The Open Scroll is central to the doctrine of Shincheonji (SCJ), representing the revealed Word of God that discloses mysteries once sealed in parables. Understanding this scroll is not simply a matter of reading words on a page, but of grasping the spiritual realities that they symbolize. The process of unveiling hidden meaning through testimony is foundational for believers, as it distinguishes true faith from deception and provides the assurance of salvation promised in Scripture. Thus, terminology becomes essential: every symbol, figure, and metaphor within the Open Scroll carries a precise doctrinal significance that must be understood in light of fulfillment.
The language of the Open Scroll is steeped in symbolism, employing parables that separate insiders from outsiders, and the revealed from the unrevealed. Words such as “lampstand,” “star,” “mountain,” “water,” and “fruit” appear frequently, but they are not to be taken literally. Instead, each term points to a deeper spiritual reality: pastors, churches, teachings, or communities that participate in God’s redemptive history. Without a proper understanding of this terminology, the message of the Open Scroll remains locked, much like the sealed scroll of Revelation. Only through interpretation given by the one who has seen and heard the fulfillment can these words be rightly understood.
For this reason, a systematic approach to SCJ’s terminology is vital. Just as the examination on the Open Scroll emphasizes precision in doctrinal understanding, this article seeks to provide clear definitions and explanations of key terms. By presenting a glossary-like structure, it will guide readers in navigating the symbolic language of prophecy and fulfillment. More than an academic exercise, this work intends to help believers discern the reality of God’s promises and align themselves with the truth revealed in the era of the Open Scroll.
Foundational Terms
Open Scroll
Sealed Scroll
Word of Testimony
Tabernacle / Temple / Sanctuary
Lampstand
Stars
Beast
Mountain
Water
Water signifies the Word of God, which nourishes and gives life to the soul. Living water represents pure teaching from God, while polluted water points to false doctrines. The type of water one drinks determines whether they gain life or are led to destruction.
Tree / Fruit / Leaves
Bride / Groom
New Heaven and New Earth (NHNE)
Sealed People / 144,000
Harvest / Firstfruits
Harvest represents the gathering of believers who hear and accept the testimony at the time of fulfillment. Firstfruits are those who are brought in early and dedicated to God, becoming the first crop of the new kingdom. Together, they signify the start of God’s restored community.
Overcomers / Promised Pastor
The overcomers are those who remain faithful, conquering trials and deception through the Word of truth. The Promised Pastor is the one who has witnessed the events of fulfillment and delivers God’s testimony to the world. In SCJ doctrine, he plays the central role in guiding believers into the new kingdom.
Hermeneutic Principles
Reality of Fulfillment
SCJ teaches that biblical prophecies are not merely spiritual allegories but are physically realized in history. Just as Old Testament promises were fulfilled in Jesus’ first coming, New Testament prophecies must also appear in tangible events, people, and places. This principle anchors faith in the evidence of fulfillment rather than abstract belief.
Parable to Reality Method
Much of Scripture was delivered in parables, concealing the truth until the appointed time. SCJ interprets these parables by connecting symbolic elements—like beasts, water, or trees—to their real-world counterparts in the time of fulfillment. This method allows believers to move from figurative language to the actual reality God is revealing today.
Importance of Witnessing
True understanding, according to SCJ, comes through testimony from the one who has seen and heard the events of fulfillment. Witnessing distinguishes true testimony from false, because only the promised pastor who directly observed the fulfillment can correctly explain it. Believers are therefore urged to test every teaching against the revealed reality and the testimony given.
Mastering biblical terminology is not merely a matter of memorization. Each word—whether “scroll,” “lampstand,” “water,” or “harvest”—carries with it a deeper meaning that points to the reality of prophecy being fulfilled today. Without grasping the true significance of these terms, one risks misunderstanding God’s will and mistaking false testimony for truth.
Terminology functions as the spiritual key to unlocking the Open Scroll. Just as parables remain hidden until their meaning is revealed, the language of Scripture requires correct interpretation to see the reality it points toward. By learning and applying these terms, believers move beyond surface reading into the wisdom of fulfillment.
Thus, the study of terminology is not simply an academic exercise but a vital part of faith and salvation. It allows believers to recognize the promised pastor, the sealed people, and the new kingdom when they appear. To know the terms is to open the scroll; to open the scroll is to see God’s work made real in our time.
Additional References for more Exploration
Open Scroll Issues
The Christian response to Shincheonji’s “open scroll” teaching emphasizes that their method is neither unique nor biblically sound. SCJ claims that the Bible was sealed for 2,000 years and only revealed to their leader, Lee Man Hee, but this mirrors the interpretive patterns of other sects like the World Mission Society Church of God. Both groups dismiss historical and linguistic context, rely on figurative reinterpretation of Scripture, and build circular arguments where their leader’s authority validates the interpretation. This framework allows for arbitrary meaning-making and contradicts the biblical witness that Scripture is both clear and sufficient for teaching, correction, and training in righteousness (2 Timothy 3:16–17).
Christians point out that while some prophecies and parables in Scripture are symbolic, many are clear and straightforward – such as Jeremiah’s seventy years prophecy, Isaiah naming Cyrus, Jonah’s warning to Nineveh, or Jesus’ direct predictions of His betrayal and resurrection. Even when parables were more layered, Jesus explained them plainly to His disciples, and in some cases His opponents understood them well enough to realize He was speaking against them (Matthew 21:45). This demonstrates that God’s Word was not locked away for millennia, nor dependent on a single modern “promised pastor” to decode it. Instead, the consistent testimony of the Bible and church history shows that God’s people could understand His Word in its original context, guided by the Spirit, without the need for secretive, exclusive interpretation.
Click here to read about the doctrinal issues of the Open Scroll
Shincheonji (SCJ) claims to be the only true interpreter of biblical prophecy, but their approach is not unique and closely mirrors other Korean apocalyptic sects such as the World Mission Society Church of God (WMSCOG). Both groups insist that the Bible is entirely symbolic, assert that only their leader can unlock its meaning, and tie salvation to accepting their exclusive teachings. This method allows the same verses and parables to produce radically different doctrines – as seen in their conflicting interpretations of symbols like clouds, birds, and bread – because they disregard historical context, original languages, and biblical audience. The result is a theology where truth depends entirely on the authority of the group’s leader.
The danger in this circular system is that it validates itself without outside accountability: the Bible is said to be sealed, only the leader can interpret it, and their interpretation is confirmed by their own claims of fulfillment. This approach leaves no room for testing truth and reduces dissent to spiritual blindness. In contrast, the Bible itself demonstrates that not all prophecy is symbolic and that many parables were explained or understood in context. The early church, guided by the Holy Spirit, proclaimed the Gospel clearly without hidden interpreters, showing that Scripture is sufficient and accessible. SCJ’s claim that understanding was impossible for 2,000 years until Lee Man Hee arose is not only unbiblical but also follows the same manipulative method used by cults throughout history.
Lee Man Hee, born on September 15, 1931, served in the Korean War before later claiming to be the “Promised Pastor” of the New Testament. According to his teachings, salvation can only be obtained by joining Shincheonji, his church, since all of Christianity is in spiritual darkness. He asserts that he never received formal biblical training, but was appointed by Jesus as his prophet in 1977 and later received full understanding of the Word from an angel in 1980. His personal testimony portrays himself as a simple farmer with no prior religious exposure, chosen directly by God without human mediation.
However, Lee’s involvement in earlier Korean sects reveals significant influences on Shincheonji’s doctrine. From 1957 to 1967, he was part of the Olive Tree Movement under Tae Sun Park, who made claims strikingly similar to Shincheonji’s teachings, such as being the “One Who Overcomes,” claiming immortality, and reserving salvation for 144,000. The Olive Tree also rejected much of the Bible, insulted Jesus, and eventually declared Park to be God himself. After leaving, Lee joined the Tabernacle Temple (1967–1971), led by Jae Yul Yoo, which emphasized secret parable interpretations, end-times urgency, and the concept of “seven messengers” linked to Revelation. Even after failed predictions that the world would end in 1969, Lee remained within the sect.
Finally, Lee became involved in Baek’s Recreation Sect (1977–1980), led by Baek, a former Tabernacle Temple leader. This group taught “Creation and Recreation” (later adapted by Shincheonji into Betrayal, Destruction, and Salvation), appointed twelve disciples, and even had Baek referred to as “Christ,” with Lee himself calling him “My Lord.” The sect also falsely predicted the world’s end in 1980. Taken together, these experiences show that Lee’s doctrines were not divinely revealed but drawn from a succession of failed cult leaders. This history underscores the biblical warning to test teachings carefully, as even false prophets can manipulate Scripture to mislead.
The Shincheonji Church of Jesus (SCJ), founded by Manhee Lee in 1984, did not emerge in isolation but is part of a lineage of Korean apocalyptic movements. Lee was first involved in the Olive Tree Movement of Tae Sun Park, who claimed divine identity and was revered as the “Righteous Man of the East.” This movement, which reached millions of followers, emphasized faith-healing, visions, and end-time promises centered in Korea but declined after scandals and failed predictions. After leaving the Olive Tree, Lee joined the Tent Temple Movement of Jae Yul Yoo, who taught that all Scripture contained hidden, paired meanings only he could interpret, and who designated Mt. Chungkye as the refuge for believers at Armageddon.
From Yoo’s Tent Temple came multiple offshoots, including Poong Il Kim’s Saegwang Central Church, In Hee Koo’s Heaven Gospel Witnessing Association, and eventually SCJ. Each of these groups carried forward similar traits: leaders claiming divine roles, exclusive interpretive authority, imminent end-time promises, and Korea as the central stage of salvation history. Koo even declared himself the embodiment of the second coming of Christ and prophesied specific dates for judgment, while Kim styled himself “Another Counselor” with unique scriptural insight. Though scandals and defections weakened many of these groups, they all shared the common theme of exclusive salvation through allegiance to their leader.
SCJ inherited these same features but reframed them under Lee as the “promised pastor” who alone can reveal the true meaning of parables and prophecies. Like his predecessors, Lee claims immortality, teaches that salvation hinges on correctly understanding his interpretations, and designates Korea — specifically Gua Chun City near Mt. Chungkye — as the gathering place of the 144,000 saints who will rule the world in the new heaven and earth. In sum, SCJ is not unique but one of several third-generation movements born from the Olive Tree and Tent Temple traditions, all marked by visionary leaders, exclusive claims to truth, and failed prophetic promises that have repeatedly splintered into further sects.
The study critically assesses Shincheonji, founded in 1984 by Lee Man‑hee, as an apocalyptic religious movement with significant growth—boasting over 150,000 members globally and a structured system including “twelve tribes.” Central to its teaching is the belief that Jesus’s spirit has descended upon Lee, making him the “promised pastor” who alone can interpret the Bible’s parables and secrets. According to this doctrine, salvation and eschatological fulfillment depend on being among the 144,000 sealed believers, whose souls will inhabit the bodies of Shincheonji’s faithful, granting them immortality when that number is reached. The movement’s doctrine emphasizes allegorical interpretations (“doctrine of mates”), where paired scriptural symbols mask hidden meaning known only to Lee.
The critique traces Shincheonji’s roots to a lineage of Korean apocalyptic movements, such as the Olive Tree Movement and the Tent Temple Movement, from which Lee adopted patterns of allegorical interpretation, claims of divine election, and end-time centralism in Korea. Kim contrasts Shincheonji’s teachings with orthodox Christian doctrine—arguing that salvation derives from faith alone, grounded in historical creeds and biblical teaching, not secret knowledge or works. The research also warns of Shincheonji’s social and ecclesiastical strategies: covert infiltration of existing churches, aggressive recruitment through disguised fronts and “Bible study” groups, and pressure on members to attain the “144,000” status. The goal is to equip church leaders to recognize and resist Shincheonji’s influence effectively, as its methods are both theologically unorthodox and socially disruptive.
Massimo Introvigne, writing for The Journal of CESNUR, recounts how the Shincheonji Church of Jesus—already viewed with suspicion by mainstream Christian groups—became a scapegoat during the COVID‑19 pandemic in South Korea. When a member known as “Patient 31” triggered a significant outbreak, the group was swiftly blamed by media and conservative Protestant critics, prompting public outrage and political calls for its disbandment. CESNUR argued that this response aligned with a familiar pattern: minorities are targeted when misunderstood or unpopular, especially during crises. Introvigne and colleagues emphasized that while Shincheonji made communication mistakes, the magnitude of backlash was disproportionate and fueled by preexisting bias.
In cooperation with the NGO Human Rights Without Frontiers, CESNUR produced a white paper highlighting that, despite errors, Shincheonji had been discriminated against during the pandemic. The paper points out that the church ultimately complied with government directives—submitting member lists (albeit with brief delay over concerns of privacy) and assisting with contact tracing. It notes that South Korean courts subsequently cleared Shincheonji’s founder, Lee Man-hee, of criminal charges related to obstructing the pandemic response, though he was convicted on unrelated embezzlement charges.
Introvigne’s report calls attention to the vulnerability of new religious movements in times of crisis. When public fear rises, existing suspicions can easily escalate into persecution, even when there’s no concrete proof of wrongdoing. The Shincheonji case demonstrates how quickly a movement can be vilified—not necessarily because of its actions, but due to its outsider status and ongoing theological controversies. This account underscores the importance of balancing public health policy with respect for religious freedom and ensuring that minority groups are not unfairly targeted in emergencies.
Please take the time to check the Bible verses we’ve provided as references. Use them as a guide for your own understanding and discernment. It’s important to verify and confirm information with external sources, witnesses, and experts to ensure validity and transparency. Additionally, remember to pray for wisdom as you seek to identify any errors and ensure that your understanding aligns with biblical teachings.