Shincheonji Bible Study – Advanced Level (Revelation)

Lesson 102: “Revelation 2: The Letter Sent to the Messengers of the 7 Churches”

A Refutation Using “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story”

---

Introduction: The Letters That Weren’t Meant for Them

Imagine you’ve been studying for over seven months now. You’ve attended more than 100 classes, memorized countless verses, and reorganized your entire life around this pursuit. Yesterday, in Lesson 101, you learned something shocking: the seven churches in Revelation aren’t actually churches—they’re seven people in one Korean organization.

Today, in Lesson 102, you’re about to read letters that Jesus supposedly wrote to these seven people. The instructor emphasizes that these individuals “have already done something that necessitates a letter. They have already started to betray.” You’re told that Jesus is offering them an opportunity to repent, and their response will determine their eternal destiny.

But here’s what makes this particularly manipulative: as you read these letters, you’re also told to “self-reflect.” The instructor asks: “Are we making the same mistakes as those in the past? Are we taking the time to repent and learn from the mistakes of others?”

In other words, these letters—originally written to seven real churches in Asia Minor 2,000 years ago—are now being applied in three layers:

1. Historical: Seven real churches in the first century (acknowledged but dismissed as merely figurative)
2. Fulfillment: Seven specific people in Korea who “betrayed” (the supposed “actual” fulfillment)
3. Application: You, the student, who must examine yourself to ensure you’re not making the same mistakes

This multi-layered interpretation creates profound psychological pressure. You’re reading about “betrayal” and being told to self-reflect. The implicit message is clear: if you question Shincheonji’s teaching, if you express doubts, if you consider leaving—you might be like these “betrayers” who forsook their “first love” and need to repent.

But what if we examined these letters through different lenses? What if we read Revelation 2 as first-century Christians would have understood it—as Jesus addressing real churches facing real challenges under Roman persecution, using language and imagery they recognized, offering both correction and encouragement? What if we evaluated Shincheonji’s claim that these letters are actually about seven people in Korea against the actual text, historical evidence, and the documented reality of what happened in Shincheonji’s organization?

This refutation will analyze Lesson 102 using the framework established in “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story.” We’ll examine SCJ’s teachings through first-century Christian lenses, historical-literary perspectives, and biblical theology—not through modern eschatological systems (Premillennialism, Amillennialism, or Postmillennialism), but through the understanding of early believers who first received these letters.

For comprehensive documentation of what actually happened in Shincheonji’s organization—the real history behind their claimed “fulfillment”—please visit the SCJ Examination at closerlookinitiative.com, particularly “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1 and 2” and “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale.”

---

Part 1: The “Perfect Faith” Framework—Adding Requirements to Salvation

Shincheonji’s “Perfect Faith” Teaching

Lesson 102 opens with a critical claim in the “Yeast of Heaven” section:

“We can have perfect faith when we know process, the order and the reality the book of Revelation from chapters 1 to 22.”

The evangelist elaborates:

“Perfect faith means believing in both prophecy and fulfillment. It also means having 100% true faith. If someone only believes in the prophecy but not the fulfillment, they only have half of the percentage. That is false faith. We must believe in both the prophecy and the fulfillment of Revelation and be able to understand and accept it.”

The Manipulation in This Teaching

This “perfect faith” doctrine creates a works-based salvation system where:

1. Faith Is Redefined as Intellectual Assent to Shincheonji’s Interpretation:

“Perfect faith” is not trust in Christ’s finished work. It’s believing Shincheonji’s interpretation of Revelation’s “process, order, and reality”—meaning their claim that Revelation was fulfilled in Korea through specific events in their organization.

2. Partial Faith Is Condemned as “False Faith”:

If you believe in Jesus but don’t accept Shincheonji’s interpretation of Revelation’s fulfillment, you have “false faith.” This makes salvation dependent on accepting organizational doctrine.

3. Understanding and Acceptance Are Required:

You must “understand and accept” Shincheonji’s interpretation. This creates pressure to suppress doubts and questions—if you don’t understand or can’t accept their teaching, you have “false faith.”

4. Knowledge Becomes the Basis of Faith:

“Perfect faith” requires knowing “the process, the order and the reality” of Revelation. This makes salvation dependent on knowledge rather than grace.

Biblical Response: What Is True Faith?

The Bible defines faith very differently from Shincheonji’s “perfect faith” doctrine:

Faith Is Trust in Christ, Not Knowledge of Interpretations:

“For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast.” (Ephesians 2:8-9)

“Now faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see.” (Hebrews 11:1)

“Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved—you and your household.” (Acts 16:31)

Biblical faith is trust in Christ for salvation. It’s not dependent on understanding complex interpretations of symbolic prophecy.

Faith Can Be Imperfect and Still Saving:

The Bible recognizes that faith can be weak, struggling, or imperfect—and yet still genuine and saving:

“Immediately the boy’s father exclaimed, ‘I do believe; help me overcome my unbelief!'” (Mark 9:24)

Jesus didn’t condemn this father for having doubts mixed with faith. He healed the boy.

“A bruised reed he will not break, and a smoldering wick he will not snuff out.” (Isaiah 42:3; Matthew 12:20)

Jesus is gentle with weak faith. He doesn’t demand “perfect faith” or condemn “half faith” as false.

“If we are faithless, he remains faithful, for he cannot disown himself.” (2 Timothy 2:13)

Even when our faith falters, God remains faithful. Our salvation doesn’t depend on maintaining “perfect faith” or perfect understanding.

The Thief on the Cross:

Consider the thief crucified next to Jesus:

“Then he said, ‘Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.’ Jesus answered him, ‘Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise.'” (Luke 23:42-43)

The thief had no knowledge of Revelation’s “process, order, and reality.” He had no understanding of prophetic fulfillment. He simply trusted Jesus. And Jesus promised him paradise that very day.

This is the gospel: salvation by grace through simple faith in Christ, not by understanding complex interpretations.

Faith Involves Mystery and Trust:

The Bible acknowledges that we don’t understand everything:

“For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.” (1 Corinthians 13:12)

“The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may follow all the words of this law.” (Deuteronomy 29:29)

We don’t need to understand all mysteries to have genuine faith. Some things are secret, belonging to God. What’s revealed is sufficient for us to trust and obey.

Shincheonji’s demand for “perfect faith” through complete understanding contradicts this biblical acknowledgment of mystery and partial knowledge.

Chapter 4-6 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” provide comprehensive analysis of how Shincheonji’s framework creates a works-based salvation system that contradicts the biblical gospel of grace.

---

Part 2: The Revelation 22:18-19 Weapon—Controlling Through Fear

Shincheonji’s Use of Revelation 22:18-19

Lesson 102 emphasizes Revelation 22:18-19 as a critical warning:

“The reason why it says that one must not add or take away from Revelation, the word of prophecy (Rev 22:18-19), is because it will be fulfilled exactly as it is written without even a hint of error.”

The evangelist elaborates:

“Regarding Revelation 22:18-19, it says not to add or subtract anything from Revelation because if we do, our share from the tree of life will be taken away, and all the curses will be added. There are consequences for adding and taking away. If we add, God will add to us the plagues described in this book. If we take away, He will take away our share in the tree of life and in the holy city… We must have perfect faith, believing in both prophecy and fulfillment. We need to know the process, order, and reality. Let’s not go beyond scriptures. When we have questions, we should bring them to either the evangelist or the instructors to avoid adding or taking away.”

The Manipulation in This Teaching

Shincheonji uses Revelation 22:18-19 as a weapon to:

1. Create Fear of Questioning:

Students are told that if they add to or take away from Revelation, they’ll lose their share in the tree of life and receive plagues. This creates intense fear of getting anything wrong.

2. Control Information:

“When we have questions, we should bring them to either the evangelist or the instructors to avoid adding or taking away.”

This prevents independent research. Students are told that thinking for themselves might constitute “adding or taking away,” so they must only get answers from approved sources.

3. Equate Questioning With “Adding or Taking Away”:

By connecting questions with the warning in Revelation 22:18-19, Shincheonji implies that questioning their interpretation might be “adding or taking away” from Scripture.

4. Claim Their Interpretation Is Scripture:

The implicit message is that Shincheonji’s interpretation of Revelation is so accurate that disagreeing with it equals “adding or taking away” from God’s word.

What Revelation 22:18-19 Actually Means

Let’s read the passage in context:

“I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll. And if anyone takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, God will take away from that person any share in the tree of life and in the Holy City, which are described in this scroll.” (Revelation 22:18-19)

First-Century Understanding:

This warning is about the text of Revelation itself—don’t add words to the scroll or remove words from it. In the ancient world, when texts were copied by hand, there was always danger of scribes adding or removing content. This warning protects the integrity of the text.

Similar warnings appear elsewhere in Scripture:

“Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the LORD your God that I give you.” (Deuteronomy 4:2)

“Every word of God is flawless; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. Do not add to his words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar.” (Proverbs 30:5-6)

These warnings are about preserving the text itself, not about forbidding different interpretations.

The Irony: Shincheonji Violates This Warning:

Ironically, Shincheonji violates the very warning they emphasize. They add to Revelation by:

1. Claiming there’s a “new John” (not in the text)
2. Asserting the seven churches are seven people (contradicts Revelation 1:20)
3. Teaching that Revelation was sealed until Lee Man-hee opened it (contradicts Revelation 22:10)
4. Requiring belief in their fulfillment for salvation (not taught in Revelation)
5. Using OPAGH to reinterpret everything as codes (adds meanings not in the text)

When Shincheonji says the seven churches are “actually” seven people in Korea, they’re adding an interpretation that contradicts what the text explicitly says: “The seven lampstands are the seven churches” (Revelation 1:20).

When they claim you must believe in their interpretation of Revelation’s fulfillment to be saved, they’re adding a requirement not found in Scripture.

The Warning Applies to Interpretations Too:

While the primary meaning is about preserving the text, the principle extends to interpretation. We shouldn’t add meanings that aren’t there or remove meanings that are.

Shincheonji does both:

• Adds: Claims about “new John,” seven people, Korean fulfillment, etc.
• Removes: The plain meaning that these were seven real churches in Asia Minor

Biblical Response: Test All Teachings:

Rather than forbidding questions, Scripture encourages testing:

“Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.” (1 John 4:1)

“Test everything; hold fast what is good.” (1 Thessalonians 5:21)

“Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.” (Acts 17:11)

The Bereans tested even the Apostle Paul’s teaching. If Paul’s teaching should be tested, how much more should we test modern organizations’ interpretations?

Shincheonji’s use of Revelation 22:18-19 to prevent questioning contradicts the biblical command to test all teachings.

Chapter 11 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” (Deception and Truth) examines how organizations use biblical warnings to control members and prevent critical evaluation.

---

Part 3: The “Reflection” Manipulation—Turning Letters Into Self-Accusation

Shincheonji’s “Reflection” Teaching

The lesson includes a “Reflection” section that’s particularly manipulative:

“Today, we’re reflecting on the impacts of yesterday’s lesson about Revelation 1:9-20. It’s still shocking to realize that the churches were people… The concept of seven churches is intriguing. We know that churches are temples and our bodies are temples. Correlating these verses helps us understand that it’s talking about seven different people.”

Later, when introducing the letters to the seven churches:

“How someone responds to the message of repentance really determines how they will be rejudged if they do not take that opportunity to repent. We should look at this as a chance to self-reflect. Are we making the same mistakes as those in the past? Are we taking the time to repent and learn from the mistakes of others? We should see this both as prophecy and fulfillment, but also as a valuable lesson for all of us.”

The Psychological Manipulation

This “reflection” creates multiple layers of psychological pressure:

Layer 1: Historical (Dismissed)

• Seven real churches in Asia Minor 2,000 years ago
• Acknowledged but treated as merely figurative

Layer 2: “Fulfillment” (The Supposed Reality)

• Seven specific people in Korea who “betrayed”
• Students will later learn these are people in the Tabernacle Temple’s organization
• These people are portrayed as having “forsaken their first love” and needing to repent

Layer 3: Application (The Trap)

• You, the student, must “self-reflect”
• Are you making the same mistakes?
• Are you “forsaking your first love”?
• Do you need to repent?

The Manipulation:

By the time students read these letters, they’ve been studying for seven months. Many are exhausted, struggling with doubts, feeling distant from God due to the performance pressure. When they read about “forsaking your first love,” they naturally wonder: Is that me? Have I lost my passion? Do I need to repent?

But here’s the manipulation: Shincheonji defines “forsaking your first love” as questioning their teaching or considering leaving. The “repentance” they’re calling for is renewed commitment to the organization.

The letters become a tool for self-accusation and renewed commitment, not a message of Christ’s grace and correction.

What “Forsaking Your First Love” Actually Means

Let’s examine what Jesus actually said to the church in Ephesus:

“Yet I hold this against you: You have forsaken the love you had at first. Consider how far you have fallen! Repent and do the things you did at first. If you do not repent, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place.” (Revelation 2:4-5)

First-Century Understanding:

The church in Ephesus had become so focused on doctrinal purity and opposing false teachers that they had lost their love—for God and for others. They were orthodox but cold, correct but loveless.

This is confirmed by Paul’s earlier letter to the Ephesians, where he emphasized love:

“And I pray that you, being rooted and established in love, may have power, together with all the Lord’s holy people, to grasp how wide and long and high and deep is the love of Christ, and to know this love that surpasses knowledge—that you may be filled to the measure of all the fullness of God.” (Ephesians 3:17-19)

The Ephesian church had drifted from this love-centered faith to a harsh, judgmental orthodoxy.

The Irony:

Shincheonji exhibits the very problem Jesus condemned in Ephesus:

• Extreme focus on doctrinal correctness (their interpretation)
• Harsh judgment of those who disagree (“Babylon,” “false faith”)
• Lack of love for those outside the organization
• Families torn apart, relationships destroyed
• Performance pressure rather than grace

If we’re talking about “forsaking first love,” we should recognize that a system that:

• Creates fear rather than love
• Demands performance rather than offering grace
• Isolates believers from family rather than fostering love
• Focuses on organizational loyalty rather than Christ

…has itself forsaken the first love.

True Repentance:

Biblical repentance means turning from sin to God. It’s not about renewed commitment to an organization—it’s about renewed relationship with Christ.

“Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord.” (Acts 3:19)

“Or do you show contempt for the riches of his kindness, forbearance and patience, not realizing that God’s kindness is intended to lead you to repentance?” (Romans 2:4)

God’s kindness leads to repentance, not fear of losing salvation or organizational pressure.

Chapter 8 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” examines how high-control groups use guilt and self-accusation to maintain control over members.

---

Part 4: The Seven Churches—Real Places, Real People, Real Problems

Shincheonji’s Claim

The lesson explicitly states:

“The fulfilment of prophecy has revealed that the seven churches actually represent seven individuals within one church. These people have already appeared, and we will soon learn more about their identities.”

The Historical Reality

Before we examine Shincheonji’s claim, let’s understand what first-century Christians would have known about these seven churches.

The Church in Ephesus:

Ephesus was the most important city in the Roman province of Asia. It was:

• A major port city and commercial center
• Home to the Temple of Artemis (one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World)
• A center of pagan worship and magic
• Where Paul spent three years establishing a church (Acts 19:1-20:1)
• Where Timothy served as pastor (1 Timothy 1:3)
• Where the Apostle John served in his later years

The church in Ephesus faced specific challenges:

• Pressure from the cult of Artemis
• False apostles claiming authority
• The Nicolaitans (a heretical group)
• The danger of losing their first love amid doctrinal battles

Historical Evidence:

We have extensive historical evidence about the church in Ephesus:

1. Paul’s Letter to the Ephesians (written ~60 AD)
2. Paul’s Farewell to the Ephesian Elders (Acts 20:17-38)
3. Paul’s Letters to Timothy (who was in Ephesus)
4. Ignatius of Antioch’s Letter to the Ephesians (~108 AD)
5. Early Christian tradition placing John in Ephesus
6. Archaeological evidence of the city and early Christian presence

This wasn’t a symbolic person—it was a real church in a real city facing real challenges.

The Problem With Shincheonji’s Interpretation

Problem #1: The Text Explicitly Says “Churches”

“The mystery of the seven stars that you saw in my right hand and of the seven golden lampstands is this: The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven lampstands are the seven churches.” (Revelation 1:20)

The text doesn’t say “seven people.” It says “seven churches.” Shincheonji must contradict the text’s explicit statement to make their interpretation work.

Problem #2: The Letters Contain City-Specific Details

Each letter contains details that only make sense for the actual cities:

Ephesus:

“I know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance. I know that you cannot tolerate wicked people, that you have tested those who claim to be apostles but are not, and have found them false.” (Revelation 2:2)

Ephesus was known for testing false teachers. Paul had warned the Ephesian elders about this (Acts 20:29-30).

Smyrna:

“I know your afflictions and your poverty—yet you are rich! I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.” (Revelation 2:9)

Smyrna had a large Jewish population that opposed Christians. The church faced severe persecution and poverty.

Pergamum:

“I know where you live—where Satan has his throne.” (Revelation 2:13)

Pergamum was the center of emperor worship in Asia, with a massive altar to Zeus. This is likely what “Satan’s throne” refers to.

Laodicea:

“I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth.” (Revelation 3:15-16)

Laodicea’s water supply came via aqueduct from hot springs, arriving lukewarm and unpleasant. Nearby Hierapolis had hot therapeutic springs, and Colossae had cold refreshing water. This metaphor only works for the actual city of Laodicea.

If these are seven people in Korea, how do these city-specific details apply?

Problem #3: Early Christian Testimony

Early Christians wrote about these churches as real communities:

Ignatius of Antioch (died ~108 AD) wrote letters to several of these churches on his way to martyrdom. He addressed real bishops, real congregations, real situations.

Polycarp (died 155 AD) was bishop of Smyrna. His martyrdom is documented. He was a real person leading a real church.

Irenaeus (died ~202 AD) wrote about John’s ministry in Ephesus and his relationship with Polycarp.

These weren’t codes or symbols. They were real churches with real leaders facing real persecution.

Problem #4: Archaeological Evidence

All seven cities have been excavated. We can visit their ruins today. We have:

• Inscriptions mentioning these cities
• Coins from these cities
• Buildings from the Roman period
• Evidence of Christian communities

These weren’t fictional places used as codes. They were real cities with real Christian communities.

Chapter 20 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” (Creative Fulfillment) examines how Shincheonji retrofits events to match prophecy, creating narratives that contradict historical reality.

---

Part 5: The “Betrayal” Narrative—Rewriting History

Shincheonji’s “Betrayal” Teaching

The lesson states:

“Another thing to understand is that these letters are written because the people have already done something that necessitates a letter. They have already started to betray. However, as God and Jesus always do, they are trying to give people an opportunity to repent.”

What Actually Happened in Shincheonji

To understand why Shincheonji teaches that the seven churches “betrayed,” we need to know the actual history. This is documented in “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1 and 2” and “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale” at closerlookinitiative.com.

The Tabernacle Temple:

In the 1970s-1980s, Lee Man-hee was part of a group called the “Tabernacle Temple” (Jangmak Seongjon) led by Yoo Jae-yeol. This group taught that:

• Yoo Jae-yeol was the “Counselor” promised in John 14-16
• Their organization was fulfilling Revelation
• They were the true church

Lee Man-hee was in this organization. However, conflicts arose, and the organization split. There were disputes over:

• Leadership and authority
• Financial matters
• Doctrinal interpretations
• Personal ambitions

The Split:

Eventually, Lee Man-hee left (or was expelled from) the Tabernacle Temple and started his own organization—Shincheonji. He took some followers with him.

The Reinterpretation:

After starting Shincheonji, Lee Man-hee reinterpreted what had happened:

• The Tabernacle Temple was the “tabernacle” in Revelation
• The seven leaders were the “seven stars”
• When the organization split, this was the “betrayal” prophesied in Revelation
• Lee Man-hee became the “one who overcomes”
• Shincheonji became the “new tabernacle” or “Mount Zion”

The Problem:

This narrative conveniently makes Lee Man-hee the hero and everyone who opposed him the villains. But consider:

1. Who determines who “betrayed”? Lee Man-hee, the one telling the story. Those who remained with the Tabernacle Temple would tell a different story.
2. Why should we accept this interpretation? It’s self-serving. Lee Man-hee claims that a conflict in his organization fulfilled biblical prophecy and proves he’s the promised pastor.
3. What about the real churches? The seven churches in Revelation 2-3 were real communities. Shincheonji’s interpretation makes these letters meaningless to their original recipients.
4. Has the interpretation changed? Yes. As documented in the “Prophecy and Fulfillment” series at closerlookinitiative.com, Shincheonji’s interpretation of who the seven stars are and what events fulfilled Revelation has changed multiple times.

The Pattern:

This is a common pattern in groups that claim to fulfill prophecy:

1. Something happens (organizational conflict, split, etc.)
2. The leader reinterprets it as fulfillment of prophecy
3. The leader becomes the hero (the “one who overcomes”)
4. Opponents become villains (the “betrayers”)
5. Followers must accept this narrative to remain in good standing

Chapter 20 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” (Creative Fulfillment) examines this pattern in detail, showing how Shincheonji retrofits events to match prophecy.

---

Part 6: The Nicolaitans—Another Reinterpreted Enemy

Shincheonji’s Teaching About the Nicolaitans

The lesson states:

“The Nicolaitans have now emerged, as mentioned in Revelation chapter 2. Historically, the Nicolaitans were a group that formed during the time of the first coming. However, it’s important to remember the concept that God uses events, places, and people from the time when the prophecy was recorded, and even before, to speak about the future. Therefore, at the time of the second coming, a group of people will appear who exhibit similar characteristics to the original Nicolaitans referenced here.”

Who Were the Historical Nicolaitans?

The Nicolaitans are mentioned twice in Revelation:

“But you have this in your favor: You hate the practices of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.” (Revelation 2:6)

“Likewise, you also have those who hold to the teaching of the Nicolaitans.” (Revelation 2:15)

What We Know:

The Nicolaitans were a heretical group in the first century. Early church fathers provide some information:

Irenaeus (Against Heresies, 1.26.3) says they were followers of Nicolas, one of the seven deacons in Acts 6:5, who later fell into heresy.

Clement of Alexandria and Tertullian describe them as teaching that Christians could participate in pagan practices, including eating food sacrificed to idols and sexual immorality.

The connection to “Balaam” in Revelation 2:14 supports this—Balaam taught Israel to compromise with pagan practices (Numbers 25:1-3; 31:16).

First-Century Understanding:

The Nicolaitans represented compromise with the surrounding pagan culture. They taught that Christians could participate in pagan festivals, eat food sacrificed to idols, and engage in sexual immorality without consequence.

This was a real temptation for first-century Christians living in cities like Ephesus and Pergamum, where:

• Trade guilds held feasts in pagan temples
• Refusing to participate could mean economic hardship
• Social pressure to conform was intense
• Sexual immorality was common in pagan worship

Jesus commends the Ephesian church for hating the practices of the Nicolaitans and warns the Pergamum church to repent of tolerating them.

How Shincheonji Reinterprets This

Shincheonji uses the OPAGH principle to claim:

• The historical Nicolaitans were just a code
• The “real” Nicolaitans appeared at the time of Revelation’s fulfillment
• These were people who opposed Lee Man-hee or the Tabernacle Temple

The Problem:

This interpretation:

1. Makes the warning meaningless to first-century Christians: If the Nicolaitans were just a code for people 2,000 years later, why warn the Ephesian and Pergamum churches about them?
2. Ignores historical evidence: We have historical testimony about the Nicolaitans from early church fathers. They were a real group causing real problems in real churches.
3. Is self-serving: Conveniently, the “Nicolaitans” are whoever opposed Shincheonji’s narrative.
4. Changes over time: As documented at closerlookinitiative.com, Shincheonji’s identification of who the “Nicolaitans” are has changed.

Biblical Response:

The warning about the Nicolaitans was relevant to first-century churches facing pressure to compromise with pagan culture. The principle applies today—Christians should not compromise with worldly values—but the specific group Jesus was warning about was real and historical.

We don’t need to identify modern “Nicolaitans” in Korea to apply this warning. We need to resist compromise with worldly values in our own contexts.

---

Part 7: First-Century Understanding of Revelation 2

Reading the Letters as First-Century Christians

To properly understand Revelation 2, we must read it as first-century Christians would have—as believers in real churches receiving real correction and encouragement from their Lord.

The Structure of Each Letter:

Each letter follows a similar pattern:

1. Address: “To the angel of the church in [city]”
2. Description of Christ: Emphasizing an attribute relevant to that church
3. Commendation: “I know your deeds…” (what they’re doing well)
4. Correction: “Yet I hold this against you…” (what needs to change)
5. Warning: Consequences if they don’t repent
6. Promise: “To the one who overcomes…” (reward for faithfulness)
7. Call: “Whoever has ears, let them hear…”

The Church in Ephesus (Revelation 2:1-7):

Christ’s Description: “Him who holds the seven stars in his right hand and walks among the seven golden lampstands”

This emphasizes Christ’s authority over church leaders (seven stars) and His presence with His churches (lampstands). The Ephesian church needed to remember that Christ, not human leaders, has ultimate authority.

Commendation:

• Hard work and perseverance
• Cannot tolerate wicked people
• Tested false apostles
• Endured hardships without growing weary
• Hate the practices of the Nicolaitans

The Ephesian church was doctrinally sound and persevering under persecution.

Correction:

• “You have forsaken the love you had at first”

Despite their doctrinal purity, they had lost love—for God and for others. They had become harsh and judgmental.

Warning:

• “If you do not repent, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place”

If they don’t return to love, Christ will remove His presence from them. A church without love is not truly Christ’s church.

Promise:

• “To the one who overcomes, I will give the right to eat from the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God”

Those who overcome (remain faithful) will have eternal life.

First-Century Application:

The Ephesian Christians would have heard this as:

• Affirmation of their doctrinal faithfulness
• Correction of their lovelessness
• Call to return to love without compromising truth
• Assurance that faithfulness leads to eternal life

This was a relevant, applicable message for their situation.

Why Shincheonji’s Interpretation Fails

Shincheonji’s interpretation fails because:

1. It Makes the Letter Irrelevant to Its Original Audience:

If this letter is actually about seven people in Korea 2,000 years later, what was the Ephesian church supposed to do with it? How could they apply it? Why would Jesus send them a letter that wasn’t really for them?

2. It Ignores the Specific Details:

The letter contains details specific to Ephesus:

• False apostles (Ephesus had this problem, documented in Acts 20:29-30)
• The Nicolaitans (a real group in Ephesus)
• Hard work and perseverance (Ephesus was known for this)
• Forsaking first love (a specific problem in that church)

These details don’t fit seven random people in Korea—they fit the actual church in Ephesus.

3. It Contradicts the Text’s Plain Meaning:

The text says “To the angel of the church in Ephesus.” It doesn’t say “To the angel of the church in Ephesus, which is actually a code for a person in Korea.”

4. It Requires Adding to the Text:

Shincheonji must add meanings not found in the text:

• “Church” actually means “person”
• “Ephesus” is a code for Korea
• The letter is about events 2,000 years later
• You must believe this interpretation to be saved

All of these are additions to the text.

Chapter 26 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” (Reading Revelation Like a First-Century Christian) provides extensive analysis of how early believers would have understood Revelation’s message.

---

Part 8: The “Overcomers” Promise—Who Really Overcomes?

The “Overcomer” Language in Revelation 2-3

Each of the seven letters ends with a promise “to the one who overcomes” (Greek: nikao, meaning “to conquer” or “to be victorious”). This language is crucial because Shincheonji will later claim that Lee Man-hee is “the one who overcomes” mentioned in Revelation.

Let’s examine what this language actually means in Revelation 2-3:

Ephesus (Revelation 2:7):

“To the one who overcomes, I will give the right to eat from the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God.”

Smyrna (Revelation 2:11):

“The one who overcomes will not be hurt at all by the second death.”

Pergamum (Revelation 2:17):

“To the one who overcomes, I will give some of the hidden manna. I will also give that person a white stone with a new name written on it, known only to the one who receives it.”

Thyatira (Revelation 2:26-28):

“To the one who overcomes and does my will to the end, I will give authority over the nations—that one ‘will rule them with an iron scepter and will dash them to pieces like pottery’—just as I have received authority from my Father. I will also give that one the morning star.”

Sardis (Revelation 3:5):

“The one who overcomes will, like them, be dressed in white. I will never blot out the name of that person from the book of life, but will acknowledge that name before my Father and his angels.”

Philadelphia (Revelation 3:12):

“The one who overcomes I will make a pillar in the temple of my God. Never again will they leave it. I will write on them the name of my God and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from my God; and I will also write on them my new name.”

Laodicea (Revelation 3:21):

“To the one who overcomes, I will give the right to sit with me on my throne, just as I overcame and sat down with my Father on his throne.”

First-Century Understanding: “Overcomers” Are All Faithful Believers

Key Observation #1: The Promises Are Plural

Notice that each promise is made to “the one who overcomes” (singular in form but plural in application). These promises are not for one special person—they’re for all believers who remain faithful.

This is confirmed by the consistent use of “whoever has ears, let them hear” after each promise. The call is to all believers, not to one special individual.

Key Observation #2: “Overcoming” Means Remaining Faithful

What does it mean to “overcome”? The letters themselves explain:

Ephesus: Overcome by returning to first love while maintaining doctrinal purity Smyrna: Overcome by remaining faithful even unto death Pergamum: Overcome by rejecting false teaching Thyatira: Overcome by doing Christ’s will to the end Sardis: Overcome by waking up and strengthening what remains Philadelphia: Overcome by keeping Christ’s word and not denying His name Laodicea: Overcome by being zealous and repenting of lukewarmness

“Overcoming” is not about being a special prophetic figure. It’s about remaining faithful to Christ despite persecution, false teaching, and temptation to compromise.

Key Observation #3: John Explains “Overcoming” Elsewhere

The Apostle John uses “overcome” language in his first epistle, written to the same audience:

“For everyone born of God overcomes the world. This is the victory that has overcome the world, even our faith. Who is it that overcomes the world? Only the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God.” (1 John 5:4-5)

John explicitly defines overcoming: it’s believing that Jesus is the Son of God. It’s faith in Christ. Every believer overcomes through faith.

“I write to you, dear children, because your sins have been forgiven on account of his name. I write to you, fathers, because you know him who is from the beginning. I write to you, young men, because you have overcome the evil one.” (1 John 2:12-13)

John addresses “young men” (plural) who “have overcome the evil one.” Overcoming is not limited to one special person—all believers overcome through faith in Christ.

Key Observation #4: Jesus Is the Ultimate Overcomer

“To the one who overcomes, I will give the right to sit with me on my throne, just as I overcame and sat down with my Father on his throne.” (Revelation 3:21)

Jesus is the ultimate overcomer. He overcame through His death and resurrection. Believers overcome by sharing in His victory, not by achieving their own.

“I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.” (John 16:33)

Jesus has already overcome. We overcome by trusting in His victory, not by achieving our own.

How Shincheonji Distorts “Overcoming”

Shincheonji will teach (in upcoming lessons) that:

• “The one who overcomes” is a specific person (Lee Man-hee)
• Only this person truly overcame
• Believers must recognize and follow this person to be saved
• The promises to “overcomers” are only for this one person (or his close followers)

The Problems:

1. It Contradicts the Plural Application:

The promises are for all who overcome, not one person. Each letter addresses a different church, and each promise is for the faithful in that church.

2. It Contradicts John’s Definition:

John says everyone who believes that Jesus is the Son of God overcomes (1 John 5:5). Shincheonji makes overcoming about recognizing Lee Man-hee.

3. It Contradicts the Context:

The letters call each church to overcome specific challenges. If “the one who overcomes” is Lee Man-hee, what were the seven churches supposed to do with these promises?

4. It Makes Salvation Dependent on Recognizing a Human:

If only Lee Man-hee overcame, and we must recognize him to be saved, then salvation depends on recognizing a human leader, not on faith in Christ.

Biblical Response:

“Who is it that overcomes the world? Only the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God.” (1 John 5:5)

Every believer overcomes through faith in Christ. We don’t overcome by recognizing Lee Man-hee—we overcome by trusting in Jesus, who has already overcome the world.

“No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us.” (Romans 8:37)

We are “more than conquerors” (Greek: hypernikao, “super-overcomers”) through Christ’s love, not through organizational membership.

Chapter 18 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” (Testing Authority Claims) provides biblical criteria for evaluating claims to special status and demonstrates why the “one who overcomes” claim fails scriptural tests.

---

Part 9: The Letters to the Seven Churches—A Closer Look

The Pattern in the Letters

Before examining each letter individually, let’s note the consistent pattern that reveals these are messages to real churches facing real situations:

1. Geographical Specificity: Each letter is addressed to a specific city: Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, Laodicea. These were real cities on a circular route through Asia Minor.

2. Christ’s Self-Description: Each letter begins with Christ describing Himself using imagery from the vision in Revelation 1. The description is chosen to address that church’s specific situation.

3. “I Know” Statements: Each letter contains “I know” statements showing Christ’s intimate knowledge of that church’s situation, struggles, and needs.

4. Specific Commendations and Corrections: Each church receives specific praise and/or correction relevant to their situation.

5. Call to Repentance: Most churches are called to repent of specific sins or problems.

6. Promise to Overcomers: Each letter ends with a promise to those who overcome, using imagery relevant to that church’s situation.

This pattern demonstrates these are real letters to real churches, not codes for seven people in Korea.

The Church in Smyrna (Revelation 2:8-11)

“To the angel of the church in Smyrna write: These are the words of him who is the First and the Last, who died and came to life again. I know your afflictions and your poverty—yet you are rich! I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan. Do not be afraid of what you are about to suffer. I tell you, the devil will put some of you in prison to test you, and you will suffer persecution for ten days. Be faithful, even to the point of death, and I will give you life as your victor’s crown. Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches. The one who overcomes will not be hurt at all by the second death.”

Historical Context:

Smyrna was a wealthy port city fiercely loyal to Rome. It was the first city in Asia to build a temple to the goddess Roma (195 BC) and later built a temple to Emperor Tiberius. The city prided itself on its beauty and was called “the crown of Asia.”

The church in Smyrna faced:

• Severe persecution: Economic sanctions, imprisonment, martyrdom
• Poverty: Likely due to economic persecution
• Opposition from the Jewish community: The synagogue was slandering Christians and possibly reporting them to Roman authorities

Christ’s Self-Description: “Him who is the First and the Last, who died and came to life again”

This description is perfect for a church facing martyrdom. Christ Himself died and rose again. Death is not the end. He is eternal (First and Last), and He conquered death.

The Message:

Christ offers no correction to Smyrna—only commendation and encouragement. They are poor materially but rich spiritually. They will face persecution (“ten days” likely symbolic of a limited time), but they should remain faithful even unto death.

The promise: “The one who overcomes will not be hurt at all by the second death.”

The second death (Revelation 20:14) is eternal separation from God. Those who remain faithful, even if they die physically, will not experience the second death. Physical martyrdom is not the end—eternal life awaits.

Historical Fulfillment:

Polycarp, bishop of Smyrna and disciple of the Apostle John, was martyred in Smyrna around 155 AD. His martyrdom account (“The Martyrdom of Polycarp”) is one of the earliest Christian documents outside the New Testament.

When commanded to curse Christ, Polycarp replied: “Eighty-six years I have served Him, and He has done me no wrong. How can I blaspheme my King and Savior?”

Polycarp was burned at the stake, faithful unto death, receiving the crown of life Jesus promised.

Why This Can’t Be About One Person in Korea:

The letter addresses a church facing persecution, poverty, and opposition from the synagogue. These are community experiences, not one person’s situation. The promise is for all who remain faithful unto death, not one individual.

The Church in Pergamum (Revelation 2:12-17)

“To the angel of the church in Pergamum write: These are the words of him who has the sharp, double-edged sword. I know where you live—where Satan has his throne. Yet you remain true to my name. You did not renounce your faith in me, not even in the days of Antipas, my faithful witness, who was put to death in your city—where Satan lives. Nevertheless, I have a few things against you: There are some among you who hold to the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to entice the Israelites to sin so that they ate food sacrificed to idols and committed sexual immorality. Likewise, you also have those who hold to the teaching of the Nicolaitans. Repent therefore! Otherwise, I will soon come to you and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth. Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who overcomes, I will give some of the hidden manna. I will also give that person a white stone with a new name written on it, known only to the one who receives it.”

Historical Context:

Pergamum was the capital of the Roman province of Asia and a center of emperor worship. The city contained:

• The first temple to a Roman emperor in Asia (built for Augustus in 29 BC)
• A massive altar to Zeus on the acropolis (possibly “Satan’s throne”)
• Temples to Athena, Dionysus, and Asclepius (the healing god, whose symbol was a serpent)
• A famous library (second only to Alexandria)

The church in Pergamum faced:

• Intense pressure to participate in emperor worship: Refusing could mean economic hardship or death
• Persecution: Antipas was martyred there (we have no other historical record of him, but Jesus remembers his name)
• Temptation to compromise: Some were following the teaching of Balaam and the Nicolaitans, compromising with pagan practices

Christ’s Self-Description: “Him who has the sharp, double-edged sword”

The sword represents God’s word and Christ’s judgment. The Roman proconsul in Pergamum had “the right of the sword” (ius gladii)—authority to execute. But Christ has the ultimate sword—His word judges all.

The Message:

Christ commends their faithfulness in a hostile environment (“where Satan has his throne”). They remained true even when Antipas was martyred.

However, some were compromising—following the teaching of Balaam (compromise with pagan practices) and the Nicolaitans (likely the same thing). They must repent.

The promise: Hidden manna (spiritual sustenance) and a white stone with a new name (acquittal, acceptance, new identity).

Why This Can’t Be About One Person in Korea:

The letter addresses a church in a specific city (“where Satan has his throne”—Pergamum’s emperor worship center). It mentions a specific martyr (Antipas). It addresses compromise within the community (“some among you”). These are community issues, not one person’s experience.

The Church in Thyatira (Revelation 2:18-29)

“To the angel of the church in Thyatira write: These are the words of the Son of God, whose eyes are like blazing fire and whose feet are like burnished bronze. I know your deeds, your love and faith, your service and perseverance, and that you are now doing more than you did at first. Nevertheless, I have this against you: You tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophet. By her teaching she misleads my servants into sexual immorality and the eating of food sacrificed to idols. I have given her time to repent of her immorality, but she is unwilling. So I will cast her on a bed of suffering, and I will make those who commit adultery with her suffer intensely, unless they repent of her ways. I will strike her children with death. Then all the churches will know that I am he who searches hearts and minds, and I will repay each of you according to your deeds. Now I say to the rest of you in Thyatira, to you who do not hold to her teaching and have not learned Satan’s so-called deep secrets, ‘I will not impose any other burden on you, except to hold on to what you have until I come.’ To the one who overcomes and does my will to the end, I will give authority over the nations—that one ‘will rule them with an iron scepter and will dash them to pieces like pottery’—just as I have received authority from my Father. I will also give that one the morning star. Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches.”

Historical Context:

Thyatira was the smallest of the seven cities but economically significant. It was known for:

• Trade guilds: More trade guilds than any other city in Asia
• Purple dye industry: Lydia, Paul’s first European convert, was from Thyatira and sold purple cloth (Acts 16:14)
• Pressure to participate in guild activities: Guild meetings often involved pagan worship, feasts in temples, and immoral practices

The church in Thyatira faced a unique challenge: economic survival often required guild membership, but guild activities involved compromise with paganism.

Christ’s Self-Description: “The Son of God, whose eyes are like blazing fire and whose feet are like burnished bronze”

The blazing eyes see everything—no compromise is hidden from Christ. The bronze feet suggest judgment and strength. This is the only letter where Christ is called “Son of God,” emphasizing His divine authority over all human authorities (including guild leaders).

The Message:

Christ commends their love, faith, service, and perseverance—they’re doing more than at first (contrast with Ephesus, which lost its first love).

However, they tolerate “Jezebel”—a woman teaching that compromise with pagan practices is acceptable. The name “Jezebel” recalls the Old Testament queen who promoted Baal worship and persecuted God’s prophets (1 Kings 16-21). This is likely not her real name but a prophetic designation.

“Jezebel” was teaching that Christians could participate in guild activities, including eating food sacrificed to idols and sexual immorality (likely connected to pagan worship). She claimed special knowledge (“Satan’s so-called deep secrets”—possibly teaching that mature Christians could participate in pagan practices without spiritual harm).

Christ warns of severe judgment unless she and her followers repent. But He encourages those who haven’t followed her teaching: “Hold on to what you have until I come.”

The promise: Authority over nations and the morning star (Christ Himself—Revelation 22:16).

Why This Can’t Be About One Person in Korea:

The letter addresses a church facing specific economic pressures related to trade guilds. It mentions a false prophetess influencing part of the community. It distinguishes between those following her teaching and those who haven’t. These are community dynamics, not one person’s experience.

The Pattern Emerges

As we examine these letters, a clear pattern emerges:

1. Real Cities, Real Churches: Each letter addresses a real church in a real city facing real challenges specific to that location.

2. Christ’s Intimate Knowledge: Christ knows each church’s situation, struggles, strengths, and weaknesses. He addresses them specifically and personally.

3. Relevant Promises: The promises to overcomers use imagery relevant to each church’s situation:

• Ephesus: Tree of life (restoration of what was lost)
• Smyrna: No second death (comfort for those facing martyrdom)
• Pergamum: Hidden manna and white stone (spiritual sustenance and acceptance)
• Thyatira: Authority over nations and morning star (vindication and Christ Himself)

4. Universal Application: While addressed to specific churches, the letters contain principles applicable to all churches: “Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches.”

5. Impossible to Apply to Seven People: The letters address community issues, distinguish between groups within each church, and contain details specific to each city. They cannot be about seven individuals in one Korean organization.

---

Part 10: The Progression of Indoctrination—Deeper Into Deception

Where Students Are Now

By Lesson 102, students have been studying for over seven months. They’re attending four classes per week (8-10 hours), plus homework, memorization, and recruitment activities. The psychological conditioning has intensified significantly.

The Psychological State at This Stage

1. Cognitive Dissonance Intensifies:

Students are now being told that seven real churches in Asia Minor are actually codes for seven people in Korea. The historical evidence is acknowledged (“Historically, there were seven churches”) but then dismissed as merely figurative.

This creates cognitive dissonance:

• The text says “seven churches”
• History confirms seven churches existed
• Shincheonji says they’re actually seven people
• Students must accept this contradiction

2. Self-Accusation Mechanism Activated:

The “reflection” teaching creates a powerful self-accusation mechanism. As students read about churches that “betrayed” and “forsook their first love,” they’re told to self-reflect: “Are we making the same mistakes?”

This is particularly manipulative because:

• Students are exhausted from the demanding schedule
• Many feel distant from God due to performance pressure
• Some are experiencing doubts about Shincheonji’s teaching
• The natural response is to wonder: “Have I forsaken my first love?”

But Shincheonji defines “forsaking first love” as questioning their teaching or considering leaving. The “repentance” they’re calling for is renewed commitment to the organization.

3. Fear of “Adding or Taking Away”:

The emphasis on Revelation 22:18-19 creates fear of questioning. Students are told:

• Don’t add or take away from Revelation
• If you have questions, only ask evangelists or instructors
• Independent research might constitute “adding or taking away”
• The consequences are losing salvation and receiving plagues

This prevents critical evaluation and creates dependency on approved sources.

4. “Perfect Faith” Pressure:

Students are told they must have “perfect faith”—believing in both prophecy and fulfillment. “Half faith” is “false faith.” This creates pressure to:

• Accept everything they’re taught without question
• Suppress doubts (doubting means imperfect faith)
• Demonstrate complete acceptance (to prove perfect faith)
• Never express uncertainty (that would be “half faith”)

5. Isolation From Outside Perspective:

By this point, students have typically:

• Distanced from family and friends who express concern
• Stopped attending their home churches
• Reorganized their schedules around Shincheonji classes
• Developed close relationships with evangelists and classmates
• Begun to see outsiders as “Babylon” who don’t understand

This isolation prevents access to outside perspective that might help them recognize the deception.

The Indoctrination Techniques in Lesson 102

Technique #1: Rewriting History

Shincheonji acknowledges historical reality (“Historically, there were seven churches in one nation”) but then claims this was just figurative code for seven people in Korea.

This technique:

• Appears to respect history (we acknowledge the churches existed)
• But dismisses historical meaning (they were just codes)
• Creates confusion about what’s real and what’s symbolic
• Makes students dependent on Shincheonji to decode reality

Technique #2: Multi-Layered Application

The letters are applied in three layers:

1. Historical (acknowledged but dismissed)
2. “Fulfillment” (seven people in Korea)
3. Personal application (students must self-reflect)

This creates psychological pressure on multiple levels. Students are reading about “betrayal” and being told to examine themselves, while also learning about specific people in Korea who supposedly betrayed.

Technique #3: Controlled Information

Students are told:

• “When we have questions, we should bring them to either the evangelist or the instructors”
• Don’t research independently (that’s “adding or taking away”)
• Don’t discuss with outsiders (they’re “Babylon”)
• Only trust Shincheonji’s interpretation

This information control prevents students from discovering:

• The actual history of what happened in Shincheonji’s organization
• How Shincheonji’s interpretations have changed over time
• Biblical scholarship on Revelation
• Testimonies from former members

Technique #4: Loaded Language

Shincheonji uses loaded language that takes on special meaning:

• “Perfect faith” = accepting Shincheonji’s interpretation
• “False faith” = questioning or doubting
• “Betrayal” = leaving or opposing the organization
• “Forsaking first love” = questioning Shincheonji’s teaching
• “Adding or taking away” = independent research or critical thinking
• “Babylon” = anyone outside Shincheonji

This language creates an us-vs-them mentality and makes it difficult to think critically.

Technique #5: Thought-Stopping Clichés

When doubts arise, students have been trained to use thought-stopping responses:

• “Don’t be rocky ground”
• “That’s Babylonian thinking”
• “You’re adding or taking away”
• “You need perfect faith, not half faith”
• “Trust the process”
• “It will make sense later”

These clichés prevent critical evaluation and suppress doubts.

The Progression Since Lesson 101

In Lesson 101, students learned:

• There must be a “new John”
• The seven churches are actually seven people
• OPAGH principle allows reinterpretation of everything
• Salvation requires “keeping the New Covenant” (accepting Shincheonji’s teaching)

In Lesson 102, the indoctrination intensifies:

• Students read letters about “betrayal” and are told to self-reflect
• “Perfect faith” is defined as accepting both prophecy and fulfillment
• Fear of “adding or taking away” prevents questioning
• The seven people who “betrayed” are introduced (though not yet named)

What’s Coming Next:

In upcoming lessons, students will learn:

• The specific identity of the seven people (leaders in the Tabernacle Temple)
• The detailed “fulfillment” narrative (organizational conflicts reinterpreted as prophecy)
• Lee Man-hee’s identity as “the one who overcomes”
• The 144,000 as Shincheonji members
• The requirement to be “sealed” in Shincheonji for salvation

Each lesson builds on previous conditioning, making it progressively harder to recognize the deception and leave.

Chapter 8 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” examines the progression of indoctrination in high-control groups and provides analysis of how psychological manipulation intensifies over time to create dependency and suppress critical thinking.

---

Part 11: The OPAGH Principle Applied—A License for Arbitrary Reinterpretation

The OPAGH Reminder in Lesson 102

The lesson includes a reminder about OPAGH:

“OPAGH: God uses historical events / places / people of and before the time of prophecy figuratively to speak about the future.”

The evangelist explains:

“When examining the map, we see that God uses historical events, places, and people from the time the prophecy is written or before. This is evident in the book of Isaiah, where the historical events of the Israelites leaving Egypt are referenced. However, people didn’t realize that God wasn’t simply recounting their ancestors’ history, but prophesying about future deliverance.”

The Example: Egypt and the Exodus

Shincheonji uses the Exodus as an example of OPAGH:

“This future deliverance involved people escaping an Egypt-like place or people, with Jesus as the Moses-like figure. The Egypt-like people were the Pharisees and Sadducees, who had enslaved the Israelites with man-made laws, traditions, and false teachings. Jesus came to deliver them and provide the true way, truth, and life.”

What’s Right and Wrong With This Example

What’s Right:

The Bible does use typology. The New Testament does see the Exodus as prefiguring Christ’s deliverance:

“When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son.” (Hosea 11:1)

Matthew applies this to Jesus:

“So he got up, took the child and his mother during the night and left for Egypt, where he stayed until the death of Herod. And so was fulfilled what the Lord had said through the prophet: ‘Out of Egypt I called my son.'” (Matthew 2:14-15)

The Exodus does prefigure Christ’s deliverance of His people from slavery to sin.

What’s Wrong:

Shincheonji takes this legitimate biblical typology and uses it to justify arbitrary reinterpretation of everything:

Problem #1: Biblical Typology Is Identified by Scripture

When the Bible uses typology, the New Testament explicitly identifies it:

• Moses as a type of Christ (Deuteronomy 18:15; Acts 3:22-23)
• The Passover lamb as a type of Christ (1 Corinthians 5:7)
• The bronze serpent as a type of Christ (John 3:14-15)

The inspired authors, writing under the Holy Spirit’s guidance, identify the types and their fulfillments.

Shincheonji reverses this: they claim Lee Man-hee, through his “witness,” can identify what historical references “really” mean. This puts human interpretation above scriptural authority.

Problem #2: Biblical Typology Points to Christ, Not Organizations

Biblical typology consistently points to Christ and His redemptive work:

• Moses → Christ (the greater deliverer)
• Passover lamb → Christ (the sacrifice for sin)
• Manna → Christ (the bread of life)
• High priest → Christ (our great high priest)

Shincheonji’s OPAGH principle claims historical references in Revelation point to their organization, their leader, and their members. This is a fundamental departure from biblical typology.

Problem #3: OPAGH Doesn’t Negate Historical Reality

When the Bible uses typology, it doesn’t deny the historical reality of the type:

• The Exodus really happened
• Moses was a real person who really delivered Israel
• The Passover was a real event
• The manna was real food

The historical reality and the typological meaning coexist.

Shincheonji’s OPAGH principle does the opposite: they claim the seven churches were real, but they’re “actually” codes for seven people in Korea. This negates the historical reality and makes the text meaningless to its original audience.

Problem #4: OPAGH Allows Constant Reinterpretation

As documented in the “Prophecy and Fulfillment” series at closerlookinitiative.com, Shincheonji’s interpretations change constantly. When one interpretation fails, they use OPAGH to claim they misidentified which historical reference matched which fulfillment.

This makes their system unfalsifiable—any interpretation can be defended, and any failed interpretation can be revised.

The Real Purpose of OPAGH

The OPAGH principle serves several purposes for Shincheonji:

1. Claim Revelation Predicts Their Organization:

By reinterpreting historical references as codes, Shincheonji can claim Revelation predicts their organization, even though the text never mentions Korea, Lee Man-hee, or Shincheonji.

2. Dismiss Historical Evidence:

When confronted with historical evidence (the seven churches were real places), Shincheonji can dismiss it: “Yes, they were real, but they were just figurative codes for the future.”

3. Change Interpretations When They Fail:

When interpretations don’t match reality, Shincheonji can claim they misidentified which code matched which fulfillment. OPAGH allows constant revision.

4. Create Dependency:

If everything is potentially a code requiring special interpretation, students become completely dependent on Shincheonji to understand Scripture.

5. Prevent Falsification:

OPAGH makes Shincheonji’s system unfalsifiable. Any evidence against their interpretation can be dismissed as “not understanding the figurative meaning.”

Chapter 12 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” (Prophecy and Fulfillment) examines Shincheonji’s hermeneutical principles and demonstrates how they contradict sound biblical interpretation.

---

Part 12: The Apostle John’s Survival—Distorting History for Effect

Shincheonji’s Teaching About John

The lesson includes this statement:

“Interestingly, the Apostle John survived an attempted martyrdom by being dropped in a vat of boiling oil. He lived because God and Jesus weren’t finished with him yet – he still needed to write the conclusion of the word. After surviving, he was exiled to Patmos, where he saw incredible things and wrote them down. John’s life was remarkable. He’s the only disciple known to have died of old age, while the others were martyred through various means such as beheading, being thrown out of a window, or crucified. We don’t have an account of John’s death, likely because he died of old age after recording Revelation on the island of Patmos in exile.”

The Historical Reality

This teaching mixes historical fact with legend in a way that serves Shincheonji’s narrative.

What’s Historically Reliable:

1. John was exiled to Patmos: This is stated in Revelation 1:9 and confirmed by early Christian tradition.
2. John likely died of old age: Early Christian sources (Irenaeus, Eusebius) indicate John lived to old age in Ephesus and was the only apostle not martyred.
3. John wrote Revelation on Patmos: This is stated in the text itself.

What’s Legendary:

The story of John being dropped in boiling oil comes from later Christian tradition (Tertullian, 3rd century), not from reliable first-century sources. While it may be true, it’s not as well-attested as other aspects of John’s life.

Why Shincheonji Emphasizes This

Shincheonji emphasizes John’s survival and long life to:

1. Establish John as Special:

By highlighting John’s miraculous survival and unique death, Shincheonji establishes him as a special prophetic figure—setting up the parallel with Lee Man-hee.

2. Create a Pattern:

The narrative suggests: John survived because God had a special purpose (writing Revelation). Similarly, Lee Man-hee has survived (they claim) because God has a special purpose (being the “new John”).

3. Emphasize “Conclusion of the Word”:

By saying John “needed to write the conclusion of the word,” Shincheonji subtly introduces the idea that Revelation is the “conclusion”—which they’ll later claim needs a special interpreter to “open.”

The Problem With This Emphasis

Problem #1: It Sets Up False Parallels

Shincheonji will later draw parallels between John and Lee Man-hee:

• John survived to write Revelation → Lee Man-hee survived to witness its fulfillment
• John was exiled → Lee Man-hee faced persecution
• John saw visions → Lee Man-hee witnessed events
• John wrote it down → Lee Man-hee testifies to it

These parallels are manufactured to support Lee Man-hee’s authority.

Problem #2: It Misses the Point

The point of John’s survival and long life wasn’t to make him a special prophetic figure requiring a future counterpart. The point was that God preserved him to complete his ministry—writing the Gospel of John, his three epistles, and Revelation.

John’s survival doesn’t establish a pattern requiring a “new John.” It simply shows God’s providence in preserving His servant to complete his work.

Problem #3: It Ignores What John Actually Wrote

John’s writings emphasize:

• Christ’s deity and finished work (Gospel of John)
• Love for one another (1 John)
• Truth and walking in truth (2-3 John)
• Christ’s victory and sovereignty (Revelation)

John never predicted another “John” would come. He pointed people to Christ, not to a future human figure.

---

Part 13: The “Holy Nation” Teaching—Redefining God’s People

Shincheonji’s “Holy Nation” Teaching

The lesson includes this reflection:

“The churches are literally one nation, and God calls us a holy nation. We’re supposed to be a holy nation, which takes time, diligence, and obedience. Thinking back to the time of Exodus, God said, ‘If you obey me fully, then you will receive these blessings.’ Often, God’s blessings are conditional, contrary to how the world depicts everything as unconditional. God has many conditions for his blessings, and He always keeps His promise. However, we struggle to keep our end of the bargain. Currently, God is looking for people who will always keep their end of the bargain because they will seal themselves with the word and the testimony as well.”

The Biblical Teaching About “Holy Nation”

The concept of “holy nation” comes from 1 Peter 2:9:

“But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s special possession, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light.” (1 Peter 2:9)

Peter is quoting Exodus 19:5-6:

“Now if you obey me fully and keep my covenant, then out of all nations you will be my treasured possession. Although the whole earth is mine, you will be for me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.” (Exodus 19:5-6)

First-Century Understanding:

Peter applies the language used for Israel to the church—all believers in Christ. The “holy nation” is not a physical nation but the worldwide community of believers from every nation, tribe, and tongue.

This is consistent with Paul’s teaching:

“There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.” (Galatians 3:28-29)

The “holy nation” is all who belong to Christ, regardless of ethnicity, nationality, or background.

How Shincheonji Distorts This

Shincheonji subtly redefines “holy nation” to mean:

1. Shincheonji as the “Holy Nation”:

By connecting “holy nation” with the seven churches (which they claim are seven people in their organization), Shincheonji implies that they are the “holy nation.”

2. Conditional Salvation:

“God is looking for people who will always keep their end of the bargain because they will seal themselves with the word and the testimony.”

This makes salvation conditional on “keeping your end of the bargain”—which Shincheonji defines as accepting their teaching and being sealed in their organization.

3. Works-Based System:

“We’re supposed to be a holy nation, which takes time, diligence, and obedience.”

This creates a works-based system where being part of the “holy nation” depends on human effort rather than God’s grace.

Biblical Response

The “Holy Nation” Is All Believers:

“But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s special possession, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light. Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.” (1 Peter 2:9-10)

The “holy nation” is all who have received God’s mercy through Christ. It’s not limited to one organization.

Holiness Is God’s Work:

“For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight.” (Ephesians 1:4)

“It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God—that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.” (1 Corinthians 1:30)

Our holiness comes from Christ, not from our efforts to “keep our end of the bargain.”

God Keeps His Covenant:

“If we are faithless, he remains faithful, for he cannot disown himself.” (2 Timothy 2:13)

“Being confident of this, that he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus.” (Philippians 1:6)

God doesn’t depend on us “keeping our end of the bargain.” He is faithful even when we are faithless. He completes the work He begins in us.

Chapter 4-6 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” provide comprehensive analysis of how Shincheonji’s framework creates a works-based salvation system that contradicts the biblical gospel of grace.

---

Part 14: Practical Guidance and Red Flags

Red Flags in Lesson 102

For those currently studying with Shincheonji or considering involvement, Lesson 102 contains numerous critical warning signs:

Red Flag #1: “Perfect Faith” Requirement

“Perfect faith means believing in both prophecy and fulfillment. It also means having 100% true faith. If someone only believes in the prophecy but not the fulfillment, they only have half of the percentage. That is false faith.”

Why This Is Concerning:

This makes salvation dependent on accepting Shincheonji’s interpretation of Revelation’s fulfillment. It condemns doubt or questioning as “false faith.”

Biblical Standard:

“For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast.” (Ephesians 2:8-9)

Salvation is by grace through faith in Christ, not by having “perfect faith” in an organization’s interpretation.

Red Flag #2: Fear-Based Control Using Revelation 22:18-19

“When we have questions, we should bring them to either the evangelist or the instructors to avoid adding or taking away.”

Why This Is Concerning:

This uses biblical warnings to prevent independent research and create dependency on approved sources. Students are told that thinking for themselves might constitute “adding or taking away” from Scripture.

Biblical Standard:

“Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.” (Acts 17:11)

We should test all teachings, not avoid questions out of fear.

Red Flag #3: Reinterpreting Historical Reality

“The fulfilment of prophecy has revealed that the seven churches actually represent seven individuals within one church.”

Why This Is Concerning:

This contradicts the text’s explicit statement (“the seven lampstands are the seven churches”) and dismisses historical evidence (the seven churches were real places).

Biblical Standard:

“Do not add to his words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar.” (Proverbs 30:6)

We shouldn’t add interpretations that contradict what the text explicitly says.

Red Flag #4: Self-Accusation Mechanism

“We should look at this as a chance to self-reflect. Are we making the same mistakes as those in the past? Are we taking the time to repent and learn from the mistakes of others?”

Why This Is Concerning:

This creates psychological pressure to examine yourself for “betrayal” or “forsaking first love,” which Shincheonji defines as questioning their teaching.

Biblical Standard:

“Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.” (Romans 8:1)

The gospel offers freedom from condemnation, not constant self-accusation.

Red Flag #5: Conditional Blessings and “Keeping Your End of the Bargain”

“God is looking for people who will always keep their end of the bargain because they will seal themselves with the word and the testimony.”

Why This Is Concerning:

This creates a works-based system where salvation depends on “keeping your end of the bargain”—accepting Shincheonji’s teaching and being sealed in their organization.

Biblical Standard:

“If we are faithless, he remains faithful, for he cannot disown himself.” (2 Timothy 2:13)

God’s faithfulness doesn’t depend on our perfect performance.

Questions to Ask

If you’re studying with Shincheonji, ask yourself honestly:

1. Does the Text Actually Say the Seven Churches Are Seven People?

Read Revelation 1:20 carefully: “The seven lampstands are the seven churches.”

Does this sound like seven people, or seven churches?

2. Why Would Jesus Send Letters to Seven People in Korea That Were Addressed to Seven Churches in Asia Minor?

If these letters are actually for seven people 2,000 years later, what were the original recipients supposed to do with them?

3. Can I Verify Shincheonji’s “Fulfillment” Claims Independently?

Visit closerlookinitiative.com and read “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1 and 2.” Compare Shincheonji’s claims with the documented historical reality.

4. Why Does “Perfect Faith” Require Accepting One Organization’s Interpretation?

The thief on the cross had no knowledge of Revelation’s interpretation, yet Jesus promised him paradise (Luke 23:43). Why do I need “perfect faith” in Shincheonji’s interpretation to be saved?

5. Am I Experiencing Freedom or Fear?

The gospel offers freedom (John 8:32, 36; Galatians 5:1). Do I feel free, or do I feel:

• Fear of “adding or taking away”
• Fear of having “false faith”
• Fear of “betraying” like the seven churches
• Fear of not “keeping my end of the bargain”

6. What Would First-Century Christians Have Understood?

If you showed Revelation 2 to a first-century Christian in Ephesus, would they understand it as a letter to their church, or as a code for seven people in Korea 2,000 years later?

7. Why Are Historical Facts Acknowledged But Then Dismissed?

Shincheonji acknowledges the seven churches were real places, then claims they were just figurative codes. Why acknowledge history if you’re going to dismiss it?

Steps to Take

If you recognize these red flags:

1. Pause and Pray:

Give yourself permission to slow down. You have time to carefully evaluate what you’re being taught.

2. Research the Actual History:

Visit closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination and read:

• “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1 and 2” (documenting what actually happened)
• “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale” (revealing the actual history)
• “Prophecy and Fulfillment” series (showing how interpretations change)
• Testimonies from former members

3. Read Revelation 2-3 in Context:

Read the letters to the seven churches using:

• Multiple Bible translations
• Reputable biblical commentaries
• Historical information about the seven cities
• Early Christian writings (Ignatius, Polycarp, etc.)

4. Talk With Trusted Christians:

Share your concerns with a pastor, Christian counselor, or trusted believer outside Shincheonji. Get perspective from people who aren’t invested in the organization.

5. Test Against Scripture:

Use the Berean method (Acts 17:11): examine everything against Scripture. Does Shincheonji’s teaching align with the consistent message of the Bible?

6. Trust Your Instincts:

If something feels wrong, trust that instinct. The Holy Spirit guides believers into truth (John 16:13).

7. Remember: You Can Leave:

You are not trapped. Leaving Shincheonji does not mean losing salvation. Salvation is in Christ alone, secured by His finished work, not by organizational membership.

Chapter 28 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” (Hope and Help) provides detailed guidance for those considering leaving Shincheonji, including practical steps, resources for healing, and encouragement for rebuilding faith and relationships.

---

Part 15: For Family and Friends

Understanding the Situation

If someone you love is involved with Shincheonji and has reached Lesson 102, they’re at a critical point. They’ve invested over seven months, are attending four classes per week, and are now being taught that:

• “Perfect faith” requires accepting Shincheonji’s interpretation
• The seven churches are actually seven people who “betrayed”
• Questioning might constitute “adding or taking away” from Scripture
• They must self-reflect to ensure they’re not “betraying” like the seven churches

What They’re Experiencing

• Intense cognitive dissonance: Trying to reconcile historical facts with Shincheonji’s reinterpretation
• Self-accusation: Reading about “betrayal” and wondering if they’re guilty of the same
• Fear of questioning: Told that independent research might be “adding or taking away”
• “Perfect faith” pressure: Feeling they must accept everything without doubt
• Exhaustion: Four classes per week plus homework, memorization, and recruitment
• Isolation: Family and friends are viewed as “Babylon” who don’t understand

How to Help

1. Ask Specific Questions About the Seven Churches:

Rather than attacking Shincheonji generally, ask specific questions about this lesson:

About the Seven Churches:

• “Can you show me on a map where the seven churches were located?”
• “If they were real churches, why does Shincheonji say they’re actually seven people?”
• “Revelation 1:20 says ‘the seven lampstands are the seven churches.’ How does that become ‘seven people’?”
• “What were the original recipients supposed to think when they received these letters?”

About “Perfect Faith”:

• “What does Ephesians 2:8-9 say about how we’re saved?”
• “The thief on the cross had no knowledge of Revelation’s interpretation. Did he have ‘perfect faith’?”
• “Is salvation by grace through faith in Christ, or by understanding Revelation correctly?”

About the “Betrayal” Narrative:

• “How do we know who ‘betrayed’ and who didn’t?”
• “Is it possible that different people in that conflict would tell different stories?”
• “Why should we accept Lee Man-hee’s interpretation of what happened?”

2. Share Historical Information:

Show them:

• Maps of the seven churches in Asia Minor
• Archaeological evidence of these cities
• Early Christian writings about these churches (Ignatius, Polycarp)
• Historical information about each city’s specific challenges

Say something like:

• “I found this information about the seven churches. They were real places with real histories. How does Shincheonji explain this?”

3. Direct Them to Documented Evidence:

Point them to closerlookinitiative.com, specifically:

• “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1 and 2” (what actually happened)
• “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale” (the real history)
• “Prophecy and Fulfillment” series (how interpretations change)

Say something like:

• “I found documentation of what actually happened in Shincheonji’s organization. The ‘fulfillment’ they claim doesn’t match the historical facts.”

4. Address the “Perfect Faith” Teaching:

Express concern about the “perfect faith” doctrine:

• “I’m concerned that you’re being told salvation depends on accepting one organization’s interpretation”
• “The Bible says we’re saved by grace through faith in Christ, not by having perfect understanding”
• “Even the disciples had doubts and questions. Does that mean they had ‘false faith’?”

5. Challenge the Fear-Based Control:

Address the use of Revelation 22:18-19:

• “I’m troubled that you’re being told not to research independently”
• “The Bereans tested even Paul’s teaching. Why can’t you test Shincheonji’s?”
• “Revelation 22:18-19 is about preserving the text, not about forbidding questions”

6. Highlight the Self-Accusation Mechanism:

Point out the psychological manipulation:

• “I notice you’re being told to self-reflect about whether you’re ‘betraying’ or ‘forsaking first love'”
• “It seems like they’re using these letters to make you feel guilty if you have doubts”
• “The gospel offers freedom from condemnation, not constant self-accusation”

7. Offer to Study Together:

Suggest studying Revelation 2-3 together using:

• Multiple Bible translations
• Reputable biblical commentaries
• Historical information about the seven cities
• Early Christian writings

Say something like:

• “Can we read these letters together and just see what they actually say?”
• “Can we look at what first-century Christians would have understood?”

8. Express Specific Concerns:

Share your concerns in “I” statements:

• “I’m concerned that historical facts are being acknowledged but then dismissed”
• “I’m worried about how exhausted you seem from four classes per week”
• “I’m troubled that you’re being told questioning is ‘adding or taking away'”
• “I’m concerned that ‘perfect faith’ is being defined as accepting one organization’s interpretation”

9. Pray Consistently:

Pray for:

• Wisdom in your interactions
• Your loved one’s eyes to be opened to truth
• Protection from psychological manipulation
• Restoration of relationship
• God’s work in ways you can’t see
• Other students in the class to recognize the deception

10. Be Patient but Persistent:

Leaving a high-control group is a process. Your loved one may need time to:

• Process the cognitive dissonance
• Overcome fear of questioning
• Rebuild relationships
• Reconstruct their faith
• Grieve the loss of community and time invested

Don’t give up hope. Many people have left Shincheonji at various stages. Your consistent love and presence matter more than you know.

Chapter 29 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” provides extensive guidance for families and friends, including communication strategies, resources, and hope for restoration.

---

Conclusion: The Letters That Speak Truth

What Lesson 102 Reveals

Lesson 102, “Revelation 2: The Letter Sent to the Messengers of the 7 Churches,” presents itself as unveiling the true meaning of Christ’s letters to the seven churches. Students are told that these letters are actually about seven people in Korea who “betrayed,” and that understanding this “fulfillment” is necessary for “perfect faith.”

However, what this lesson actually reveals is not hidden biblical truth but Shincheonji’s manipulative system:

Shincheonji’s System:

• “Perfect faith” requires accepting their interpretation
• The seven churches are “actually” seven people in Korea
• Historical reality is acknowledged but dismissed as figurative
• Students must self-reflect about “betrayal” and “forsaking first love”
• Questioning is discouraged through fear of “adding or taking away”
• Salvation depends on “keeping your end of the bargain”

The Biblical Gospel:

• Salvation by grace through faith in Christ alone
• The seven churches were real communities receiving real messages
• Historical reality matters and isn’t negated by typology
• The gospel offers freedom from condemnation, not self-accusation
• We should test all teachings, not fear questions
• God keeps His covenant even when we are faithless

The True Message of Revelation 2

When we read Revelation 2 as first-century Christians would have understood it, the message is clear and powerful:

Christ Walks Among His Churches:

“These are the words of him who holds the seven stars in his right hand and walks among the seven golden lampstands.” (Revelation 2:1)

Christ is present with His churches. He knows their situations intimately. He sees their struggles, their faithfulness, their failures.

Christ Offers Both Correction and Encouragement:

• To Ephesus: Return to your first love
• To Smyrna: Be faithful unto death; I will give you the crown of life
• To Pergamum: Repent of compromise
• To Thyatira: Hold on to what you have until I come

Christ’s corrections are specific, relevant, and redemptive. His encouragements are genuine and hope-filled.

Christ Promises Victory to All Who Overcome:

“To the one who overcomes, I will give the right to eat from the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God.” (Revelation 2:7)

The promises are for all who overcome through faith in Christ, not for one special person. Every believer overcomes through Christ’s victory.

Christ Calls All to Hear:

“Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches.” (Revelation 2:7, 11, 17, 29)

The message is for all who will listen. It’s not sealed away requiring a special interpreter. It’s accessible to all who have ears to hear.

An Invitation to True Faith

If you’re currently involved with Shincheonji, please hear this: The letters to the seven churches are not codes requiring special interpretation. They are Christ’s words to His churches—then and now.

You don’t need:

• “Perfect faith” defined as accepting Shincheonji’s interpretation
• To identify seven people in Korea who “betrayed”
• To fear “adding or taking away” if you ask questions
• To constantly self-examine for “betrayal”
• To “keep your end of the bargain” to earn God’s blessings

You need only Jesus Christ—who walks among His churches, who knows you intimately, who offers both correction and encouragement, who promises victory to all who trust in Him.

The true gospel is beautifully simple:

“For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.” (John 3:16)

“If you declare with your mouth, ‘Jesus is Lord,’ and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” (Romans 10:9)

“For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast.” (Ephesians 2:8-9)

Salvation is a gift, freely offered to all who believe. You receive it by trusting in Christ, not by:

• Having “perfect faith” in an organization’s interpretation
• Identifying seven people in Korea
• Understanding complex fulfillment narratives
• “Keeping your end of the bargain”
• Being sealed in Shincheonji

The True “Overcomer”

Shincheonji will claim that Lee Man-hee is “the one who overcomes.” But Scripture is clear about who overcomes:

“Who is it that overcomes the world? Only the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God.” (1 John 5:5)

Every believer overcomes through faith in Christ.

“No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us.” (Romans 8:37)

We are “more than conquerors” through Christ’s love, not through organizational membership.

“I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.” (John 16:33)

Jesus has already overcome. We overcome by trusting in His victory, not by achieving our own.

The Letters Speak Truth

The letters to the seven churches speak truth—not the “truth” Shincheonji claims (codes for seven people in Korea), but the real truth:

Christ is present with His people. Christ knows our situations intimately. Christ offers correction when we stray. Christ encourages us when we’re faithful. Christ promises victory to all who trust in Him. Christ calls all to hear His voice.

This is the message that encouraged persecuted first-century believers. This is the message that has encouraged Christians throughout history. This is the message that should encourage us today.

Any interpretation that obscures this message—that shifts focus from Christ to human figures, from His victory to organizational structures, from His grace to human performance—fundamentally misses the point of these letters.

Final Encouragement

For those who have recognized the deception and are considering leaving: You are making the right choice.

The letters to the seven churches are not about seven people in Korea. They’re about Christ’s relationship with His churches—then and now. They’re about His presence, His knowledge, His correction, His encouragement, His promises.

You don’t need Shincheonji’s interpretation to understand these letters. You need only to read them with an open heart, trusting that Christ speaks to you through His word.

Know that:

1. God’s Grace Is Greater:

No amount of time invested in false teaching puts you beyond God’s reach.

“Where sin increased, grace increased all the more.” (Romans 5:20)

2. Your Salvation Is Secure in Christ:

Your salvation never depended on Shincheonji. It depends on Christ alone.

“For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Romans 8:38-39)

3. Many Have Left and Rebuilt Their Lives:

You are not alone. Many people have left Shincheonji and found healing, restored relationships, and rebuilt their faith.

4. Healing Is Possible:

The wounds from involvement in a high-control group are real, but healing is possible. With time, support, and God’s grace, you can recover.

5. Your Family Still Loves You:

The family and friends you’ve distanced from still love you. They’ve been waiting and praying for you.

6. God Still Loves You:

Most importantly, God still loves you. He has never stopped loving you.

“The LORD is compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, abounding in love.” (Psalm 103:8)

The True Vision

Let’s end where we began—with Christ’s letters to the seven churches.

These letters were not given to be decoded as predictions of events in Korea. They were given to encourage real churches facing real challenges, offering correction, encouragement, and hope.

When you read these letters, don’t look for codes or hidden meanings. Simply hear what Christ says:

“I know your deeds.” (He sees you) “I know your afflictions.” (He understands your struggles) “Repent.” (He calls you to turn from what’s wrong) “Be faithful.” (He encourages you to persevere) “To the one who overcomes, I will give…” (He promises victory) “Whoever has ears, let them hear.” (He calls you to listen)

This is the true message of Revelation 2: Christ knows you, loves you, corrects you, encourages you, and promises you victory through faith in Him.

Not through an organization. Not through a special interpretation. Not through “perfect faith” in human teaching.

Through Him alone.

Come to Him. Trust in Him. Rest in Him. Find your salvation, your identity, your hope, your peace in Him alone.

“Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.” (Matthew 11:28-30)

May you know this rest—the rest that comes from trusting in Christ’s finished work, not in human interpretations or organizational membership.

May you know this freedom—the freedom that comes from the truth of the gospel, not from the bondage of a system that demands perfect understanding and performance.

May you know this hope—the hope that is found in Christ alone, who walks among His churches, who knows you by name, who calls you to Himself.

To Him be glory and power forever and ever. Amen.

---

This refutation was prepared using the framework established in “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” and draws on first-century Christian understanding, historical-literary analysis, and biblical theology to provide accurate evaluation of Shincheonji’s teachings. For comprehensive documentation of what actually happened in Shincheonji’s organization and how their claims contradict historical reality, please visit closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination.

Additional resources mentioned in this refutation:

• “SCJ’s Fulfillment of Revelation Part 1 and 2” – Available at closerlookinitiative.com
• “The Real Reasons Behind the Tabernacle Temple’s Destruction and Sale” – Available at closerlookinitiative.com
• “Prophecy and Fulfillment” series – Available at closerlookinitiative.com

All biblical quotations are from the New International Version (NIV) unless otherwise noted.