Beasts represent false pastors and people who do not understand the Word (Revelation 13). They act instinctively and lack the ability to reason or discern spiritual truth. Proverbs 30:2-4.
“Beast” in Shincheonji Doctrine
1. Definition and Core Concept
In Shincheonji terminology, the “beast” is not a literal animal but a figurative term used to describe a person—or group of people—who lack a proper understanding of God’s word. More specifically, it is often applied to false pastors or leaders whose actions are driven by instinct and worldly influences rather than by true spiritual discernment. Such individuals are seen as “beast-like” because, like animals, they act irrationally and destructively when they do not understand the deeper spiritual truths of God’s message. This concept is central to Shincheonji’s criticism of those who have embraced doctrines originating from what they call “Babylon” (a symbol for worldly, corrupt, or false religious systems) rather than the pure, revealed word of God.
2. Biblical Basis and Key Verses
Shincheonji teachings draw heavily on Revelation 13, where John describes a beast coming out of the sea with seven heads, ten horns, and blasphemous names (Revelation 13:1–4). In this context, the beast is interpreted as a false pastor or an ungodly leader who, empowered by the dragon (Satan), exercises authority in opposition to God’s chosen people. For example, one lesson explains that the characteristics—the appearance resembling a lion, leopard, and bear—are not random; they are chosen because these animals represent destroyers in nature, mirroring the destructive nature of those who “do not know the word” .
Other verses further clarify the metaphor: Jude 1:10 compares irrational, destructive speech to that of beasts, and Psalms and Proverbs are used to illustrate that a person lacking understanding behaves like an animal. Moreover, the mark of the beast (666) is reinterpreted by Shincheonji not as a literal number for a microchip or vaccine but as symbolic of Satan’s false doctrines and the self-appointed titles false pastors assign themselves .
3. Figurative Representations and Cross-References
Within Shincheonji teachings, several figurative images are associated with the term “beast”:
-
Beast from the Sea:
This is the primary image from Revelation 13. It represents a false pastor coming from the “sea” (symbolic of the worldly, corrupt realm) who is granted authority by the dragon (Satan). The beast’s composite features (lion, leopard, and bear) signify destructive power and the predatory nature of those who oppose God’s truth. -
Beast from the Earth:
In contrast, the beast from the earth is described as a person who already belongs to the corrupted system (or “tabernacle of heaven” as infiltrated by false doctrines) and then works in tandem with the beast from the sea to destroy the congregation. This figure is linked to historical figures in the Bible—such as Solomon, who in later years strayed from pure devotion—and is characterized by accepting worldly wealth (represented figuratively by the number 666 in relation to Solomon’s treasures) rather than divine truth. -
Additional Figurative Terms:
Other representations include the “head, horn, and tail” images, which in Shincheonji doctrine refer to the structure of false leadership. The “head” is the leading false pastor, the “horns” are the authority figures (elders) who support and carry out his orders, and the “tail” represents the false prophets or those who follow without true understanding. These images help believers discern between genuine, sheep-like followers and those who are mere beasts lacking insight.
4. The Psychological and Doctrinal Implications
From a psychological standpoint, Shincheonji teaches that the “beast” mentality arises from a failure to internalize God’s word. Just as an animal relies on instinct without reflection, those who are not spiritually reformed will act irrationally and destructively. This lack of understanding is not only personal but also institutional. False pastors are seen as embodiments of a corrupted mindset—one that is swayed by worldly opinions, misunderstanding, and a refusal to let the revealed word guide one’s actions. The result is a form of spiritual degeneration that contrasts sharply with the selfless, humble “sheep” who truly know and follow God’s word.
5. Babylon and Its Connection to the “Beast”
In Shincheonji theology, “Babylon” is a symbolic term for the false religious systems and worldly doctrines that distort the truth. Babylon is seen as the source of all false teachings and the breeding ground for those who become “beasts.” When a false pastor (the beast) emerges, he is understood to be operating under the banner of Babylon—propagating doctrines that are contrary to the revealed truth of God’s word. This interpretation sharply contrasts with traditional Christian views, which often see the beast as an eschatological figure in a more literal end-times scenario rather than as a representation of false leadership within corrupt religious institutions.
6. Distinction from Mainstream Christianity
While mainstream Christianity typically interprets the beast of Revelation as a future, apocalyptic enemy or a symbol of pervasive evil, Shincheonji redefines the beast as a present, human element—the false pastor or ungodly leader. For Shincheonji, the emphasis is on discernment: believers are urged to verify whether their pastors reflect true shepherding (laying down one’s life for the sheep) or if they embody the beastly attributes of irrationality and destructive authority. This reorientation is meant to protect the integrity of the church (the “tabernacle of heaven”) from infiltration by Babylon’s false doctrines.
7. Summary and Application
In summary, the Shincheonji doctrine defines the “beast” as a figurative symbol for those who do not understand God’s word—most notably false pastors who serve as agents of worldly, corrupt doctrines (Babylon). The imagery of the beast (with its lion, leopard, and bear features, seven heads, and ten horns) is used to describe the destructive, irrational nature of these individuals and to warn believers against accepting teachings that are not rooted in the pure, revealed word of God. By understanding these symbolic representations, adherents are better equipped to discern true shepherds from those who lead others astray, thus safeguarding their spiritual integrity.
Additional References for more Exploration
Shincheonji’s Interpretation of the Beast in Revelation: Fulfillment in South Korea
1. Introduction: The Doctrine of Fulfillment
Shincheonji (also known as New Heaven and New Earth) teaches that the Bible—especially the Book of Revelation—is written in symbolic language and parables that now have a concrete, physical fulfillment. Rather than waiting for an apocalyptic future, SCJ asserts that the divine plan is unfolding here and now in South Korea. Central to this fulfillment is the identification of “the beast,” a term that, in SCJ doctrine, symbolizes false leadership and corrupted religious structures opposing God’s will. This understanding is not only a matter of eschatology but also a call to spiritual discernment for believers.
2. Core Doctrine: Figurative Interpretation and Physical Fulfillment
According to SCJ, every biblical prophecy was designed to be fulfilled physically in the pattern of God’s re-creation of heaven and earth. In this framework, the prophecies of Revelation are not vague warnings but detailed descriptions of events and individuals. The symbolic language—including images of beasts, heads, horns, and marks—is understood as a divine code that reveals the identity and role of false pastors and institutions. By decoding these symbols, believers are meant to recognize the “true” shepherds of God’s people and separate them from those who lead them astray.
3. The Beast as a Figurative Representation
In Shincheonji theology, “the beast” does not refer to an animal-like creature, but to human figures who are antagonistic to God’s restored kingdom. There are two primary categories:
-
The Beast of the Sea (Revelation 13:1):
This figure is understood as the principal false pastor—an individual who emerges from the “sea” (symbolizing the turbulent, corrupted world). The beast of the sea is endowed with attributes like seven heads and ten horns, signifying a complex and destructive authority that opposes God’s appointed leadership. In SCJ teaching, this beast represents a leader whose actions are manipulated by Satan, manifesting in deceptive doctrines and destructive practices. -
The Beast of the Earth (Revelation 13:11):
This secondary figure is seen as a false prophet arising from within the corrupted religious establishment itself—the Tabernacle Temple. This beast works in concert with the primary false leader, deceiving the faithful by promoting doctrines that mimic true spirituality while steering believers toward worldly allegiances. Both types are integral to the overall picture of spiritual deception described in Revelation.
4. Identification of Key Figures: The “Actual Reality” Behind the Beasts
Shincheonji goes further than abstract symbolism by identifying specific individuals as the “actual reality” of these beasts. Two prominent names often cited are:
-
Mr. Oh:
Considered the embodiment of the beast of the earth, Mr. Oh is linked with several symbolic images:
• He is equated with figures like Balaam and Nicholas—leaders who historically led God’s people astray.
• He is also identified with Wormwood, the star that poisons the waters (as in Revelation 8:10–11), signifying his role in corrupting and defiling God’s word.
• Furthermore, Mr. Oh is associated with the infamous “mark of the beast” (666) and is even identified with the figure described as the “eighth king” in Revelation 17, as well as the false prophet mentioned in Revelation 19:20.
His actions within the Tabernacle Temple in Gwacheon are interpreted as fulfilling prophecy by introducing false doctrines and betraying the true worship of God. -
Mr. Tak:
Mr. Tak is identified as one of the seven heads of the beast. As an authority figure within the temple structure, he is credited with orchestrating significant, destructive changes that SCJ views as direct fulfillments of Revelation’s prophecies. His leadership is seen as a key element in the spiritual defilement and betrayal that precedes the final separation of true believers from the false.
5. The Timeline of Fulfillment and Conflicts
Shincheonji asserts that these prophecies have been unfolding according to a precise timeline:
- 1966: The establishment of the Tabernacle Temple in Gwacheon, South Korea, sets the stage for future events.
- 1975: Mr. Oh rises as the right-hand man of a key temple leader, further entrenching false doctrines within the institution.
- September 20, 1981: A significant “mark of the beast” incident occurs during which, under Mr. Tak’s authority, about 3,000 members gather and 17 evangelists are ordained as Presbyterian pastors. This event is interpreted as the physical manifestation of prophecy regarding deception and betrayal.
- 1982–1983: A period of internal conflict and spiritual battle takes place, marking the intensification of false teachings.
- March 14, 1984: The formal establishment of the Shincheonji Church of Jesus—Temple of the Tabernacle of the Testimony—marks a new era, as SCJ claims to fulfill the promises of Revelation by restoring God’s true temple.
These events, according to SCJ, represent a progressive unfolding of prophecy. The infiltration, betrayal, and subsequent purification of the Tabernacle Temple mirror the biblical narrative of the separation of wheat (true believers) from the weeds (the false elements).
6. Why This Interpretation Matters
For Shincheonji, correctly discerning the identity of the beasts and understanding their fulfillment is critical for several reasons:
- Spiritual Discernment: Believers are taught to differentiate between true spiritual leadership and deceptive, destructive forces. Recognizing the “names” and roles of the beasts (such as Mr. Oh and Mr. Tak) is key to safeguarding the community from spiritual corruption.
- Validation of Prophecy: The fulfillment of these prophecies serves as tangible evidence of God’s active re-creation of heaven and earth. It reassures believers that the words of Revelation are being fulfilled exactly as promised.
- Call to Salvation: By exposing the falsehood of the corrupted temple and its leaders, Shincheonji positions itself as the sole possessor of the true word. Believers are urged to come to the “new” spiritual Israel—Shincheonji—to be saved and to participate in the harvest of God’s people.
- Judgment and Purification: The revelation of the beasts’ identities signals that the final separation of true and false believers is imminent. This impending judgment is meant to cleanse the community and restore the purity of God’s temple.
7. Conclusion: The Full Picture of Fulfillment
Shincheonji’s interpretation of “the beast” in Revelation is a comprehensive, multi-layered doctrine that connects biblical prophecy with modern events. By reading the apocalyptic imagery as symbolic representations of specific individuals—most notably Mr. Oh (the false prophet and deceiver) and Mr. Tak (the orchestrator of destructive changes)—SCJ explains how God’s plan is being fulfilled right here in South Korea. The doctrines emphasize that these events are not merely metaphorical but are actual, tangible signs of the restoration of true worship and the imminent gathering of God’s faithful people. Ultimately, this interpretation serves as both a warning against deception and a beacon of hope for believers who follow the revealed word.
Mr. Tak as Symbolic of the Beast and the Tabernacle Temple in Shincheonji Doctrine
Within Shincheonji (SCJ) theology, Mr. Tak is a significant figure, embodying destructive forces that SCJ believes infiltrated and corrupted the Tabernacle Temple. Understanding his role requires explaining what the Tabernacle Temple represents in SCJ’s teachings.
The Tabernacle Temple: A Center of Faith and Prophecy
For those unfamiliar with Shincheonji:
• The Tabernacle Temple, specifically the one in Gwacheon, South Korea, is seen as God’s dwelling place and the center of faith.
• It is believed that the events of Revelation take place in this tabernacle.
• It symbolizes the tabernacle of chosen people, which grows as believers are evangelized and gathered.
• It is where the prophecies in the Old and New Testaments are said to be mastered and explained.
• It is important to note that Shincheonji identifies the Tabernacle Temple as later changing its name to the Stewardship Education Center or various other affiliated names depending on the translation from Korean.
Mr. Tak: Embodiment of the Beast from the Sea
Shincheonji identifies Mr. Tak as one of the “beasts” described in the Book of Revelation, particularly linking him to the “beast from the sea”. This identification carries significant symbolic weight:
• False Pastor: SCJ equates the beast with a false pastor or teacher who does not correctly understand the word.
• One of the Seven Heads: Mr. Tak is considered one of the seven heads of the beast, symbolizing leadership within a destructive force.
• Actions as Fulfillment: SCJ interprets Mr. Tak’s actions, particularly in ordaining Presbyterian pastors, as fulfilling prophecies related to deception and destruction.
Affiliations and Representations of Mr. Tak
Within Shincheonji’s symbolic framework, Mr. Tak’s affiliations and representations include:
• The Beast from the Sea: Representing false teachings and deception.
• One of the Seven Heads: Symbolizing leadership within a destructive force.
• Authority Figure: His position in the Stewardship Education Center symbolizes his influence and control [previous turns].
• Destroyer: Representing the corruption of God’s temple.
• Nicolaitan: Associated with Satan and his Nicolaitans, who enticed the seven messengers and their followers to eat food sacrificed to idols and to commit sexual immorality.
The Narrative of Destruction and the Rise of Shincheonji
Shincheonji views Mr. Tak’s actions as pivotal in the Tabernacle Temple’s downfall:
• 1966: SCJ claims that Satan and his Nicolaitans entered the Tabernacle Temple in Gwacheon, enticing followers into immorality and idol worship.
• September 20, 1981: Under Mr. Tak’s authority, about 3,000 members gathered, and 17 evangelists were ordained as Presbyterian pastors, seen by SCJ as a deceptive act leading members to serve false pastors.
According to Shincheonji doctrine, the destruction of the first tabernacle leads to the creation of a new one:
• Temple of the Tabernacle of the Testimony: SCJ identifies itself as the Temple of the Tabernacle of the Testimony, established by those who have overcome the beast.
• New Spiritual Israel: SCJ is also referred to as New Spiritual Israel, a gathering place for those who are victorious.
• Importance of Finding Shincheonji: Believers are urged to seek the promised pastor and the Temple of the Tabernacle of the Testimony for salvation.
Cautionary Note
It is important to recognize that Shincheonji’s interpretations of Mr. Tak, the Tabernacle Temple, and related prophecies are specific to their doctrine and not universally accepted [previous turns]. Like all of SCJ’s teachings, these views are subjective and should be approached with critical awareness.
Who Is Mr. Oh? Understanding His Role in the Tabernacle Temple and Shincheonji Doctrine
In Shincheonji teachings, biblical prophecy is not confined to an abstract, distant future—it is being fulfilled here and now through physical events and specific individuals. Central to this fulfillment is the concept of the Tabernacle Temple and the identification of key figures who embody prophetic symbols. One of these figures is Mr. Pyongho Oh, whose role is intricately tied to the corruption and deception within the temple. This article provides an in‐depth look at who Mr. Oh is, his significance within the Tabernacle Temple, and why his identity is essential for understanding Shincheonji’s fulfillment of Revelation.
1. The Tabernacle Temple: A Brief Overview
For those unfamiliar with Shincheonji, the Tabernacle Temple is more than a physical building—it is a symbolic representation of God’s re-created kingdom on earth. Located in Gwacheon, South Korea, this temple is seen by Shincheonji as the modern-day counterpart to the biblical temple, where God’s spiritual purposes are physically manifested. It is here that divine prophecy converges with historical events. The temple serves as the center of spiritual authority and the battleground where true worship is to be distinguished from false doctrine.
In Shincheonji doctrine, the Tabernacle Temple is both a sanctuary and a signpost. It signifies the restoration of God’s original design and stands as evidence that biblical prophecies, particularly those in the Book of Revelation, are being fulfilled. The temple is also a focal point for internal conflicts—between genuine adherents of the “living word” and those who introduce deceptive teachings.
2. Mr. Pyongho Oh: The Embodiment of the Beast of the Earth
Within this context, Mr. Pyongho Oh emerges as a pivotal figure. In Shincheonji teachings, he is identified as the “actual reality” of the beast of the earth—a symbol derived from Revelation 13. Unlike a literal beast, Mr. Oh is seen as a human leader who, through his actions and doctrines, embodies spiritual corruption and deception.
a. The Symbolic Identity of Mr. Oh
Shincheonji interprets the biblical imagery of the beast—its heads, horns, and the infamous mark (commonly associated with 666)—as pointing to individuals who mislead God’s people. Mr. Oh is linked with several symbolic figures:
- Balaam and the Nicolaitans: He is compared to historical figures who led God’s people astray by promoting false teachings.
- Wormwood: Like the star that poisons the waters in Revelation 8, Mr. Oh is seen as one who corrupts the pure, nourishing word of God.
- The False Prophet and the Eighth King: His role is extended to include characteristics of the deceiver who gives the mark of the beast, signifying his allegiance to Satan and his function in undermining true worship.
b. His Role Within the Tabernacle Temple
Mr. Oh’s influence is primarily exercised within the Tabernacle Temple—a place that, for Shincheonji, is supposed to be the re-creation of God’s temple. However, Mr. Oh is regarded as the agent of corruption within this sacred space. His introduction of false doctrines and his manipulation of the temple’s spiritual functions have led to internal betrayal and the spiritual defilement of what was intended to be a pure center of divine revelation.
Shincheonji adherents point to specific events as evidence of his role. For instance, incidents such as false ordinations and the dissemination of teachings that diverge from what they believe is the “living and enduring word” are attributed to his influence. By corrupting the temple, Mr. Oh paves the way for the fulfillment of prophetic warnings found in Revelation—warnings that call for a final, divine purification.
3. Why Mr. Oh’s Identity Matters in Shincheonji Doctrine
Understanding who Mr. Oh is—and what he represents—is crucial for several reasons:
-
Spiritual Discernment:
Identifying Mr. Oh as the embodiment of the beast of the earth helps believers differentiate between true spiritual leadership and deceptive forces. In a period when false teachings are believed to infiltrate the temple, recognizing his influence is seen as essential for safeguarding one’s faith. -
Validation of Fulfillment:
For Shincheonji, the fulfillment of biblical prophecy is evidenced by the concrete actions and the emergence of figures like Mr. Oh. His role serves as a tangible sign that the events foretold in Revelation are unfolding, reinforcing the organization’s claim to be at the center of God’s re-creation of heaven and earth. -
Call to Purification:
The exposure of Mr. Oh’s actions is not meant solely as a cautionary tale but as a call to action. Believers are urged to purge the corruption that he represents by embracing the true word. In doing so, they prepare themselves for the ultimate separation of the wheat from the weeds—the gathering of true believers and the casting out of false elements.
4. Conclusion
In Shincheonji’s eschatological framework, Mr. Pyongho Oh is more than just an individual; he is a symbol of the pervasive corruption that stands in opposition to God’s re-established kingdom. As the “beast of the earth,” his role within the Tabernacle Temple underscores the ongoing battle between true worship and deceptive doctrines. For those new to Shincheonji, the Tabernacle Temple represents the physical manifestation of God’s promised restoration—a sacred space that, when corrupted by figures like Mr. Oh, signals the urgent need for discernment, purification, and renewal.
By exposing the true identity and actions of Mr. Oh, Shincheonji teachings aim to validate their interpretation of Revelation and to prepare believers for the final fulfillment of prophecy. Recognizing his influence is seen as essential for anyone striving to adhere to the authentic, unadulterated word of God.
Shincheonji’s Definition of “Beast” in Revelation: An Extensive Analysis with Actual Fulfillment
Introduction: Prophecy, Fulfillment, and Figurative Language
According to Shincheonji teachings, the Bible—especially the Book of Revelation—is written in symbolic language. Lee Manhee’s published works assert that these symbols are not merely metaphors for distant future events but are already being physically fulfilled. In this framework, the “beast” is not a literal creature but a figurative representation of false leadership and corrupt spiritual forces. Recognizing the true meaning of these symbols is key to understanding God’s re-creation of heaven and earth (The Creation of Heaven and Earth, pp. 1–10).
1. The Concept of “Beast” in Shincheonji Doctrine
In Shincheonji’s view, the term “beast” encompasses various symbolic figures that stand in opposition to God’s true worship. Rather than referring to animal-like monsters, the beast represents human leaders—false pastors or propagators of corrupt doctrine—who lead believers away from the pure, revealed word. This interpretation is part of a broader theme in Lee Manhee’s work that all biblical prophecies are fulfilled physically in a cyclical process of creation, betrayal, destruction, and re-creation (The Creation of Heaven and Earth, pp. 6–10).
2. The Beast of the Sea and the Beast of the Earth
Lee Manhee’s interpretation—detailed extensively in The Physical Fulfillment of Revelation—identifies two primary symbolic beasts in Revelation:
-
The Beast of the Sea:
This beast emerges from the “sea,” which Shincheonji explains as representing the impure, worldly realm. It is portrayed as having multiple heads and horns, signifying a complex and destructive authority. In Shincheonji doctrine, this figure is fulfilled by a false pastor whose power is externally evident. Although details vary, some teachings point to Mr. Tak as the realized embodiment of this beast; he is identified as one of the seven heads, representing a key authority figure whose actions within the temple have introduced deceptive doctrines (The Physical Fulfillment of Revelation, pp. 176–181). -
The Beast of the Earth:
Complementing the external false power of the beast of the sea, the beast of the earth is understood as an internal corrupting force. It operates from within the “Tabernacle Temple” (the modern, physical representation of God’s re-created kingdom in South Korea) as a false prophet. Lee Manhee’s writings explain that this role is fulfilled by Mr. Oh, who is seen as the actual representative of internal spiritual corruption. Mr. Oh is associated with the dissemination of false doctrines, the giving of the “mark of the beast,” and acts that align with the prophetic descriptions of betrayal and defilement (The Physical Fulfillment of Revelation, pp. 176–181).
3. Figurative Representations and Their Actual Fulfillment
Lee Manhee also uses the language of parables to further elucidate these symbols. In The Explanation of Parables from the SCJ ParableBook, the “Figurative Beast, Head, Horn, Tail” is broken down into its constituent symbolic parts (p. 55). Here, the figurative breakdown is as follows:
- The “head” represents the primary authority or the false pastor who stands at the forefront of deception.
- The “horns” denote supporting figures who amplify the false doctrine.
- The “tail” symbolizes the lingering influence of these deceptive forces.
In the actual fulfillment of prophecy, Mr. Tak is interpreted as fulfilling the role of the external, dominant head (the beast of the sea), while Mr. Oh fulfills the role of the internal, corrupting spirit (the beast of the earth). Their activities within the Tabernacle Temple illustrate how false teachings and internal betrayal are manifested in physical reality.
4. The Importance of These Interpretations
For Shincheonji, correctly identifying and understanding the symbolic beasts and their actual fulfillment is crucial for several reasons:
-
Spiritual Discernment:
Recognizing that the beast is not a mythological monster but a symbol of real, human deception enables believers to discern genuine spiritual guidance from false leadership. Identifying Mr. Tak and Mr. Oh helps believers to safeguard themselves from corrupt influences. -
Validation of Prophecy:
The detailed fulfillment of the prophecies regarding the beasts—both of the sea and the earth—is presented as concrete evidence that biblical prophecy is being realized physically. This reinforces Shincheonji’s claim to be at the center of God’s re-creation of heaven and earth (The Physical Fulfillment of Revelation, pp. 176–181). -
Call to Purification:
By exposing the actual individuals (Mr. Tak and Mr. Oh) who embody these prophetic symbols, Shincheonji calls for a cleansing of the temple. This purification process is viewed as necessary to restore the community of believers to its divinely intended state.
5. Conclusion
Shincheonji’s definition of “beast” in Revelation is a sophisticated blend of figurative language and physical fulfillment. Lee Manhee’s published works, including The Creation of Heaven and Earth (pp. 1–10) and The Physical Fulfillment of Revelation (pp. 176–181), along with detailed explanations in The Explanation of Parables from the SCJ ParableBook (p. 55), provide a roadmap for understanding how the beasts of the sea and the earth are not literal monsters but symbolic representations of false pastors and deceptive prophets. In actual fulfillment, Mr. Tak is identified with the beast of the sea, representing external, authoritative deception, while Mr. Oh is seen as the beast of the earth, representing internal corruption within the temple.
These interpretations are central to Shincheonji’s doctrine, serving as both a warning against spiritual deception and a validation of the fulfillment of biblical prophecy. Believers are urged to study these texts closely so they may recognize the signs of fulfillment and align themselves with what is believed to be the true, unadulterated word of God. This understanding is considered essential for safeguarding one’s faith and for participating in the divine re-creation of heaven and earth.
References:
– The Creation of Heaven and Earth, pp. 1–10
– The Physical Fulfillment of Revelation, pp. 176–181
– The Explanation of Parables (SCJ ParableBook), p. 55
Please take the time to check the Bible verses we’ve provided as references. Use them as a guide for your own understanding and discernment. It’s important to verify and confirm information with external sources, witnesses, and experts to ensure validity and transparency. Additionally, remember to pray for wisdom as you seek to identify any errors and ensure that your understanding aligns with biblical teachings.
Let's assess whether SCJ's interpretation aligns with biblical teachings in context
Corrected Analysis: Biblical Teaching Versus Shincheonji’s Interpretation of the Beasts in Revelation
1. Mainstream Biblical Scholarship on Revelation’s Beasts
Most biblical scholars agree that the Book of Revelation is written as apocalyptic literature—a genre rich in symbolic and metaphorical language. In this view:
• The imagery of the beasts (such as the beast from the sea and the beast from the earth) is understood as representing broad, often recurring forces in history. For example, the beast from the sea (Revelation 13:1–4) is typically interpreted as symbolizing powerful, oppressive empires or political systems that oppose God’s kingdom. Its multiple heads and horns are seen as signifying the complexity and unity of these corrupt forces rather than pointing to one specific individual.
• Similarly, the beast from the earth (Revelation 13:11–18) is generally seen as representing a false prophet or an internal religious force that supports the external power of the first beast. This figure is thought to symbolize the deceptive religious systems that lead people away from true worship.
• The “mark of the beast” (Revelation 13:16–18) is commonly understood as a symbol of allegiance to these oppressive systems, often interpreted in economic or political terms rather than a literal mark administered by a single leader.
Overall, mainstream interpretations stress that Revelation’s vivid images are meant to be read symbolically, pointing to cycles of political and religious apostasy, rather than as a one-to-one identification of modern individuals.
2. Shincheonji’s Interpretation
In contrast, Shincheonji’s teachings—based on the writings of Lee Manhee—claim that the prophecies in Revelation are now being physically fulfilled in South Korea. According to this interpretation:
• The “beast” is not a composite symbol for political or religious systems over time but is fulfilled by specific modern figures. For example, Shincheonji identifies the beast of the sea with a false pastor whose authority is external and visible, while the beast of the earth is understood as an internal corrupting force within the religious establishment.
• Within this framework, individuals such as Mr. Tak and Mr. Oh are singled out as the literal embodiments of these prophetic images. Mr. Tak is seen as representing the external power of the beast (often linked to the heads and horns imagery), whereas Mr. Oh is identified with the internal deception—the false prophet who corrupts the community from within.
• Shincheonji asserts that events within their Tabernacle Temple in South Korea serve as tangible signs of these fulfillments, with the physical gathering of members and the propagation of false doctrines being viewed as direct fulfillments of the symbolism in Revelation.
3. Correcting the Interpretative Approach
When comparing these views with the broader biblical context, several points of correction emerge:
• Symbolic versus Literal Fulfillment: Mainstream biblical scholarship holds that the imagery in Revelation is highly symbolic and meant to convey spiritual truths about the struggle between God and evil over the course of history, rather than pinpointing specific modern individuals. The symbols (such as the multi-headed beast or the mark of the beast) are not intended to be interpreted as direct, literal identifications of people like Mr. Tak or Mr. Oh.
• Historical Context: Scholars note that the Book of Revelation was written in a first-century context of persecution, where its symbols would have been understood as commentary on the political and religious powers of that era. The application of these symbols to modern South Korean figures is a departure from this historical understanding.
• Diverse Interpretative Traditions: Throughout church history, there have been multiple interpretations of Revelation’s imagery—preterist, historicist, futurist, and idealist. While some interpret the symbols as representing future global events, most agree that the text is meant to inspire perseverance and moral discernment among believers rather than serve as a precise blueprint for identifying contemporary individuals.
4. Conclusion
In summary, the mainstream biblical interpretation of the beasts in Revelation emphasizes their symbolic nature as representations of large-scale, recurring forces—such as corrupt political empires or false religious systems—rather than specific individuals. Shincheonji’s interpretation, which identifies figures like Mr. Tak and Mr. Oh as the actual fulfillment of these prophecies in South Korea, diverges significantly from this conventional understanding.
The corrected perspective is that Revelation’s imagery should be seen as a symbolic, multi-layered depiction of the ongoing conflict between God’s kingdom and the forces of evil throughout history. This view is supported by historical-critical scholarship and a broad range of theological interpretations within mainstream Christianity.
Context or Contradiction?
Below is an extensive list of Bible verses that are commonly referenced by Shincheonji—and by many scholars—to interpret the “beasts” in Revelation and related prophetic imagery. Note that while Shincheonji’s interpretation often links these passages to modern fulfillments (such as identifying specific individuals like Mr. Tak and Mr. Oh), most traditional interpretations understand these verses as symbolic representations of large-scale forces in history. Use this list as a resource for studying the subject in depth.
Primary Passages in Revelation:
-
Revelation 13:1–18
• Describes the beast from the sea with seven heads and ten horns, its authority, and the mark of the beast (666).
• This chapter is central for any discussion on the symbolic nature of the beast. -
Revelation 17:1–18
• Offers a detailed picture of the great prostitute and the beast with seven heads and ten horns.
• Often used to interpret the corrupt religious system that supports the worldly power of the beast. -
Revelation 19:20
• Describes the capture and eventual defeat of the beast and the false prophet.
• Seen as the final judgment against the forces of deception. -
Revelation 10:8–11
• Although focused on a “little book” and the command to prophesy, it is connected to the unveiling of prophetic secrets that include the beasts’ symbolism.
Related Prophetic and Apocalyptic Passages in Other Books:
-
Daniel 7:7–8; 7:24–25
• Daniel’s vision of the fourth beast—with iron teeth and ten horns—is frequently compared with Revelation 13’s imagery.
• The ten horns mentioned here are seen as precursors to the ten horns on the beast in Revelation. -
2 Thessalonians 2:3–4
• Describes the “man of lawlessness” who exalts himself above every so‐called god or object of worship, a figure that some link to the beast’s character. -
Mark 13:24–27
• Jesus’ discourse on the “abomination that causes desolation” and subsequent cosmic disturbances is sometimes associated with apocalyptic imagery. -
Matthew 24:15–28
• Also discusses the abomination of desolation and the coming judgment, setting the stage for understanding end-times imagery.
Additional Verses and Symbolic Parallels:
-
Revelation 8:10–11
• Describes a great star called Wormwood that makes the waters bitter—often seen as part of the overall judgment narrative connected to the beast’s influence. -
Revelation 6:4; 6:8
• The descriptions of the red and pale horses and their riders, while not directly naming the beast, contribute to the overall apocalyptic picture of judgment associated with beast imagery. -
Revelation 12:3–4
• Although focused on the great red dragon, this passage is interlinked with the beast imagery, since the dragon is the source of the beast’s power. -
Revelation 20:7–9
• Discusses the gathering of nations for the final battle—a scene that some interpret as the climax of the beast’s influence before ultimate judgment. -
1 John 2:18
• Mentions “antichrists,” which conceptually connect to the idea of deceptive, beast-like figures who oppose Christ’s truth.
Notes on Interpretation:
• Many mainstream scholars read these passages as symbolic rather than literal. In the historical and literary context of apocalyptic literature, the beast imagery is meant to represent overarching forces (political, religious, or spiritual) rather than point to one modern individual.
• Shincheonji, on the other hand, interprets these verses as having a present, physical fulfillment—identifying figures such as Mr. Tak (associated with the external, authoritative “beast of the sea”) and Mr. Oh (associated with the internal, corrupting “beast of the earth”).
• When studying these verses, it is important to compare the symbolic language found in Revelation with the visions in Daniel and the teachings of the New Testament, as well as to consider the historical context in which these texts were written.