate in the “first resurrection”. These 144,000 are believed to become one with the souls of martyrs descending from Heaven and will reign on earth with Jesus for 1,000 years as priests and kings. This is presented as a literal, physical fulfillment occurring within Shincheonji itself.
The movement claims that its total number of followers has already exceeded 144,000, with the excess members constituting the “Great White Multitude” (Revelation 7:9-10) who will also achieve salvation. A particularly compelling aspect of Shincheonji’s teaching is the claim that Chairman Lee Man-hee, as the promised pastor, will not die. Instead, he will enter the millennial Kingdom of God with his physical body, alongside many other living members who will survive until the Millennium. This promise of physical immortality on earth serves as a powerful incentive for adherence.
2.2. Ex-Members’ Concerns and Discrepancies
Former members of Shincheonji have raised several concerns and identified discrepancies regarding the organization’s evolving interpretation of Revelation 7, particularly concerning the “great tribulation” and the sealing of the 144,000.
2.2.1. Contradictions Regarding the 144,000 Membership Numbers
Significant discrepancies have been noted in the fulfillment of the 144,000 prophecy. Specifically, at the beginning of 2020, several Shincheonji tribes, especially the Bartholomew tribe, did not possess the required 12,000 sealed members. Adding to this, former members observed that tribe reports, which would verify these numbers, ceased conveniently when it was time to confirm that each tribe had reached the 12,000 member count by the end of 2020. This cessation is widely perceived as a deliberate act to obscure the failure to meet the prophetic quota and avoid accountability. The logistical improbability is also highlighted: for Bartholomew’s tribe to reach 12,000 members by March 2020, it would have necessitated evangelizing and sealing an additional 7,000 people in just three months, a feat considered highly improbable given the tribe had not even reached half of that number in over 30 years.
2.2.2. The Introduction of the “Partially Sealed” Concept
A major doctrinal alteration identified by former members is the introduction of the concept of “partially sealed” members. This is widely viewed as an “obvious change to previous teaching” and an “unfalsifiable claim” that was retroactively introduced to incorporate global events, specifically the COVID-19 pandemic, into their supposed fulfillment of Revelation. The original teaching presented a clear, sequential fulfillment of Revelation 7: A (sealing of 144,000) followed by B (the tribulation and the coming of the great multitude). However, the new interpretation shifted to A (partially sealed) then B (tribulation) then A (fully sealed), implying that the sealing process and the tribulation could occur simultaneously. This reinterpretation fundamentally undermines the meaning of the phrase “After this” in Revelation 7, making any sequential biblical event arbitrarily “partially completed” without verifiable proof.
The specific predictions regarding the 144,000 membership numbers and the impact of the “Great Tribulation” (COVID-19) did not materialize as originally taught. These failures necessitated a doctrinal response to maintain credibility and the narrative of ongoing fulfillment. The introduction of concepts like “partially sealed” and the reinterpretation of the tribulation’s target (from world churches to Shincheonji itself) reveal a strategic, rather than spontaneous, adaptive mechanism. This allows the organization to retroactively fit unforeseen events or unmet targets into its existing prophetic framework. The common Shincheonji response, that “God knows the reason why He changed the Doctrine” , acts as a theological shield, shifting accountability from the prophet to divine will, thereby insulating the leadership from direct criticism for failed predictions. This continuous adaptation, while potentially maintaining internal coherence for deeply committed members, serves as a significant point of cognitive dissonance and a catalyst for doubt and departure among those who critically examine the claims. It highlights a fundamental tension between a rigid, pre-determined prophetic narrative and the unpredictable, often contradictory, nature of real-world events.
2.2.3. The Tribulation’s Impact and Changes in Evangelism Directives
Shincheonji taught that the “Great Tribulation” (which they linked to the COVID-19 pandemic ) was primarily prophesied to affect the world’s established churches, leading people to abandon them and flock to Shincheonji for salvation. However, the reality was the opposite: the COVID-19 tribulation disproportionately impacted Shincheonji itself in Korea, leading to widespread controversy and skepticism globally, rather than an influx of new members. Furthermore, former members recall being taught that they would
not need to evangelize the “great multitude” once the 144,000 were sealed. Yet, Shincheonji is reportedly still actively evangelizing, even more intensely than before, directly contradicting this previous teaching.
A central tenet of Shincheonji is the physical immortality of Chairman Lee Man-hee and many living members who will enter the millennial kingdom. However, the advanced age of Chairman Lee (93 years old ) and the documented deaths of other senior leaders present a direct, empirical challenge to this core eschatological claim. This particular doctrine is highly susceptible to falsification by natural processes. As Chairman Lee continues to age, and upon his eventual death, the credibility of the physical immortality claim will be severely tested. The current Shincheonji response to questions about his potential death—that “everything will happen according to the will of God” —indicates a pre-emptive, yet ultimately insufficient, mechanism to manage this inevitable contradiction. The failure of this specific prophecy, when it occurs, holds the potential for a profound crisis of faith for remaining members, potentially leading to widespread disillusionment, significant departures, or necessitating even more radical and complex doctrinal revisions to explain away what would be a direct refutation of a central promise. This highlights a critical vulnerability in Shincheonji’s long-term theological sustainability.
To provide a theological counterpoint to Shincheonji’s claims, it is crucial to examine biblical criteria for identifying true and false prophets, particularly from the Book of Deuteronomy. This comparison is vital for assessing Shincheonji’s claims from a traditional theological perspective.
3.1. Analysis of Deuteronomy 18:22 and its Criteria for Identifying False Prophecy
Deuteronomy 18:22 provides a clear and direct criterion for discerning a true prophet from a false one: “If a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD but the thing does not take place or prove true, it is a word that the LORD has not spoken. The prophet has spoken it presumptuously; do not be frightened by it”. This verse is consistently translated across various biblical versions, all conveying the same core message of verifiable fulfillment.
This passage, along with other related texts such as Deuteronomy 13:1-3 (warning against prophets who lead to other gods, even if their signs come true) and 18:15-20 (describing a true prophet raised by God), establishes a framework for evaluating prophetic claims. While Deuteronomy 18:22 is contextualized against “diviner prophets” who might lead people into syncretistic worship, its fundamental principle regarding the veracity and fulfillment of a prophet’s word remains a critical biblical standard. The emphasis is not merely on a prediction being made, but on whether the word “prove[s] true” in the “outworking of the life of the people of God” and in “human history.” False words, according to Scripture, “cannot prove true in human experience”.
3.2. Implications for Evaluating Shincheonji’s Prophetic Claims
The documented contradictions and changes in Shincheonji’s Revelation 7 doctrine, such as the unfulfilled 144,000 membership numbers and the misdirected “tribulation” , can be directly and critically evaluated against the explicit Deuteronomic principle. Shincheonji’s pattern of retroactively fitting events into prophecies, rather than making specific, verifiable predictions that then come to pass , stands in stark contrast to the biblical expectation that a prophet’s word “take place or prove true”
as spoken. The need for constant reinterpretation and adaptation suggests a failure to meet this fundamental biblical test of prophetic authenticity.
Deuteronomy 18:22 provides a clear, falsifiable criterion for a true prophet: their words must come to pass. Conversely, Shincheonji’s practice involves reinterpreting or adapting prophecies
after events occur or when they fail to occur as initially taught. This creates an irreconcilable conflict between Shincheonji’s internal method of validating prophecy and the explicit standards set forth in the very Bible they claim to interpret and fulfill. For a movement that purports to be the literal fulfillment of biblical prophecy and whose leader claims to have “perfect understanding” , this fundamental inconsistency represents a profound theological weakness. It suggests that Shincheonji’s claims cannot withstand scrutiny based on the very text they hold sacred. The statement that “truth doesn’t hide behind secret classes or shifting timelines” directly challenges Shincheonji’s approach of altering narratives when faced with contradictions, highlighting a lack of accountability inherent in their prophetic system. This clash provides a powerful, biblically grounded argument for former members and external critics, demonstrating that Shincheonji’s claims of divine authority and prophetic fulfillment fail by the standards of the Bible itself. This further highlights the internal pressure within Shincheonji to maintain a narrative of “fulfillment” at the expense of consistency and factual accuracy, leading to what former members describe as a “rewritten history”.
Shincheonji’s doctrines have exhibited a notable fluidity, with various interpretations changing over time. This section details several key doctrinal shifts, illustrating the organization’s adaptability in its teachings.
4.1. Timeline of Key Doctrinal Changes in Shincheonji
- Original Teaching: 12,000 sealed from each tribe must be achieved before tribulation.
- Current Teaching: “Partially sealed” members introduced; sealing and tribulation can occur simultaneously.
- Observed Discrepancy/Ex-Member Testimony: Tribes, especially Bartholomew, did not reach 12,000 by early 2020; tribe reports ceased. LMH stated 144,000 sealed in early 2020, but by July 2023, said sealing was prolonged due to Protestant interference.
- Implication of Change: Unfalsifiable claim; undermines sequential meaning of “After this” in Revelation; retroactive adjustment to failed prophecy.
Revelation 7:9-10 (Great Multitude)
- Original Teaching: Would not need to evangelize the great multitude after 144,000 sealed.
- Current Teaching: Still actively evangelizing, even more intensely.
- Observed Discrepancy/Ex-Member Testimony: Contradicts previous teaching on evangelism directives. LMH shifted timing, stating they would appear “amidst” tribulation.
- Implication of Change: Reveals adaptation to ongoing recruitment needs despite prophetic claims.
Revelation 11:9 (3.5 Days Witnesses Dead)
- Original Teaching: Figurative 3.5 years (100 days jail + 2.5 years probation) (Lee Man-hee, Revelation’s Reality (1985), pp. 165-167).
- Current Teaching: Literal 3.5 days (Jan 30 – Feb 2, 1981) (Lee Man-hee, Physical Fulfillment of Revelation, p. 245).
- Observed Discrepancy/Ex-Member Testimony: Clear shift from figurative to literal interpretation; demonstrates Lee Man-hee’s past incorrect testimony. Original interpretation illogical as actual jail time was less than 3.5 years.
- Implication of Change: Undermines claim of “perfect understanding” and immutability of revelation; suggests “adding and taking away” from prophecy.
Revelation 11:1 (Measuring Rod)
- Original Teaching: The Word from God, similar to the scroll in Revelation 10 (Lee Man-hee, Revelation’s Reality (1985), p. 155).
- Current Teaching: The “2nd witness” (Lee Man-hee, Physical Fulfillment of Revelation, pp. 229-230).
- Observed Discrepancy/Ex-Member Testimony: Fundamental change in symbolic interpretation. Reportedly helped explain departure of former right-hand man, Mr. Hong, by fitting his departure into the “prophecy”.
- Implication of Change: Illustrates fluidity and adaptability of core biblical interpretations.
Revelation 10 (Open Scroll & Lee’s Understanding)
- Original Teaching: Lee Man-hee received a perfect and complete understanding of Revelation’s fulfillment.
- Current Teaching: (Implied by changes) Understanding is subject to revision.
- Observed Discrepancy/Ex-Member Testimony: Documented changes (e.g., 3.5 days, 144,000, Revelation 18) contradict initial “perfect understanding” claim.
- Implication of Change: Raises fundamental questions about the authenticity and immutability of claimed revelations.
Matthew 11:11 (John the Baptist’s Fate)
- Original Teaching: (Not explicitly stated as original/current, but observed teaching) John the Baptist is in hell.
- Current Teaching: (Not explicitly stated as original/current, but observed teaching) John the Baptist is in hell.
- Observed Discrepancy/Ex-Member Testimony: Viewed as “reductive reasoning” and distortion of biblical text, based on “least in kingdom of heaven is greater than he”.
- Implication of Change: Diminishes biblical figures to potentially elevate Chairman Lee’s unique position.
Justification for Deception
- Original Teaching: Lying is permissible if it propels God’s purpose; Abraham’s actions cited as example.
- Current Teaching: Lying is permissible if it propels God’s purpose; Abraham’s actions cited as example.
- Observed Discrepancy/Ex-Member Testimony: Systematic and doctrinally sanctioned use of deception in evangelism; “Food at the proper time” phrase used to delay answers.
- Implication of Change: Significant ethical concern; hallmark of high-control groups; underpins psychological manipulation and isolation.
Revelation 18 (Judgment of Babylon)
- Original Teaching: Events prophesied in Rv 18 have already been physically fulfilled (Lee Man-hee, The Creation of Heaven and Earth (2009), p. 243; The Physical Fulfillment of Revelation (2015), p. 453).
- Current Teaching: The revelation has been fulfilled up to Rev 17, and Rev 18 and the works after it are still to come (Lee Man-hee letter, March 7, 2023).
- Observed Discrepancy/Ex-Member Testimony: Direct contradiction in the timeline of fulfillment for Revelation 18.
- Implication of Change: Undermines the claim of consistent, unchanging “physical fulfillment” and suggests retroactive adjustment of prophecy.
Revelation 13 (Beast of the Earth)
- Original Teaching: Lee Cho-Joo (Lee Man-hee, Revelation’s Reality (1985)).
- Current Teaching: Oh Pyeong-Ho (Lee Man-hee, Physical Fulfillment of Revelation).
- Observed Discrepancy/Ex-Member Testimony: Clear change in the identity of a key prophetic figure. Oh Pyeong-Ho portrayed as destroyer, linked to Balaam, Nicholas, beast with ten horns, and responsible for Tabernacle Temple’s “destruction”.
- Implication of Change: Demonstrates reinterpretation to fit evolving historical narrative and assign roles to specific individuals.
Revelation 11:13 (7,000 Killed)
- Original Teaching: “Weird mathematical equation” (seven shepherds times ten elders times a hundred) representing “Babylon” (Lee Man-hee, Revelation’s Reality (1985)).
- Current Teaching: (Current interpretation not explicitly detailed in sources, but change noted).
- Observed Discrepancy/Ex-Member Testimony: Shift from a complex symbolic calculation to a different understanding.
- Implication of Change: Highlights fluidity in interpreting symbolic numbers and events.
Number of Wars in Revelation
- Original Teaching: Two wars.
- Current Teaching: Three wars, then back to two.
- Observed Discrepancy/Ex-Member Testimony: Direct change in the number of prophesied wars.
- Implication of Change: Indicates arbitrary adjustments to prophetic details.
4.2. Specific Examples of Doctrinal Shifts (Detailed)
4.2.1. Revelation 11:9: The “3.5 Days” Interpretation
Shincheonji previously taught that the “3.5 days” the two witnesses are dead in Revelation 11:9 was a figurative period, representing 3.5 years of jail time plus probation for the witnesses. This was explained as 100 days in prison followed by 2.5 years of suspended sentence/probation, which, due to the timing across a new year, was rounded to 1 year + 2.5 years = 3.5 years. During this period, the witnesses were considered “spiritually dead” because they were prevented from fulfilling their duty of testifying. This interpretation can be found in Lee Man-hee’s book,
Revelation’s Reality (1985), specifically on pages 165-167.
This interpretation has been drastically changed to a literal 3.5 days, specifically from January 30 to February 2, 1981. This represents a clear and significant shift from a figurative interpretation to a literal one. Former members highlight that this change demonstrates Lee Man-hee’s past incorrect testimony and his act of “adding and taking away” from his own interpretation of Revelation’s fulfillment, which, according to his own doctrine (Revelation 22:18-19), would be considered a sin. This directly undermines his claim of having received a “perfect understanding” of Revelation. The current teaching is found in Lee Man-hee’s
Physical Fulfillment of Revelation on page 245.
4.2.2. Revelation 11:1: The “Measuring Rod” Interpretation
Shincheonji previously taught that the “measuring rod” in Revelation 11:1 symbolized the “Word from God,” akin to the scroll in Revelation 10. This was detailed in Lee Man-hee’s
Revelation’s Reality (1985) on page 155, where it states that receiving the measuring rod is related to receiving the little book, and both are “words from God”. The interpretation has shifted, and it is now taught to represent the “2nd witness”. This current teaching is found in Lee Man-hee’s
Physical Fulfillment of Revelation on pages 229-230. This is another clear example of a fundamental change in the symbolic interpretation of a key biblical element within Shincheonji’s doctrine, further illustrating the fluidity and adaptability of their teachings over time. This change reportedly helped explain why a former right-hand man of LMH, Mr. Hong, left SCJ, by fitting his departure into the “prophecy”.
4.2.3. Revelation 10: The “Open Scroll” and Lee Man-hee’s Understanding
Lee Man-hee’s central claim is that he is the “New John” who received the “opened book” (the little scroll) from Jesus through an angel, and by eating it, he gained a perfect and complete understanding of Revelation’s fulfillment. He then testifies about what he has “seen and heard” as the physical reality of Revelation. The documented doctrinal changes, such as the shifts in the 3.5 days prophecy, the reinterpretation of the 144,000, the measuring rod, and Revelation 18, directly contradict the assertion of having a “perfect understanding” from the outset. If his understanding was truly perfect and divinely revealed, such significant revisions and reinterpretations would not be necessary. This raises fundamental questions about the authenticity and immutability of his claimed revelations.
The evidence demonstrates that doctrinal changes are not isolated incidents related solely to Revelation 7, but span various biblical interpretations (e.g., 3.5 days, measuring rod, John the Baptist’s fate, Revelation 18, Beast of the Earth, 7,000 killed, number of wars). This indicates a pervasive and continuous pattern of reinterpretation and adaptation of core tenets within Shincheonji. This inherent fluidity, while appearing contradictory from an external perspective, serves a critical function: it maintains the absolute authority of Chairman Lee Man-hee. By being the sole “New John” who “eats the scroll” and reveals “fulfillment,” he possesses the power to continuously adjust the narrative to accommodate new realities, past failures, or evolving needs of the organization. This ensures that the doctrine always aligns with his current pronouncements, effectively making him the ultimate, unquestionable source of truth. The argument that “details don’t matter” when inconsistencies are exposed is a direct manifestation of this strategy to deflect criticism and preserve his infallible image. This dynamic creates a “moving target” for critics and makes it exceedingly challenging for members to independently verify claims or identify inconsistencies. It also explains why members might remain within the group despite encountering contradictions, as questioning the doctrine is often framed internally as questioning God’s will, lacking spiritual understanding, or succumbing to “Satan’s temptations”. This reinforces the group’s control over its members’ cognitive processes.
4.2.4. Matthew 11:11: Interpretation of John the Baptist’s Fate
Shincheonji reportedly interprets Matthew 11:11 (“Truly I tell you, among those born of women there has not risen anyone greater than John the Baptist; yet whoever is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he”) to conclude that John the Baptist must be in hell. This interpretation is viewed by critics as an example of “reductive reasoning” and a distortion of biblical text. Such an interpretation may serve to diminish the stature of revered biblical figures, potentially to elevate the perceived unique position and authority of Chairman Lee Man-hee within their theological framework.
4.2.5. Justification for Deception and Secrecy in Evangelism
Shincheonji is widely known for its “deceptive evangelism,” where members secretly teach their doctrines while deliberately hiding their affiliation. Members are “commanded to not disclose their denomination name (Shincheonji)” and are taught that “lying is acceptable to ‘protect’ the group from scrutiny”. A common tactic involves using the phrase “Food at the proper time” to delay answering difficult or questionable doctrinal points, thereby conditioning recruits to suppress critical thought and absorb their beliefs more readily. Shincheonji justifies lying to family and friends by citing the story of Abraham hiding facts from his son as a biblical example to follow, arguing that such deception “propels God’s purpose”. This systematic and doctrinally sanctioned use of deception is a significant ethical concern and a hallmark characteristic identified by former members and anti-cult movements. It highlights a fundamental divergence in ethical approach compared to mainstream Christian teachings, which typically emphasize truthfulness and transparency. This practice underpins the psychological manipulation and isolation tactics employed by the group.
4.2.6. Revelation 13: The Identity of the “Beast of the Earth”
Shincheonji’s interpretation of the “Beast of the Earth” in Revelation 13 has also undergone a significant change. In his 1985 book, Revelation’s Reality, Lee Man-hee initially identified this figure as Lee Cho-Joo. However, later teachings, found in
Physical Fulfillment of Revelation, changed this identity to Oh Pyeong-Ho. Shincheonji’s teaching materials portray Oh Pyeong-Ho as the destroyer, linking him to various negative biblical figures like Balaam, Nicholas, and the “beast with ten horns”. SCJ teaches that Mr. Oh entered the Tabernacle Temple with ulterior motives to take it over and make it Presbyterian, eventually changing its name to Isaac Church. This is framed as the “end of the spiritual Israel” and the “traditional churches of Christianity”.
4.2.7. Revelation 11:13: The “7,000 Killed”
The interpretation of the “7,000 killed” in Revelation 11:13 has also shifted. In Revelation’s Reality (1985), this was defined as a “weird mathematical equation” involving “seven shepherds times ten elders times a hundred,” which was said to represent “Babylon”. While the current interpretation is not explicitly detailed in the provided sources, the change from a complex symbolic calculation highlights a doctrinal shift.
4.2.8. Number of Wars in Revelation
Former members have noted that the number of wars mentioned in Revelation teaching changed from two to three, and then back to two. This fluctuation in a specific prophetic detail further illustrates the adaptability of Shincheonji’s interpretations.
4.2.9. Gaslighting and Suppression of Dissent
Shincheonji employs gaslighting tactics to manage internal inconsistencies and suppress dissent among members. When members raise questions or express doubts about doctrinal changes or historical discrepancies, these concerns are often dismissed as “persecution” or framed as “satanic opposition” to divine truth. This deflection mechanism prevents genuine critical inquiry and reinforces the idea that any questioning of Shincheonji’s teachings or Chairman Lee’s authority is a spiritual failing. Instructors may tell members that “details don’t matter” or that they are not yet ready for certain “truths” (using the “Food at the proper time” justification). This continuous reshaping of doctrine to fit Lee Man-hee’s actions and pronouncements, coupled with the dismissal of legitimate concerns, creates an environment where members are conditioned to accept contradictions and maintain blind devotion, making it difficult for them to leave or challenge the group’s narrative.
Shincheonji’s theological framework is deeply intertwined with its historical narratives, which are presented as literal fulfillments of prophecy. A comparison of these narratives with verifiable historical and legal records reveals significant discrepancies, highlighting the extent to which Shincheonji constructs its own version of history to support its theological claims.
5.1. Mr. Yoo and the Westminster Seminary Claim
Shincheonji’s narrative includes a specific interpretation of Revelation 12:14, where the “woman” who “flew on the two wings of a great eagle to the wilderness” is identified as Mr. Yoo, the leader of the Tabernacle Temple. They assert that this “wilderness” is Westminster Theological Seminary in the U.S., where Mr. Yoo was supposedly “nurtured” for 3.5 years. This interpretation is presented as “sacred truth” and is used internally to validate Shincheonji’s authority and to isolate members from traditional Christian theology.
However, critical analysis reveals that Shincheonji has used “lying fake photo[s]” of a pastor standing at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in NYC to falsely represent Westminster Theological Seminary. There is no credible evidence from the provided information or widely available historical records to support the claim that the Mr. Yoo who led the Tabernacle Temple attended or was “nurtured” at Westminster Theological Seminary. The provided curriculum vitae of a “William Yoo” indicates an academic at Columbia Theological Seminary, entirely unrelated to the Mr. Yoo of the Tabernacle Temple or the Westminster Seminary claim.
5.2. The Tabernacle Temple and the “SEC Invasion”
Shincheonji frames the events surrounding the Tabernacle Temple (where Lee Man-hee was an early member) as the physical fulfillment of key Revelation prophecies. They claim that after Lee joined the Tabernacle Temple (established by seven “messengers” including Mr. Yoo), corruption and divisions arose. They assert that a “false pastor influenced by the spirit of Satan” (identified as Oh Pyeong-ho, an evangelist who became head of the Temple) entered, misled its leaders, and effectively dissolved the Temple. Oh is said to have introduced the Stewardship Education Center (SEC), which Shincheonji portrays as playing a “destructive role,” associated with “heretic ‘Nicolaites’,” “seven destroyers,” a “beast coming out of the sea,” and a “great prostitute” (identified as Tak, head of the SEC). Lee Man-hee is positioned as the “one who overcomes,” who fought and was victorious over these corrupting elements, leading to the establishment of Shincheonji on March 14, 1984. These events are collectively referred to as the “destruction of the first tabernacle”.
Historically, the Tabernacle Temple, founded in 1966, did indeed face significant internal issues, including scandals, fraud, and abuse. Its leader, Yoo Jae-yeol, was imprisoned for fraud and embezzlement in 1975. Notably, Lee Man-hee himself was among the followers who filed criminal complaints against the Tabernacle Temple leaders in 1971. The church was officially dismantled when Yoo Jae-yeol immigrated to the United States in October 1980. Lee Man-hee criticized the Tabernacle Temple’s decision to affiliate with the Presbyterian Church, viewing it as a corruption.
The Stewardship Education Center (SEC), contrary to Shincheonji’s portrayal, was a legitimate, non-denominational training institute. Its purpose was to help church leaders develop in stewardship, offering basic seminars, not to “wage spiritual war” or act as a destructive force. Shincheonji’s claim that the SEC possessed the power to appoint pastors, shut down ministries, or label churches as heretical is false.
Furthermore, there are significant discrepancies in Shincheonji’s timeline regarding the SEC. Shincheonji teaches that the SEC existed for only seven years and was “destroyed” in 1991, fulfilling a symbolic period of judgment. However, documented printing histories of SEC’s publications confirm that their materials were still being published as late as 1995. This factual discrepancy directly refutes Shincheonji’s timeline. If the SEC was still functioning beyond its supposed prophetic deadline, then that part of the prophecy fails. Moreover, the physical Tabernacle Temple building itself was sold to the Seoul Metropolitan Government in 1977 and was abandoned and awaiting demolition by 1979. This contradicts the narrative of it being “infiltrated” or “destroyed” by the SEC in the 1980s or 1990s as a literal fulfillment of prophecy.
The claims regarding Mr. Yoo at Westminster Seminary and the true nature and timeline of the SEC are demonstrably false or highly misleading when compared to external, verifiable evidence. This indicates a deliberate construction of a historical narrative that is not rooted in factual accuracy but rather designed to fit and validate a pre-determined prophetic interpretation. The use of “lying fake photo[s]” is direct evidence of intentional deception. For Shincheonji, the “history” of the Tabernacle Temple and Lee Man-hee’s role within it is not simply background; it is presented as the physical fulfillment of Revelation. Therefore, altering or fabricating these historical details is tantamount to altering the “fulfillment” of prophecy itself. This makes the group’s “truth” dependent on a manufactured story rather than objective reality. The critical question posed by former members, “if the very timeline this teaching is based on is historically false, what does that say about the salvation they promise?” , encapsulates this profound implication. This practice of fabricating historical details for doctrinal purposes fundamentally undermines the group’s claim to “truth” and its assertion that its teachings are “all found in the Bible”. It reveals a deep-seated reliance on deception at the foundational level of their theological system, which is a major characteristic of high-control groups often labeled as cults.
5.3. Lee Man-hee’s “3.5 Days in Prison”
As detailed in Section 4.2.1, Shincheonji interprets the “3.5 days” the witnesses are dead in Revelation 11:9 as a direct fulfillment through Lee Man-hee’s detention. The official teaching has shifted from a figurative 3.5 years of jail plus probation to a literal 3.5 days from January 30 to February 2, 1981.
Lee Man-hee has a verifiable history of arrests and legal proceedings in South Korea, none of which directly align with a specific “3.5 days” or “3.5 years” prophetic fulfillment as claimed:
Lee Man-hee’s Documented Legal History
Event: February 1965
- Charges: Violating the National Security Act (pro-communist film portrayal)
- Outcome/Sentence: Released on probation after agreeing to edit film
- Shincheonji’s Narrative Link (if any): Not directly linked by Shincheonji to Revelation 11:9 prophecy
Event: July 31, 2020
- Charges: Violating Infectious Disease and Control Act (withholding COVID-19 data), embezzlement (3.2-5 billion won), obstruction of public affairs
- Outcome/Sentence: Arrested; later acquitted of infectious disease violation, convicted of embezzlement and obstruction of public affairs
- Shincheonji’s Narrative Link (if any): Not directly linked to “3.5 days” prophecy; occurred much later than claimed 1981 fulfillment
Event: January 13, 2021
- Charges: (Continuation of 2020 charges)
- Outcome/Sentence: Acquitted of violating infectious disease laws
- Shincheonji’s Narrative Link (if any): N/A
Event: August 2022
- Charges: Embezzlement (5.6 billion won for “Palace of Peace”), obstruction of business (unapproved religious events)
- Outcome/Sentence: Three-year prison term, suspended for five years (remains out on probation)
- Shincheonji’s Narrative Link (if any): N/A
Event: June 2025 (Allegations)
- Charges: Using private convoy to control traffic, receiving preferential treatment for court-ordered education
- Outcome/Sentence: Facing criticism; Justice Ministry cited health issues for special treatment
- Shincheonji’s Narrative Link (if any): N/A
The documented legal history of Lee Man-hee does not support a specific 3.5-day or 3.5-year period of imprisonment or detention that aligns with the Shincheonji doctrine’s interpretation of Revelation 11:9. The shift to a precise January 30 – February 2, 1981, date appears to be an internal reinterpretation that lacks corroboration from public police or court records. This factual disproof directly challenges Shincheonji’s claims by presenting verifiable facts. By comparing the actual dates, charges, and outcomes of Lee Man-hee’s legal detentions against the specific “3.5 days” or “3.5 years” claimed as prophetic fulfillment, it becomes evident that his real-world experiences do not align with the Shincheonji narrative. This directly undermines the credibility of his “witness” and his claim to have “seen and heard the physical fulfillment of Revelation”. By presenting these documented facts, the report promotes transparency and holds Shincheonji’s historical narratives accountable to external evidence. This is crucial for informed decision-making and for challenging the group’s claims of divine authority.
The examination of Shincheonji Church of Jesus reveals a consistent pattern of doctrinal adaptation and historical revisionism. The core claim that prophecies are understood only upon their physical fulfillment, interpreted solely by Chairman Lee Man-hee, provides a flexible framework that allows the organization to reinterpret events and adjust its teachings when initial predictions fail. This is evident in the shifting interpretations of Revelation 7 concerning the 144,000 members and the impact of the “Great Tribulation,” where the concept of “partially sealed” members was introduced and the tribulation’s target was re-contextualized to fit unforeseen realities like the COVID-19 pandemic.
This adaptive approach stands in stark contrast to biblical principles of prophecy, particularly those outlined in Deuteronomy 18:22, which require a prophet’s words to “take place or prove true” as spoken. Shincheonji’s continuous need for reinterpretation suggests a fundamental divergence from this standard, undermining its claims to divine authority and infallible revelation.
Furthermore, the report highlights significant discrepancies between Shincheonji’s historical narratives and verifiable facts. The misrepresentation of Mr. Yoo’s connection to Westminster Seminary, including the use of fabricated imagery, and the distorted portrayal of the Tabernacle Temple and the Stewardship Education Center, reveal a deliberate construction of history to validate theological claims. These alterations of foundational historical details, presented as literal fulfillments of prophecy, demonstrate a reliance on manufactured narratives rather than objective reality.
The doctrine of physical immortality for Chairman Lee Man-hee presents a particularly vulnerable point for Shincheonji, as it is directly challenged by the empirical reality of aging and death. The eventual passing of Chairman Lee would necessitate a profound doctrinal shift or explanation, potentially leading to a significant crisis of faith for adherents.
Collectively, these findings indicate that Shincheonji’s internal narrative is designed to maintain the absolute authority of its leader and to insulate the organization from external scrutiny and failed predictions. The systematic use of deception in recruitment and the justification of lying to members’ families further underscore the group’s manipulative tactics. The fluidity of doctrine and the fabrication of historical events are not isolated incidents but appear to be systemic mechanisms employed to preserve the organization’s claims of unique truth and divine fulfillment, despite contradictions with verifiable facts and traditional biblical standards.
Additional References for more Exploration
1. The Central Role of Lee Man-hee: The "Promised Pastor" and "New John"
Shincheonji doctrine asserts that LMH has uniquely “seen and heard all of the events of Revelation” and has received the “opened scroll” directly from Jesus, thereby granting him the sole and exclusive capacity to decipher its “secret metaphors”. This positions his personal testimony as the ultimate and exclusive source of truth concerning Revelation’s fulfillment, rendering his interpretations non-negotiable within the movement.
A fundamental aspect of Shincheonji’s theological architecture is the self-validating nature of its leader’s prophetic claims. The entire framework of belief is meticulously constructed around Lee Man-hee’s exclusive assertion of having personally witnessed and received the fulfilled Revelation. This is not merely a doctrinal point; it constitutes the absolute foundation of Shincheonji’s authority and its unique claim to truth. If Lee Man-hee is indeed the sole individual who truly comprehends Revelation because he physically observed its fulfillment, then any past inaccuracies in his testimony or any subsequent modifications to doctrine cannot be attributed to human fallibility. Instead, such changes must be reinterpreted as a “new understanding” or a clearer comprehension that emerges as “more fulfillment took place”. This creates a closed epistemological loop where Lee Man-hee’s pronouncements are inherently self-authenticating, making external critique or internal questioning extremely challenging to reconcile without a complete rejection of the entire system. This inherent structure explains why doctrinal adjustments are not just a possibility but a necessity for Shincheonji to maintain its narrative in the face of contradictory realities or evolving circumstances. It also underscores the profound vulnerability of the entire system to Lee Man-hee’s physical presence and his continued ability to “reveal” new truths, particularly given his advanced age and the group’s doctrine of physical immortality.
2. Doctrinal Evolution: Adapting "Truth" to "Fulfillment"
2.1 Detailed Analysis of Key Doctrinal Shifts
The following table illustrates some of the most prominent documented changes in Shincheonji’s interpretations of Revelation:
| Biblical Reference | Previous Doctrine/Interpretation | Current Doctrine/Interpretation | Key Discrepancy/Implication |
| Revelation 11:9 (The 3.5 Days) | Figurative 3.5 years of jail + probation for “two witnesses,” representing a period of spiritual death due to inability to testify. | Literal 3.5 days, specifically January 30 to February 2, 1981. | Shift from figurative to literal interpretation, retroactively fitting a specific historical period. |
| Revelation 11:1 (The Measuring Rod) | The “Word from God,” similar to the scroll in Revelation 10; measuring was synonymous with judgment. | The “second witness”; measurement is now interpreted as evaluating people’s knowledge and faith. | Change in the symbolic meaning of a key prophetic object and action. |
| Revelation 18 (Judgment of Babylon) | Explicitly stated as “already physically fulfilled” in Lee Man-hee’s 2009 book, ‘The Creation of Heaven and Earth’. | Stated in a March 2023 letter from Lee Man-hee that “Rev 18 and the works after it are still to come”. | Direct contradiction regarding the fulfillment status of a major prophetic event. |
| Revelation 7 (The 144,000 & Great Tribulation) | Sequential fulfillment: 12,000 sealed from each tribe, then tribulation and great multitude. Evangelism would cease as the great multitude would automatically flock to SCJ. | Introduction of “partially sealed” members when targets were not met. COVID-19 retroactively identified as the tribulation, occurring before full sealing. Continued, even increased, evangelism. | Failure to meet membership targets led to a new, “unfalsifiable” concept and a shift in the timeline of prophetic events, contradicting previous teachings on evangelism. |
2.2 Shincheonji’s Internal Explanations and Justifications for Changes
When confronted with questions about these doctrinal shifts, Shincheonji instructors frequently employ specific phrases and explanations to manage members’ understanding and stem critical inquiry. The phrase “Food at the proper time” is a common deferral tactic, used to conceal “questionable elements of their doctrine” from new recruits. This mechanism is designed to suppress critical thought, gradually conditioning recruits to accept that certain truths are revealed only when they are deemed “ready” or at an appropriate stage of their spiritual development, thereby delaying exposure to potentially contradictory information.
Doctrinal modifications are often rationalized by assertions that Lee Man-hee receives “new understandings” or that comprehension becomes clearer as “more fulfillment took place”. This explanation, however, directly conflicts with Lee Man-hee’s foundational claim of having already “seen and heard all events of Revelation” and having received a complete understanding of the “opened scroll”. If his initial understanding was perfect, such significant revisions should not be necessary.
Furthermore, when faced with inconsistencies or outright contradictions, Shincheonji members or instructors may dismiss these concerns by stating that “details don’t matter” or that “God knows the reason why He changed the Doctrine”. This tactic effectively shifts responsibility away from Lee Man-hee and onto divine will, thereby precluding further questioning or scrutiny.
2.3 Examination of Contradictions and Inconsistencies Arising from These Adaptations
The consistent pattern of doctrinal changes, particularly in direct response to failed predictions (such as the inability to meet the 144,000 member target or the unexpected impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Shincheonji itself), functions as a highly effective mechanism for maintaining internal consistency and managing psychological discomfort among adherents. When external realities or internal inconsistencies contradict a prophecy or teaching, Shincheonji does not acknowledge error. Instead, it redefines the prophecy, its timeline, or its fulfillment. This strategic adaptation is crucial for the group’s continued operation. By providing a new explanation (e.g., “new understanding,” “partially sealed,” “God’s will”), even if it directly contradicts previous teachings, it enables members to sustain their belief in the face of disconfirming evidence, thereby preserving the core narrative and Lee Man-hee’s authority. This makes Shincheonji highly resilient to both external critique and internal doubt, as any challenge can be absorbed and reinterpreted within their flexible theological framework. It also highlights the immense psychological pressure on members to conform their understanding to the latest “truth,” rather than engaging in independent critical evaluation. This dynamic is sharply contrasted by the observation that “Truth is effortless and never changes. It is solid. Lies are intentional, deliberate and exhausting”.
The documented instances of Lee Man-hee’s shifting testimony about Revelation’s fulfillment directly undermine his central claim of having received the “opened scroll” and personally witnessed all events. Former members explicitly state that by “adding and taking away from his testimony,” Lee Man-hee has “sinned according to his own interpretation of Rev 22:18-19”. If he possessed perfect understanding, such significant revisions would be unnecessary.
The failure of Shincheonji to meet the 12,000 sealed members per tribe target by early 2020, followed by the cessation of reporting, and the COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affecting Shincheonji in Korea (rather than the world’s churches or leading to people flocking to them), represent significant unfulfilled predictions. The subsequent introduction of concepts like “partially sealed” to retroactively fit current events into prophecies is a clear example of reinterpretation to avoid admitting failure. Biblical passages such as Deuteronomy 18:22 provide a criterion for identifying false prophets: “If a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD but the thing does not take place or prove true, it is a word that the LORD has not spoken”. The documented doctrinal changes and unfulfilled predictions within Shincheonji’s narrative raise critical questions about Lee Man-hee’s prophetic claims under this widely accepted biblical standard.
3.1 Strategies for Online Information Control, Correction, and Narrative Management
Shincheonji employs a strategy of dismissing questions, disagreements, and external critiques as “persecution” or “satanic opposition to heavenly doctrine”. This is a common tactic used by high-control groups to invalidate external criticism and reinforce internal cohesion among members. The group actively accuses former members and critics of “slander”, aiming to discredit dissenting voices and control the public narrative surrounding the organization.
Shincheonji consistently emphasizes that its teachings are derived solely from the Bible and Lee Man-hee’s unique, divinely-given understanding, implying that any external critiques or alternative interpretations are human-made and therefore inherently false or misleading. This approach establishes Shincheonji as the exclusive arbiter of truth.
3.2 Analysis of How External Critiques and Public Opinion Influence Their Online Responses
The existence of active online communities, such as the r/Shincheonji subreddit, where former members share testimonies and engage in detailed discussions about doctrinal changes, indicates a significant and persistent platform for external critique. These discussions frequently highlight the very inconsistencies that Shincheonji seeks to manage. The specific doctrinal changes, particularly those concerning the 144,000 and the COVID-19 pandemic, are explicitly cited by former members as primary reasons for their departure. This strong feedback loop suggests that Shincheonji is acutely aware of these criticisms and adapts its explanations and messaging to counter them, especially in public forums.
The introduction of concepts like “partially sealed” in Revelation 7 doctrine is identified by former members as a “convenient” and “obvious change” designed to “retroactively include a global event” (COVID-19) into their prophecy. This demonstrates a direct adaptive response to a real-world event that challenged their established narrative, indicating a reactive strategy to manage public perception and internal consistency.
The interaction between external scrutiny and Shincheonji’s internal responses reveals a dynamic process of narrative refinement. External challenges, often originating from former members or anti-cult organizations, effectively expose inconsistencies or unfulfilled prophecies within Shincheonji’s narrative. In response, Shincheonji adjusts its doctrine or refines its explanations. These new narratives are then disseminated by its information management teams across social media and other platforms. This process is not merely defensive; it constitutes a proactive form of narrative engineering, aimed at “correcting” perceived “slander” and refining explanations for both current members and potential recruits. This continuous and adaptive narrative engineering makes it exceptionally challenging for outsiders to pinpoint a stable or unchanging “truth” from Shincheonji, as their core narrative is constantly shifting to maintain internal coherence and external plausibility. It also implies that public critiques, while essential for awareness, can inadvertently provide Shincheonji with new data points or challenges that they then strategically incorporate into their evolving explanations. This dynamic highlights the group’s capacity for strategic resilience in the face of scrutiny.
3.3 The Use of Social Media for Covert Recruitment and Deceptive Evangelism
Shincheonji operates covertly in its recruitment efforts, employing manipulation and deception to attract potential members without initially revealing its true identity. This includes refusing to name their church, claiming to be “nondenominational” or an “international church”. A significant portion of their recruitment now occurs online, particularly via Zoom, which further facilitates the concealment of their true identity until a recruit is deeply involved.
4. Recruitment and Indoctrination: Refining the Narrative
4.1 How Doctrinal Adjustments are Integrated into Bible Study Programs and Explanations for New Recruits
The indoctrination process within Shincheonji typically commences in a one-on-one setting before transitioning to larger classroom environments. This phased approach allows for a controlled, gradual exposure to Shincheonji’s unique teachings. A key deceptive tactic involves pairing new trainees with “maintainers,” who are in fact experienced Shincheonji members posing as new recruits. These maintainers subtly model desired opinions and provide a false impression of the Bible study content, thereby creating an artificial sense of peer validation for the Shincheonji narrative.
The phrase “food at the proper time” is strategically utilized by instructors to control the dissemination of information and defer questions about “questionable elements of their doctrine”. This tactic is designed to gradually condition recruits to suppress critical thought, ensuring that more extreme or contradictory doctrines are introduced only once the recruit is emotionally and mentally invested and thus less inclined to question.
4.2 Tactics Employed During Recruitment
Shincheonji employs a range of sophisticated tactics during its recruitment process:
- Deception and Secrecy: Shincheonji members are explicitly “commanded to not disclose their denomination name” and are taught that “lying is acceptable to ‘protect’ the group from scrutiny”. This deceptive practice is justified internally by referencing biblical figures like Abraham or by claiming that Jesus also instructed people not to reveal his identity “until the right time”.
- “Love-Bombing”: Recruits are subjected to “love-bombing,” characterized by excessive friendliness, provision of free meals, emotional support, and engaging in deep, often intense, conversations. These actions are designed to rapidly foster a sense of connection and value in the recruit. This creates a strong emotional bond that significantly complicates disengagement later.
- Time Monopolization: The frequency of “Bible study” sessions rapidly escalates from an initial twice a week to over 20 hours per week. This intense time commitment often leads to the neglect of academic coursework, professional responsibilities, and existing social connections, further isolating recruits within the Shincheonji environment.
- Harsh Criticism of Current Beliefs: During the early stages of recruitment, Shincheonji actively attempts to dismantle a recruit’s existing belief system. This frequently involves ad-hominem attacks, such as labeling individuals “arrogant” if they express disagreement with Shincheonji’s teachings. This tactic aims to render individuals more susceptible to adopting Shincheonji’s beliefs by framing their resistance as a personal flaw.
- Exploiting Vulnerabilities: Shincheonji strategically targets young adults, particularly those experiencing “hard times,” by offering psychological counseling at “counseling cafés”. These seemingly benign services serve as a front to introduce Bible study and ultimately channel individuals into Shincheonji’s recruitment pipeline.
4.3 The Role of Secrecy and the Justification of Deception in Their Proselytizing Efforts
The entire recruitment process is predicated on a “lack of consent,” as it is recognized that “No one wants to join a cult”. Members are “manipulated into the cult” and are only informed that their initial lack of consent was “for their benefit”
after they have been thoroughly indoctrinated, thereby minimizing disapproval or resistance.
Members are actively pressured to conceal their involvement from family and friends, which significantly hinders their ability to leave the group. Former members have testified that they hid their involvement for years because Shincheonji taught them to deceive others to “avoid persecution”.
A striking characteristic of Shincheonji’s operational methodology is the redefinition of deception, elevating it from a moral transgression to a justifiable, even commendable, practice. By reframing lying and withholding information as necessary and even virtuous acts undertaken for “God’s purpose”, Shincheonji systematically undermines conventional moral norms of honesty and transparency. This allows members to rationalize behaviors that would otherwise be considered unethical, creating a significant barrier to critical self-reflection and external accountability. The assertion that “truth holds up against scrutiny” is ironically contradicted by their own reliance on deception. This redefinition of deception makes it extremely difficult for new recruits to discern the true nature of the group, as the very act of seeking clarifying information is met with sanctioned dishonesty. It also contributes significantly to the isolation of members from their existing social networks, as honesty with outside relationships is actively discouraged or forbidden, leading to fractured families and social alienation.
5. Implications and Warning Signs for Concerned Stakeholders
5.1 The Impact of Doctrinal Fluidity on Members’ Critical Thinking and Faith
The continuous and often contradictory reshaping of doctrine to align with Lee Man-hee’s actions or external events fosters a state of profound devotion among members. In this environment, any challenge to Lee Man-hee’s teachings or authority is framed as tantamount to heresy, effectively silencing dissent. Recruits are systematically conditioned to abandon critical thinking in favor of adopting “sound bites” and pre-approved narratives provided by the group. This process gradually erodes their capacity for independent thought and judgment.
Internal doubts or questions are routinely reframed as “spiritual failures” or a lack of sincerity, leading members to believe that leaving Shincheonji is equivalent to “rejecting God”. This psychological manipulation creates immense internal pressure to remain within the group. Former members frequently describe the profound pain and disillusionment of realizing they were deceived, grappling with the “reality of being deceived” after years of commitment.
The cumulative effect of Shincheonji’s informational control and psychological tactics systematically undermines an individual’s capacity for independent critical assessment, leading to a profound reliance on the group’s interpretations of reality. This renders members highly susceptible to ongoing manipulation and makes them resistant to external information, even from concerned loved ones, as such information is automatically categorized as “slander” or “persecution.” This creates a significant barrier to exit and recovery.
5.2 Key Red Flags and Behavioral Indicators for Identifying Shincheonji Involvement
For individuals and communities seeking to identify potential Shincheonji involvement, several key red flags and behavioral indicators warrant attention:
- Secrecy and Evasion: Individuals will refuse to name their church or religious affiliation, often claiming to be “nondenominational,” an “international church,” or simply “Bible study”.
- Intense Time Commitment: A rapid and significant escalation of time dedicated to “Bible study” or religious activities, often reaching 20 or more hours per week, leading to neglect of other responsibilities.
- Isolation from Existing Networks: Pressure to conceal involvement from family and friends, and encouragement to reduce or sever relationships with those outside the group.
- “Love-Bombing” and Instant Connection: Encounters with overly friendly, charismatic individuals who offer immediate deep conversations, excessive emotional support, and free meals, fostering a quick, intense bond.
- Specific Language Use: Frequent use of unique phrases or concepts, such as “food at the proper time,” to deflect questions or control information flow.
- Exclusive Claims to “Hidden Knowledge”: Claims of possessing unique, hidden, or “opened” knowledge of the Bible, particularly the Book of Revelation, that no other church or denomination understands.
- Ad-Hominem Attacks and Gaslighting: Responding to questions or disagreements by labeling the questioner “arrogant” or framing doubts as spiritual failings or “persecution”.
- Personal Data Collection: Attempts to collect personal information, including photos (often disguised as “selfies”), addresses, and contact details, which may later be used for surveillance or pressure.
- Financial Pressure: Subtle or overt encouragement to donate money, even from individuals who are financially struggling, with promises that “God will provide”.
5.3 The Broader Societal Concerns Stemming from Their Manipulative Practices
Beyond the immediate effects of individual manipulation, the collective impact of Shincheonji’s operational practices generates systemic detriments that ripple through families and broader societal structures. The group’s internal justifications for deception and control (e.g., acting for “God’s purpose,” “avoiding persecution”) establish a moral framework that can lead to significant social disruption, personal suffering, and a drain on societal resources (e.g., mental health services, lost productivity). This is not merely a collection of isolated incidents but a direct consequence of their operational model and self-serving theological justifications.
- Relationship Destruction: Shincheonji’s manipulative tactics have been widely reported to “destroy relationships,” particularly within families, as members are encouraged to prioritize the group over their loved ones.
- Educational and Career Disruption: The intense time commitment demanded by Shincheonji often leads to students dropping out of college or pausing their career development, jeopardizing their futures.
- Financial Exploitation: Adherents are encouraged to relinquish worldly possessions, including savings, for the group’s cause , leading to significant financial harm.
- Mental Health Impact: Former members frequently experience severe mental health challenges and a sudden, profound loss of social structure and community upon leaving Shincheonji, given the extreme social lifestyle they were accustomed to.
- Misuse of Public Resources and Privilege: Documented instances of Lee Man-hee’s use of private convoys with illegal sirens and alleged preferential treatment during court-ordered education sessions highlight a disregard for public norms and a potential abuse of influence or privilege within society.
- Public Health Risk: The significant COVID-19 cluster infection traced back to Shincheonji in South Korea in 2020 demonstrated the tangible public health risks associated with the group’s practices, particularly its large gatherings and initial reluctance to provide full member lists for contact tracing.
For individuals and communities, recognizing the specific behavioral indicators and understanding the underlying psychological and sociological mechanisms employed by Shincheonji is crucial for protection, intervention, and supporting those affected. The analysis concludes that sustained vigilance, informed awareness, and the dissemination of accurate, evidence-based information are essential in navigating the shifting and controlled narrative propagated by Shincheonji and mitigating its potential harms.
Shincheonji’s founder, Lee Man-hee, published several books in the 1980s that presented his interpretation of the Book of Revelation. These early doctrinal texts, such as “The Secret of Heaven: The Truth of Revelation” (1985) and its follow-up “Revelation’s Reality” (1988), were circulated among Shincheonji members. They were initially presented as the divinely inspired “fulfillment” of Revelation. For instance, the 1985 book interpreted Revelation chapter by chapter, claiming to unveil the “reality” of prophecy in modern times. These early teachings included specific prophetic narratives, such as Lee and a colleague (Hong Jong-ho) being the “two witnesses” of Revelation 11, and provided detailed timelines and symbol interpretations. For several years, members considered these teachings to be absolute truth from the “Promised Pastor”.
However, as Shincheonji’s doctrine evolved, the content of these first editions became problematic. Many interpretations in the 1985-1988 books were later altered or abandoned, leading to questions about their standing within the church.
Revisions and Corrections of Doctrine Over Time
Shincheonji has a documented history of revising its official doctrine, often through new editions of Lee’s books. Lee Man-hee’s Revelation commentary has been revised at least eight times between 1985 and 2017. The first significant revision occurred just three years after the 1985 book, when Lee’s co-founder Hong Jong-ho split from him, prompting Lee to rewrite relevant doctrinal portions. In 1988, “The Truth of Revelation 2” was issued, with “many parts” changed from the 1985 version to accommodate the new situation. This pattern of revision continued with a 1993 edition (“Revelation’s Reality”), a heavily revised 1999 hardcover edition (“Revelation”), “The Physical Fulfillment of Revelation” in 2005, and further updates around 2011 and 2017, each adjusting previously taught “truth”. Critics point out that if Lee’s received revelation was perfect, it should not have required “rewriting it 8 times over 33 years” due to emerging errors.
These changes were not minor but substantive doctrinal corrections. For example, Lee’s early interpretation of the “half hour of silence” in Revelation 8:1 changed drastically. Initially, Shincheonji taught that “half an hour” symbolized six months, based on a prophetic day-year principle, but a later edition reverted to interpreting it as literally 30 minutes. This reversal caused confusion and led some members to leave the church due to the inconsistency in supposed divine revelation. Shincheonji’s leadership attributed this discrepancy to a printing mistake, claiming “the teacher said 30 minutes from the start, but the book’s editor made an error”. However, audio recordings of Lee’s own lectures proved he originally taught the six-month interpretation, contradicting the official explanation. Such examples demonstrate how earlier “truths” were later deemed doctrinally incorrect and quietly corrected in new publications. Critics argue that a genuine divine revelation would not require serial corrections, stating that “if Lee’s revelations were true, only one perfect book would have been needed – not one that had to be ‘fixed’ repeatedly over the decades”.
Lee Man-hee’s Stance Toward His Older Books
Publicly, Lee Man-hee rarely acknowledges flaws in his prior books, but internally, there are indications that he and his church have disavowed those early editions. Former members report that Shincheonji now labels the old teachings as false or even “heresy”. One ex-member questioned how anyone can trust the current version if older books, once considered truth, are now called heresy. This suggests that within Shincheonji, the superseded doctrines are officially regarded as incorrect, effectively renouncing what was once taught as revealed truth. The organization has repudiated its earlier doctrinal iterations, even using the term “heresy” for teachings Lee himself authored in the 1980s. Current Shincheonji doctrine asserts that understanding has been “refined” over time, implying the old interpretations were flawed or misguided.
There is evidence that Lee Man-hee distances himself from the early publications. Whistleblowers allege that Lee denies or downplays his involvement in those books. For example, ex-members noted that Lee would “feign ignorance” if confronted about the 1985 “Revelation’s Reality” book, which was published by “Shincheonji Publishing”. One former member meticulously demonstrated that the 1985 book and related volumes could only have originated from Lee’s fledgling church, concluding that Lee “knows about it, and he would only be feigning ignorance (playing dumb) if he says he doesn’t”. Lee has never openly condemned himself as a heretic, but by denying knowledge of his old teachings or blaming “mistakes” on others, he essentially repudiates those earlier doctrines. Shincheonji’s official line is that Lee is the “Promised Pastor” who cannot err, so any past error is typically explained away as someone else’s fault or as preliminary understanding that was later clarified. This tacitly frames the 1980s books as doctrinally wrong, without Lee directly calling his own past self a false teacher.
Official Disavowal and Restricted Access to Outdated Editions
Shincheonji today formally uses only the latest doctrinal materials and has effectively disavowed earlier editions by removing them from circulation. There is no open promotion or distribution of Lee’s 1980s-1990s books to ordinary members. Instead, Shincheonji teaches that truth has been progressively revealed, rendering older texts obsolete. Current members, especially new Bible students, are not allowed access to the old books. Multiple ex-members testify that Shincheonji restricts or censors older publications to prevent confusion or comparison. For example, a former member who left in 2023 shared Shincheonji’s internal files and noted that Shincheonji has been “getting rid of [older materials]… deleting anything that might show changes in their doctrine”. Shincheonji’s own online portal began purging past content, like older sermon transcripts and class materials, once doctrinal updates were made, to hide evidence of shifting interpretations. As that ex-member observed, for 40 years, Shincheonji has removed or restricted access to outdated materials whenever doctrine changes, so that members see only the revised “truth”.
Access to early books is heavily discouraged. Shincheonji does not provide the 1985 or 1988 Revelation commentaries to students, and many current members are unaware those books ever existed. If a member obtains an old book or brings up its content, they may be told it is invalid or unauthorized. Shincheonji leadership’s stance is that only the current version of Lee’s teaching is doctrinally correct, implying prior versions were mistaken. Some outdated teachings are even branded as “satanic” or heretical influences that needed correction. This official disavowal is not always explicit in public but is reflected in how new printings replaced old ones and how discussing outdated doctrine is taboo internally.
Internal Handling of Outdated Editions and Doctrinal Changes
Within Shincheonji, the replacement of old doctrine with new is a managed process. When a new edition or updated teaching is released, members are expected to adopt it immediately. Any old lesson notes or books are quietly set aside. There have been reports of instructors instructing members to turn in or dispose of old study materials when revisions occur to ensure “one heart” in doctrine, though documentation of formal recall orders is limited. Nevertheless, the pattern is clear: outdated books are treated as if they never existed. Shincheonji’s internal e-learning system (Eduzion) has scrubbed archives of older materials, and even Korean-language instructional articles (CUBS or JSS documents) reflecting earlier interpretations have been deleted. The intent is to erase evidence of doctrinal U-turns, likened by an ex-member to “George Orwell’s 1984” where past records are continually altered.
There is also an element of intentional revisionism: Shincheonji’s official history does not advertise that Lee’s prophecies or teachings ever changed. Instead, changes are reframed as clarifications or deepening of understanding. For example, when the prophecy about the 144,000 sealed believers did not materialize as once expected, Lee “updated” the doctrine, and references to the old claim were erased from publications. Members who noticed such discrepancies internally often kept silent out of fear, as questioning the chairman’s teaching is viewed as a lack of faith. Whistleblower accounts later revealed that leaders privately acknowledged errors and fixed them in new books. A 2020 revelation about the multiple reprints of the Revelation commentary highlights that Shincheonji knowingly corrected “wrong parts” and republished the book after discovering errors. However, rank-and-file members were rarely, if ever, explicitly told, “Our previous book was wrong”. Instead, they were given the new book as the truth, and the old was quietly phased out.
Whistleblower and Ex-Member Testimonies
Former Shincheonji members and whistleblowers, including Korean bloggers and Reddit users, have provided evidence of these doctrinal about-faces and the secretive handling of old teachings. A South Korean news article by cult research pastor Jin Yong-sik in 2020 famously detailed the eight rounds of revisions to Lee’s Revelation books. It cited side-by-side examples of changed interpretations, such as the identity of certain biblical figures in Revelation being re-assigned in later editions (e.g., the “beast from the earth” was initially identified as Lee Cho-joo but later changed to Oh Pyeong-ho). Such comparisons, often leaked by ex-members, show that entire prophecy fulfillments were retroactively rewritten. Whistleblowers have described how discovering these changes was pivotal in their decision to leave.
In Reddit forums and Korean online communities, ex-members confirm that access to the old books was tightly controlled. Some have managed to obtain scanned PDFs of the 1985 “Revelation’s Reality” or other early Shincheonji texts and shared them online, precisely because current Shincheonji devotees would otherwise never see them. One Reddit user posted an English translation of the 1985 book, noting it had to be recovered from discarded files and warning that Shincheonji leadership “will continue to remove or restrict access to older materials as it has done so for the last 40 years”.
Insider testimony also reveals cover-up tactics. In the case of the “half hour = 6 months” doctrinal flip, former members recall that some inquisitive believers left Shincheonji in protest when they realized the teaching had changed. Those who raised questions were given an official explanation that a “typo” or editor’s mistake was to blame, rather than Lee Man-hee’s error. However, a leaked audio of Lee’s prior sermon proved that the original doctrine indeed came from Lee’s own mouth. This kind of leaked evidence confirms that Shincheonji’s top leaders were aware of the discrepancies and took steps to conceal them from the general membership.
Korean ex-member communities frequently discuss how Shincheonji leadership monitors and suppresses information that contradicts the current official line. Testimonies note that members are warned not to seek out unauthorized materials; reading old doctrinal books or listening to ex-member accounts is equated with “spiritual poisoning” or betrayal. Despite this, whistleblowers have preserved copies of the old books outside the church, using them to demonstrate the major doctrinal corrections that Shincheonji made but never publicly admitted.
Rumors and Unconfirmed Reports
Several rumors circulate among ex-members regarding Shincheonji’s treatment of the old books, though hard proof is sometimes lacking. For instance, it is often rumored that Shincheonji officials have actively collected and destroyed earlier editions of Lee’s books to prevent their spread. Some former believers claim that when a new revision was released, cell leaders instructed members to turn in any prior edition for disposal, essentially a quiet recall. However, documentary evidence of systematic book-burning or recalls is scant, and Shincheonji has never publicly announced such a policy. It is also whispered that Lee Man-hee privately blames unnamed “editors” or former aides for the errors in the 1980s books, as a way to avoid personal fault. While Lee has not been recorded explicitly denouncing his own books as “heresy” in public, ex-members suspect he might allege those early writings were tainted by betrayers or incomplete understanding. These claims remain unconfirmed, as no direct statement from Lee has surfaced admitting, “My old book was doctrinally wrong”. What is clear from verified accounts is that Lee and Shincheonji no longer endorse the content of those early works, even if they stop short of openly confessing error. The strong consensus of those who left is that something is being hidden, with one former member musing, “If they taught it was truth then but call it false now, what else are they hiding?”. This lingering suspicion is widespread in ex-Shincheonji communities, though Shincheonji itself denies any wrongdoing in how it manages doctrinal changes.
All Known Published Books by Lee Man Hee
Books Published in Korean (Partial list based on sources and witness accounts):
- 천지창조 (The Creation of Heaven and Earth)
- First published: 2007
- Revised: Multiple times
- English translation available.
- 계시의 실상 (The Physical Fulfillment of Revelation)
- First published: 2014
- Revised: Yes
- English version available.
- 계시의 실상 (1985 Version) – Also titled “The Reality of the Revelation”
- Original edition banned internally due to doctrinal issues.
- English translation of this early version is available.
- 신탄 (Shintan)
- Highly controversial and later discredited.
- This book was co-authored or edited by Kim Gun-nam and Hong Jong-hyo and allegedly altered from Lee’s original manuscript.
- Publicly condemned by Lee himself in 2019 as corrupt and a source of “harassment”.
- 계시 전서 1권 (Revelation Vol. 1)
- Believed to contain early interpretations no longer taught today.
- 새천지의 성장사 (The Growth of Shincheonji History)
- Contains covenant-by-blood rituals.
- English not available; cited in theological critiques as evidence of Lee’s messianic self-deification.
- 요한계시록의 진상 (The True Story of Revelation)
- Early volumes written in the 1980s.
- No official English translation available.
- 비유풀이 (Explanation of Parables)
- A parables book that evolved through versions.
- English version available with edits.
- 천국비밀의 성취 (Fulfillment of the Secrets of Heaven)
- Not translated to English.
- 청지기 교육원 강의록 (Stewardship Education Center Lecture Notes)
- Internal curriculum; not public.
Several books were withdrawn or quietly retired as doctrine evolved, including books once claimed to be direct revelation. The total number of Lee’s authored or attributed works exceeds 25 titles, although many are not accessible to the public, and some exist only in Korean.
Doctrinal Contradictions and Book Revisions
| Area of Doctrine | Earlier Teaching (in Published Books) | Current Teaching in SCJ Bible Class (2024-2025) | Sources |
| Date of Ordination | Spring 1980 (in 1985’s Reality of Revelation) | Now claimed as 1977 or 1979 | the true story of Shinc… |
| 7 Messengers | Formerly claimed Lee judged them by 7 Trumpets | Now softened to “sent letters” only | the true story of Shinc… |
| Shintan Book | Once distributed as official doctrine | Condemned by Lee as manipulated | All combined |
| The Image of the Beast | Specific interpretation from Rev 13:15-16 | Not emphasized or removed in modern materials | All combined |
| Heaven and Earth Creation | Ongoing sealing of 144,000 emphasized Formerly physical, later spiritualized | Bible Study PDF and 2024 curriculum | |
| Dates | fulfillment now | ||
| Blood Covenant Ritual | Denied or hidden from foreign students Leaders signed with blood in “New Covenant” | Kim_Shincheonji_2016 | |
| End-Time Timeline | Now allegorized or Earlier versions spiritually ongoing hinted at specific dates | the true story of Shinc… |
Why Lee’s Own Books Were Condemned as Heretical
- “Shintan” Controversy: Lee publicly condemned this book due to alleged interference from Kim Gun-nam and others. Despite being part of SCJ’s early teachings, it was later scrubbed from classrooms and branded as doctrinally impure.
- Doctrinal Inconsistency: Many of Lee’s books made claims about events and interpretations that were later changed without open acknowledgment. For example, “The Physical Fulfillment of Revelation” no longer matches teachings in SCJ 2024 Bible Study slides.
- Information Control: SCJ has forbidden access to older editions. New recruits are only given sanitized versions, and older members are discouraged or forbidden from referencing older publications; many are completely unavailable to non-Korean speakers.
- Deification of Lee: Some books, like “The Growth of Shincheonji,” allegedly feature rituals that elevate Lee to a messianic figure, such as blood covenants, which are considered blasphemous by mainstream Christianity.
Access and Suppression of Old Books
Are Old Books Still Available? No. According to multiple sources, including whistleblower documents and ex-member Reddit threads, most earlier books are banned, removed from official sites, and are not shared with international members.
Why Are They Suppressed?
- They contradict the current version of Lee’s testimony.
- They include incorrect prophecies (e.g., physical end-dates).
- They reveal internal power struggles and betrayals.
- They hint at past affiliations (e.g., with Olive Tree or Tabernacle Temple) that SCJ wants to erase.
Rumors or Unverified Claims
Some testimonies accuse Lee of copying doctrine from Yoo Jae-yeol or Park Tae-seon, while others claim fabricated visions. These require further documentation and cannot be fully confirmed with public evidence. These are not included in the doctrinal contradiction table but are discussed in “The True Story of Shincheonji” and Kim, Min-hyuk’s “Shincheonji Cult Analysis Report (2016)”.
Sources and Links
- [The True Story of Shincheonji (Translation Archive)]
- [Reddit Thread – Doctrinal Change Logs by Ex-Members]
- [Shintan Controversy Testimony]
Bibliography
Books by Lee Man-hee (Published by Shincheonji Church of Jesus):
- Lee, Man-hee. The Creation of Heaven and Earth. Shincheonji Church of Jesus, 2007. English translation edition.
- Lee, Man-hee. The Physical Fulfillment of Revelation. Shincheonji Church of Jesus, 2014. English edition.
- Lee, Man-hee. The Reality of the Revelation. Shincheonji Church of Jesus, 1985. Korean edition (translated unofficially by ex-members).
- Lee, Man-hee. Explanation of Parables: Figurative Language of the Bible. Shincheonji Church of Jesus, various editions. English version circulated among SCJ students (undated).
- Lee, Man-hee. Growth of Shincheonji History. Shincheonji Church of Jesus, unpublished internal textbook. Korean only.
- Lee, Man-hee. The True Story of Revelation (요한계시록의 진상). Shincheonji Publishing, 1985–1988. Korean only; withdrawn from use.
- Lee, Man-hee. Revelation’s Reality (계시의 실상). Shincheonji Publishing, 1993. Superseded by later editions.
Additional Research Sources and Whistleblower Reports:
- Kim, Min-hyuk. Shincheonji Cult Analysis Report (2016). Unofficial internal critique shared by ex-members. Korean PDF.
- “SCJ Bible Study Notes (2024).” Internal teaching slides and notes used in Shincheonji classes.
- ParableBook_SCJ_readable. Shincheonji Church of Jesus, internal figurative language training manual.
Introvigne, Massimo. Shincheonji: A New Religious Movement. CESNUR, 2016.
Please take the time to check the Bible verses we’ve provided as references. Use them as a guide for your own understanding and discernment. It’s important to verify and confirm information with external sources, witnesses, and experts to ensure validity and transparency. Additionally, remember to pray for wisdom as you seek to identify any errors and ensure that your understanding aligns with biblical teachings.