Analysis of SCJ Lesson 24: “Secrets of Heaven – Figurative Censer”

A Refutation Using “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story”

---

Introduction: The Art of Spiritual Gatekeeping

Imagine attending a cooking class where the instructor teaches you legitimate techniques—how to dice onions, sauté vegetables, season properly. Everything seems helpful and educational. But gradually, you notice something odd: every recipe requires a special ingredient that only the instructor can provide. Without this secret ingredient, he explains, your cooking will never truly nourish anyone. Regular ingredients from regular stores might look the same, but they lack the essential quality that makes food truly satisfying.

“You can follow other recipes,” he says, “but without understanding the true purpose of each ingredient—the hidden meaning behind salt, the spiritual significance of oil—you’re just going through motions. Your family might eat what you make, but they won’t be truly fed.”

By the time you realize this instructor is selling expensive “special ingredients” and recruiting for a multi-level marketing scheme, you’ve already internalized his framework: regular cooking is insufficient, true nourishment requires secret knowledge, and you need his exclusive products to succeed.

This is what happens in SCJ Lesson 24.

The lesson appears to be a thoughtful Bible study about prayer and righteousness. Instructor Nate walks students through legitimate Scripture passages about censers, incense, and the Tabernacle. He encourages prayer, emphasizes knowing God’s Word, and warns against empty religiosity. Everything sounds biblical, spiritually enriching, and doctrinally sound.

But beneath the surface, something else is happening. The lesson is constructing a framework that will eventually position SCJ—and specifically Lee Man-hee’s interpretation—as the essential “ingredient” for acceptable prayer. By teaching that prayers without “the Word” (which will later be defined as SCJ’s specific interpretation) don’t rise to God, the lesson creates spiritual anxiety that only SCJ’s system can resolve.

This lesson sits at position 24 in the Introductory (Parables) Level—far enough in that students are invested and trust the instructor, but early enough that they don’t yet know they’re in Shincheonji or where this teaching ultimately leads. They’re learning to cook, unaware that they’re being prepared to believe only one kitchen has real ingredients.

Let’s examine how this lesson uses legitimate biblical teaching to build an illegitimate theological framework, and how the principles in “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” expose the manipulation.

---

Part 1: What SCJ Teaches in This Lesson

The Surface Teaching (What Students Hear)

The lesson presents a straightforward symbolic interpretation:

• Censer = A person’s heart (Acts 9:15 – Paul as a “vessel”)
• Fire = God’s Word (Jeremiah 5:14)
• Incense = Prayers of the saints (Revelation 5:8, Psalm 141:2)
• Smoke = Prayers rising to God (Revelation 8:3-4)

The instructor identifies three types of “censers” (people):

1. Fire without incense = Knowledge without prayer (produces arrogance, no acceptable prayers)
2. Incense without fire = Prayer without God’s Word (produces no acceptable prayers)
3. Fire plus incense = God’s Word plus prayer (produces acceptable prayers that rise to God)

The lesson emphasizes that only “righteous” people have effective prayers (James 5:16), and righteousness is defined as having “God’s law in their hearts” (Psalm 37:30-31). Students are taught that prayers must be based on Scripture to be acceptable to God.

The Subtext (What’s Really Being Established)

Beneath this seemingly orthodox teaching, several problematic foundations are being laid:

1. Exclusive interpretation required: The lesson repeatedly emphasizes not going “beyond what is written” (1 Corinthians 4:6), but then proceeds to give highly specific symbolic interpretations that aren’t explicitly stated in Scripture. Students are being trained to accept that biblical symbols require SCJ’s interpretation.
2. Spiritual hierarchy being constructed: By teaching that some prayers rise to God while others don’t, the lesson creates anxiety about whether one’s prayers are acceptable. This anxiety will later be resolved by SCJ’s claim that only those with their “opened” understanding can pray effectively.
3. Preparation for exclusivity: The emphasis on “righteousness” being defined as having God’s Word “in the heart” is preparing students to accept SCJ’s later claim that only their organization has the correctly “opened” Word to place in hearts.
4. Subtle elitism: The warning against those with “knowledge but no prayer” (arrogant people) is ironically preparing students to become exactly that—people who believe they have special knowledge that makes them spiritually superior.

---

Part 2: Analysis Through “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story”

Chapter 11-13: Deception Through Isolation and Information Control

Chapter 11 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” examines how sophisticated deception systems use isolation strategies disguised as protection. This lesson demonstrates that pattern perfectly.

The Isolation Tactic in This Lesson:

The instructor tells students: “When we don’t know something, sometimes we might go online and read a thousand different opinions and end up more confused than we were at the beginning when we just read the Bible. Let’s make a habit of sticking to what is in the word of God, so that we are not confused.”

This sounds like wisdom—stick to Scripture rather than human opinion. But notice what’s actually happening:

1. External sources are pre-discredited: Students are warned that seeking outside information leads to confusion
2. The instructor’s interpretation is positioned as “just the Bible”: Even though he’s providing highly specific symbolic interpretations
3. Dependency is created: Students are told that “someone who is faithful” in not going beyond Scripture will have truth revealed “when the time is right”—by whom? The instructor.

Chapter 12 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” discusses how propaganda differs from teaching by examining intent. Legitimate teaching seeks truth even when it challenges the teacher’s preferences. This lesson uses the language of humble Bible study while actually establishing the instructor as the authoritative interpreter.

Biblical Response:

The Bereans in Acts 17:11 were commended specifically for not taking Paul’s word at face value: “Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.”

Paul—an actual apostle with genuine divine revelation—commended people for fact-checking him against Scripture. Yet SCJ instructors discourage students from consulting other sources, claiming it causes “confusion.” This reveals that SCJ’s teaching cannot withstand scrutiny, which is why isolation from outside information is necessary.

The warning against going to “a thousand different opinions” creates a false dichotomy: either accept our interpretation without question, or be lost in confusion. But there’s a third option: study Scripture in its context, consult multiple scholarly sources, and test interpretations against the whole counsel of God’s Word—exactly what the Bereans did.

Chapter 13: The Verification Problem

Chapter 13 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” addresses how to evaluate spiritual claims that cannot be independently verified. This lesson creates a verification problem by teaching symbolic interpretations as if they were explicit biblical facts.

The Problem:

The instructor states: “When God inspired the writing of Revelation 8:5, did He intend multiple meanings, or was there a specific message that He has concealed within parables?”

This question assumes that:

1. Revelation’s symbols have single, specific meanings
2. These meanings are “concealed” and require special revelation
3. The instructor has access to these concealed meanings

But how can students verify these claims? The lesson provides no methodology for testing whether the interpretations are correct. Students are simply told: “Let’s use this mindset as we go forward—don’t go beyond the scriptures, but stay within them. Someone who is faithful in doing that, God will reveal the truth when the time is right.”

Biblical Response:

The Bible itself provides principles for interpreting symbols:

1. Scripture interprets Scripture: When the Bible uses symbols, it often explains them. For example:

• Revelation 1:20 explicitly states: “The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven lampstands are the seven churches.”
• Daniel 7:17 explains: “The four great beasts are four kings that will rise from the earth.”
• Matthew 13:37-39 provides Jesus’ own interpretation of the parable of the weeds.

2. Context determines meaning: Symbols can have different meanings in different contexts. Water symbolizes:

• Life and the Holy Spirit (John 7:38-39)
• Cleansing (Ephesians 5:26)
• Peoples and nations (Revelation 17:15)
• Chaos and judgment (Revelation 8:10-11)

The meaning depends on context, not a universal symbolic “dictionary.”

3. Clear passages interpret unclear ones: 2 Peter 3:16 acknowledges that some Scripture is “hard to understand,” but the solution is not secret knowledge—it’s interpreting difficult passages in light of clear ones.

The lesson’s interpretation of the censer isn’t necessarily wrong as a devotional application (having God’s Word and prayer together is indeed important), but it’s presented as the definitive meaning that God “concealed” and is now revealing. This creates dependency on the instructor’s interpretation rather than teaching students to study Scripture in context.

Chapter 18-19: Testing Authority and Unfalsifiable Claims

Chapters 18 and 18.13 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” examine how to test claims of spiritual authority and why Jesus’ disciples’ experience doesn’t support the claim that truth must be hidden and accessible only through one person’s interpretation.

The Authority Problem in This Lesson:

The instructor positions himself as the revealer of “secrets of heaven” that God has concealed. Students are told: “God spoke these prophecies, He used imagery from His creation so that people could understand them when the time was right.”

The implication: the time is now right, and the instructor is revealing what was previously concealed. But by what authority? How can students verify this claim?

Chapter 19 discusses unfalsifiable claims—assertions that cannot be tested or proven wrong. This lesson’s framework creates an unfalsifiable system:

• If you understand and accept the teaching → You’re humble and righteous
• If you question or don’t understand → You’re proud or not yet ready
• If you seek outside verification → You’re going “beyond Scripture” and causing confusion

Biblical Response:

Jesus’ teaching method was radically different. When He taught in parables, He:

1. Explained them to His disciples (Matthew 13:36-43, Mark 4:34) 2. Expected understanding, not blind acceptance (Matthew 16:9-11) 3. Pointed to verifiable fulfillment (Luke 24:44-47) 4. Welcomed questions (John 14:5, 8, 22)

Moreover, Jesus’ parables weren’t “secrets” that only an elite group could understand through special teaching. They were designed to reveal truth to the humble while concealing it from the proud (Matthew 13:11-17). The difference wasn’t access to a special teacher, but the condition of the heart.

The Apostle Paul’s teaching was also verifiable. He constantly appealed to:

• Fulfilled prophecy (Acts 17:2-3)
• Eyewitness testimony (1 Corinthians 15:3-8)
• Public events (Acts 26:26)
• Logical reasoning from Scripture (Acts 17:17, 18:4, 19:8)

Paul never said, “Trust me because I have secret knowledge.” He said, “Test everything” (1 Thessalonians 5:21) and “Examine the Scriptures” (Acts 17:11).

Chapter 20: Creative Fulfillment and Gap-Filling

Chapter 20 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” warns about “creative fulfillment”—how adaptation, gap-filling, and selective interpretation create false narratives. This lesson demonstrates that technique through its handling of the Tabernacle symbolism.

The Gap-Filling in This Lesson:

The instructor teaches: “Moses’s Tabernacle was a drawing or illustration, meaning that God had something in mind for the future that the Tabernacle would point to. God had them make these things as a blueprint, an illustration, with deeper meaning, like a parable.”

This is actually biblically accurate—Hebrews 9:9 and 10:1 do describe the Tabernacle as a “shadow” of things to come. The problem is what comes next: the lesson fills in the “meaning” of these shadows with SCJ’s specific interpretations, presented as if they were explicit biblical teaching.

Biblical Response:

The book of Hebrews—the New Testament’s primary text on Tabernacle symbolism—explicitly tells us what the Tabernacle pointed to: Jesus Christ and His once-for-all sacrifice.

• Hebrews 9:11-12: “But when Christ came as high priest of the good things that are now already here, he went through the greater and more perfect tabernacle that is not made with human hands, that is to say, is not a part of this creation. He did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves; but he entered the Most Holy Place once for all by his own blood, thus obtaining eternal redemption.”
• Hebrews 10:19-22: “Therefore, brothers and sisters, since we have confidence to enter the Most Holy Place by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way opened for us through the curtain, that is, his body, and since we have a great priest over the house of God, let us draw near to God with a sincere heart and with the full assurance that faith brings.”

The Tabernacle pointed to Christ’s work—His sacrifice, His priesthood, His opening of access to God. The lesson mentions this briefly but then moves past it to establish SCJ’s symbolic framework, which will later be used to point to Lee Man-hee and SCJ’s organization.

This is the “gap-filling” technique: take a biblical truth (the Tabernacle was symbolic), acknowledge the biblical fulfillment (Jesus), but then add layers of additional “meaning” that will later support SCJ’s theology.

Chapter 24-25: The Scarlet Thread

Chapters 24 and 25 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” examine the unified biblical narrative—the “scarlet thread” of God’s redemptive plan centered on Jesus Christ from Genesis to Revelation.

The Fragmentation Problem:

The lesson demonstrates exactly what Chapter 24 warns against: “Imagine taking a tapestry—a magnificent work of art woven with a single scarlet thread running through every scene—and cutting it into fragments. You examine each piece under a microscope, analyzing the colors, the texture, the individual stitches. You become an expert on isolated sections. But you never step back to see the whole picture.”

This lesson examines Revelation 8:5, Exodus 30, Psalm 141, James 5, and other passages in isolation, creating a symbolic system without showing how it fits into the Bible’s overarching narrative. Students are learning SCJ’s interpretive framework piece by piece, without seeing where it ultimately leads or how it compares to the Bible’s actual unified message.

Biblical Response:

The Bible’s unified message about prayer is clear when we read it as a whole:

1. Access to God through Christ alone:

• John 14:6: “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”
• Ephesians 2:18: “For through him we both have access to the Father by one Spirit.”
• Hebrews 4:16: “Let us then approach God’s throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.”

2. Prayer based on relationship, not knowledge:

• Romans 8:26-27: “In the same way, the Spirit helps us in our weakness. We do not know what we ought to pray for, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us through wordless groans. And he who searches our hearts knows the mind of the Spirit, because the Spirit intercedes for God’s people in accordance with the will of God.”

Notice: the Spirit intercedes when we don’t know what to pray. Prayer isn’t dependent on having perfect biblical knowledge or the “right” interpretation.

3. God hears sincere prayers:

• Psalm 145:18: “The Lord is near to all who call on him, to all who call on him in truth.”
• 1 John 5:14: “This is the confidence we have in approaching God: that if we ask anything according to his will, he hears us.”

The lesson creates anxiety by suggesting that prayers without “fire” (which will later be defined as SCJ’s specific understanding) don’t rise to God. But Scripture teaches that God hears the prayers of all who call on Him sincerely through Christ, regardless of their level of biblical knowledge or interpretive sophistication.

---

Part 3: The Psychological Progression

The Indoctrination Process at Lesson 24

By Lesson 24, students have been in the Parables course for several months. Let’s examine what’s happened psychologically:

1. Investment and Sunk Cost: Students have invested significant time (24 lessons, typically 2-3 per week, means roughly 8-12 weeks of study). They’ve built relationships with their instructor and classmates. They’ve completed homework, taken tests, and worked hard to understand the material. The psychological principle of “sunk cost” makes it harder to walk away—they’ve invested too much to quit now.

2. Progressive Disclosure: Students still don’t know they’re in Shincheonji. They believe they’re in an independent Bible study. This lesson continues building SCJ’s interpretive framework without revealing where it’s heading. It’s like assembling a puzzle without seeing the picture on the box—by the time you see what you’ve been building, you’ve already put most of it together.

3. Dependency Creation: The lesson creates dependency in several ways:

• Intellectual dependency: “Don’t go to outside sources; they’ll confuse you”
• Spiritual dependency: “Your prayers might not be rising to God if you lack understanding”
• Relational dependency: The instructor and classmates become the student’s primary spiritual community

4. Identity Shift: The lesson encourages students to see themselves as part of an elite group who are learning “secrets of heaven” that others don’t understand. This creates an “us vs. them” mentality even before students know they’re in SCJ.

5. Thought-Stopping Techniques: When students have questions or doubts, they’re taught to interpret these as signs of spiritual pride or lack of readiness. The lesson explicitly warns against being like the Pharisees who had outward religion but lacked true understanding. Students learn to suppress doubts rather than voice them.

Biblical Response: How Jesus Actually Taught

The contrast with Jesus’ teaching method is stark:

Jesus was transparent about identity and cost:

• Luke 14:28-33: He told people to count the cost before following Him
• John 6:60-66: When His teaching was difficult, He let people leave rather than manipulating them to stay
• Matthew 10:16-25: He warned disciples upfront about persecution and difficulty

Jesus encouraged questions and critical thinking:

• Mark 8:17-21: He rebuked disciples for not thinking critically about His teaching
• John 20:24-29: He provided evidence to Thomas’s doubts rather than condemning him
• Luke 24:25-27: He explained Scripture to confused disciples rather than creating dependency

Jesus pointed to Himself, not to a system:

• John 5:39-40: “You study the Scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. These are the very Scriptures that testify about me, yet you refuse to come to me to have life.”

The goal of biblical teaching is to point people to Christ, not to create dependency on a teacher or interpretive system.

---

Part 4: Distinguishing Biblical Truth from SCJ Framework

What’s Biblical in This Lesson?

It’s important to acknowledge what’s actually true and biblical in this lesson:

1. Prayer and God’s Word should go together:

• Psalm 119:11: “I have hidden your word in my heart that I might not sin against you.”
• Joshua 1:8: “Keep this Book of the Law always on your lips; meditate on it day and night.”
• Colossians 3:16: “Let the message of Christ dwell among you richly.”

2. Righteousness matters in prayer:

• James 5:16: “The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and effective.”
• Proverbs 15:29: “The Lord is far from the wicked, but he hears the prayer of the righteous.”

3. The Tabernacle was symbolic:

• Hebrews 9:9: “This is an illustration for the present time.”
• Hebrews 10:1: “The law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming.”

4. Prayer should align with God’s will:

• 1 John 5:14: “This is the confidence we have in approaching God: that if we ask anything according to his will, he hears us.”

What’s Uniquely SCJ?

The problematic elements are subtle but significant:

1. The claim that symbols have single, concealed meanings requiring special revelation:

• Biblical: Symbols are explained in context or have multiple contextual meanings
• SCJ: Symbols have hidden meanings that require SCJ’s interpretive key

2. The suggestion that prayers without “proper understanding” don’t rise to God:

• Biblical: God hears sincere prayers through Christ, even when we don’t know what to pray (Romans 8:26)
• SCJ: Effective prayer requires SCJ’s specific understanding of “the Word”

3. The emphasis on not seeking outside sources:

• Biblical: Test everything, examine Scriptures daily (Acts 17:11, 1 Thessalonians 5:21)
• SCJ: Outside sources cause confusion; trust our teaching

4. The positioning of the instructor as revealer of “secrets”:

• Biblical: Scripture is clear enough for ordinary believers to understand (Psalm 119:130, 2 Timothy 3:15-17)
• SCJ: Special teaching is needed to unlock Scripture’s true meaning

5. The three-tier system of censers (people):

• Biblical: All believers have access to God through Christ (Hebrews 4:16, Ephesians 2:18)
• SCJ: Creates hierarchy where some people’s prayers are acceptable and others’ aren’t, based on having “the Word” (which will later mean SCJ’s interpretation)

The Blurred Lines

The genius of this lesson is how it blurs the line between biblical truth and SCJ framework. Students can’t easily identify where legitimate Bible teaching ends and manipulation begins because they’re woven together seamlessly.

For example:

• Biblical truth: Prayer and Scripture knowledge should go together
• SCJ addition: Without our specific interpretation, your prayers don’t rise to God
• Result: Students accept the SCJ addition because it’s packaged with biblical truth

This is why Chapter 20 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” warns about “creative fulfillment”—taking biblical truth and adding layers of interpretation that support a predetermined conclusion.

---

Part 5: The Larger Pattern

How This Lesson Fits SCJ’s Overall Strategy

This lesson is part of a carefully designed progression:

Introductory Level (Parables) – Lessons 1-24+:

• Establish that the Bible is “sealed” and requires special interpretation
• Build SCJ’s symbolic framework piece by piece
• Create dependency on the instructor
• Isolate students from outside information
• Build investment through time and effort

Intermediate Level (Bible Logic):

• Introduce the pattern of “betrayal, destruction, salvation”
• Teach that Christianity has been “destroyed” and needs restoration
• Position SCJ as the “salvation” that restores true Christianity
• Still don’t reveal it’s Shincheonji

Advanced Level (Revelation):

• Apply all previous teaching to Revelation
• Reveal that Lee Man-hee is the “promised pastor”
• Teach that SCJ is the physical fulfillment of Revelation’s prophecies
• By this point, students have invested 6-9 months and accepted the entire framework

Lesson 24’s Role: This lesson is laying groundwork for later claims:

• That Lee Man-hee has the “opened” Word (the “fire” needed for acceptable prayers)
• That SCJ members are the “righteous” whose prayers rise to God
• That Christians outside SCJ have “incense without fire” (prayer without true understanding)
• That joining SCJ is necessary for one’s prayers to be effective

Students don’t see this yet at Lesson 24, but the foundation is being laid.

The Testimony Pattern

Chapter 14 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” shares testimonies from former members. A common theme: “I didn’t see it coming. Everything seemed so biblical. By the time I realized what I’d accepted, I’d already built my entire spiritual life around it.”

This lesson demonstrates why. At Lesson 24:

• Students think they’re learning legitimate Bible study
• They’re building relationships and community
• They’re experiencing spiritual growth (learning Scripture, praying more, etc.)
• They have no reason to suspect manipulation

The manipulation isn’t in teaching them to pray or study Scripture—those are good things. The manipulation is in the framework being built around those good things, which will later be used to trap them in SCJ’s system.

---

Part 6: Practical Application and Warning Signs

For Current Students: Questions to Ask

If you’re currently taking this course, here are questions to consider:

1. About interpretation:

• How do I know these symbolic interpretations are correct?
• Are there other legitimate ways to understand these passages?
• Why am I discouraged from consulting other Bible teachers or commentaries?

2. About authority:

• By what authority does this instructor claim to reveal “secrets of heaven”?
• How can I verify these claims?
• Why does questioning lead to being labeled as proud or unready?

3. About the organization:

• Why hasn’t the instructor told me what organization this is?
• Why is the organization’s identity a secret if the teaching is true?
• What will I learn in later levels that I’m not being told now?

4. About isolation:

• Why am I being discouraged from discussing this with my pastor or Christian friends?
• Why am I told that outside sources will “confuse” me?
• Why is this teaching presented as if no other Christians understand these things?

5. About progression:

• Where is this teaching leading?
• What will I be expected to believe or do in later levels?
• Why can’t I know the full picture before investing more time?

For Family and Friends: Warning Signs

If someone you love is taking this course, watch for these signs:

1. Increased secrecy:

• Won’t tell you details about the Bible study
• Defensive when asked about the organization
• Spends significant time in study but won’t share what they’re learning

2. Changed language:

• Talks about “sealed” and “opened” Scripture
• Refers to “secrets of heaven” or “hidden meanings”
• Uses phrases like “physical fulfillment” or “true orthodoxy”

3. Isolation behaviors:

• Pulls away from church or Christian community
• Dismisses other Bible teachers as “confused” or “not understanding”
• Spends increasing time with study group, less with family/friends

4. Spiritual elitism:

• Hints at knowing things others don’t
• Suggests their prayers or understanding are more effective than others’
• Shows subtle superiority about biblical knowledge

5. Resistance to questions:

• Becomes defensive when you ask about the organization
• Accuses you of being “closed-minded” or “persecuting” them
• Refuses to discuss concerns with pastor or trusted Christian mentors

For Pastors and Counselors

Chapter 15 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” shares insights from pastors and counselors who have helped people leave SCJ. Key recommendations:

1. Don’t be dismissive: The teaching sounds biblical on the surface. If you dismiss concerns without understanding SCJ’s actual methods, you’ll lose credibility with the person caught in it.

2. Ask questions rather than lecture: Help the person think critically by asking:

• “How do you know that interpretation is correct?”
• “What would it look like if that interpretation were wrong?”
• “Why do you think they haven’t told you the organization’s name?”

3. Focus on Jesus: SCJ’s system ultimately points away from Christ’s sufficiency and toward Lee Man-hee and the organization. Keep bringing the conversation back to: “Is Jesus enough, or do you need this organization’s interpretation to be saved?”

4. Be patient: Leaving a high-control group is a process, not an event. The person has invested months, built relationships, and constructed their spiritual identity around SCJ’s teaching. Deconstruction takes time.

5. Provide resources: Direct people to closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination for detailed refutations of SCJ’s specific claims, including their interpretation of Revelation and their claims about Lee Man-hee.

---

Part 7: The Biblical Alternative

How to Actually Study the Bible

The lesson’s warning against going to “a thousand different opinions” creates a false choice: either accept our interpretation without question, or be hopelessly confused. But there’s a biblical alternative:

1. Read Scripture in context:

• Who wrote it? To whom? Why? When?
• What comes before and after this passage?
• How does this fit into the book’s overall message?

For example, Revelation 8:5 (the main passage in this lesson) is part of the seven seals judgment sequence. The censer being thrown to earth represents God’s judgment beginning, not a lesson about prayer methodology. Context matters.

2. Let Scripture interpret Scripture:

• How does the Bible itself explain symbols?
• Are there clearer passages on this topic?
• Does my interpretation contradict clear biblical teaching elsewhere?

3. Consult the historic Christian church:

• How have Christians throughout history understood this passage?
• What do trusted commentaries and Bible teachers say?
• Am I discovering something no Christian has seen in 2,000 years? (If so, that should raise red flags)

4. Test interpretations:

• Does this interpretation point to Christ or away from Him?
• Does it create dependency on a teacher/organization or on Christ?
• Does it produce fruit of the Spirit or spiritual pride?
• Can it be verified, or must it be accepted on faith in the teacher?

5. Seek wise counsel:

• Proverbs 11:14: “Where there is no guidance, a people falls, but in an abundance of counselors there is safety.”
• Proverbs 15:22: “Without counsel plans fail, but with many advisers they succeed.”

The Bible never teaches that seeking multiple perspectives causes confusion. That’s a manipulation tactic to prevent students from discovering that SCJ’s interpretations don’t hold up under scrutiny.

The True Gospel of Prayer

The biblical teaching on prayer is far more beautiful and liberating than SCJ’s system:

1. Access through Christ alone: We don’t need special knowledge or perfect understanding. We need Jesus.

• Hebrews 10:19-22: “Therefore, brothers and sisters, since we have confidence to enter the Most Holy Place by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way opened for us through the curtain, that is, his body… let us draw near to God with a sincere heart and with the full assurance that faith brings.”

2. The Spirit helps our weakness: We don’t need to have perfect prayers or perfect understanding. The Spirit intercedes for us.

• Romans 8:26-27: “In the same way, the Spirit helps us in our weakness. We do not know what we ought to pray for, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us through wordless groans.”

3. God hears sincere hearts: God isn’t looking for sophisticated theological knowledge. He’s looking for sincere faith.

• Psalm 51:17: “My sacrifice, O God, is a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart you, God, will not despise.”
• Matthew 6:7-8: “And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.”

4. Righteousness through Christ, not knowledge: The lesson teaches that righteousness comes from having “God’s law in the heart” (which will later mean SCJ’s interpretation). But biblical righteousness is:

• Philippians 3:9: “…not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ—the righteousness that comes from God on the basis of faith.”
• 2 Corinthians 5:21: “God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.”

We are righteous through faith in Christ, not through acquiring special biblical knowledge.

5. Prayer is relationship, not ritual: Prayer isn’t about having the right “fire” and “incense” combination. It’s about relationship with a loving Father.

• Matthew 7:9-11: “Which of you, if your son asks for bread, will give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him!”

God isn’t waiting for us to get the formula right. He’s a Father who delights in His children’s prayers, even when they’re clumsy or confused.

---

Conclusion: The Path Forward

For Those Currently in SCJ’s Course

If you’re reading this while taking SCJ’s Bible study, you’re at a crossroads. You’ve invested time and built relationships. The teaching has seemed biblical and enriching. The thought of walking away feels like giving up on spiritual growth.

But consider this: True spiritual growth never requires deception.

• If this teaching is true, why wasn’t the organization’s identity revealed upfront?
• If this interpretation is correct, why does it require isolation from other Christian perspectives?
• If this is God’s work, why does questioning lead to accusations of pride rather than patient answers?

Jesus said, “You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free” (John 8:32). Truth doesn’t need to hide behind secrecy, isolation, and manipulation. Truth can withstand scrutiny.

Chapter 27 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” is titled “Your Investigation Begins.” It provides practical steps for investigating SCJ’s claims:

1. Ask for transparency: Request to know the organization’s full identity and what you’ll be taught in later levels
2. Consult outside sources: Visit closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination for detailed analysis
3. Talk to former members: Hear from people who completed the course and left
4. Discuss with trusted Christians: Share what you’re learning with your pastor or mature Christian friends
5. Test the interpretations: Study the passages in context using multiple resources

If the teaching is true, investigation will confirm it. If it’s false, investigation will expose it. The question is: are you willing to investigate?

For Those Who Have Left

Chapter 28 of “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims” offers hope and guidance for former members. Key points:

1. You’re not alone: Thousands have left SCJ and rebuilt their faith 2. Healing takes time: Give yourself grace as you process the experience 3. God hasn’t abandoned you: Your time in SCJ doesn’t disqualify you from God’s love 4. Your story matters: Your testimony can help others avoid or escape SCJ

The path forward involves:

• Reconnecting with healthy Christian community: Find a church that teaches Christ-centered, grace-filled theology
• Relearning to read Scripture: Without SCJ’s interpretive framework
• Processing the experience: Possibly with a counselor who understands spiritual abuse
• Rebuilding trust: In yourself, in others, and in God

For the Christian Community

The existence of groups like SCJ should motivate us to:

1. Teach biblical literacy: Help Christians learn to study Scripture in context 2. Emphasize Christ’s sufficiency: Our message must be clear that Jesus is enough 3. Create authentic community: People join groups like SCJ partly because they’re seeking belonging 4. Be vigilant but not paranoid: Aware of deceptive groups without becoming suspicious of all Bible study 5. Respond with grace: Those caught in or leaving SCJ need compassion, not condemnation

Final Thoughts

This lesson—Lesson 24 on the figurative censer—appears innocent. It teaches about prayer and righteousness using biblical passages. But beneath the surface, it’s constructing a framework that will eventually lead students to believe they need SCJ’s interpretation to have acceptable prayers, that Lee Man-hee is the promised pastor of Revelation, and that leaving SCJ means abandoning God’s truth.

The principles in “Testing Shincheonji’s Claims: Two Lenses, One Story” help us see through the deception:

• Chapter 11-13: Recognize isolation tactics disguised as protection
• Chapter 18-19: Test claims of authority and watch for unfalsifiable assertions
• Chapter 20: Identify creative fulfillment and gap-filling
• Chapter 24-26: Keep the Bible’s unified message centered on Christ
• Chapter 27-28: Know that investigation is possible and healing is available

The true gospel is better than SCJ’s counterfeit:

• Access to God through Christ alone, not through special interpretation
• Righteousness through faith, not through knowledge
• Prayer as relationship, not as ritual formula
• Scripture as clear enough for ordinary believers to understand
• Community as transparent, not secretive
• Growth through grace, not through manipulation

May those reading this find freedom in Christ, who is “the way and the truth and the life” (John 14:6)—not through a organization’s interpretive system, but through simple faith in Him.

---

Additional Resources

For more detailed refutation of Shincheonji’s specific doctrines and claims:

Visit: closerlookinitiative.com/shincheonji-examination

This comprehensive resource provides:

• Detailed analysis of SCJ’s Revelation interpretation
• Refutation of claims about Lee Man-hee
• Testimonies from former members
• Biblical responses to SCJ’s theology
• Guidance for families and counselors

The examination is thorough, biblically grounded, and presented with grace—exactly what’s needed to counter SCJ’s deceptive but sophisticated system.

---

“Test everything; hold fast what is good.” — 1 Thessalonians 5:21

“Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.” — 1 John 4:1