A Refutation Using “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story”

Lesson 107: Revelation 6 – The Judgment of the Sun, Moon, and Stars of the Former Heaven that Betrayed (Part 1)

Viewing Through First-Century Christian, Historical, and Literary Lenses

---

Introduction: The Moment the Story Becomes Personal

You’ve been studying for months now. You’ve learned the parables, mastered the “Bible logic,” understood the patterns of betrayal-destruction-salvation. You’ve seen the throne room of heaven in Revelation 4-5, and you’ve been told you are part of the potential 144,000—essential, chosen, irreplaceable.

But now, in Lesson 107, something shifts. The instructor’s voice takes on a more urgent tone as he begins:

“There is nowhere else to go in the Bible. If one considers this time like it is a joke and it goes in one ear and out the other, one must be finished off just like Noah’s generation. It doesn’t matter what you say. God will only gather the truly good grain (the wheat) to create a new nation.”

The warning is clear: This is not optional. This is not theoretical. This is life or death.

And then the instructor introduces you to something you’ve never heard before—something that will become the foundation of everything Shincheonji teaches about Revelation. He tells you about a place called the Tabernacle Temple—a church in South Korea that existed in the 1960s-1980s. He tells you that what happened there—the conflicts, the betrayals, the destruction—was the literal fulfillment of Revelation 6.

Not a symbol. Not a parallel. The actual, prophesied fulfillment.

You lean forward, trying to understand. How could events in a Korean church be the fulfillment of cosmic visions written 2,000 years ago? How could a church split be the opening of the seven seals? How could organizational disputes be the judgment of the sun, moon, and stars?

But the instructor is confident. He has charts, timelines, connections. He shows you Zechariah 6 and links it to Revelation 6. He explains that the “four living creatures” are the “four chariots” with horses of different colors. He tells you that the white horse represents Jesus (or Jesus working through Lee Man-hee as the “New John”), coming to judge the Tabernacle Temple because its leaders betrayed God.

And then he tells you the most important part: Lee Man-hee was there. He witnessed it all. He is the “New John” who saw these events unfold.

This is the moment when Shincheonji’s theology shifts from abstract biblical interpretation to concrete historical claims. This is where their entire system either stands or falls. If the Tabernacle Temple was truly the fulfillment of Revelation 6, then Lee Man-hee is truly the promised pastor. But if it wasn’t—if this is simply a reinterpretation of mundane church conflicts dressed up as cosmic prophecy—then the entire Shincheonji system collapses.

In this refutation, we will examine Lesson 107 through the dual lenses outlined in “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story”—the Reflectional Lens (examining the psychological and spiritual impact of these teachings) and the Discernment Lens (testing these claims against Scripture, history, and logic). We will also apply the First-Century Christian lens, asking what the original recipients of Revelation would have understood, and the Historical and Political lens, examining the actual events at the Tabernacle Temple through verifiable evidence rather than theological reinterpretation.

This refutation does not focus on debates between Premillennialism, Amillennialism, or Postmillennialism. Instead, it seeks to understand Revelation as the first-century church would have—as a letter of encouragement, warning, and hope written to real communities facing real persecution under the Roman Empire.

For a more comprehensive examination of Shincheonji’s claims, visit closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination.

---

Part 1: The Escalation – “There Is Nowhere Else to Go”

SCJ’s Teaching: The Final Warning

Lesson 107 opens with a stark warning that reveals the high-stakes environment Shincheonji creates:

“There is nowhere else to go in the Bible. If one considers this time like it is a joke and it goes in one ear and out the other, one must be finished off just like Noah’s generation. It doesn’t matter what you say. God will only gather the truly good grain (the wheat) to create a new nation.”

This is not gentle teaching. This is ultimatum language. The message is clear: Accept what we’re about to teach you, or face judgment like those who perished in the flood.

Notice the progression of psychological pressure:

• Lesson 106: “You are important. You are part of the potential 144,000. Every person is critical.”
• Lesson 107: “There is nowhere else to go. If you don’t take this seriously, you will be finished off.”

The carrot has given way to the stick. Students who were elevated and made to feel special in Lesson 106 are now being threatened with destruction in Lesson 107. This is a classic high-control group tactic: alternate between affirmation and threat to keep members psychologically off-balance and compliant.

Biblical Response: Jesus Invites, He Does Not Threaten

Let’s contrast this with how Jesus actually spoke to those who were seeking truth:

John 6:37:

“All those the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away.”

Matthew 11:28-30:

“Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”

John 10:9:

“I am the gate; whoever enters through me will be saved. They will come in and go out, and find pasture.”

Jesus’ invitation is characterized by gentleness, rest, and freedom. He does not say, “There is nowhere else to go—accept my teaching or be finished off.” Instead, He says, “Come to me. My yoke is easy. My burden is light.”

Even when Jesus spoke hard truths, He did so with compassion and gave people the freedom to walk away. In John 6:66-67, after a difficult teaching, “many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him.” Jesus did not threaten them or warn them they would be “finished off.” Instead, He turned to the Twelve and asked, “You do not want to leave too, do you?”

Peter’s response is instructive: “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life” (John 6:68).

Notice the difference: Peter stayed because he recognized Jesus had the words of life—not because he was threatened with destruction if he left. True faith is drawn by love and truth, not driven by fear and ultimatums.

The Noah Comparison: Misapplied Judgment

The instructor’s comparison to “Noah’s generation” is meant to create fear: “If you don’t take this seriously, you’ll be destroyed like those who perished in the flood.”

But let’s examine this comparison carefully. What was the sin of Noah’s generation?

Genesis 6:5:

“The Lord saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time.”

The sin was not “failing to understand a prophecy” or “not taking a Bible study seriously.” The sin was pervasive wickedness, violence, and corruption. God’s judgment came after 120 years of warning (Genesis 6:3), during which Noah preached righteousness (2 Peter 2:5).

To compare students who question Shincheonji’s interpretation of Revelation to the wicked generation of Noah is manipulative and unbiblical. It equates honest inquiry with moral rebellion, and it uses fear of divine judgment to suppress critical thinking.

As Chapter 5 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” explains, this is spiritual abuse—using the threat of God’s judgment to control behavior and belief.

---

Part 2: The Setup – “Contrasting Chapters” and Interpretive Framework

SCJ’s Teaching: Three Sets of Contrasting Chapters

The instructor introduces a framework that will shape how students interpret Revelation:

“In Revelation, there are 3 sets of contrasting chapters. Which means one chapter represents the negative of something. And the chapter that happens after represents the positive of a new thing.”

He lists three pairs:

1. Revelation 6 and 7: Chapter 6 = end of spiritual Israel; Chapter 7 = new spiritual Israel (144,000)
2. Revelation 13 and 14: Chapter 13 = mark of the beast; Chapter 14 = seal of God
3. Revelation 18 and 19: Chapter 18 = marriage with the devil; Chapter 19 = marriage with the Lamb

This framework is not inherently wrong. Revelation does contain contrasts—between Babylon and the New Jerusalem, between the beast and the Lamb, between judgment and salvation. This is a common feature of apocalyptic literature.

However, Shincheonji uses this framework to impose a specific historical interpretation: that Revelation 6 describes the destruction of the Tabernacle Temple, and Revelation 7 describes the creation of Shincheonji.

First-Century Understanding: Contrasts, Not Chronological Fulfillments

The first-century Christians would have understood these contrasts thematically and theologically, not as a timeline of specific organizational events in 20th-century Korea.

The contrast between Revelation 6 and 7 is not between two different organizations. It is between judgment and salvation, between those who face God’s wrath and those who are sealed and protected.

Let’s look at the actual text:

Revelation 6:15-17 (end of chapter 6):

“Then the kings of the earth, the princes, the generals, the rich, the mighty, and everyone else, both slave and free, hid in caves and among the rocks of the mountains. They called to the mountains and the rocks, ‘Fall on us and hide us from the face of him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb! For the great day of their wrath has come, and who can withstand it?'”

Revelation 7:9-10 (middle of chapter 7):

“After this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. And they cried out in a loud voice: ‘Salvation belongs to our God, who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb.'”

The contrast is between those who cry out in terror at God’s judgment and those who cry out in joy at God’s salvation. This is a universal, cosmic contrast—not a contrast between two Korean religious organizations.

The first-century readers would have understood this as encouragement: “You may face persecution and judgment from Rome, but God will seal and protect His people. Do not fear—salvation belongs to God.”

Shincheonji’s interpretation reduces this cosmic drama to a local church dispute. It takes a message meant to encourage Christians facing martyrdom and turns it into a recruitment tool for a specific organization.

---

Part 3: The Core Claim – The Tabernacle Temple as Revelation 6

SCJ’s Teaching: Seven Key Points of Revelation 6

The instructor lays out seven key points that will shape the entire lesson:

1. Revelation 6 is judgment due to lack of repentance (failing to heed the letters in Revelation 2-3)
2. They ignored the letters, so they are judged
3. Jesus judges through the four living creatures
4. The location is the Tabernacle Temple (TT) in Gwacheon, South Korea
5. Jesus opens = Jesus fulfills (real people, real events)
6. New John witnesses (Lee Man-hee sees the realities)
7. Revelation 6 = end of an era; Revelation 7 = new spiritual Israel

This is the heart of Shincheonji’s theology. Everything hinges on point #4: that Revelation 6 was fulfilled at a specific location—the Tabernacle Temple in Gwacheon, South Korea.

Let’s examine each of these claims carefully.

Claim #1 & #2: Judgment Due to Ignoring the Letters

SCJ’s Teaching:

“Revelation 6 is the judgment that takes place due to the lack of repentance. When was an opportunity to repent given? In the letters. In which chapters? 2 and 3. So why were they judged? Because in Revelation 2 and 3, they did not heed the letters. They ignored the letters sent to them.”

Biblical Response:

The letters in Revelation 2-3 were written to seven specific churches in Asia Minor (modern-day Turkey): Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodicea. These were real, first-century churches facing real challenges.

Revelation 1:11:

“Write on a scroll what you see and send it to the seven churches: to Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia and Laodicea.”

These letters were not written to a 20th-century Korean church. They were written to first-century churches in Asia Minor. The “you” in these letters refers to those specific congregations.

Each letter addresses specific issues relevant to that church’s context:

• Ephesus: Lost their first love (Revelation 2:4)
• Smyrna: Facing persecution and poverty (Revelation 2:9-10)
• Pergamum: Tolerating false teaching (Revelation 2:14-15)
• Thyatira: Tolerating Jezebel’s false prophecy (Revelation 2:20)
• Sardis: Dead reputation despite being alive (Revelation 3:1)
• Philadelphia: Faithful despite little strength (Revelation 3:8)
• Laodicea: Lukewarm, neither hot nor cold (Revelation 3:15-16)

Shincheonji claims that these letters were actually written to the Tabernacle Temple and its leaders. But this raises obvious questions:

• Why would Jesus address letters to “Ephesus” and “Smyrna” if He really meant “the Tabernacle Temple”?
• Why would He use names of real cities in Asia Minor if He was actually talking about Korea?
• Why would the original recipients of Revelation think these letters were for them if they were actually meant for a church 1,900 years in the future?

This interpretation makes no sense unless you assume that the entire book of Revelation was not meant to be understood by its original audience—which contradicts Revelation 1:3 (“Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear it and take to heart what is written in it, because the time is near”).

The Historical Reality: What the Letters Meant to First-Century Christians

As explained in “How First-Century Christians Read Revelation Like a Political Cartoon,” the first-century Christians would have understood these letters in their immediate context:

• Ephesus was a major city with a temple to Artemis (Diana). The church there was warned about losing their first love—perhaps being distracted by the surrounding pagan culture.
• Smyrna was experiencing persecution from both Roman authorities and local Jewish communities who opposed Christianity.
• Pergamum was the location of a major temple to the emperor cult—”where Satan has his throne” (Revelation 2:13).
• Thyatira was a commercial city with many trade guilds that required participation in pagan rituals.
• Sardis had a reputation for strength but was spiritually dead—perhaps resting on past glory.
• Philadelphia was a small, faithful church facing opposition.
• Laodicea was a wealthy city known for banking, textile production, and a medical school—hence the references to gold, white garments, and eye salve (Revelation 3:18).

These details make sense in the first-century context. They make no sense if applied to a 20th-century Korean church.

Shincheonji’s interpretation requires us to believe that Jesus was speaking in code—that when He said “Ephesus,” He really meant something else entirely. But this is not how the Bible works. God speaks clearly, not in secret codes that can only be deciphered 2,000 years later by one man in Korea.

---

Part 4: The Four Living Creatures and the Four Horses

SCJ’s Teaching: Zechariah 6 Explains Revelation 6

The instructor takes students to Zechariah 6:1-5 to explain the four living creatures:

Zechariah 6:1-5:

“I looked up again—and there before me were four chariots coming out from between two mountains—mountains of bronze! The first chariot had red horses, the second black, the third white, and the fourth dappled—all of them powerful. I asked the angel who was speaking to me, ‘What are these, my lord?’ The angel answered me, ‘These are the four spirits of heaven, going out from standing in the presence of the Lord of the whole world.'”

The instructor explains:

“So Zechariah looks up and he sees four chariots. Who are these four chariots? Four living creatures. The four living creatures. And each of the four living creatures comes with a pair of horses.”

This connection is not entirely wrong. There is a relationship between the visions in Zechariah and the visions in Revelation. Both use similar imagery—horses, colors, heavenly beings. This is because both are apocalyptic literature, using symbolic language to communicate spiritual truths.

However, Shincheonji uses this connection to claim that the horses in Revelation 6 are literal agents of judgment sent to destroy the Tabernacle Temple.

First-Century Understanding: Symbolic Judgment, Not Literal Horses

Let’s read Revelation 6:1-8 carefully:

Revelation 6:1-2 (First Seal – White Horse):

“I watched as the Lamb opened the first of the seven seals. Then I heard one of the four living creatures say in a voice like thunder, ‘Come!’ I looked, and there before me was a white horse! Its rider held a bow, and he was given a crown, and he rode out as a conqueror bent on conquest.”

Revelation 6:3-4 (Second Seal – Red Horse):

“When the Lamb opened the second seal, I heard the second living creature say, ‘Come!’ Then another horse came out, a fiery red one. Its rider was given power to take peace from the earth and to make people kill each other. To him was given a large sword.”

Revelation 6:5-6 (Third Seal – Black Horse):

“When the Lamb opened the third seal, I heard the third living creature say, ‘Come!’ I looked, and there before me was a black horse! Its rider was holding a pair of scales in his hand. Then I heard what sounded like a voice among the four living creatures, saying, ‘Two pounds of wheat for a day’s wages, and six pounds of barley for a day’s wages, and do not damage the oil and the wine!'”

Revelation 6:7-8 (Fourth Seal – Pale Horse):

“When the Lamb opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth living creature say, ‘Come!’ I looked, and there before me was a pale horse! Its rider was named Death, and Hades was following close behind him. They were given power over a fourth of the earth to kill by sword, famine and plague, and by the wild beasts of the earth.”

What do these horses represent?

The first-century readers would have understood these as symbolic representations of the judgments that come upon those who oppose God’s kingdom:

• White horse with a bow and crown = Conquest/Military invasion
• Red horse with a sword = War and bloodshed
• Black horse with scales = Famine and economic hardship
• Pale horse named Death = Plague and death

These are the classic judgments described throughout the Old Testament (see Ezekiel 14:21: “sword and famine and wild beasts and plague”). They represent the consequences of rejecting God—whether experienced by Israel in the Old Testament or by Rome in the first century.

The first-century Christians facing persecution under Rome would have understood this as a message of hope: “Rome may seem invincible, but God’s judgment is coming. The empire that persecutes you will face conquest, war, famine, and death. Hold fast—God will vindicate His people.”

This is not a description of events at a Korean church in the 1970s. It is a symbolic vision of divine judgment using imagery familiar to the Old Testament prophets and the first-century audience.

---

Part 5: The Tabernacle Temple – Historical Reality vs. Theological Claim

SCJ’s Teaching: The Location is the Tabernacle Temple

The instructor makes a specific, verifiable claim:

“The location of Revelation chapter 6 is the Tabernacle Temple or we can say in abbreviation the TT. That’s where it took place. In this location. Tabernacle of the seven golden lampstands. That was in Gwacheon, South Korea at the base of a mountain called Cheonggye.”

This is the lynchpin of Shincheonji’s entire theology. If this claim is true—if Revelation 6 was literally fulfilled at the Tabernacle Temple in Gwacheon, South Korea—then Lee Man-hee’s claims have credibility. But if this claim is false—if the events at the Tabernacle Temple were simply mundane church conflicts reinterpreted as cosmic prophecy—then the entire Shincheonji system collapses.

So let’s examine the historical reality of the Tabernacle Temple.

The Historical Reality: What Actually Happened

According to “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale” and “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1,” here is what actually happened:

The Tabernacle Temple was a religious organization founded by a man named Yoo Jae-yeol in the 1960s-1970s. Yoo claimed to have received special revelation and taught that he was fulfilling biblical prophecy. He established a church with a specific structure, including “seven golden lampstands” (seven leaders or congregations).

Lee Man-hee joined this organization. He was deeply involved in the Tabernacle Temple’s ministry and believed in Yoo’s teachings.

However, in the late 1970s-early 1980s, the organization experienced internal conflicts. There were disputes over leadership, theology, finances, and authority. Different factions emerged, each claiming to be the true continuation of Yoo’s work.

The organization eventually fractured and dissolved. Some members followed different leaders. Some left entirely. The property was sold. The movement collapsed.

Lee Man-hee, after the collapse, claimed that he had been the faithful witness to these events. He reinterpreted the conflicts and collapse as the fulfillment of Revelation 6—the judgment of the “first heaven and first earth.” He then founded Shincheonji, claiming it was the “new heaven and new earth” prophesied in Revelation 21.

This is the historical reality. Not cosmic warfare. Not angelic judgments. Not the opening of seven seals. A church split. Leadership conflicts. Financial disputes. Organizational collapse.

These are the events that Shincheonji claims are the literal fulfillment of Revelation 6.

The Political and Historical Lens: Was This Really Prophecy?

Let’s apply the political and historical lens to examine this claim. If the Tabernacle Temple’s collapse was truly the fulfillment of Revelation 6, we should expect:

1. Universal significance: Revelation describes events that affect “a fourth of the earth” (Revelation 6:8). Did the Tabernacle Temple’s collapse affect a fourth of the earth? No. It affected a small religious group in South Korea.
2. Cosmic signs: Revelation 6:12-14 describes the sun turning black, the moon turning blood red, stars falling from the sky, and the sky receding like a scroll. Did these cosmic signs accompany the Tabernacle Temple’s collapse? No.
3. Recognition by the world: Revelation describes kings, princes, generals, the rich, and the mighty hiding in caves and calling for the mountains to fall on them (Revelation 6:15-16). Did world leaders react this way to the Tabernacle Temple’s collapse? No. The world didn’t even notice.
4. Fulfillment of the letters: If Revelation 6 is judgment for ignoring the letters in Revelation 2-3, then the Tabernacle Temple must have received those letters and ignored them. But the letters were written to seven churches in Asia Minor in the first century. How could a 20th-century Korean church “ignore” letters written 1,900 years before it existed?

The historical reality does not match the biblical description. The only way to make them match is to reinterpret every detail symbolically—to claim that “a fourth of the earth” really means “a portion of the Tabernacle Temple,” that “the sun turning black” really means “a pastor losing his position,” that “stars falling from the sky” really means “members leaving the church.”

But if you can reinterpret the text this freely, you can make it mean anything. You could claim that Revelation 6 was fulfilled in any church split, any organizational conflict, any leadership dispute anywhere in the world.

This is not biblical interpretation. This is eisegesis—reading your own meaning into the text rather than drawing the meaning out of it.

---

Part 6: The First Seal – The White Horse and the Conqueror

SCJ’s Teaching: The White Horse Represents Jesus/The New John

The instructor continues with the opening of the first seal:

Revelation 6:1-2:

“I watched as the Lamb opened the first of the seven seals. Then I heard one of the four living creatures say in a voice like thunder, ‘Come!’ I looked, and there before me was a white horse! Its rider held a bow, and he was given a crown, and he rode out as a conqueror bent on conquest.”

According to SCJ’s Lesson 107, the first seal reveals “a rider on a white horse representing Jesus holding a bow of judgment.”

More specifically, SCJ teaches that:

• The white horse represents Jesus (or the Holy Spirit) working through the “New John” (Lee Man-hee)
• The bow = God’s word used as an instrument of judgment
• The crown = legitimate authority given to carry out judgment
• “Conquering” = Jesus through the New John exposing and judging the betrayers at the Tabernacle Temple

In SCJ theology, this white horse rider is portrayed positively as the righteous judge who initiates the judgment sequence against those who betrayed at the Tabernacle Temple in the 1980s.

The Problem with This Interpretation:

1. It Contradicts the Parallel Structure of Revelation 6

If we accept SCJ’s framework that the four horsemen represent judgments on the Tabernacle Temple, we encounter a logical problem:

• 2nd seal (red horse): Takes peace away with a sword (God’s word) – judgment
• 3rd seal (black horse): Weighs faith and deeds with scales – judgment
• 4th seal (pale horse): Death and Hades follow – judgment

All three clearly represent destructive forces. Why would the first horse suddenly represent Jesus/the righteous judge, while the other three represent instruments of judgment or destruction? The parallel structure suggests all four horsemen represent aspects of God’s judgment being poured out, not that the first one is Jesus personally appearing.

2. It Ignores the Biblical Context of White Horse Imagery

SCJ wants to connect this white horse to Revelation 19:11-16, where Jesus clearly rides a white horse at His second coming. However, there are critical differences:

Revelation 6:2 (First Seal):

• Rider carries a bow (no arrows mentioned)
• Given a crown (stephanos – victor’s crown)
• Goes out “conquering and to conquer”
• Part of a sequence of judgments
• No identification of who the rider is

Revelation 19:11-16 (Jesus’ Return):

• Rider carries a sharp sword from His mouth
• Wears many crowns (diadems – royal crowns)
• Called “Faithful and True,” “Word of God,” “King of Kings”
• Armies of heaven follow Him
• Explicitly identified as Jesus

These are clearly two different riders in two different contexts. The first is part of a judgment sequence using Old Testament imagery; the second is the triumphant return of Christ.

3. It Misses the Old Testament Background

The imagery of horses and riders in Revelation 6 draws heavily from Zechariah 1:8-11 and 6:1-8, where colored horses represent God’s agents patrolling the earth and executing judgment. They are not God Himself, but instruments He uses.

Similarly, in Revelation 6, the four horsemen represent forces God uses to bring judgment – conquest, war, famine, and death. The white horse rider is the first wave of judgment, not Jesus personally appearing.

4. It Shrinks Cosmic Judgment to Organizational Drama

Even if we accept that the white horse represents Jesus working through Lee Man-hee, we face the same fundamental problem as before:

What first-century Christians understood:

• Cosmic judgment on the Roman Empire and evil systems
• Encouragement that God would vindicate His persecuted people
• Universal scope affecting all nations

What SCJ claims it means:

• Jesus working through Lee Man-hee to judge a Korean church
• Internal organizational conflict reinterpreted as prophecy
• Scope limited to one building in South Korea in the 1980s

This interpretation still requires accepting that:

• The apostle John’s vision was secretly about 20th-century Korea
• First-century Christians were reading a coded message they couldn’t possibly understand
• The “conquering” Jesus does through the white horse = Lee Man-hee exposing church leadership disputes

5. It Creates a Theological Problem: When Did Jesus Return?

If the white horse rider represents Jesus (or Jesus working through Lee Man-hee) appearing to judge the Tabernacle Temple in the 1980s, this raises serious questions:

• Did Jesus’ second coming already happen in secret at the Tabernacle Temple?
• Why does Revelation 19 then show Jesus coming again on a white horse?
• How can Jesus “come” multiple times in Revelation?

SCJ tries to resolve this by saying Jesus works “spiritually” through Lee Man-hee, but this creates more problems than it solves. It essentially claims Jesus’ return happened invisibly in Korea while the rest of the world was unaware – exactly the kind of “secret coming” that Jesus warned against in Matthew 24:23-27.

The Historical-Critical Reading:

The four horsemen of Revelation 6 are best understood as:

1. Literary devices using Old Testament imagery (Zechariah, Ezekiel, etc.)
2. Symbolic representations of the judgments God brings on evil empires
3. Encouragement to persecuted first-century Christians that God would judge Rome
4. Not literal individuals but forces God uses throughout history

The white horse rider represents the beginning of conquest and judgment – the first wave of God’s judgment on the oppressive systems persecuting His people. It’s part of a sequence, not a standalone figure to be identified with a specific modern person.

While SCJ’s interpretation of the white horse as representing Jesus/Lee Man-hee is internally consistent with their overall theology, it:

• Contradicts the parallel structure of the four horsemen
• Ignores the differences between Revelation 6:2 and 19:11
• Misses the Old Testament background of horses as God’s agents
• Still shrinks cosmic prophecy to organizational events
• Creates theological problems about Jesus’ return

Most importantly, it requires accepting that Lee Man-hee is the person through whom Jesus is “conquering” – a claim that elevates one man to an unprecedented position and makes salvation dependent on recognizing his authority.

The question remains: Is it more reasonable to believe that Revelation 6 describes God’s judgment on evil empires using symbolic Old Testament imagery, or that it secretly predicted Lee Man-hee would witness a church split in 1980s Korea?

This interpretation positions Lee Man-hee as the vessel through which Jesus brings judgment on the Tabernacle Temple, establishing him as the righteous witness rather than a deceiver.

First-Century Understanding: Conquest and Military Power

The first-century readers would have understood the white horse very differently. In the Roman world, a white horse was associated with military victory and imperial triumph. Roman generals who won significant victories would ride white horses in triumphal processions through Rome.

The rider with a bow and crown represents conquest and military domination. This would have been immediately understood as a reference to Rome’s military power—the empire that was conquering nations and demanding submission.

Some scholars also see a connection to the Parthian Empire, Rome’s great enemy to the east. The Parthians were famous for their mounted archers (riders with bows), and they posed a constant military threat to Rome. The first-century readers might have understood this as representing the threat of invasion and war.

Either way, the image is one of military conquest—not Jesus working through a witness in a Korean church.

The Problem with SCJ’s Interpretation

Shincheonji’s interpretation requires us to believe that:

1. The “white horse” doesn’t mean what it obviously meant in the first-century context (military victory), but instead represents Jesus or the Holy Spirit working through Lee Man-hee

2. The “bow” doesn’t mean a weapon of war, but represents God’s word used as an instrument of judgment

3. The “crown” doesn’t mean authority gained through military conquest, but represents divine authority given to the New John

4. “Conquering” doesn’t mean military victory, but means exposing and judging betrayers at the Tabernacle Temple

5. This entire vision, which the first-century Christians would have understood as describing forces of judgment (conquest, war, famine, death), is actually about one man witnessing church conflicts in Korea

This is allegorical interpretation taken to an extreme. Every detail is stripped of its historical and cultural meaning and assigned a new meaning that fits Shincheonji’s narrative.

But here’s the problem: If you can reinterpret symbols this freely, the text can mean anything you want it to mean. There is no objective standard, no way to test whether an interpretation is correct. The interpreter becomes the ultimate authority, not the text itself.

As Chapter 11 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” explains, this is how cults operate—they claim exclusive interpretive authority and redefine biblical symbols to fit their own narrative.

The Broader Pattern: Four Horsemen as Sequential Judgments

Let’s look at the four horsemen as a complete picture:

1. White horse (conquest) – Military invasion
2. Red horse (war) – Bloodshed and violence
3. Black horse (famine) – Economic collapse and starvation
4. Pale horse (death) – Plague and mass death

This is a sequence of judgments that follow a logical progression:

• First comes conquest (an invading army)
• Which leads to war (resistance and bloodshed)
• Which causes famine (agricultural disruption and economic collapse)
• Which results in death (from violence, starvation, and disease)

This pattern is found throughout the Old Testament as God’s judgment on rebellious nations:

Jeremiah 14:12:

“Although they fast, I will not listen to their cry; though they offer burnt offerings and grain offerings, I will not accept them. Instead, I will destroy them with the sword, famine and plague.”

Ezekiel 14:21:

“For this is what the Sovereign Lord says: How much worse will it be when I send against Jerusalem my four dreadful judgments—sword and famine and wild beasts and plague—to kill its people and their animals!”

The four horsemen represent the classic judgments of God: conquest, war, famine, and death. The first-century Christians would have recognized this immediately as the pattern of divine judgment described by the prophets.

To claim that the white horse specifically represents Jesus/Lee Man-hee as the righteous judge, while the other horses represent various judgments at the Tabernacle Temple, creates an inconsistent interpretive framework. If the white horse is literal (a specific person), why are the other horses symbolic (various forms of judgment)? This selective literalism reveals the arbitrary nature of Shincheonji’s interpretation.

---

Part 7: “Jesus Opens = Jesus Fulfills” – The Problem with Literalism

SCJ’s Teaching: Opening Means Physical Fulfillment

The instructor states a key principle:

“What does it mean for Jesus to open? It means that Jesus fulfills. So as Jesus opens the scroll, real people, real events, real things take place. Realities appear. That’s what it means for Jesus to open the scroll.”

This sounds reasonable at first. After all, prophecy should have fulfillment, right? When Jesus opens the seals, something should happen.

But here’s where Shincheonji makes a critical error: They assume that “fulfillment” must mean literal, physical events that correspond exactly to the symbolic imagery.

So when Revelation 6:12 says “the sun turned black like sackcloth,” Shincheonji teaches that this means a specific pastor (the “sun”) lost his position or authority. When it says “the stars fell to earth,” they teach this means church members (the “stars”) left the organization.

This is hyper-literalism applied to apocalyptic literature—and it fundamentally misunderstands the genre.

Understanding Apocalyptic Literature: Symbolic Truth, Not Literal Description

As explained in “How First-Century Christians Read Revelation Like a Political Cartoon,” apocalyptic literature uses symbolic imagery to communicate spiritual and theological truths. The symbols are not meant to be decoded into literal, one-to-one correspondences.

Consider how Jesus used parables. When He said, “The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed” (Matthew 13:31), did He mean the kingdom is literally a seed? No. He was using a familiar image to communicate a spiritual truth: the kingdom starts small but grows large.

Similarly, when Revelation uses imagery of horses, seals, trumpets, and bowls, it is communicating spiritual truths about God’s judgment, the vindication of the faithful, and the ultimate victory of Christ. The imagery is meant to evoke emotion, convey theological meaning, and encourage perseverance—not to provide a literal blueprint of future events.

Dr. Warren Gage, in “The Revelation Project,” explains that Revelation is structured as a chiasm—a Hebrew literary pattern where themes are presented, developed, and then recapitulated from different angles. The book is not a linear timeline but a thematic and theological message about God’s sovereignty and Christ’s victory.

The Danger of Hyper-Literalism

When you interpret apocalyptic literature hyper-literally, you end up with absurd conclusions:

• If the “stars falling from the sky” (Revelation 6:13) means church members leaving, then what does “the sky receding like a scroll” (Revelation 6:14) mean? Did the physical sky roll up? Did the church building collapse?
• If the “sun turning black” (Revelation 6:12) means a pastor losing authority, then what does “the moon turning blood red” mean? Did an evangelist become violent?
• If the “great earthquake” (Revelation 6:12) means organizational upheaval, then what about the earthquake in Revelation 11:13 that kills 7,000 people? Did 7,000 members die at the Tabernacle Temple?

Shincheonji’s interpretation is inconsistent. They interpret some details literally (the location, the people involved) and other details symbolically (the cosmic signs, the numbers). They pick and choose which details to literalize based on what fits their narrative.

This is not sound biblical interpretation. This is eisegesis—forcing the text to say what you want it to say.

---

Part 8: “New John Witnesses” – The Claim of Eyewitness Authority

SCJ’s Teaching: Lee Man-hee as the New John

One of the most critical claims in Lesson 107 is this:

“New John witnesses Jesus opening the scroll. And he sees the realities. He sees the realities. The who, the what, the when, the where, the why, and the how. It’s how we know about this in the first place. If he wasn’t there to see it, we wouldn’t have known about it.”

This is Shincheonji’s claim to exclusive authority: Lee Man-hee is the “New John” who witnessed the fulfillment of Revelation 6 at the Tabernacle Temple. Just as the Apostle John saw the visions and wrote them down, Lee Man-hee saw the fulfillments and can now explain them.

This claim is foundational to Shincheonji’s entire system. Without Lee Man-hee as the eyewitness, they have no way to verify their interpretation. The entire structure depends on accepting his testimony as authoritative and inerrant.

Biblical Response: The Uniqueness of Apostolic Witness

Let’s examine what the Bible says about the role of apostolic witness.

The Apostle John was chosen by Jesus during His earthly ministry (Mark 3:14-17). He was one of the Twelve, part of Jesus’ inner circle (along with Peter and James). He witnessed Jesus’ transfiguration (Matthew 17:1-2), was present at the Last Supper (John 13:23), stood at the foot of the cross (John 19:26-27), and was among the first to see the empty tomb (John 20:1-8).

John’s authority as an apostle was recognized by the early church (Galatians 2:9). His writings—the Gospel of John, the three epistles of John, and Revelation—were accepted as Scripture because of his apostolic authority and because they were consistent with the rest of Scripture.

The apostles were unique witnesses to the resurrection:

Acts 1:21-22:

“Therefore it is necessary to choose one of the men who have been with us the whole time the Lord Jesus was living among us, beginning from John’s baptism to the time when Jesus was taken up from us. For one of these must become a witness with us of his resurrection.”

1 Corinthians 15:5-8:

“He appeared to Cephas, and then to the Twelve. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time… Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one abnormally born.”

Paul calls himself the “last” apostle—”one abnormally born.” He recognizes that apostolic witness to the resurrection was a unique, unrepeatable role.

There is no biblical basis for a “New John” 2,000 years later. The apostolic witness was completed in the first century. The canon of Scripture is closed. We do not need new apostles or new revelations—we have the complete Word of God in the Bible.

The Problem with Claimed Eyewitness Authority

Lee Man-hee claims to be an eyewitness to the fulfillment of Revelation. But his “witness” is not to objective, verifiable events—it is to his interpretation of events.

Consider the difference:

• The Apostle John witnessed: Jesus’ miracles, His death, His resurrection, His ascension. These were objective, physical events that multiple people witnessed.
• Lee Man-hee witnessed: Church conflicts, leadership disputes, organizational collapse at the Tabernacle Temple. These were ordinary events that he interprets as the fulfillment of Revelation 6.

The events themselves are not in dispute. Yes, there were conflicts at the Tabernacle Temple. Yes, the organization collapsed. What is in dispute is the interpretation—the claim that these mundane events were the cosmic fulfillment of biblical prophecy.

And here’s the critical point: If Lee Man-hee’s interpretation is wrong, then his entire claim to authority collapses. He is not an eyewitness to prophecy fulfillment—he is simply someone who experienced a church split and reinterpreted it as cosmic significance.

As Chapter 8 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” explains, this is a form of self-authentication—claiming authority based on your own testimony, with no external verification. The Bible warns against this:

2 Corinthians 10:18:

“For it is not the one who commends himself who is approved, but the one whom the Lord commends.”

Proverbs 27:2:

“Let someone else praise you, and not your own mouth; an outsider, and not your own lips.”

Lee Man-hee’s authority rests entirely on his own claims. There is no external verification, no objective evidence, no confirmation from the broader Christian community. Students are asked to accept his interpretation on faith—to trust that he is who he says he is.

But the Bible commands us to test such claims (1 John 4:1). And when we test Lee Man-hee’s claims against Scripture, history, and logic, they do not hold up.

---

Part 9: The Psychological Progression – Where You Are Now

Understanding the Indoctrination Process

By the time students reach Lesson 107, they have been through a carefully designed progression:

Beginner Level (Parables):

• Established the “Betrayal-Destruction-Salvation” framework
• Taught that God always works through one chosen person
• Created the expectation that prophecy must have physical fulfillment

Intermediate Level (Bible Logic):

• Taught students to see patterns and connections that “prove” the framework
• Established that traditional Christian interpretation is wrong
• Created distrust of pastors and churches outside Shincheonji

Advanced Level (Revelation 4-5):

• Elevated students’ sense of importance (“You are part of the 144,000”)
• Introduced the throne room and the sealed scroll
• Created anticipation: “Now we’re getting to the real fulfillment”

Advanced Level (Revelation 6):

• This is where the rubber meets the road. Students are now being told that specific events in Korea are the literal fulfillment of Revelation.
• The stakes are raised: “There is nowhere else to go. Accept this or be finished off.”
• Students are introduced to the “New John” (Lee Man-hee) as the authoritative witness.

This is the moment of maximum cognitive dissonance. Students have invested months of time and emotional energy. They have formed deep relationships. They have been told they are special and chosen. But now they are being asked to believe something that seems… improbable.

How could events in a Korean church be the fulfillment of cosmic prophecy?

This is where the psychological tactics become most intense:

Tactic #1: Sunk Cost Fallacy

As explained in Chapter 19 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story,” the sunk cost fallacy is the tendency to continue investing in something because of how much you’ve already invested, even when evidence suggests you should stop.

Students think: “I’ve spent six months studying. I’ve made friends here. I’ve told my family I’m learning the Bible. If I walk away now, all of that was wasted. I need to keep going to make it worthwhile.”

But this is faulty logic. The time you’ve already spent is gone—you can’t get it back. The only question that matters is: Is what I’m being taught true? If it’s not true, continuing to invest more time doesn’t make it true—it just means you’ve wasted more time.

Tactic #2: Information Control

Shincheonji controls the narrative about the Tabernacle Temple. Students are only given Shincheonji’s version of events—the theological interpretation that frames the conflicts as cosmic prophecy.

They are not told:

• The actual reasons for the conflicts (documented in “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale”)
• The financial disputes and power struggles
• The fact that multiple people claimed to be the “true” successor to Yoo Jae-yeol
• The fact that Lee Man-hee was just one of several leaders who broke away to form their own groups

Students are not encouraged to research the Tabernacle Temple independently. They are not given access to neutral historical sources. They are given only the information that supports Shincheonji’s interpretation.

This is a classic high-control group tactic: Control the information, and you control the interpretation.

Tactic #3: Us vs. Them Mentality

The instructor’s opening warning reinforces the “us vs. them” mentality:

“There is nowhere else to go in the Bible. If one considers this time like it is a joke and it goes in one ear and out the other, one must be finished off just like Noah’s generation.”

Translation: “We have the truth. Everyone else is wrong. If you leave us, you will face God’s judgment.”

This creates intense fear around the thought of leaving. Students begin to believe that questioning Shincheonji is the same as questioning God. Leaving the organization is equated with leaving God.

But this is not biblical Christianity. The Bible never teaches that salvation is tied to membership in a specific organization. Salvation is through faith in Jesus Christ alone (Ephesians 2:8-9), not through allegiance to a human leader or group.

Tactic #4: Elevation and Threat

Notice the psychological whiplash:

• Lesson 106: “You are important. You are part of the 144,000. You are essential to God’s plan.”
• Lesson 107: “There is nowhere else to go. If you don’t take this seriously, you will be finished off.”

This alternation between elevation (you’re special) and threat (you could lose it all) keeps students in a state of anxiety and compliance. They are simultaneously inflated and deflated, praised and warned.

This is not how Jesus treats His followers. Jesus offers security, rest, and assurance:

John 10:27-29:

“My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand.”

Romans 8:38-39:

“For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.”

Biblical Christianity offers security and assurance. Shincheonji offers anxiety and conditional acceptance.

---

Part 10: The Korean Cult Genealogy – A Pattern of Claims

Understanding the Historical Context

As documented in the Korean cult genealogy resources, Shincheonji is part of a lineage of Korean religious movements that share similar patterns:

The Genealogy:

1. Park Tae-sun (Olive Tree movement) – Claimed to be the Holy Spirit incarnate
2. Yoo Jae-yeol (Tabernacle Temple) – Claimed to be fulfilling Revelation, established “seven golden lampstands”
3. Lee Man-hee (Shincheonji) – Claimed to be the “promised pastor,” the “New John,” the one who overcomes

Each leader claimed:

• Exclusive revelation from God
• To be the unique fulfillment of biblical prophecy
• That previous movements failed, but theirs is the true fulfillment
• That followers must join their organization to be saved

And here’s the critical pattern: Lee Man-hee was a member of the Tabernacle Temple before founding Shincheonji. He believed in Yoo Jae-yeol’s claims. He was part of the organization that he now says was “judged” in Revelation 6.

This raises obvious questions:

• If Yoo Jae-yeol’s Tabernacle Temple was the fulfillment of Revelation, why did it fail?
• If it wasn’t the true fulfillment, why did Lee Man-hee follow it?
• How can we trust Lee Man-hee’s claims when he was wrong about his previous leader’s claims?
• What happens when the next leader emerges, claims Shincheonji has been “judged,” and declares his organization is the true fulfillment?

The pattern suggests this cycle will continue indefinitely—each new leader claiming to be the fulfillment, each previous movement reinterpreted as the “failed” generation that was judged.

The Broader Pattern: Reinterpreting Failure as Prophecy

Here’s what actually happened:

1. Yoo Jae-yeol founded the Tabernacle Temple and claimed it was the fulfillment of Revelation.
2. The organization experienced conflicts and collapsed.
3. Lee Man-hee, instead of admitting “we were wrong—this wasn’t the fulfillment,” reinterpreted the failure as part of the prophecy: “The collapse was the judgment of Revelation 6. I witnessed it. Now I’m founding the true fulfillment in Revelation 7.”

This is a brilliant psychological move. Instead of the failure disproving the theology, the failure becomes proof of the theology. The collapse of the Tabernacle Temple doesn’t mean the interpretation was wrong—it means the prophecy was being fulfilled.

But this logic can justify anything. Any failure, any conflict, any collapse can be reinterpreted as “judgment” and used as the foundation for a new claim of fulfillment.

This is not biblical prophecy. This is post-hoc rationalization—reinterpreting events after the fact to fit a predetermined narrative.

---

Part 11: The Theological Problem – Shrinking Revelation

From Cosmic to Local

One of the most significant problems with Shincheonji’s interpretation is that it shrinks the scope of Revelation from cosmic to local, from universal to organizational.

The Apostle John wrote Revelation to encourage Christians facing persecution throughout the Roman Empire. The message was: “God is sovereign. Christ has won the victory. Evil will be judged. Hold fast—your suffering is not meaningless.”

This message had relevance for Christians in Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, and throughout the empire. It gave them hope that Rome’s power was not ultimate, that God would vindicate His people, that death was not the end.

Shincheonji’s interpretation reduces this universal message to a local church dispute in Korea. The cosmic drama of God’s judgment on evil becomes a story about conflicts at the Tabernacle Temple. The hope of resurrection and new creation becomes the founding of a new religious organization.

This is not just a different interpretation—it’s a fundamentally different message.

The Problem of Exclusivity

Shincheonji’s interpretation makes Revelation irrelevant to 99.99% of Christians throughout history.

• It wasn’t relevant to first-century Christians facing martyrdom under Nero.
• It wasn’t relevant to medieval Christians facing plague and war.
• It wasn’t relevant to Reformation Christians rediscovering the gospel.
• It wasn’t relevant to modern Christians facing persecution in hostile nations.

According to Shincheonji, Revelation was only relevant to a small group of people in Korea in the 1970s-1980s, and now to those who join Shincheonji.

But Revelation 1:3 says: “Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear it and take to heart what is written in it, because the time is near.”

The blessing was for the original readers. The message was for them. The “time” was near for them—not 2,000 years in the future.

Shincheonji’s interpretation makes this verse meaningless for the original audience. Why would they be blessed for reading a prophecy that wouldn’t be fulfilled until 1,900 years later in a country they’d never heard of?

The Problem of Verification

Biblical prophecy was meant to be verifiable. When the prophets spoke, they gave specific, testable predictions that could be confirmed or disproved.

Deuteronomy 18:21-22:

“You may say to yourselves, ‘How can we know when a message has not been spoken by the Lord?’ If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the Lord does not take place or come true, that is a message the Lord has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously, so do not be alarmed.”

Shincheonji’s “fulfillment” is not verifiable in this way. They claim that internal organizational conflicts are the fulfillment of cosmic prophecies. But there’s no objective way to test this claim. You either accept Lee Man-hee’s interpretation or you don’t.

This is not how biblical prophecy works. Biblical prophecy was public, verifiable, and testable. Shincheonji’s “fulfillment” is private, interpretive, and unfalsifiable.

---

Part 12: What the First-Century Christians Actually Understood

Revelation 6 in Historical Context

Let’s return to the first-century context and ask: What would the original readers have understood from Revelation 6?

They would have understood the seals as representing the judgments coming upon Rome and those who persecuted God’s people:

The First Four Seals (Four Horsemen):

• Conquest, war, famine, death – The classic sequence of divine judgment described by the prophets (Jeremiah 14:12; Ezekiel 14:21)
• A warning that Rome’s power would not last forever
• Encouragement that God would judge those who opposed His kingdom

The Fifth Seal (Martyrs Crying Out):

Revelation 6:9-11:

“When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained. They called out in a loud voice, ‘How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the earth and avenge our blood?’ Then each of them was given a white robe, and they were told to wait a little longer, until the full number of their fellow servants, their brothers and sisters, were killed just as they had been.”

This would have been deeply meaningful to Christians facing martyrdom. The message was: “Your suffering is not forgotten. God sees. God will vindicate. Wait a little longer—justice is coming.”

The Sixth Seal (Cosmic Upheaval):

Revelation 6:12-17:

“I watched as he opened the sixth seal. There was a great earthquake. The sun turned black like sackcloth made of goat hair, the whole moon turned blood red, and the stars in the sky fell to earth, as figs drop from a fig tree when shaken by a strong wind. The heavens receded like a scroll being rolled up, and every mountain and island was removed from its place. Then the kings of the earth, the princes, the generals, the rich, the mighty, and everyone else, both slave and free, hid in caves and among the rocks of the mountains. They called to the mountains and the rocks, ‘Fall on us and hide us from the face of him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb! For the great day of their wrath has come, and who can withstand it?'”

This imagery is drawn directly from the Old Testament prophets who used cosmic language to describe God’s judgment on nations:

Isaiah 13:9-10 (judgment on Babylon):

“See, the day of the Lord is coming—a cruel day, with wrath and fierce anger—to make the land desolate and destroy the sinners within it. The stars of heaven and their constellations will not show their light. The rising sun will be darkened and the moon will not give its light.”

Isaiah 34:4 (judgment on Edom):

“All the stars in the sky will be dissolved and the heavens rolled up like a scroll; all the starry host will fall like withered leaves from the vine, like shriveled figs from the fig tree.”

Joel 2:30-31:

“I will show wonders in the heavens and on the earth, blood and fire and billows of smoke. The sun will be turned to darkness and the moon to blood before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord.”

The first-century readers would have recognized this language immediately. It was the prophetic way of describing God’s judgment on a nation or empire—not literal cosmic collapse, but the overthrow of political powers.

Jesus Himself used this language when prophesying about the destruction of Jerusalem:

Matthew 24:29-30:

“Immediately after the distress of those days ‘the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.’ Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory.”

This was fulfilled in AD 70 when the Romans destroyed Jerusalem and the temple. The “sun, moon, and stars” represented the religious and political leadership of Israel, which was judged and removed.

Similarly, Revelation 6 uses this prophetic language to describe God’s judgment on Rome and the powers that persecuted Christians. The “sun turning black” and “stars falling” represent the collapse of political and religious authority—not individual pastors at a Korean church.

---

Part 13: The Danger of Accepting This Teaching

What Happens If You Accept SCJ’s Interpretation?

Let’s consider the practical and spiritual consequences of accepting Shincheonji’s interpretation of Revelation 6:

1. You Accept Lee Man-hee’s Exclusive Authority

If the Tabernacle Temple was the fulfillment of Revelation 6, and Lee Man-hee is the only one who witnessed and understood it, then you must accept his interpretation of all Scripture. You cannot question, verify, or test his claims—you must trust that he is who he says he is.

This places a human being in the position of ultimate interpretive authority—a position that belongs to the Holy Spirit and the Word of God alone.

2. You Disconnect from 2,000 Years of Christian Understanding

Shincheonji’s interpretation means that every Christian before the 1980s misunderstood Revelation. The early church fathers, the Reformers, the missionaries, the martyrs—all of them were wrong. Only Lee Man-hee has the correct interpretation.

This is an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence. But Shincheonji provides no evidence beyond Lee Man-hee’s own testimony.

3. You Shrink the Gospel

The gospel becomes: “Believe in Jesus, and also join Shincheonji, because that’s where the fulfillment is happening.”

But the biblical gospel is: “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved” (Acts 16:31). Salvation is through faith in Christ alone, not through membership in an organization.

4. You Live in Constant Anxiety

As we’ve seen throughout the lessons, Shincheonji creates a system of conditional acceptance and constant performance pressure. You are told you’re part of the 144,000, but you could lose your place. You’re told you’re essential, but if you leave, you’ll be “finished off.”

This is not the rest and security that Jesus offers (Matthew 11:28-30).

5. You Become Isolated from the Broader Christian Community

Shincheonji teaches that other churches are “Babylon,” that pastors are “blind guides,” that traditional Christianity is false. This isolates you from the global body of Christ—from the fellowship, wisdom, and support of millions of believers throughout history and around the world.

---

Part 14: Testing the Claims – The Discernment Lens

Applying the Tests from “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims”

Let’s apply the specific tests outlined in “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” to evaluate Shincheonji’s interpretation of Revelation 6:

Test #1: Does It Match the Original Context?

No. Revelation was written to seven churches in Asia Minor in the first century. The original readers would not have understood the seals as referring to events in 20th-century Korea. They would have understood them as referring to God’s judgment on Rome and encouragement for persecuted Christians.

Test #2: Does It Require Secret Knowledge?

Yes. Shincheonji’s interpretation requires accepting that Revelation was written in code that could only be understood by Lee Man-hee 2,000 years later. This contradicts Revelation 1:3, which pronounces a blessing on the original readers.

Test #3: Does It Elevate a Human Leader?

Yes. Lee Man-hee is positioned as the “New John,” the only one who can explain Revelation, the promised pastor, the one who overcomes. This places him in a position of authority that rivals Christ Himself.

Test #4: Does It Create Fear and Control?

Yes. The teaching uses threats (“you will be finished off like Noah’s generation”), creates anxiety about losing your position, and makes salvation dependent on accepting Shincheonji’s interpretation.

Test #5: Is It Verifiable?

No. The “fulfillment” at the Tabernacle Temple is only “verifiable” if you accept Lee Man-hee’s interpretation of ordinary church conflicts as cosmic prophecy. There is no objective, external evidence that these events were the fulfillment of Revelation 6.

Test #6: Does It Align with the Whole of Scripture?

No. The interpretation contradicts:

• The sufficiency of Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16-17)
• The finality of apostolic revelation (Jude 3)
• The priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9)
• Salvation by grace through faith alone (Ephesians 2:8-9)
• The security of believers in Christ (Romans 8:38-39)

Based on these tests, Shincheonji’s interpretation of Revelation 6 fails to meet biblical standards for sound doctrine.

---

Part 15: The Way Forward – Freedom from Fear

For Those Currently Taking This Lesson

If you are currently studying Lesson 107, you may be experiencing confusion, doubt, or cognitive dissonance. These feelings are valid and important. They may be the Holy Spirit prompting you to examine more carefully.

Here’s what you need to know:

1. You Are Not Required to Accept This Interpretation

The Bible does not teach that you must accept Lee Man-hee’s interpretation of Revelation to be saved. Salvation is through faith in Jesus Christ alone (John 3:16; Romans 10:9-10; Ephesians 2:8-9).

2. Questioning Is Not Rebellion

God is not threatened by honest questions. The Bereans were commended for examining Paul’s teaching against Scripture (Acts 17:11). You have the right and responsibility to test what you’re being taught (1 Thessalonians 5:21).

3. The Events at the Tabernacle Temple Were Ordinary, Not Cosmic

The conflicts and collapse at the Tabernacle Temple were typical of organizational disputes—power struggles, financial disagreements, theological differences. There is no objective evidence that these were the fulfillment of Revelation 6. You are being asked to accept this interpretation on faith in Lee Man-hee’s testimony alone.

4. You Can Leave Without Losing Your Salvation

Leaving Shincheonji does not mean leaving God. Your relationship with God is based on Christ’s finished work on the cross, not on your membership in an organization. If you leave, you will not be “finished off like Noah’s generation.” You will simply be choosing to follow Christ outside of Shincheonji’s system.

5. There Is Support Available

Many people have left Shincheonji and found healing, freedom, and authentic Christian community. You are not alone. Visit closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination for resources, testimonies, and support.

For Those Who Have Left

If you have already left Shincheonji, you may be processing feelings of betrayal, anger, grief, or confusion. This is normal and healthy. You invested time, energy, and emotion based on claims that turned out to be false.

Here’s what you need to know:

1. You Were Not Foolish

Shincheonji’s system is sophisticated and psychologically manipulative. You were not stupid or gullible for being drawn in. You were seeking truth, seeking God, seeking community. These are good desires. Shincheonji exploited them.

2. Your Time Was Not Wasted

Even though Shincheonji’s teaching was false, you learned valuable lessons:

• You learned to value Scripture and want to understand it deeply
• You learned to recognize manipulation and control tactics
• You learned the importance of testing teaching against the whole of Scripture
• You learned to trust your instincts when something doesn’t feel right

These lessons will serve you well as you continue your spiritual journey.

3. God Never Left You

Even when you were in Shincheonji, even when you believed false teaching, God was with you. He was patient, faithful, and loving. He did not abandon you. He led you out.

Psalm 139:7-10:

“Where can I go from your Spirit? Where can I flee from your presence? If I go up to the heavens, you are there; if I make my bed in the depths, you are there. If I rise on the wings of the dawn, if I settle on the far side of the sea, even there your hand will guide me, your right hand will hold me fast.”

4. Healing Takes Time

You may need to grieve the time lost, the relationships broken, the beliefs you held. Give yourself permission to feel these things. Healing is not linear. There will be good days and hard days.

Consider seeking support from:

• A licensed counselor familiar with spiritual abuse
• A healthy, Bible-teaching church
• Support groups for former members of high-control groups
• Trusted friends and family

5. There Is Life After Shincheonji

You can find authentic Christian community. You can read the Bible without fear or manipulation. You can worship God freely. You can ask questions without being threatened. You can experience the rest and security that Jesus offers.

Matthew 11:28-30:

“Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”

---

Part 16: The Sun, Moon, and Stars – Spiritual Leaders or Cosmic Signs?

SCJ’s Teaching: Spiritual Meanings of Celestial Bodies

The instructor establishes a key interpretive framework at the beginning of Lesson 107:

“And we know spiritually what the sun, moon, and stars are, right?

Spiritual Meanings:

• The Sun = Pastor
• The Moon = Evangelist
• The Stars = Saints”

This framework is foundational to Shincheonji’s entire interpretation of Revelation 6. When the text describes the sun turning black, the moon turning blood red, and the stars falling from the sky, Shincheonji interprets this as pastors losing their positions, evangelists being corrupted, and church members leaving the organization.

This interpretive key is taught as if it’s obvious, universal biblical truth. But is it?

Biblical Response: Where Does This Interpretation Come From?

Let’s examine whether the Bible actually teaches that “sun = pastor, moon = evangelist, stars = saints.”

Genesis 37:9-10 is often cited as the basis for this interpretation:

Genesis 37:9-10:

“Then he [Joseph] had another dream, and he told it to his brothers. ‘Listen,’ he said, ‘I had another dream, and this time the sun and moon and eleven stars were bowing down to me.’ When he told his father as well as his brothers, his father rebuked him and said, ‘What is this dream you had? Will your mother and I and your brothers actually come and bow down to the ground before you?'”

In this specific dream, in this specific context:

• The sun represented Joseph’s father (Jacob)
• The moon represented Joseph’s mother
• The eleven stars represented Joseph’s eleven brothers

But notice: This was a specific, contextual dream about Joseph’s family. Jacob understood the symbols because they made sense in that context. The dream was not establishing a universal interpretive key for all biblical references to sun, moon, and stars.

To claim that every reference to sun, moon, and stars in Scripture must follow this pattern is eisegesis—reading meaning into the text rather than drawing meaning from it.

How the Bible Actually Uses Sun, Moon, and Stars

Let’s look at how the Bible actually uses celestial imagery:

Genesis 1:14-16:

“And God said, ‘Let there be lights in the vault of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark sacred times, and days and years, and let them be lights in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth.’ And it was so. God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars.”

Here, sun, moon, and stars are literal celestial bodies created by God.

2. Symbols of God’s Covenant Faithfulness

Jeremiah 31:35-36:

“This is what the Lord says, he who appoints the sun to shine by day, who decrees the moon and stars to shine by night, who stirs up the sea so that its waves roar—the Lord Almighty is his name: ‘Only if these decrees vanish from my sight,’ declares the Lord, ‘will Israel ever cease being a nation before me.'”

Here, the sun, moon, and stars represent the permanence and reliability of God’s covenant.

3. Prophetic Language for Political/Religious Collapse

Isaiah 13:9-10 (judgment on Babylon):

“See, the day of the Lord is coming—a cruel day, with wrath and fierce anger—to make the land desolate and destroy the sinners within it. The stars of heaven and their constellations will not show their light. The rising sun will be darkened and the moon will not give its light.”

Isaiah 34:4 (judgment on Edom):

“All the stars in the sky will be dissolved and the heavens rolled up like a scroll; all the starry host will fall like withered leaves from the vine, like shriveled figs from the fig tree.”

Ezekiel 32:7-8 (judgment on Egypt):

“When I snuff you out, I will cover the heavens and darken their stars; I will cover the sun with a cloud, and the moon will not give its light. All the shining lights in the heavens I will darken over you; I will bring darkness over your land, declares the Sovereign Lord.”

In these passages, the darkening of sun, moon, and stars is prophetic language for the collapse of nations and their ruling powers. This was a common way for the prophets to describe God’s judgment on political entities.

4. Jesus’ Use of This Language

Matthew 24:29 (describing the destruction of Jerusalem):

“Immediately after the distress of those days ‘the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.'”

Jesus used the same prophetic language to describe the coming judgment on Jerusalem in AD 70. He was not talking about literal cosmic collapse—He was using the prophetic imagery His audience would have recognized to describe the end of the old covenant order and the destruction of the temple.

This was fulfilled in AD 70 when the Romans destroyed Jerusalem. The “sun, moon, and stars”—the religious and political leadership of Israel—were judged and removed.

The First-Century Understanding of Revelation 6

When the first-century Christians read Revelation 6:12-13:

Revelation 6:12-13:

“I watched as he opened the sixth seal. There was a great earthquake. The sun turned black like sackcloth made of goat hair, the whole moon turned blood red, and the stars in the sky fell to earth, as figs drop from a fig tree when shaken by a strong wind.”

They would have immediately recognized this as prophetic language for the collapse of political and religious powers. They would have understood it as describing God’s judgment on Rome and the forces that persecuted Christians.

They would NOT have thought: “Oh, this must be about specific pastors and evangelists at a church in Korea 1,900 years from now.”

That interpretation requires:

• Ignoring the historical and literary context
• Imposing a rigid interpretive framework (sun = pastor, moon = evangelist, stars = saints) that the text itself doesn’t establish
• Accepting that the original readers couldn’t understand the message meant for them

This is not sound biblical interpretation.

The Problem with Rigid Symbolic Keys

Shincheonji’s interpretive method assumes that biblical symbols have fixed, universal meanings. But this is not how the Bible works.

Consider the symbol of “water”:

• In John 4:14, water represents the Holy Spirit (“living water”)
• In Ephesians 5:26, water represents the Word of God (“washing with water through the word”)
• In Revelation 17:15, water represents “peoples, multitudes, nations and languages”

The meaning of a symbol depends on its context. You cannot create a universal “dictionary” of biblical symbols and apply it mechanically to every passage.

Similarly, “sun, moon, and stars” can mean different things in different contexts:

• In Genesis 1, they are literal celestial bodies
• In Joseph’s dream, they represent his family members
• In the prophets, they represent political and religious powers
• In Revelation, they represent the collapse of oppressive systems under God’s judgment

To insist that they MUST mean “pastor, evangelist, saints” in every context is to impose a rigid framework that the Bible itself doesn’t support.

---

Part 17: The “Former Heaven” – What Does It Mean?

SCJ’s Teaching: The First Heaven and First Earth

The instructor explains:

“The sun, moon, and stars of the former heaven. What does it mean that we say former heaven? Used to be. The first heaven and first earth is being judged. So then what does that mean has to happen after this? We need a new one. So if the former heaven or the first heaven passes away, it means that we need a new heaven to take its place. So Revelation 21:1. The first heaven and first earth that passes away starts in this chapter.”

Shincheonji teaches that:

• The “first heaven and first earth” refers to the Tabernacle Temple
• Revelation 6 describes its judgment and destruction
• The “new heaven and new earth” refers to Shincheonji
• This is why they named their organization “Shincheonji” (which means “new heaven new earth” in Korean)

This interpretation is central to Shincheonji’s identity and authority claims.

Biblical Response: What Is the New Heaven and New Earth?

Let’s examine what the Bible actually teaches about the “new heaven and new earth.”

Isaiah 65:17-19:

“See, I will create new heavens and a new earth. The former things will not be remembered, nor will they come to mind. But be glad and rejoice forever in what I will create, for I will create Jerusalem to be a delight and its people a joy. I will rejoice over Jerusalem and take delight in my people; the sound of weeping and of crying will be heard in it no more.”

Isaiah 66:22:

“‘As the new heavens and the new earth that I make will endure before me,’ declares the Lord, ‘so will your name and descendants endure.'”

2 Peter 3:10-13:

“But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare… But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, where righteousness dwells.”

Revelation 21:1-5:

“Then I saw ‘a new heaven and a new earth,’ for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea. I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, ‘Look! God’s dwelling place is now among the people, and he will dwell with them. They will be his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God. He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away.’ He who was seated on the throne said, ‘I am making everything new!'”

What do we see in these passages?

1. The new heaven and new earth is a cosmic renewal, not an organizational change. It involves the entire created order, not just a religious group.

2. It is accompanied by the end of death, mourning, crying, and pain. Has Shincheonji eliminated death and suffering? No.

3. It involves God dwelling directly with His people. Is God physically present at Shincheonji’s headquarters? No.

4. It is a future hope that all Christians await. Paul writes in Romans 8:19-21: “For the creation waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed. For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God.”

The new heaven and new earth is not a metaphor for a religious organization. It is the biblical promise of the complete renewal of all creation—the restoration of the world to its intended state, free from sin, death, and decay.

The Absurdity of the Claim

Let’s be clear about what Shincheonji is claiming:

They are claiming that when Revelation 21:1 says “I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away,” this is describing the founding of their organization in South Korea.

But Revelation 21:4 says: “There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain.”

Has Shincheonji eliminated death? No. People in Shincheonji still die.

Has Shincheonji eliminated mourning, crying, and pain? No. In fact, as documented in testimonies from former members, Shincheonji has caused significant emotional and spiritual pain.

Revelation 21:3 says: “God’s dwelling place is now among the people, and he will dwell with them.”

Is God physically dwelling at Shincheonji’s headquarters? No.

Revelation 21:1 says: “There was no longer any sea.”

Is there still an ocean? Yes. The seas still exist.

The claim that Shincheonji is the “new heaven and new earth” is absurd when you actually read what Revelation 21 describes. It requires ignoring or spiritualizing every specific detail that doesn’t fit.

The Pattern of Over-Realized Eschatology

As explained in Chapter 15 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story,” Shincheonji exhibits over-realized eschatology—the belief that future promises have been completely fulfilled in the present.

The New Testament presents a tension between “already” and “not yet”:

• The kingdom of God has already been inaugurated through Jesus’ death and resurrection
• But it has not yet been fully consummated—we still await Christ’s return, the resurrection of the dead, and the renewal of all creation

Shincheonji collapses this tension by claiming that the “not yet” has become “already” at their organization. They claim the new heaven and new earth is here, the 144,000 are being sealed, the kingdom is being established—all at Shincheonji.

This leads to:

• Spiritual pride (“We have arrived; we are the fulfillment”)
• Disillusionment (when the promised reality doesn’t match the actual experience)
• Isolation (from the broader Christian community that still awaits Christ’s return)

Biblical Christianity maintains the tension: We live in the “already” of Christ’s victory while we await the “not yet” of His return and the complete renewal of all things.

---

Part 18: Contrasting Chapters – Revelation 6 and 7

SCJ’s Teaching: End of One Era, Beginning of Another

The instructor explains:

“Lastly, and most importantly, Revelation 6 represents the end of an era, which means Revelation 7 represents new spiritual Israel. That’s why in Revelation 7 we see the 144,000 and the great multitude.”

Shincheonji teaches that:

• Revelation 6 = Judgment and destruction of the Tabernacle Temple (the “old” spiritual Israel)
• Revelation 7 = Creation and sealing of Shincheonji (the “new” spiritual Israel)

This framework makes sense within Shincheonji’s system. If Revelation 6 describes the end of the Tabernacle Temple, then Revelation 7 must describe what comes next—the establishment of Shincheonji with its 144,000 sealed members.

First-Century Understanding: Two Perspectives on the Same Reality

But let’s examine what the text actually says and how the first-century readers would have understood it.

Revelation 6:15-17 (end of chapter 6):

“Then the kings of the earth, the princes, the generals, the rich, the mighty, and everyone else, both slave and free, hid in caves and among the rocks of the mountains. They called to the mountains and the rocks, ‘Fall on us and hide us from the face of him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb! For the great day of their wrath has come, and who can withstand it?'”

This ends with a question: “Who can withstand it?”

Revelation 7:1-3 (beginning of chapter 7):

“After this I saw four angels standing at the four corners of the earth, holding back the four winds of the earth to prevent any wind from blowing on the land or on the sea or on any tree. Then I saw another angel coming up from the east, having the seal of the living God. He called out in a loud voice to the four angels who had been given power to harm the land and the sea: ‘Do not harm the land or the sea or the trees until we put a seal on the foreheads of the servants of our God.'”

Revelation 7 answers the question from Revelation 6: “Who can withstand the wrath of God? Those who are sealed by God.”

This is not describing two different organizations or two different time periods. It is describing two perspectives on the same reality:

• Revelation 6: The perspective of those who face God’s judgment—terror, fear, hiding
• Revelation 7: The perspective of those who are protected by God’s seal—security, salvation, worship

The literary structure suggests these are simultaneous, not sequential. While judgment is falling on those who oppose God, God is simultaneously sealing and protecting His people.

The 144,000 and the Great Multitude: One Group or Two?

Revelation 7:4-8 describes 144,000 sealed from the twelve tribes of Israel.

Revelation 7:9-10 describes “a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language.”

Are these two different groups, or two different descriptions of the same group?

As we discussed in the refutation of Lesson 106, the literary structure suggests they are the same group viewed from different angles:

• The 144,000 = God’s people viewed as the complete, perfected Israel (12 tribes × 12 apostles × 1,000 = completeness)
• The great multitude = The same people viewed as the universal church from all nations

This is a common technique in Revelation called recapitulation—describing the same reality from multiple perspectives to emphasize different aspects.

The first-century readers would have understood this as encouragement: “You are part of God’s sealed people. You are secure. Though the world faces judgment, you are protected. You will stand before the throne and worship.”

Shincheonji’s interpretation—that these are two different groups at two different organizations—misses the literary structure and the message of hope.

---

Part 19: The Progression of Indoctrination – Where Are You Now?

Understanding the Journey

By Lesson 107, students have been on a carefully designed journey:

Beginner Level:

• Introduced to the “Betrayal-Destruction-Salvation” framework
• Taught that God always works through one chosen person
• Created distrust of traditional Christian teaching

Intermediate Level:

• Learned “Bible logic” and pattern recognition
• Established that only Shincheonji has the correct interpretation
• Deepened distrust of pastors and churches outside Shincheonji

Advanced Level – Revelation 4-5:

• Elevated sense of importance (“You are part of the 144,000”)
• Introduced to the throne room and sealed scroll
• Created anticipation for the “fulfillment”

Advanced Level – Revelation 6:

• Introduced to the Tabernacle Temple narrative
• Established Lee Man-hee as the “New John” eyewitness
• Raised the stakes with threats of judgment
• Made acceptance of this interpretation essential for salvation

This is the critical juncture. Students are being asked to accept claims that are:

• Historically unverifiable
• Biblically questionable
• Logically inconsistent
• Psychologically manipulative

But they are also:

• Deeply invested (months of study)
• Emotionally attached (friendships, community)
• Psychologically primed (elevated, then threatened)
• Informationally controlled (only given Shincheonji’s version of events)

The Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort experienced when holding two conflicting beliefs or when behavior conflicts with beliefs.

Students at this point may be experiencing:

• “This seems like a stretch, but everyone else seems convinced…”
• “I’ve invested so much time—I need to see this through…”
• “The instructor is so confident—maybe I’m just not understanding it yet…”
• “If I question this, will I be ‘finished off like Noah’s generation’?”
• “But I’ve made such good friends here—I don’t want to lose them…”

This discomfort is actually a healthy sign. It means your critical thinking hasn’t been completely suppressed. It means the Holy Spirit may be prompting you to examine more carefully.

The Tactics at Work

Let’s identify the specific manipulation tactics being used in Lesson 107:

1. Threat of Divine Judgment

“If one considers this time like it is a joke and it goes in one ear and out the other, one must be finished off just like Noah’s generation.”

Purpose: Create fear around questioning or leaving.

2. False Urgency

“There is nowhere else to go in the Bible.”

Purpose: Create the impression that this is the final, ultimate truth—there’s nothing beyond this.

3. Exclusive Claim

“New John witnesses… If he wasn’t there to see it, we wouldn’t have known about it.”

Purpose: Establish Lee Man-hee as the sole authority and source of truth.

4. Information Control

Students are only given Shincheonji’s interpretation of the Tabernacle Temple events. They are not encouraged to research independently or consult other sources.

Purpose: Control the narrative and prevent students from discovering contradictory information.

5. Sunk Cost Exploitation

Students have invested months of time and emotional energy. The thought of walking away now feels like wasting all that investment.

Purpose: Keep students committed even when they have doubts.

6. Social Pressure

Students have formed friendships and community. Leaving means losing those relationships.

Purpose: Use social bonds to maintain commitment to the group.

These are not the methods of biblical teaching. These are the methods of high-control groups that prioritize organizational loyalty over truth.

---

Part 20: The Historical Reality – What Actually Happened at the Tabernacle Temple

Applying the Political and Historical Lens

Let’s examine the actual historical events at the Tabernacle Temple, using the information documented in “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale” and “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1 and 2.”

The Tabernacle Temple was founded by Yoo Jae-yeol in the 1960s-1970s. Yoo claimed to have received special revelation and taught that he was fulfilling biblical prophecy. He established a church structure with seven leaders or congregations, which he called the “seven golden lampstands.”

Lee Man-hee joined this organization and became deeply involved. He believed in Yoo’s teachings and was part of the leadership structure.

In the late 1970s-early 1980s, internal conflicts arose:

• Leadership disputes: Different leaders claimed authority and had conflicting visions for the organization.
• Theological disagreements: Questions arose about Yoo’s teachings and interpretations.
• Financial issues: There were disputes over money, property, and resources.
• Personal conflicts: Relationships broke down, trust was violated, accusations were made.

The organization fractured into multiple groups:

• Some followed one leader
• Some followed another leader
• Some left entirely
• The property was eventually sold

Lee Man-hee was one of several leaders who broke away to form their own groups. He founded Shincheonji and claimed that he was the faithful witness to the events at the Tabernacle Temple, and that those events were the fulfillment of Revelation 6.

But here’s the critical point: Other leaders who broke away made similar claims. They also claimed to be the true continuation, the faithful witness, the one who understood what really happened.

So we have multiple people, all claiming to be the fulfillment, all claiming to have the true interpretation, all claiming that their organization is the “new heaven and new earth.”

Who is right? How can we know?

Shincheonji says: “Trust Lee Man-hee. He was there. He witnessed it. He is the New John.”

But the other groups say the same thing about their leaders.

This is not how biblical prophecy works. Biblical prophecy is publicly verifiable, not dependent on accepting one person’s private interpretation of ambiguous events.

The Mundane Reality

When you strip away the theological reinterpretation, what happened at the Tabernacle Temple was:

• A religious organization experienced internal conflicts
• Leaders disagreed about theology, authority, and resources
• The organization split into factions
• Each faction claimed to be the true continuation
• The original organization dissolved

This is not uncommon in religious history. Church splits happen. Organizations fracture. Leaders disagree. People leave.

What makes Shincheonji unique is not that they experienced a church split, but that they reinterpreted that church split as the cosmic fulfillment of biblical prophecy.

But you could do this with any church split anywhere in the world. You could take any organizational conflict, assign biblical symbols to the people involved, and claim it’s the fulfillment of Revelation.

This is not biblical interpretation. This is creative storytelling.

---

Part 21: The Theological Implications – What’s Really at Stake

The Authority of Scripture

At the heart of this issue is a question about the authority of Scripture:

Does the Bible mean what it says, or does it mean what Lee Man-hee says it means?

Shincheonji’s interpretation requires accepting that:

• The original readers of Revelation couldn’t understand it
• The message wasn’t for them—it was for people 1,900 years later
• The symbols don’t mean what they obviously meant in the first-century context
• Only one person (Lee Man-hee) can correctly interpret the book

This effectively places Lee Man-hee’s interpretation above Scripture itself. The Bible becomes a coded message that requires a special interpreter—and that interpreter becomes the ultimate authority.

But the Bible claims to be clear and sufficient:

2 Timothy 3:16-17:

“All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.”

Psalm 119:105:

“Your word is a lamp for my feet, a light on my path.”

2 Peter 1:20-21:

“Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation of things. For prophecy never had its origin in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.”

The Bible is clear enough to guide us, sufficient to equip us, and authoritative on its own—it doesn’t require a special interpreter to unlock its meaning.

The Sufficiency of Christ

Another theological issue at stake is the sufficiency of Christ’s work:

Shincheonji’s system implies that Christ’s work was incomplete—that it required a physical, organizational fulfillment in Korea 2,000 years later.

But the New Testament declares that Christ’s work is finished:

John 19:30:

“When he had received the drink, Jesus said, ‘It is finished.’ With that, he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.”

Hebrews 10:12-14:

“But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God, and since that time he waits for his enemies to be made his footstool. For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.”

Colossians 2:9-10:

“For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form, and in Christ you have been brought to fullness. He is the head over every power and authority.”

We are complete in Christ. We don’t need a “new heaven and new earth” organization in Korea to complete what Christ began. His work is finished. We are waiting for His return and the final consummation of His kingdom—but the decisive victory has already been won.

The Nature of the Church

Shincheonji’s teaching also distorts the biblical understanding of the church:

They teach that the church is a specific organization (Shincheonji) with a specific structure (12 tribes) in a specific location (South Korea).

But the Bible teaches that the church is the universal body of all believers in Christ:

Ephesians 1:22-23:

“And God placed all things under his feet and appointed him to be head over everything for the church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills everything in every way.”

1 Corinthians 12:12-13:

“Just as a body, though one, has many parts, but all its many parts form one body, so it is with Christ. For we were all baptized by one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.”

Galatians 3:26-28:

“So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

The church is not an organization—it is the body of Christ, composed of all who have faith in Him, regardless of location, denomination, or organizational affiliation.

Shincheonji’s claim to be the exclusive “new heaven and new earth” contradicts the biblical teaching that the church is universal and includes all believers.

---

Part 22: Practical Steps – What Should You Do?

If You’re Currently Taking This Lesson

1. Pause and Reflect

Don’t rush through this material. Take time to think critically about what you’re being asked to believe.

Ask yourself:

• Does this interpretation make sense in the original context?
• Am I being given all the information, or just one perspective?
• Am I being pressured to accept this quickly?
• What happens if I question or disagree?

2. Research Independently

Don’t rely solely on Shincheonji’s version of events. Research the Tabernacle Temple independently. Look for neutral, historical sources.

Ask:

• What do non-Shincheonji sources say about the Tabernacle Temple?
• Are there other people who were there who tell a different story?
• What do scholars say about how to interpret Revelation?

3. Test Against Scripture

Read Revelation 6 in its full context. Read the letters to the seven churches (Revelation 2-3). Read the Old Testament passages that use similar imagery (Isaiah 13, 34; Ezekiel 32; Joel 2).

Ask:

• Does Shincheonji’s interpretation fit the context?
• Would the original readers have understood it this way?
• Does this interpretation align with the rest of Scripture?

4. Seek Outside Counsel

Talk to Christians outside of Shincheonji. Get other perspectives. Don’t let Shincheonji be your only source of biblical teaching.

Consider:

• Talking to a pastor or Christian counselor
• Reading commentaries on Revelation by respected scholars
• Visiting closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination for more resources

5. Trust Your Instincts

If something feels wrong, if you’re experiencing cognitive dissonance, if you’re being pressured to accept something that doesn’t make sense—trust those feelings. They may be the Holy Spirit prompting you to examine more carefully.

Proverbs 14:15:

“The simple believe anything, but the prudent give thought to their steps.”

1 Thessalonians 5:21:

“Test everything; hold fast what is good.”

If You’re Considering Leaving

1. Know That It’s Okay to Leave

Leaving Shincheonji is not leaving God. Your relationship with God is based on Christ’s finished work, not on your membership in an organization.

2. Prepare for the Transition

Leaving may be difficult. You may lose friendships. You may face pressure to stay. You may experience grief and confusion.

But you will also experience:

• Freedom from manipulation and control
• Ability to read the Bible without fear
• Connection with the broader Christian community
• Rest and security in Christ

3. Seek Support

Don’t go through this alone. Connect with:

• Former members who understand what you’re experiencing
• A healthy, Bible-teaching church
• A counselor familiar with spiritual abuse
• Trusted friends and family

4. Be Patient with Yourself

Healing takes time. You may need to grieve, process, and rebuild. Give yourself grace. God is patient and faithful.

5. Rediscover the Gospel

The gospel is simple and beautiful: God loves you. Christ died for you. You are saved by grace through faith. You are secure in Him.

You don’t have to earn it. You don’t have to maintain it through performance. You don’t have to be part of a specific organization.

It’s a gift. Receive it. Rest in it.

---

Part 23: The True Message of Revelation 6

What the First-Century Christians Heard

Let’s return to the original context and ask: What message did the first-century Christians receive from Revelation 6?

They heard:

1. God is Sovereign

Despite the power of Rome, despite the persecution they faced, God is still on His throne. The Lamb opens the seals. God’s plan is unfolding. Nothing is out of His control.

2. Judgment is Coming

The forces that oppose God’s kingdom—represented by the four horsemen—will not last forever. God will judge evil. Rome’s power is not ultimate.

3. Martyrs Will Be Vindicated

The souls under the altar (Revelation 6:9-11) cry out: “How long, Sovereign Lord, until you judge and avenge our blood?” The answer: “Wait a little longer.” God sees. God remembers. God will vindicate.

4. The Day of Wrath is Coming

The powerful of the earth—kings, princes, generals, the rich, the mighty—will face God’s wrath (Revelation 6:15-17). No one can escape God’s judgment. Even the powerful will cry out for the mountains to fall on them.

5. But God’s People Are Protected

This leads into Revelation 7, where we see that God seals His people before the judgment falls. They are protected, secure, and will stand before the throne in worship.

This was a message of hope, encouragement, and perseverance for Christians facing martyrdom under Rome.

It was not a coded message about a church split in Korea 1,900 years later.

The Timeless Application

While Revelation was written to a specific audience in a specific context, it also has timeless application for all Christians:

1. God is Sovereign Over History

Empires rise and fall. Powers come and go. But God remains on His throne. He is working out His purposes, even when we can’t see it.

2. Evil Will Be Judged

Injustice, oppression, persecution—God will judge it all. We may not see justice in this life, but we can trust that God will make all things right.

3. Suffering is Not Meaningless

When we suffer for our faith, when we face opposition and persecution, our suffering is not meaningless. God sees. God remembers. We will be vindicated.

4. We Are Secure in Christ

No matter what we face in this world, we are sealed by God. Nothing can separate us from His love (Romans 8:38-39). We are secure.

5. We Await Christ’s Return

We live in the tension between the “already” and the “not yet.” Christ has won the victory, but we still await the final consummation. We wait with hope, perseverance, and faith.

This is the true message of Revelation 6—not a message about organizational disputes in Korea, but a message about God’s sovereignty, justice, and faithfulness that applies to all Christians in all times and places.

---

Conclusion: Two Stories, One Choice

The Two Stories

You are being presented with two different stories:

Shincheonji’s Story:

• Revelation was a coded message that couldn’t be understood for 2,000 years
• It was fulfilled through events at the Tabernacle Temple in Korea
• Lee Man-hee is the New John who witnessed and can explain it
• You must join Shincheonji to be part of the 144,000
• If you leave or question, you will face judgment

The Biblical Story:

• Revelation was a letter to first-century Christians facing persecution
• It used prophetic imagery to encourage them to remain faithful
• It proclaimed God’s sovereignty, the victory of Christ, and the vindication of martyrs
• It applies to all Christians as a message of hope and perseverance
• Salvation is through faith in Christ alone, not through organizational membership

These are fundamentally different stories. They cannot both be true.

The Choice Before You

You must choose which story you will believe.

Will you believe:

• The story that requires accepting one man’s interpretation as authoritative?
• The story that shrinks Revelation from cosmic to organizational?
• The story that creates fear, anxiety, and conditional acceptance?
• The story that isolates you from the broader Christian community?

Or will you believe:

• The story that the Bible speaks clearly and can be understood by all believers?
• The story that Revelation is about God’s universal plan of redemption?
• The story that offers rest, security, and assurance in Christ?
• The story that connects you with 2,000 years of Christian faith and witness?

This is not a small decision. This is a decision about authority, truth, and the nature of the gospel itself.

The Invitation

If you are struggling with doubt, if you are experiencing cognitive dissonance, if you are feeling pressured and anxious—hear this:

Jesus invites you to come to Him, not to an organization:

Matthew 11:28-30:

“Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”

John 6:37:

“All those the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away.”

John 10:27-28:

“My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand.”

You don’t need to be part of the 144,000 at Shincheonji. You don’t need Lee Man-hee to mediate for you. You don’t need to accept a questionable interpretation of Revelation to be saved.

You need Jesus. Only Jesus. And He is freely available to all who call on His name.

Romans 10:13:

“Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”

Not everyone who joins Shincheonji. Not everyone who accepts Lee Man-hee’s interpretation. Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord.

That’s the gospel. That’s the good news. That’s the truth that sets us free.

---

Final Word: The Test of Time

Throughout history, many people have claimed to be the fulfillment of biblical prophecy. Many organizations have claimed to be the exclusive people of God. Many leaders have claimed special revelation and authority.

And throughout history, these claims have been tested by time—and most have been found wanting.

The Tabernacle Temple claimed to be the fulfillment. It collapsed.

Now Shincheonji claims to be the fulfillment. But what happens when it, too, faces challenges, conflicts, and potential dissolution? Will the next leader claim that Shincheonji’s collapse was “Revelation 6” and that his organization is the true “Revelation 7”?

The cycle will continue as long as people accept the premise that Revelation must be fulfilled through a physical organization led by a single man.

But the biblical message is different:

The fulfillment is not an organization. The fulfillment is a person—Jesus Christ.

He is the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. He is the Lamb who was slain. He is the Lion of Judah. He is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords.

He has won the victory. He reigns. And He invites all who believe to share in His triumph—not through organizational membership, but through faith, grace, and the indwelling Holy Spirit.

This is the one story that matters. This is the gospel. This is the truth that has stood the test of 2,000 years and will stand for eternity.

May you have wisdom to discern truth from error, courage to follow where truth leads, and peace in knowing that your security rests not in an organization, but in Christ alone.

---

For more resources, testimonies, and support, visit: closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination

---

“Test everything; hold fast what is good.” (1 Thessalonians 5:21)

“You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” (John 8:32)