Analysis of SCJ Lesson 19: “Secrets of Heaven – Figurative Yeast”

A Refutation Using “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story”

---

Introduction: The Baker’s Secret Ingredient

Imagine visiting a bakery renowned for its exceptional bread. The owner, a master baker, invites you into the kitchen for a private lesson. “The secret to great bread,” he explains, “is the yeast. Most bakers use ordinary yeast, but I have access to something special—a rare strain passed down through generations. This is the true yeast that makes bread rise properly.”

He shows you two loaves: one made with his “special yeast,” golden and perfectly risen, and another made with “ordinary yeast,” flat and unappetizing. “See the difference?” he asks. “Most bakeries claim they make good bread, but they’re using inferior yeast. Their bread looks fine on the outside, but it lacks the essential quality that makes bread truly nourishing.”

Intrigued, you ask where you can get this special yeast. He shakes his head sadly. “That’s the problem. Most people don’t even know it exists. They’ve been eating inferior bread their whole lives and don’t realize what they’re missing. But now that you know, you have a choice: keep eating the old bread, or learn to make bread with the true yeast.”

Over the following weeks, you return for more lessons. The baker teaches you to identify “false yeast” in other bakeries. “They claim their bread is good,” he warns, “but it’s actually harmful. Their yeast is contaminated. If you eat their bread, you’ll become sick—spiritually sick.” He encourages you to warn your friends and family about the dangers of “false yeast” and to bring them to his bakery for the “true” bread.

Gradually, you stop buying bread anywhere else. You avoid other bakeries, convinced their yeast is dangerous. You begin to see yourself as part of an enlightened group who knows the secret of “true yeast” while everyone else remains deceived. When friends question your new obsession with this one bakery, you dismiss their concerns—they simply don’t understand the difference between true and false yeast.

This is what happens in SCJ Lesson 19.

The lesson appears to be a straightforward Bible study about “yeast” as a metaphor for teaching. Instructor Nate walks students through passages where Jesus warns against the “yeast of the Pharisees,” explaining that yeast represents teachings or instructions. He contrasts “God’s yeast” (good teaching) with “Satan’s yeast” (false teaching), encouraging students to discern between them. Everything sounds biblical, discerning, and spiritually mature.

But beneath the surface, something else is happening. The lesson is constructing a framework that will eventually position SCJ’s teaching as the only “good yeast” while labeling all other Christian teaching—including that of students’ home churches—as “Satan’s yeast” or the “yeast of the Pharisees.” By teaching that consuming “bad yeast” transforms people into “Satan’s image,” the lesson creates fear that keeps students from engaging with any theological perspective outside SCJ.

This lesson sits at position 19 in the Introductory (Parables) Level—strategically placed after students have learned about “sealed” Scripture and “spiritual food.” Students are now being taught about discernment, but the criteria for discernment are being subtly redefined to serve SCJ’s agenda. By the time students realize where this teaching leads, they’ve already accepted the framework: that most Christian teaching is “bad yeast,” that their pastors are like the Pharisees, that leaving SCJ means consuming “Satan’s yeast,” and that only through SCJ can they receive the “hidden manna” and “food at the proper time.”

Let’s examine how this lesson uses legitimate biblical teaching about discernment to create an illegitimate system of spiritual isolation and control, and how the principles in “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” expose the manipulation.

---

Part 1: What SCJ Teaches in This Lesson

The Surface Teaching (What Students Hear)

The lesson presents what appears to be straightforward biblical teaching about yeast as a metaphor:

Physical Characteristics of Yeast:

1. Yeast is like bacteria that causes change and rise
2. Yeast is used to make leavened bread
3. God created yeast to teach us something specific
4. The most important aspect: yeast causes change

Spiritual Meaning of Yeast:

• Yeast = Teachings or instructions (Matthew 16:12)
• Jesus warned against the “yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees”
• Their yeast was hypocrisy and human traditions (Luke 12:1, Mark 7:6-7)
• Yeast causes transformation—either into God’s image or Satan’s image

Two Types of Yeast:

God’s Yeast (Good Yeast):

• Jesus’ teaching at the First Coming (Mark 1:21-22, 27)
• “New teaching with authority”
• Transforms people into God’s image (Ephesians 4:21-24)
• The “opened word” and “new teachings”

Satan’s Yeast (Bad Yeast):

• The Pharisees’ and Sadducees’ teaching
• Hypocrisy and human traditions
• Transforms people into Satan’s image
• The “old yeast” and “sealed word”
• At the Second Coming: teachings of Balaam and the Nicolaitans (Revelation 2:14-15)

Yeast at the First and Second Coming:

First Coming:

• Jesus brought “new yeast”—teaching about fulfilled prophecy
• The Pharisees had “old yeast”—sealed word and human traditions
• Jesus was the “faithful shepherd” with God’s yeast

Second Coming:

• Someone will bring “food at the proper time” (Matthew 24:45-47)
• This will be “hidden manna” (Revelation 2:17)
• There will be false teachings (Balaam, Nicolaitans) to avoid
• Students must discern between good and bad yeast

The Lesson’s Hope Statement: “Our Hope: To discern between yeast and become an example ‘good yeast’ at the time of the second coming!”

The Subtext (What’s Really Being Established)

Beneath this seemingly biblical teaching, several problematic foundations are being laid:

1. Preparing to Delegitimize All Non-SCJ Teaching: The lesson establishes that there are only two types of teaching: God’s yeast (good) and Satan’s yeast (bad). This binary framework will later be used to categorize SCJ’s teaching as “God’s yeast” and all other Christian teaching as “Satan’s yeast.”

2. Creating Fear of “Bad Yeast”: By teaching that consuming “bad yeast” transforms people into “Satan’s image,” the lesson creates profound fear. Students begin to worry: What if I’m unknowingly consuming bad yeast? What if my church’s teaching is actually Satan’s yeast?

3. Positioning SCJ as the Source of “Good Yeast”: The emphasis on needing “food at the proper time” and “hidden manna” at the Second Coming prepares students to accept that SCJ has this special teaching. The lesson asks: “What yeast is going to be given in our time now?” The implied answer: SCJ’s teaching.

4. Comparing Mainstream Christianity to the Pharisees: By extensively discussing the Pharisees’ “bad yeast,” the lesson prepares students to view their pastors and churches similarly. The parallel is being drawn: just as the Pharisees were religious leaders with “bad yeast” at the First Coming, so mainstream Christian leaders have “bad yeast” at the Second Coming.

5. Creating Dependency on SCJ’s Interpretation: The lesson emphasizes that discernment is crucial but provides no objective criteria for discerning good from bad yeast—except the implicit message that SCJ will teach you how to discern. This creates dependency on SCJ’s framework.

6. Preparing for Complete Separation: The lesson’s warning to “be on guard” against bad yeast and the statement that “one who receives Satan’s yeast will be made in Satan’s image” prepares students to separate completely from any teaching outside SCJ, including their home churches.

---

Part 2: Analysis Through “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story”

Chapter 11-13: Information Control and the Verification Problem

Chapter 11 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” examines isolation strategies disguised as protection. This lesson demonstrates a sophisticated form of information control by teaching students to fear and avoid “bad yeast” (any teaching outside SCJ).

The Information Control in This Lesson:

The lesson teaches: “One who receives God’s yeast will change into being more in God’s image—being remade into God’s likeness. But one who receives Satan’s yeast will be made in Satan’s image—a child of hell, as Jesus said (Matthew 23:15).”

This creates a binary framework where:

• SCJ’s teaching = God’s yeast (transforms into God’s image)
• All other teaching = Satan’s yeast (transforms into Satan’s image)

The fear of being transformed into “Satan’s image” or becoming “a child of hell” by consuming the wrong teaching creates powerful motivation to avoid all non-SCJ sources.

Chapter 13’s Verification Problem:

Chapter 13 addresses how to evaluate spiritual claims that cannot be independently verified. This lesson creates a verification problem: How can students objectively determine which teaching is “God’s yeast” and which is “Satan’s yeast”?

The lesson provides no objective criteria—only:

1. Jesus’ teaching was “new” and had “authority”
2. The Pharisees’ teaching was “old” and hypocritical
3. At the Second Coming, someone will give “food at the proper time”

But how do students verify which contemporary teaching is the “new yeast with authority”? The lesson doesn’t say explicitly, but the implication is clear: SCJ will teach you to discern, and SCJ’s teaching is the “good yeast.”

Biblical Response:

1. The Bible provides objective criteria for testing teaching:

• 1 John 4:1-3: “Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God.”

The test is whether teaching acknowledges Jesus Christ as Lord who came in the flesh, not whether it’s “new” or claims to be “food at the proper time.”

• Acts 17:11: “Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.”

The Bereans tested Paul’s teaching against Scripture. They didn’t avoid “bad yeast” by isolating themselves—they tested everything against God’s Word.

• 1 Thessalonians 5:21-22: “Test everything; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every form of evil.”

Paul encourages testing everything, not avoiding all teaching except one source.

2. The “yeast of the Pharisees” was specific, not a blanket condemnation:

Jesus warned against the “yeast of the Pharisees” for specific reasons:

• Hypocrisy: Luke 12:1 – “Be on your guard against the yeast of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy”
• Human traditions that nullified God’s Word: Mark 7:8-9, 13 – “You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions… Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition”
• Burdening people with legalism: Matthew 23:4 – “They tie up heavy, cumbersome loads and put them on other people’s shoulders”
• Rejecting Jesus as Messiah: John 12:37-40

The Pharisees weren’t condemned for having different interpretations of prophecy. They were condemned for:

1. Adding human traditions that contradicted Scripture
2. Hypocrisy (saying one thing, doing another)
3. Legalism that burdened people
4. Rejecting Jesus despite overwhelming evidence

This is vastly different from sincere Christian pastors and teachers who may interpret some passages differently than SCJ but who love Jesus, teach Scripture faithfully, and serve their congregations humbly.

3. The lesson misapplies the Pharisees comparison:

The lesson states: “To be clear, the Pharisees and Sadducees were not non-believers—they were the religious leaders of that time. Yet they had to be rebuked for the things they taught the people of Israel, which pulled people’s hearts far from God.”

This sets up a dangerous parallel: Just as the Pharisees were religious leaders with bad teaching, so contemporary Christian leaders are religious leaders with bad teaching. But this comparison is false equivalence:

• The Pharisees added traditions that contradicted Scripture and rejected the Messiah
• Christian pastors teach from Scripture, acknowledge Jesus as Lord, and serve their congregations

Comparing faithful Christian pastors to the Pharisees is not biblical discernment—it’s slander.

Chapter 18-20: Testing Authority and Creative Fulfillment

Chapter 18 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” examines how to test claims of spiritual authority. This lesson makes implicit authority claims by positioning SCJ as having the “good yeast” and “food at the proper time.”

The Authority Problem:

The lesson teaches that at the Second Coming, someone will give “food at the proper time” (Matthew 24:45-47) and “hidden manna” (Revelation 2:17). The implicit message: SCJ has this teaching, making them the authoritative source of “good yeast.”

But how can students verify this claim? The lesson provides no methodology—only the assertion that there will be someone with “good yeast” and students need to discern who it is.

Chapter 19-20’s Response:

Chapter 19 discusses unfalsifiable claims. The lesson’s framework creates an unfalsifiable system:

• If you accept SCJ’s teaching → You’re consuming “God’s yeast”
• If you question SCJ’s teaching → You’re resisting “good yeast” (like the Pharisees resisted Jesus)
• If you consult other sources → You’re consuming “Satan’s yeast”

Chapter 20 warns about “creative fulfillment”—adding interpretive layers to Scripture that support predetermined conclusions. This lesson demonstrates that technique through its handling of the “yeast” metaphor and Second Coming prophecies.

Biblical Response to the “Food at the Proper Time” Claim:

1. Matthew 24:45-47 in context:

The lesson quotes Matthew 24:45-47: “Who then is the faithful and wise servant, whom the master has put in charge of the servants in his household to give them their food at the proper time?”

But context matters. Jesus is teaching about readiness for His return:

• Matthew 24:42: “Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come.”
• Matthew 24:44: “So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him.”

Jesus then gives several parables about readiness:

• The faithful servant (24:45-51)
• The ten virgins (25:1-13)
• The talents (25:14-30)

The “faithful servant” parable is about all church leaders being faithful stewards who care for God’s people, not about one special person at the Second Coming who has unique “food.” The contrast is between:

• Faithful servants: Those who care for God’s people faithfully
• Wicked servants: Those who abuse their position (24:48-51)

This is a call to faithfulness for all Christian leaders, not a prophecy about one person with special teaching at the Second Coming.

2. Revelation 2:17 in context:

The lesson references Revelation 2:17 about “hidden manna”: “Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who is victorious, I will give some of the hidden manna.”

But context shows this is a promise to all faithful believers in Pergamum, not to one special person:

• Revelation 2:12: “To the angel of the church in Pergamum write…”
• Revelation 2:13: “I know where you live—where Satan has his throne. Yet you remain true to my name.”
• Revelation 2:17: “To the one who is victorious, I will give some of the hidden manna”

The “hidden manna” is a promise to all overcomers—all faithful believers who remain true to Christ despite persecution. It’s not a special teaching given to one organization at the Second Coming.

Moreover, the “hidden manna” likely refers to spiritual nourishment in the age to come (eternal life with Christ), not to special biblical interpretation in the present age.

Chapter 24-26: The Unified Biblical Narrative

Chapter 24-25 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” (“The Scarlet Thread”) examines the Bible’s unified narrative centered on Christ’s redemptive work. This lesson demonstrates fragmentation by pulling “yeast” passages from multiple contexts without showing how they all point to the gospel.

The Fragmentation Problem:

The lesson jumps between:

• Matthew 13:33 (Kingdom of Heaven like yeast)
• Matthew 16:6-12 (Yeast of the Pharisees)
• Luke 12:1 (Yeast is hypocrisy)
• Mark 7:6-7 (Human traditions)
• Revelation 2:14-15 (Balaam and Nicolaitans)
• Matthew 24:45-47 (Faithful servant)

Each passage is examined to support the “good yeast vs. bad yeast” framework, but the lesson never shows how these passages fit into the Bible’s overarching story of redemption through Christ.

Chapter 26 (“Reading Revelation Like a First-Century Christian”) explains that Revelation’s imagery was meaningful to its original audience. The references to Balaam and the Nicolaitans in Revelation 2 would have been understood by the seven churches as warnings about specific false teachings they were facing, not as coded prophecies about the 21st century requiring SCJ’s interpretation.

Biblical Response:

1. The Bible’s unified message about teaching and discernment:

When we read the Bible as a unified story, the teaching about discernment has a clear progression:

Old Testament: God’s people are to follow His Word, not human traditions

• Deuteronomy 4:2: “Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it”
• Isaiah 8:20: “Consult God’s instruction and the testimony of warning. If anyone does not speak according to this word, they have no light of dawn.”

Jesus’ Teaching: Beware of teaching that adds human traditions or leads away from God

• Matthew 15:9: “They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely human rules”
• John 7:16-17: “My teaching is not my own. It comes from the one who sent me. Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God”

Apostolic Teaching: Test all teaching against the gospel of Christ

• Galatians 1:8-9: “But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse!”
• 2 Timothy 4:3-4: “For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.”

The Unified Message:

• God’s Word is the standard for all teaching
• Beware of teaching that adds human traditions or contradicts Scripture
• Test all teaching against the gospel of Christ crucified and risen
• The Holy Spirit guides believers into truth (John 16:13)
• Discernment is a community practice, not isolation (Acts 15, 1 Corinthians 14:29)

This is the Bible’s unified teaching about discernment. The lesson isn’t wrong that we should discern between good and bad teaching, but it fragments these passages to build a fear-based isolation system rather than showing how they all point to Christ-centered discernment.

2. The “yeast” metaphor in Matthew 13:33:

The lesson begins with Matthew 13:33: “The kingdom of heaven is like yeast that a woman took and mixed into about sixty pounds of flour until it worked all through the dough.”

But the lesson never explains what this parable actually means. It simply uses “yeast” as a springboard to discuss good and bad teaching. But what did Jesus mean?

Interpretation 1: The Kingdom’s Growth Most scholars understand this parable as teaching about the Kingdom of Heaven’s growth—it starts small (like yeast) but permeates and transforms everything (like dough). This is consistent with other parables in Matthew 13 about the Kingdom’s growth (mustard seed, etc.).

Interpretation 2: The Kingdom’s Influence The parable may teach that the Kingdom of Heaven, though seemingly insignificant, has transformative influence in the world.

What the parable is NOT about: The parable is not about discerning between good and bad teaching. Jesus uses “yeast” positively here (the Kingdom is like yeast), whereas in Matthew 16 He uses it negatively (beware the yeast of the Pharisees).

The lesson conflates these different uses of “yeast” to build its framework, but this is eisegesis (reading meaning into the text) rather than exegesis (drawing meaning from the text).

---

Part 3: The Psychological Progression

The Indoctrination Process at Lesson 19

By Lesson 19, students have been in the Parables course for approximately 6-9 weeks. Let’s examine what’s happened psychologically:

1. Accumulated Framework:

Students have been taught:

• The Bible was “sealed” and requires special interpretation (Lessons 1-10)
• Spiritual food (God’s Word) vs. physical food (Lessons 15-18)
• Now: Good yeast (God’s teaching) vs. bad yeast (Satan’s teaching)

Each lesson adds another layer to the interpretive framework, making it increasingly difficult to question the overall system.

2. Fear-Based Motivation:

The lesson creates profound fear: “One who receives Satan’s yeast will be made in Satan’s image—a child of hell.”

This fear motivates students to:

• Avoid any teaching outside SCJ
• Question their home church’s teaching
• Depend on SCJ to tell them what’s “good yeast”

3. Binary Thinking:

The lesson reinforces black-and-white categories:

• God’s yeast vs. Satan’s yeast
• God’s image vs. Satan’s image
• New teaching vs. old teaching
• Hidden manna vs. human traditions

This binary thinking makes it psychologically difficult to recognize that most Christian teaching falls into neither extreme—it’s faithful, Christ-centered teaching that may differ on secondary issues.

4. Preparation for Separation:

By comparing mainstream Christian leaders to the Pharisees, the lesson prepares students to separate from their home churches. The implicit message: Your pastor is like the Pharisees—he has bad yeast that will transform you into Satan’s image.

5. Identity Formation:

Students begin to see themselves as the enlightened few who can discern “good yeast” from “bad yeast,” while everyone else (including their pastors and Christian friends) remains deceived. This creates spiritual elitism that makes leaving SCJ psychologically difficult.

Biblical Response: The Gospel’s Discernment

The contrast with the gospel’s message about discernment is instructive:

The Gospel Encourages Testing, Not Isolation:

• Acts 17:11: “Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.”

The Bereans didn’t isolate themselves from Paul’s teaching—they tested it against Scripture. This is healthy discernment.

The Gospel Produces Unity, Not Division:

• 1 Corinthians 1:10: “I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another in what you say and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly united in mind and thought.”
• Ephesians 4:3-6: “Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called to one hope when you were called; one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all”

The gospel produces unity among believers, not the attitude “we have good yeast, they have bad yeast.”

The Gospel Centers on Christ, Not on Special Knowledge:

• 1 Corinthians 2:2: “For I resolved to know nothing while I was with you except Jesus Christ and him crucified.”
• Colossians 2:2-3: “…that they may know the mystery of God, namely, Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.”

The “hidden manna” and “food at the proper time” is Christ Himself, not special interpretive knowledge about prophecy.

---

Part 4: Distinguishing Biblical Truth from SCJ Framework

What’s Biblical in This Lesson?

It’s important to acknowledge what’s actually true and biblical:

1. Jesus did warn against the “yeast of the Pharisees”:

• Matthew 16:6, 11-12: “Be on your guard against the yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees… Then they understood that he was not telling them to guard against the yeast used in bread, but against the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees.”

This is biblical truth.

2. The Pharisees’ teaching included hypocrisy and human traditions:

• Luke 12:1: “Be on your guard against the yeast of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy”
• Mark 7:7-8: “They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely human rules. You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions.”

This is accurate biblical teaching.

3. We should discern between true and false teaching:

• 1 John 4:1: “Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God”
• 1 Thessalonians 5:21: “Test everything; hold fast what is good”

This is sound biblical principle.

4. Teaching does influence and transform us:

• Romans 12:2: “Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind”
• Ephesians 4:22-24: “…to put off your old self… to be made new in the attitude of your minds; and to put on the new self, created to be like God”

This is biblical truth.

What’s Uniquely SCJ?

The problematic elements are subtle but significant:

1. The binary framework (all teaching is either God’s yeast or Satan’s yeast):

• Biblical: Test all teaching; some is sound, some is false, much is faithful but imperfect
• SCJ: All teaching is either completely good (SCJ) or completely bad (everyone else)

2. The comparison of Christian leaders to the Pharisees:

• Biblical: The Pharisees were condemned for specific sins (hypocrisy, adding traditions, rejecting Christ)
• SCJ: Christian pastors are like the Pharisees because they don’t have SCJ’s interpretation

3. The claim that SCJ has “food at the proper time” and “hidden manna”:

• Biblical: Matthew 24:45-47 is about all Christian leaders being faithful; Revelation 2:17 is a promise to all overcomers
• SCJ: These passages refer to SCJ’s special teaching at the Second Coming

4. The fear-based isolation:

• Biblical: Test all teaching against Scripture (Acts 17:11)
• SCJ: Avoid all teaching outside SCJ because it’s “Satan’s yeast” that will transform you into “Satan’s image”

5. The suggestion that most Christians are consuming “bad yeast”:

• Biblical: There are false teachers, but also many faithful teachers (Ephesians 4:11-13)
• SCJ: Most Christian teaching is “bad yeast” like the Pharisees; only SCJ has “good yeast”

6. The emphasis on “new teaching” as validation:

• Biblical: Truth is measured by consistency with apostolic teaching (Galatians 1:8-9)
• SCJ: “New teaching” is presented as inherently better than “old teaching”

The Blurred Lines

The genius of this lesson is how it blurs biblical truth with SCJ framework:

Example 1: Discernment

• Biblical truth: We should discern between true and false teaching
• Biblical method: Test against Scripture, the gospel, and apostolic teaching
• SCJ addition: The way to discern is to accept SCJ’s teaching and reject all others
• Result: Students accept isolation while thinking they’re practicing biblical discernment

Example 2: The Pharisees

• Biblical truth: Jesus condemned the Pharisees for hypocrisy and human traditions
• Biblical context: The Pharisees added traditions that contradicted Scripture and rejected Christ
• SCJ addition: Christian pastors are like the Pharisees because they don’t have SCJ’s interpretation
• Result: Students view their pastors as having “bad yeast” while thinking they’re following Jesus’ example

Example 3: Transformation

• Biblical truth: Teaching influences and transforms us
• Biblical context: We’re transformed by the Holy Spirit through God’s Word (2 Corinthians 3:18)
• SCJ addition: Only SCJ’s teaching transforms into God’s image; other teaching transforms into Satan’s image
• Result: Students fear any teaching outside SCJ while thinking they’re protecting their spiritual health

---

Part 5: The Larger Pattern

How This Lesson Fits SCJ’s Overall Strategy

This lesson is part of a carefully designed progression:

Lessons 1-15: Foundation

• Bible is “sealed” and requires special interpretation
• Most Christians don’t understand Scripture correctly
• Students need SCJ’s teaching to understand God’s Word

Lessons 16-19: Creating Fear and Dependency

• Lesson 16-17 (Food): Spiritual food (God’s Word) vs. Satan’s food
• Lesson 18 (Drink): Spiritual drink (God’s Word) vs. Satan’s drink
• Lesson 19 (Yeast): God’s yeast (good teaching) vs. Satan’s yeast (bad teaching)

Each lesson adds another layer of fear about consuming the “wrong” spiritual nourishment and creates dependency on SCJ as the source of the “right” nourishment.

Later Lessons: Solidifying the Framework

• Lesson 20-25: Further symbolic interpretation building SCJ’s framework
• Intermediate Level: Christianity has been “destroyed”; SCJ is the restoration
• Advanced Level: Lee Man-hee is the promised pastor; SCJ is the 144,000

Lesson 19’s Specific Role:

This lesson creates fear and isolation that keeps students in SCJ:

• “What if my church’s teaching is Satan’s yeast?”
• “What if I’m being transformed into Satan’s image without knowing it?”
• “I need to stay in SCJ where I’m receiving good yeast”

The fear of consuming “bad yeast” becomes a psychological trap that makes leaving feel spiritually dangerous.

The Testimony Pattern

Chapter 14 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” shares testimonies from former members. A common theme regarding the “yeast” teaching:

“I was taught that SCJ had ‘good yeast’ (God’s teaching) while all other churches had ‘bad yeast’ (Satan’s teaching). I became afraid to listen to my pastor’s sermons or read Christian books because I thought they would transform me into ‘Satan’s image.’ I stopped going to my home church because I believed they were like the Pharisees with hypocritical teaching. It took me months after leaving SCJ to realize that my pastor was a faithful servant of Christ, not a Pharisee with ‘bad yeast.’ The ‘yeast’ teaching had isolated me from the body of Christ and made me spiritually arrogant.”

This lesson creates that fear and isolation. The “yeast” framework becomes a tool for controlling members by making them afraid to engage with any Christian teaching outside SCJ.

---

Part 6: Practical Application and Warning Signs

For Current Students: Questions to Ask

If you’re currently taking this course, here are critical questions to consider:

1. About the “good yeast vs. bad yeast” framework:

• Does the Bible actually teach that all teaching is either completely good or completely bad?
• How can I objectively verify which teaching is “God’s yeast” and which is “Satan’s yeast”?
• Is it biblical to compare faithful Christian pastors to the Pharisees?

2. About the Pharisees comparison:

• Why were the Pharisees actually condemned? (Hypocrisy, adding traditions, rejecting Christ)
• Do Christian pastors who love Jesus and teach Scripture faithfully deserve this comparison?
• What does this comparison reveal about SCJ’s attitude toward other Christians?

3. About “food at the proper time” and “hidden manna”:

• Does Matthew 24:45-47 actually teach about one special person at the Second Coming?
• Does Revelation 2:17 actually teach about special interpretation, or is it a promise to all faithful believers?
• How can I verify that SCJ has this “food” and “manna”?

4. About isolation:

• Why does this teaching discourage me from engaging with other Christian teaching?
• If truth can withstand scrutiny, why am I taught to avoid all non-SCJ sources?
• Is isolation from other Christians a sign of healthy discernment or unhealthy control?

5. About where this is leading:

• If I’m being taught that most Christian teaching is “Satan’s yeast,” what am I being prepared to believe about the church?
• Why is my spiritual safety increasingly tied to one organization?
• What will I be taught in later levels about who has “good yeast” and who has “bad yeast”?

For Family and Friends: Warning Signs

If someone you love is taking this course, watch for these signs:

1. Fear of other Christian teaching:

• Stops listening to sermons or reading Christian books
• Refers to other teaching as “bad yeast” or “Satan’s yeast”
• Shows anxiety about being “transformed into Satan’s image”

2. Comparison of pastors to Pharisees:

• Criticizes their pastor or church leaders
• Suggests their church’s teaching is hypocritical or based on human traditions
• Shows decreasing respect for Christian leaders outside SCJ

3. Spiritual elitism:

• Talks about being able to “discern” while others can’t
• Hints that most Christians are deceived or consuming “bad yeast”
• Shows subtle superiority about their biblical understanding

4. Isolation from Christian community:

• Stops attending church or becomes critical during attendance
• Pulls away from Christian friends and fellowship
• Spends increasing time only with SCJ study group

5. Changed vocabulary:

• Uses phrases like “good yeast,” “bad yeast,” “food at the proper time,” “hidden manna”
• Talks about needing to “discern” in ways that mean avoiding all non-SCJ input
• Refers to being “transformed” in ways tied to SCJ’s teaching

For Pastors and Counselors

Chapter 15 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” shares insights from pastors who have helped people leave SCJ. Key recommendations regarding the “yeast” teaching:

1. Address the Pharisees comparison directly: Explain that:

• The Pharisees were condemned for specific sins, not for interpretive differences
• Faithful Christian pastors who love Jesus and teach Scripture don’t deserve this comparison
• This comparison is a manipulation tactic to delegitimize all Christian leadership

2. Clarify biblical discernment: Show that:

• Biblical discernment involves testing against Scripture (Acts 17:11)
• It doesn’t mean isolating from all other Christian input
• The early church practiced discernment in community (Acts 15, 1 Corinthians 14:29)

3. Examine the passages in context: Walk through:

• Matthew 24:45-47 in context (about all Christian leaders being faithful)
• Revelation 2:17 in context (promise to all overcomers in Pergamum)
• Matthew 13:33 in context (parable about Kingdom’s growth, not about discernment)

4. Address the fear: Help the person see that:

• God’s love casts out fear (1 John 4:18)
• The gospel produces confidence, not anxiety about consuming “bad yeast”
• Faithful Christian teaching won’t transform them into “Satan’s image”

5. Point to Christ-centered discernment: Emphasize that:

• The test of teaching is whether it exalts Christ (1 Corinthians 2:2)
• The gospel is the standard (Galatians 1:8-9)
• The Holy Spirit guides believers into truth (John 16:13)

6. Be patient: Understand that the “yeast” teaching creates deep fear. Questioning SCJ feels like risking spiritual contamination. Deconstruction takes time.

7. Provide resources: Direct people to closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination for detailed refutation of SCJ’s claims about “good yeast,” “food at the proper time,” and the Pharisees comparison.

---

Part 7: The Biblical Alternative

The True Gospel of Discernment

The biblical teaching about discernment is far more balanced and Christ-centered than SCJ’s fear-based system:

1. Test all teaching against Scripture:

• Acts 17:11: “Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.”

The Bereans tested even Paul’s apostolic teaching against Scripture. This is healthy discernment, not isolation.

2. The standard is the gospel of Christ:

• Galatians 1:8-9: “But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse! As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under God’s curse!”

The test isn’t whether teaching is “new” or claims to be “food at the proper time.” The test is whether it’s consistent with the gospel of Christ crucified and risen.

3. Discernment is practiced in community:

• 1 Corinthians 14:29: “Two or three prophets should speak, and the others should weigh carefully what is said.”
• Acts 15:1-29: The Jerusalem Council tested Paul’s teaching in community

Biblical discernment isn’t isolation from all other input—it’s testing teaching in community with other believers.

4. The Holy Spirit guides believers into truth:

• John 16:13: “But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth.”
• 1 John 2:27: “As for you, the anointing you received from him remains in you, and you do not need anyone to teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about all things and as that anointing is real, not counterfeit—just as it has taught you, remain in him.”

Believers have the Holy Spirit to guide them. While teachers are valuable (Ephesians 4:11), believers aren’t dependent on one organization to tell them what’s “good yeast.”

5. The goal is Christ-likeness, not special knowledge:

• 2 Corinthians 3:18: “And we all, who with unveiled faces contemplate the Lord’s glory, are being transformed into his image with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.”
• Colossians 1:28: “He is the one we proclaim, admonishing and teaching everyone with all wisdom, so that we may present everyone fully mature in Christ.”

The goal of teaching is transformation into Christ’s image through the Spirit, not acquiring special interpretive knowledge.

How to Actually Practice Biblical Discernment

Instead of SCJ’s approach (isolating from all teaching except one source), here’s how to practice biblical discernment:

1. Know the gospel clearly:

The gospel is the standard for all teaching:

• 1 Corinthians 15:3-4: “For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures”

Any teaching that contradicts or adds to this gospel is false.

2. Test teaching against Scripture:

• Read passages in context
• Compare Scripture with Scripture
• Ask: Does this interpretation fit the overall biblical narrative?

3. Evaluate the fruit:

• Matthew 7:15-20: “By their fruit you will recognize them”
• Galatians 5:22-23: Does the teaching produce love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control?

If teaching produces fear, isolation, and spiritual elitism, that’s a warning sign.

4. Seek wise counsel:

• Proverbs 11:14: “For lack of guidance a nation falls, but victory is won through many advisers”
• Proverbs 15:22: “Plans fail for lack of counsel, but with many advisers they succeed”

Don’t rely on one source—seek input from multiple mature Christians.

5. Ask critical questions:

• Does this teaching exalt Christ or something else?
• Does it produce humility or pride?
• Does it create unity or division in the body of Christ?
• Does it encourage testing or demand blind acceptance?
• Does it produce freedom or fear?

---

Conclusion: The Path Forward

For Those Currently in SCJ’s Course

If you’re reading this while taking SCJ’s Bible study, you’re at a critical juncture. The “yeast” teaching has likely created fear: What if I’m consuming bad yeast? What if my church’s teaching is transforming me into Satan’s image? What if I’m being deceived like those who followed the Pharisees?

But consider this: Biblical discernment produces confidence, not fear.

• 1 John 4:18: “There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love.”
• 2 Timothy 1:7: “For the Spirit God gave us does not make us timid, but gives us power, love and self-discipline.”

If teaching creates constant fear about consuming “bad yeast,” that teaching contradicts the gospel’s message of confidence in Christ.

Chapter 27 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” (“Your Investigation Begins”) provides practical steps:

1. Examine the passages in context: Read Matthew 24:45-47, Revelation 2:17, and Matthew 16:6-12 in their full contexts. Do they actually teach what this lesson claims?
2. Test the Pharisees comparison: Were the Pharisees condemned for interpretive differences or for specific sins (hypocrisy, adding traditions, rejecting Christ)? Do faithful Christian pastors deserve this comparison?
3. Evaluate the fruit: Is this teaching producing love and unity, or fear and isolation?
4. Seek outside perspectives: Talk to your pastor or mature Christian friends about what you’re learning. If the teaching is true, it will withstand scrutiny.
5. Visit closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination: This comprehensive resource provides detailed biblical refutation of SCJ’s “yeast” teaching and claims about “food at the proper time.”

For Those Who Have Left

Chapter 28 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” (“Hope and Help”) offers guidance for former members. Key points regarding the “yeast” teaching:

1. The fear was false: Your pastor’s teaching wasn’t “Satan’s yeast” that would transform you into “Satan’s image.” Faithful Christian teaching that exalts Christ is “good yeast,” even if it differs from SCJ’s interpretation on secondary issues.

2. The Pharisees comparison was slander: Your pastor wasn’t like the Pharisees. The Pharisees were condemned for hypocrisy, adding traditions that contradicted Scripture, and rejecting Christ—not for having different interpretations than one organization.

3. You can engage with Christian teaching again: Reading Christian books, listening to sermons, and learning from various teachers isn’t consuming “bad yeast”—it’s practicing biblical discernment in community.

4. Biblical discernment is balanced: You can test all teaching against Scripture without isolating yourself from all other Christian input. The Bereans tested Paul’s teaching—they didn’t avoid it.

For the Christian Community

The existence of teachings like SCJ’s “yeast” doctrine should motivate us to:

1. Teach biblical discernment clearly: Help believers learn to test teaching against Scripture, the gospel, and apostolic doctrine—not to isolate from all other input.

2. Model humble teaching: Show that faithful Christian teachers can disagree on secondary issues while maintaining unity in the gospel.

3. Create safe spaces for questions: Encourage believers to test teaching (like the Bereans) rather than demanding blind acceptance.

4. Emphasize Christ-centered transformation: Teach that transformation comes through the Holy Spirit and God’s Word, not through one organization’s interpretation.

5. Respond with compassion: Those caught in or leaving SCJ need grace, not condemnation. They were seeking to discern truth; they were simply misled about how to do so.

Final Thoughts

This lesson—Lesson 19 on figurative yeast—appears to be encouraging biblical discernment between good and bad teaching. But beneath the surface, it’s constructing a fear-based isolation system that positions SCJ as the only source of “good yeast” while labeling all other Christian teaching as “Satan’s yeast” or the “yeast of the Pharisees.”

The principles in “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” help us see through the deception:

• Chapter 11-13: Recognize isolation tactics and demand verifiable criteria for discernment
• Chapter 18-20: Test authority claims and watch for creative fulfillment
• Chapter 24-26: Keep the Bible’s unified message centered on Christ
• Chapter 27-28: Know that investigation is possible and healing is available

The true gospel is better than SCJ’s counterfeit:

• Discernment through testing, not through isolation
• Confidence in Christ, not fear of “bad yeast”
• Unity in the gospel, not division over secondary issues
• Transformation by the Spirit, not by one organization’s teaching
• Freedom in Christ, not bondage to fear

May those reading this find freedom in Christ, who said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free” (John 8:31-32)—not through isolating from all other Christian teaching, but through knowing Him.

---

Additional Resources

For more detailed refutation of Shincheonji’s specific doctrines and claims:

Visit: closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination

This comprehensive resource provides:

• Detailed analysis of SCJ’s “yeast” teaching and isolation tactics
• Biblical examination of Matthew 24:45-47 and Revelation 2:17 in context
• Refutation of the comparison between Christian pastors and the Pharisees
• Testimonies from former members about the fear created by this teaching
• Guidance for families and counselors
• Resources for practicing biblical discernment in community

The examination is thorough, biblically grounded, and presented with grace—exactly what’s needed to counter SCJ’s fear-based but sophisticated system.

---

“Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.” — Acts 17:11

“Test everything; hold fast what is good.” — 1 Thessalonians 5:21

“There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love.” — 1 John 4:18

“If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” — John 8:31-32